ah, to start an intensive course of memory recovery on our team with ah, the media outlets publish articles claiming that pro ukrainian individuals were behind the bombing of the north stream pipelines with a plot twist. apparently not legs to clear all the us as with the leg, by genesis theme all her a polish it, they run the oil company wants to, to rush if a halting petroleum deliveries wants to move to previously missing that they wanted to break the contract with moscow. itself, that was a, played a fine with australia is preparing for a war with china, according to mainstream media in the island nation. explores who's really behind

the war mongering propaganda with a very welcome. you're watching aussie international with the latest wealth news out date is good to have your company. this our, our top story, us intelligence source is say, a pro ukrainian group carried out last year as bowman of the north stream pipelines from russia to germany, according to a new report from the new york times. so i think a lot of us officials who said that they have not been able to link the attack to the ukrainian government or it's western patrons. well, these claims contradicts the recent report from pulitzer prize winner seymour hersh, whose investigation alleged that the u. s. government destroyed the pipeline. officials who have reviewed the intelligence, said they believed the saboteurs were most likely ukrainian, or russian nationals or some combination of the 2. u. s. officials said no american

or british nationals were involved. get more information now from i knew your correspondence. caleb martin. caleb, good to see you now while both the new york times on c mahash sciences anonymous sources in that report to which one sounds more convenient for the u. s. government and its allies. well, it looks pretty obviously here, like the united states is very much trying to read, take control of the narrative, in the aftermath of all the backlash that has come from the story by pulitzer prize winning journalist seymour hersh saying that the white house engineered the destruction of the nordstrom to pipeline. now this new report from the new york times, it says the destruction of the pipeline was carried out by ukrainians and russians that were part of some kind of ante russia group. now it doesn't directly say that they were tied to here. here's what we've heard.

any suggestion of ukrainian involvement, whether direct or indirect could have said the delicate relationship between ukraine and germany, sour in support among the german public that has swallowed high energy prices in the name of solidarity. now at this point, if there were to be any involvement even indirectly back here, that would raise some serious questions. germany is the strongest economy in the european union, and it has heavily suffered as a result of this. and the energy costs for germany have been massive out. there has been quite a bit of suffering at this point. washington is refusing to comment on the matter. they're not stepping in and giving their version of events. we haven't heard directly from the white house. if russia invade ukraine, one way or another nord stream to will not move forward. if russia invasion, that means tanks or troops crossing the on the border of ukraine's again,

then there will be a week, there will be no longer a nor stream to we will bring an end. how will you do that exact way, since the product and control of the product is within germany's control, i promise you will be able do that, of course, is what we heard from the white house prior to the destruction of the pipeline. we have not heard a statement from the white house in the aftermath of the pipelines destruction. now this report from the new york times is the latest development that we have heard around the story. no official comment from washington, yet. we understand danish authorities are now going to allow inspection of the site in which the destruction was carried out. that will be a step forward that can help determine the cause and whether or not it was an intentional destruction of the pipeline. it's also important to note that the

russian ambassador, the deputy ambassador to the united nations, has said that this basically confirms how correct russia's push were an official un investigation into the destruction of the nord string to pipeline was. and that they intend to bring a resolution calling for such an investigation to the un security council before the end of march, and have a vote on it. so there can be a decision to move ahead with an international investigation and prob, into what is taking place now. it's also interesting to note that when seymour hersh, the pulitzer prize winning journalist was discussing this new statement from the new york times, saying that washington and the white house were not involved in the lab. and we indicated that there's actually a new report in the words that see more hers will soon be out a new information to reveal about the nordstrom to pipeline, and it's destruction. so we'll be waiting, of course as the whole world is to see what new revelations seymour hersh has

enlightened this new report from anonymous intelligence sources in the new york times. absolutely kennedy things happen is up to speed on the latest, not se caleb martin. well, these latest allegations are an attempt to distract from the alleged western road in the pipeline. a ton expense, according to russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman the was the media is bombarded by the news that the investigation into the terrorist attacks against nordstrom has a version that this is a non russia, b, ukrainian groups. i wonder who allows such leagues feeling the information space with them. the answer, those who do not want to conduct an investigation in the legal field and are going to divert the attention of the audience from the facts in every possible way. instead of leaks the western regimes involved in the incident should respond to official requests from the russian side. and at the very least take into account the materials of the hersch investigation. instead of replacing them with anonymous throw wins,

or just one off the new york times article was published. german media lead zeiss released its own bomb, shall report finding a local investigation. and i think that ukrainian citizens blew up the new stream pipelines. do you think a boat from poland the boat that was allegedly used for the secret operation is said to be a yacht rented from a company based in poland, apparently owned by 2 ukrainians, caused it to ralph t, no minor term in all the german opposition group for sovereignty on constitution, many thanks for joining us on the program. always a pleasure to have you on the program. so just to new western media reports now letting that nie the key as no any western governments had a direct role in the new stream. a cock, well shifting the blame to some sort of pro ukrainian group was to take on these claims. well, i wish i would be able to laugh about it as well, but it is a serious matter because that is enough to pipeline to disruption of not stream one

and allegedly old. so if not stream to have caused serious damage, serious harm to the german economy. and we don't take that lighthearted. so as i just said, at least it's not russia anymore. that is blamed. that is what we heard at the beginning. and we had to laugh about that already. now, seriously. and the question creed will know who is benefiting one will probably find the truth. and it is that when we see that some countries are benefiting most, then it is of course ukraine because they split again. also the best and allies here, germany, which is reluctant to support them and the longer and the americans. so whoever it was, we don't know, but i must say i, i, i've seen less evidence in cases after $911.00 and

that led to the bombing of chemist on that time. so if terrorists from ukraine did it and were order to do it by some breast on power that said to united states of america or britain, then they should be held responsible. but of course, i'm a man of peace and i say don't bump anybody for that. what they make at the timing of these new reports coming. of course, just a couple of weeks after the more hush is bombshell report. well, of course they had to react to that. the allegation is out there and okay. say mom harris is a very serious reporter on his lifelong he always found out the truth in whatever scandals from iran contra affair to watergate at the beginning of his career and also enough garrison and the rocky. he found the truth. and so it is very difficult

to prove him wrong, so they had to do something and i'm now excited to see what people be coming up to counter that. how believable do you think these new claims are when they contradict the findings of the more her? she concluded the us government was to blame. what do you make of the inconsistencies here? it just seems like, you know, they think it's being points in so many different directions. nobody knows where to look. yeah, exactly. it's distracting our minds again, and i call it happen of mass this direction. so they want to blame everybody else, but not themselves. of course, they would never admit that, but if time goes by the end, people will understand that those who really had an interest where the united states of america. it is also because mr. biden is facing a reelection campaign that is going to start at the end of this year beginning of next year. so he has to win some support among his own people. so no wonder that

they would try in anything to just try to the version of, say more hershey or, of course they would come up with something else. but before we have seen cases in world history, the last evidence was produced at the end of lead to serious consequences. so we should really reconsider how we want to help your crane to get through the crisis, not by arms deliveries. obviously they are not handling them. and they, it is tricky though, isn't it when it comes to who we should be trusting and we should be leaving, especially when both of these reports, both about new western reports and see more investigation site anonymous sources. as opposed sometimes it comes down to which side of a story sounds more convenience and more believable, especially when it comes to what the us government on its allies really once. yes, that's true and you see whenever they're being pushed into a corner, they are reacted. so when i came back from

a lot of stock in september with the agreement from mr. miller, c o, and cham enough gas from. and i presented that to chancellor charles is off as they knew that not stream to have to be opened. the demand is up to the german people want the drummond economy wants it, and yet they didn't know how to say no to that because there are no sanctions about rational gas. it's about rational island other transactions. so i knew when i left the chancellor's office at that time, i knew something was going to happen, and i thought it would happen to me. well, it didn't. luckily i must say. but and 67 days later, the pipeline exploded. so that came as surprising as the burning of the rice struck that happen. 90 years ago brought it to power when it comes to the using anonymous . so my source is 0 otherwise a 3rd party terrorist being blamed for attacks. it's not

a new tactic. is that we saw something similar with west and official skate goes in groups like al qaeda, always like state so. so for those of patterns, you think we're now seeing whether it's the same, like, let's go back in history to, to talkin to the fake explosions at. ready the boats in vietnam at that time or if you go back to hitler who said he only shot back when the climate was taken, supposedly taken by polish fighters, which was locked through. you always need to create something in order to fight back if you want to start the war. and in this case we see the same happening. it's the same battle, like the duncan crisis, or early on history, what hitler did. thank you so much for your time today. it's always a great pleasure to have you on the program. we've been speaking throughout the teen. i'm i a chairman of the german opposition group for sovereignty and constitution. thank you. thank you. and other developments now,

a polish fate and oil company is planning to sue russia over the whole of supplies via a pipeline that trunk boil to eastern europe. after president joe biden's visit, the russians stopped pumping oil to poland. we will now take legal action and assert claims. let me get this straight. poland is up said that russia won't take poland money any more. pullin has been going out of its way to act as ukraine's teacher's pack within the ear. going round publicly, bullying. it's fellow european allies for doing business with russia just a few days ago. the polish defense minister said on state tv quote, there is no doubt it was germany's policy that helped bruton to get money, which he used to strengthen his army. nord stream is an example, although we were called russ a phobic. we warned against it. we're talking billions that poland has sent to russia for energy as the german ambassador to the country has pointed out. now

poland even promised to end all russian oil imports by the end of last year. so you think that they would welcome this development, but now the same c, e o of poland state energy from orland is complaining that the evil russian oil has stopped flowing into poland, which was the largest importer of russian oil to the whole of e u. in january consisting of about 10 percent of its supply. and when confronted with that fact, the same c, e o's defense was basically that he just didn't know how to shut off the top. there were 2 contracts, one contract expired in january, the other expires in 2024. it is difficult to break a contract without sanctions. we would expose ourselves to large fines and that money would go to put in any way we would pay for the oil that we didn't even receive. so he said that he really,

really liked to shut off that russian oil to poland, but that he couldn't do that without getting fined for breaking a business contract with russia. so it be better to just keep paying for the russian oil. well then to have to pay a massive fine for stopping it. close buddy, looks like your problems are all solved because it sounds like moscow is basically now stopped and he won't have to pay the fine. so, what's the problem? unless of course, he really didn't want to break poland, long term relationship with russian oil and was just telling everyone that they were only dating casually, you know, until something or someone better came along and offered some other supply. speaking of dating on the down, low german economy minister, robert havoc also said this week that berlin doesn't have a formal relationship with russian gas after someone mysteriously blew it up. along with the nord stream pipelines regime, cynthia momentum,

we are not dependent on russian guest supplies at the moment talk. so it may be that through the elegy, terminals of neighboring countries through which gas quantities come rushing molecules or the gas mix, it does look like can neither be controlled nor excluded. but german companies do not buy algae gas from russian companies or russia, whatever he makes a sound like rushing yas, his imposing itself on germany like some kind of a crazy acts like, well, we tried to get it off our line, but it just wouldn't leave us alone, so they're acting like it's not really their fault if they're still playing some kind of light foot see under the table with russian fuel, the american c. e o of chevron. mike worth recently pointed out that indeed europe is still getting russian fuel that it's just taking the long way around from russia going through unsanctioned countries. and obviously that's going to mean that it's more expensive and also introduces more potential risks in

a much larger supply chain. which conveniently makes us natural gas a lot more attractive. so it's hardly surprise for example, that shell oils c e o is now saying that stability of the u. s. energy market makes it more attractive for the company's investments. then, for example, the u. k. or europe and european customers and industry are absolutely the ones bearing the brunt of all these added costs to buy energy and to, to re routed through half the world. now, europe has been saying that it wants to ramp up it's military industrial production . but here in france, they're even struggling to keep making baguettes do the energy cost. so good luck with that guys. meanwhile, the blocks fearless leaders keep saying that they're strong and independent and don't need russian fuel, even as they keep importing it on the sly. that is until, as we've just seen with poland,

russian fuel dumps them australia face is the threat of war with china within 3 years. and we're not read a nice the title of australian media sydney morning herald, which held a pano with guests from an independent thank time to discuss the possibility of a direct conflict with china. i have a tie one ortiz at donald court, a dove deep into the details, and he was really behind the think tank and the rhetoric the wheels of australia's mainstream media machine are moving towards war with china. a panel of so called experts have decided tambra should be battle ready in no less than 3 years time. not because there's any threat of beijing invading australia, but to help the us fight a war over taiwan. we have made our choice. if the united states goes to war with taiwan, we are going to support them one way or the other. we have deep interest in the preservation of ty, one's democracy, but also preservation of

a border order where large authoritarians can't be predators on smaller democratic nations. australia preparing for war with china seems a little out of the blue. but for those who are funded by the u. s. military industrial complex, any occasion can be turned into a call to arms. that's exactly who these experts are. for example, mike ryan is an adjunct fellow at the center for strategic and international studies. a think tank funded by top us. a defense contractors like lockheed martin raytheon and northrop grumman, as also peter jennings, levine, a lee and leslie c. back all contributors and fellows at the australian strategic policy institute. another organization, bankrolled by the u. s. establishment. the australian strategic policy institute is the propaganda arm of the c. i a in the u. s. government. it is a mouthpiece for the americans. it is funded by the american government and american arms manufacturers. white is allowed to sit at the center of the australian government when it has so much foreign funding. i don't know if it were

funded by anybody else, it would not be where it is at. many australians are understandably outraged by this blatant example of war mongering propaganda with the countries former prime minister, calling it a grievous and provocative to day sydney morning herald and h, front page stories on australia's supposed war risk with china represents the most egregious and provocative news presentation of any newspaper i have witnessed in over 50 years of active public life. it is way worse that the illustrated sampan shown to be coming from china and the build up to the war in vietnam in the 19 sixty's. the extent of the boys and news abuses i believe unparalleled in modern australian journalism. after all, australians are essentially being doused an ante china sentiment by the media sky. news recently claimed australia needs to double its military budget in preparation for an american war over taiwan. by the way, that network also has decades old ties to the u. s. government. because we

fundamentally been increased for i to years. many people i serious will be on the corner of the ukrainians. this kind of stuff isn't just on the airways, though. it's becoming australian government policy. the prime minister is expected to announce the building of a nuclear powered submarine fleet as part of can burrows, deeper involvement than the anti china august military alliance with the u. k. and the u. s. unfortunately, it seems like australia's top officials don't understand that china presents a lot less of a danger. and washington's provocations against beijing which threatened to push the world closer to nuclear war. iran is looking forward to building technological relations with africa. how's emphasized that a scientific on thinking on the cooperation meeting between iran and west african countries, they kicked off into ron on monday. in the past centuries, western countries have looted the wealth of these countries by exercising colonial

rule. but the development of relations with africa for the islamic republic of iran is not for the wealth of this region, but for the development and welfare of all nations, including african nations. you can get to know these developments and capabilities of iran through a personal visit and received the message that the determination and perseverance of a nation can turn all threats and sanctions into opportunities and bring that nation to progress. a conference board together, the islamic republican, 15 west african states, radian presidents apprehend bracy stress that to wrong desire for why the cooperation noting the importance of sharing experiences in strategic fears, such as i t wrong cause for stronger ties with africa committee cannot make uncertainty in the nation promotes by a new round of western sanctions. we spoke to political sociology. professor dr. science sunday, and economics expert fired i a law he who set that views that a wrong search for new partners is this. where was this thing?

sanctions while also benefiting africa. the compressor that he might see is boosting again the cooperation with africa. now the 3 between e long and abstract is over $1000000000.00. in the last 10 months of that goal, we have open also 8 centers for iranian centers to make the business and boost deletions between iranian economy, manian centers of technology, and the highland africa, and many african states. so this is part of the mean strategy of the along to break the sanctions and sure that the world is not consistent of western countries, but there are also other can be on the continent that can have 3 was then you know, i'm is suffering from enough functions, i don't think you'll, if you have more sanction, it will stop. and in fact, i think the planning different to, to, to read between the on and,

and those african that would facilitate the relations. and it would present a model the offer assistance that we are a country under fiction. and we are capable of reaching african countries and boasting of resistance and corporations. we've been following the idea of resistant economy in the last 20 years and cheating the outcome we need to, as i said, we need to diversify both our products and service as well as export the nation. everybody knows we are on the the most and then the sanction. and we have been through this

in the last 10 years over the last 10 years. unfortunately we have had no economic growth mean 0. and we, we do need to, i get out of this situation, thousands of taking the streets in protest against pension reforms in france with riot police using tear gas against demonstrators. oh ah, point union sets up and find marching on last tuesday as powers came to a standstill with feel deliveries disrupted, and schools shut at 250 more protests are expected around the country. in the coming days, us defense secretary lloyd austin has made an unannounced trip to iraq on tuesday

just days before the 20. yeah. on the anniversary of the us led invasion of the nation. austin met with the iraqi prime minister and stated that washington wants to strengthen the partnership between the 2 countries. do i look forward to continuing to consult with our valued iraqi partners and to advance? sure, sure. and trish and to improve the lives of the iraqi people. i am optimistic about the future of our partnership and united states will continue to strengthen and broaden our partnership in support of iraqi security, stability and sovereignty. the pentagon chief's visit to banks on his part of a 3 day to win the middle east. wilson met with king abdullah, the 2nd of jordan on monday, and is that to travel to israel and egypt to meet top officials. add on the trip for us announced that the discussions with focus on the growing threat iran poses

to regional stability. maybe swanson, executive director of welds beyond war say that the main goal of the meeting was to convince the rocky government to keep us troops in the country. it is great to presumably part of the reason he's there is to pressure the iraqi government to keep the u. s. troops there, there are still at least a couple 1000 us troops there and, and they want them to never leave. i and the iraqi people are overwhelmingly opposed to continue as for every minute of the past 20 years to want every last us troop out. and he doesn't want that. i did this may backfire just to as the, the iraq war back fired on the u. s. policy ames, i, you know, they of course wanted tens of thousands of troops permanently there. they wanted iraq as a base for attacking a number of neighboring countries. ok. but the, the goal in terms of u. s. propaganda at the moment which may have little to do with his visit,

he's visiting his pet dictator in jordan and various other countries on this trip. ah, he is to portray the war on iraq as a victory as a success. 20 years later. this is what we're now being told in us media that this was a success because there was a surge. how however, that logic works. i and, and of course, it can't be a success without permanent u. s. troops in iraq. so they've got to stay there. ah, india has set a goal of minimal dependency on foreign fun suit. the coal sound, health care of the message from the nations prime minister when you're moody, who states the news that new delhi has learned. it's lesson from the coven era pandemic. up to 260 new medical schools have opened the last few years is as mission demand has doubled since 2014. the prime minister also note that large investments of boosted nations pharma, medical tech industry. last off, the global south leaders condemned west and country for refusing to share vaccine

payton's leaving them alone to fight the pandemic, the nation's coffee, universal access to vaccine. so i think of failure to cooperate on an international level that was health organization on the united nations, of also jewish nation against the west, monopolizing of the vaccine we had from health care experts from india and south africa and say the failure to unite in the face of the cobit pandemic has greatly weakened the global south ambition of every country and every continent i believe, to acquire independence. how sovereignty, if you want to call it that, and my suit in the hall security. so the lessons we learned very clearly from covet, particularly on the african continent and in south africa and the other african countries is very much it. you cannot depend on others to supply your critical mason's vaccines.