ah, ah ah, breaking news from georgia web protest there were attempting to storm the country. parliament made classes with police as people rally against a draft and all that would run some media outlets foreign agents. us on german media outlets publish articles claiming that a pro ukrainian group was behind the bombing benoit, stream pipeline. but russia called it an attempt to shift the blame from the alleged western roll revealed by seymour hersh. i'll go straight to your eyes

helping the us wage war against china or taiwan that we expose the american establishment links to war mongering, australian propaganda, and india aims to boost its independence from foreign pharmaceuticals on the health care. often a global south was let down by the covey vaccine. the call is the promise find to, with a very well welcome to you. you're watching all the international with the latest world news update is good to have your company this hour. i was starting with breaking news from the georgian capital to please see where protest is broken through a barricade there. the country is parliament while attempting to storm the building . the

the i see in an attempt to quo the protests police resorted to tear gas and water cannon road traffic has been blocked with months. the rest also reported, some of the protest isn't being seen throwing molotov cocktails and stones and police officers, leaving several injured ambulances have arrived to help treat any casualties. earlier on tuesday, they proposed law response clashes between george and lawmakers inside parliament. washington is also weighed in saying it does not rule out the possibility of imposing sanctions against georgia authority. those that a controversial law from this country president is visiting the us of the cussing shorter me things with officials. that alone is the rubbish space. you'd be severely has addressed the georgian nation, saying that she will be the controversial nor one thing. she supports the protest this when you more as

a situation develop. so do say with us on the international the you know, the news now us intelligence source is a pro ukrainian group tower that last year the bombing of the north stream pipelines from russia to germany. as according to a new report from the new york times, it's, i think, a non mis officials, he said that they've not been able to link the attack to the ukrainian government, or it's west and patrons. these claims contradict the recent report from police surprise when a theme or her shoes investigation alleged that the u. s. government destroys the pipelines. officials who have reviewed the intelligence, said they believed the saboteurs were most likely ukrainian, or russian nationals or some combination of the 2. u. s. officials said no american or british nationals were involved. washington has so far been completely

dismissive of the revelations from seymour hersh regarding the destruction in ord stream to pipeline. they said the report is not credible because it used anonymous sources. but now we have the new york times stepping up to the plate with their own version of that. they say it's not the white house who's responsible for destroying the nordstrom to pipeline, but rather in their version of a dance, it is a group of russians and ukrainians. now in their report, they do not directly blame the government in kiev. here's what we've heard. officials who have reviewed the intelligence, said they believed the saboteurs were most likely ukrainian, or russian nationals or some combination of the 2. u. s. officials said no american or british nationals were involved. now germany is sending tanks to kia than many are looking on and wondering what exactly the response will be and how big the backlash from the german public might be. in response to the revelation that

ukrainian forces may have had something to do with destroying the nord stream to pipeline. but it also seems to indicate that this report is very convenient for the white house. it pushes the blame away from the united states and its allies and pushes it on to forces outside of the wes, ukrainians and russians. and it also provides kiya with an alibi. and let's take note that many have looked at the statements that were made by the white house in the lead up to the destruction of the north stream to pipeline. and say that this seems to indicate why we've heard such a deafening silence from us. ringback officials, here's what was said. if russia invade you crane one way or another nord stream to will not move forward. if russian rate that means tanks truth crossing the border of ukraine. again,

there will be we, there will be no longer nor stream to. we will bring in and how will you do that exactly. since the project and control of the project is within germany's control, i promise you will be able to do. now it appears danish officials will be allowing an inspection of the site and that is, according to a recent leak. it has been revealed that there will be some kind of inspection and investigation taking place. russia has confirmed that this seems to indicate they were correct. the deputy ambassador to the united nations says that this indicates russia's call for a u. s. investigation into the destruction of the pipeline was correct, and they plan to have a vote on such investigation. taking place at the un security council before the end of the month. now sy hersh said that he does not believe that washington will ever admit their direct participation in destroying the north spring to pipeline.

here's what he said. the last thing the white house, look, i'm telling you the never going to say they're never going to say i surrender. they're just never going to do it. now see more hers is also sad. he will reveal further information about how the nord stream to pipeline was destroyed in the new report currently in the works. many are looking on at this new piece by the new york times and raising the question of whether or not this is simply the new york times running interference for the u. s. government. giving a platform to the intelligence agencies to try and control the narrative when all the evidence and all the facts that have recently been revealed seem to points in the opposite direction and indicate that washington is directly responsible. the latest reports are an attempt to distract from the alleged western role in the pipeline attack. according to russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman, there was a media is bombarded by the news that the investigation into the terrorist attacks

against nordstrom has aversion that this is a non russia b ukrainian groups. i wonder who allows such leagues feeling the information space with them? the answer, those who do not want to conduct an investigation in the legal field and are going to divert the attention of the audience from the facts in every possible way. instead of leaks the western regimes involved in the incident, should respond to official requests from the russian side. and at the very least take into account the materials of the hersch investigation. instead of replacing them with anonymous throw wins. just one hour off the new york times article was published. a german media outlets designed really to turn bob shower report, which i think a local investigation lead ukrainian citizens blew up the new stream pipelines using a boat from poland. the boat that was allegedly used for the secret operation is said to be a yacht rented from a company based in poland, apparently owned by 2 ukrainians across to i guess martin golds are

a full member of the honda parliament in germany. many thanks for joining us. on the program this evening, it's lovely to see you. so we have 2 new western media reports alleging that neither here nor any lesson, governments had a direct role in the new stream attack. well, shifting the play into some sort of pro ukrainian group. what's your take on these claims when i 1st see this new, so i thought it's a bit strange. it can be something like diversion or a tactic or anything to throw the blame on someone else. now, if we look at the normal investigative journalist in germany, it's not up to you and the newspaper, sorry, you know, linked to trans atlantic thinking very closely. and so the government, i asked myself why, for example, terry questions off the terry, who left in parliament, the german government say,

any information about who made this a text on no string, one more thing to endanger the security of germany. and now there is leap like that. there must be some reason. so i think the raj knew which had been brought into light by seymour hersh. seems to me a bit more likely to be the truth then what happens now? if i look at 6 proteins on the small left small, i want to be responsible for such an attack where you meet most likely, some in the submarine to carry out that attack and need to be very professional. and then after all, they do the boat and leave some signs of of the t and t or whatever they're used in the boat. i think that is a bit like rubber steel or something,

but we don't know for sure what happens. but it seems to be something like a diversionary tactics. and once you make the timing of these new reports, it seems like we went weeks and weeks with no one knowing who was responsible. and then we've got all these different reports coming out of the same time. that's a bit strange. we had a visit of all it shows the president of the u. s. a. and shot after that. now we have this. when seymour hersh came into the life with this investigation and occasions there was some serious in the face for that it's the truth still that there should have been something like independent investigation of what has been happening, but that was blocked by the rest and state. and now there is a, something like running and throwing the blame on someone else, and the u. s. a might be behind this test. i think this is not the way to do it

now. throwing in new and new ideas, how it caught them without any proof that can be proved by independent investigators. there should be an independent investigation of the united nations, of the security council, or whatever with people involved from all those who are in the conflict. and then might be, we would find out the truth like this. it's more or less what's your belief, what you don't believe and keep all. so what is useful for the long side can be always brought into the life without any evidence which can be proved by independent people. that is not the way to find eligible checklists if we look at was profiting is most likely the was a property of this. and of course you're trained in the wall. the apple and they are linked together and there was so we don't know who was responsible,

but it's kind of is a bit like best game that shouldn't go on there should be serious investigation. one thing these 2 new reports do have in common is they both contradicts the findings recently published by police a price when a theme or hers, you conclude, of course the us government was to blame. so what do you make of the inconsistencies here? and also with these new reports about see more house going to really who may be going to release more details from his investigation. how do you think that will change the view of what really happens? i think that is a point where in the different parts in the world, if you will be changed in different way. know if i look and try to analyze clearly the investigation of seymour hersh was very deep and was looking at every aspect which showed question. if you will,

seriously start to find out what happens. now, when i look at the report in germany, that's only some aspects which are attached by that investigation. and then there is some kind of $69.00 people coming from somewhere going to somewhere. we don't know anything about the cycle to ship. we don't know all they could reach that deep in the sea to really attack the stream pipelines. we don't know anything about that receive that. they seem to be there a chance in leaving some kind of off or evidences after and they just like fish really rent and brought all this seems to be more like from a bad movie. then from real lance incident, when i look at what seymour hersh find out, well knows,

it seems to be something like, if you tried to make the reality check, it could have been like that, as far as inflammation has come, all know about the idea that some people, randall from poland went to rostock, that went then to the pipe line with some 5 people from a small boat without maybe a submarine, that's nothing about a submarine or anything that's nothing about their qualification, if they are serious qualification. so dive in that kind of see and to prepare stuff like that, that is so much on the surface information in the moment. so we can say true on it's wrong, but it so less aspect. and i think as well, it could be wrong into problem to make so discredit kate seymour hersh,

who will miss famous or that she just investigation very problem and with seeing all the aspects. so, oh, yes, i only can repeat, we need an investigation independent, was serious people not linked to one side of the conflict that has to be independent of a group or an independent, dreamy, independent sources where the different information come from. and then the group has to collect it and find the real well, it's all like, okay, absolutely. most of those are a former member of the humble parliament in germany. many thanks for your time. really appreciate it. thank you as well. the ukrainian radicals would be making headlines this week, most recently, and no, not the battalion commander openly advocated for terrorism by suggesting that

russians should attack their own presidents as suicide bombers mentality of the see on the me, those are the russian mentality is very hard for me to understand the same goes for the bill of rational, but this for ukrainians, can't leave under the tyranny. but they always did. there hasn't been a single russian who has strep dynamic to himself, and at least try to run to which bruton or some general. if a man would die, i would someone all the guys to go on the offensive and not miss the opportunity. and there's a pretty good author. and will correspondence thomas wrote essays, the west is being hypocritical by turning a blind eye to ukrainian violations while criticizing. question, this is absolute, not a surprise and it shows what country ukraine became. we can add also the bombing of the nuclear plant and separator, and many other things that bombing hospitals into nets coach i solos for myself. of

course, there will be no reaction just what we could go. we have this video where you, cranium, soul, just showed russian prisoners of war. and the u. n. a now was this video was authentic, and there was no reaction to west. nobody in the west knows about it. so how the western media i was working, we now and of course they will not talk, talk about this if it would be, vice versa will be a big scandal. and all they have class in another development apparently ignored by the western media. american white supremacists, linked to the alpha battalion, have been charged with flossing, a several attacks on us soil, but the connections to ukraine's near ne, reportedly being hushed up all the details. you can be found on our website r t dot com, check it out. if we turn not to our breaking news from the georgia capital tbilisi where protest is broken through a barricade of the countries parliament wall attempting to storm the building.

ah ah, in an attempt to call the protest, police have resorted to tear gas and more the cannon icpc from these pictures. road traffic has been blocked with mess. arrests also reported. since the close has it been seen throwing molotov cocktails and stones at the police, having several offices injured ambulances have arrived to help treat any casualties . early on tuesday, the proposed snow sparks clashes between jordan because inside parliament, washington is also weighed in saying it does not rule out the possibility of imposing sanctions against george and all over the controversial law. it comes as a country's president, his visiting the us off the cussing,

short and meeting with officials that she addressed the georgian nation, saying he will be code the controversial law while same. she supports the protesters, the more on the situation as it developed. let's discuss the situation now with yes, john combat like human and labor wives attorney and all so many thanks for joining us on the program. done. great to see. so let's talk about what's happening into place the what do you make of the reasons behind these riots in georgia? well, i find them interesting as i understand it there in response to a proposed law that would sanction individuals or groups that receive more than 20 percent of their funding from foreign sources. but refuse to or to report that funding because they'd be considered for an agents. i guess they find it

a little baffling if there be major protests to this because i can't imagine that that would apply to that many people in georgia. i don't know. the other interesting thing, the us has a law called barra, the for ages or to act which has similar requirements. i don't think it's funny percent funding threshold, but it does require for an a to report themselves. so the to the about the law. i thought also intriguing today we can read into the timing of these events. it's all well, i mean, they, you know, given what's happening, a new crane. obviously it could be related to that because of course you have, you know, really almost well, it could be fair to say almost a war world war involved. there was so many foreign forces involved in that

conflict. obviously what's happening in georgia could be a response to that and some lawmakers wanting to prevent tech for an interference in georgia. you know, a lot of times in truth the u. s. in particular, users funding for and entities in order to gain influence and even foreign government, so that the georgia in parliament would have some concerns over. that is not particularly surprising interesting that the georgia president who is currently visiting the us as spoken, i was saying he supposed to protest, i mean, could be seen as inciting the riot for the way. well perhaps i mean it again, the whole thing seems a little strange to me. i mean, why in

a huge amount of people would be concerned about a lot targeted for and funding i again, i don't see how that impact so many people and yeah, i mean the fact that the george and president is, is it locked step with the us who's also posing this legislation? you know, makes you wonder where the opposition to all of this is truly coming. what do you think the us is now? so i thing to, to get involved and sanction the country over it, or why they trying to dictate how georgia should mileage, is and politics. i mean, i know that the, the us threatens georgia with sanctions previously about a month ago. if georgia should resume flights between the georgia and russia, and now the 1st thing sanctions again yeah, well, i mean, this is not surprising. the u. s. feels that it has the authority to interfere in every country around the world. i mean that, that's obvious, right?

i mean, the us interfere is often in other countries. elections. it helps over throw foreign governments, including frank, the, the want to ukraine in 2014, the us, you know, was the high, the qu, there. so yeah, the us feels that has the right to interfere in government and i think it in particular feels the need to interfere in the, in the former soviet republics that does not want to see coming together again, russia and like you say, this comes amid the ukraine conflicts can't be ignored, and georgia has so far been trying to stay neutral. but do you think that position might change, perhaps under some influence? yeah, i mean, i don't think the us wants georgia to be neutral, wants it to be firmly in the camp of russia. and it be again, if you look at the 2014 made on to in ukraine,

that the u. s. supported the president at that time was not pro russian, although the west tends to claim that he was track you trying to walk a more neutral path between the you and and that was unacceptable to the united states. so yeah, i think i think, you know, do travel the way sion is not acceptable to the united states. thank a valid human labor rights attorney and all so many things your time really appreciate your insight into the mass. i thank you. thank you. okay. have has reportedly doubled down on its efforts to get american made cluster bombs now asking for a variance capable of being used via ukrainian drones. but western officials on media have remained silent on campus request while loudly condemning russia for using the same munitions. these weapons rockets are missiles that deploy a large number of small explosives are banned by more than 100 countries. that's

indicative of cluster munitions that are a bunch of things that are expiring in the same time when cluster munitions are one of those things that have been a huge problem here in this war, we've seen videos of russian forces moving exceptionally lethal weapon entry into ukraine. which has no place on the battlefield, that includes cluster munitions and vacuum bombs which are banned under the geneva convention. russia is not a party to the convention cluster munitions international treaty that bands his weapons. but russia's cluster mission attacks have been unlawful because they involve inherently indiscriminate weapons that cannot distinguish between combatants and civilians. ukraine's homemade cluster bon called the torch key you is constantly being used on civilian areas in western russia, according to moscow officials. but western media and officials have widely turned a blind eye has one example of such attack, in which dozens of don yet citizens were killed. a warning for you,

the following images may be disturbing for some views. ah, life with krista on the on ortho journalist on founder of dumbass inside essays that the western media chooses to turn a blind eye to any narrative that doesn't serve that agenda. now was myself and there are such a shilling last here it will show which was the gun and grads which were also clustered and which were shield on, on civilian areas, on the residential areas. and they knew that they were shooting into areas was you

create an army doing that, and i've seen no condemnation about that. and the idea that they can provide such weapons to, to ukraine is just absolutely shameful. all the withdrawn media, they have guidelines to follow in terms of narrative and they stick to it. so of course everything which is not fitting to this narrative, they put it aside. and so the fact that the us are themselves producing and using these kind of forbidden are all low for weapon the they should the mouth about that like the fact that for example, the us destroyed it's all chemical whipping arsenalt. on the contrary of russia, for example, which has destroyed everything. so the everything which is not convenient for the narrative, the official narrative, they just should them up. moscow and kia has carried out yet another military prisoner swap deal luxury say that service men will the mortal danger

while in captivity. 90 ukrainian prisoners of war were exchanged for 90 russians, who were now being transported to moscow for medical evaluation and treatment. last month, 2 seminar swaps were conducted between russia and ukraine, with one of the mediated by the united arab emirates. and other developments australia faces the threats of war with china within 3 years . and we're not ready. according to the sydney morning herald, which held a panel with guests from a u. s. funded think tank to discuss a direct conflict with china over taiwan ortiz, donald court, who investigates who's really behind the war mongering rhetoric. the wheels of australia's mainstream media machine are moving towards war with china, a panel of so called experts have decided tambra should be battle ready in no less than 3 years time. not because there's any threat of beijing invading australia,

but to help us fight a war over taiwan. we have made our choice. if the united states goes to war with taiwan, we are going to support them one way or the other. we have deep interest in the preservation of taiwanese democracy, but also preservation of a border order where large authoritarians can't be predators on smaller democratic nations. australia preparing for war with china seems a little out of the blue. but for those who are funded by the us military, industrial, complex, any occasion can be turned into a call to arms. that's exactly who these experts are. for example, mike ryan is an ad junk fellow at the center for strategic and international studies. a think tank funded by top us. a defense contractors like lockheed martin raytheon and northrop groom and there's also peter jennings, levine, a lee and leslie ceeback, all contributors and fellows at the australian strategic paul.