ah ah ah, processes in georgia or attempted to the countries parliament amid clashes with people rally, i can say draw floor that would run some media outlets. foreign, asian american non german reports claim that a pro ukrainian group was behind the bombing of the node stream pipeline. but russia cause it's an attempt to shift the blame from the alleged western roles were

billed by 3 more ultimately, a eyes helping the us wage war against china over taiwan. we expose the american establishment links to more mongering, australian profit down with a very welcome. you're watching on the international, but the latest news update is good to happy with top story in the georgia capital capital leafy police that special forces are dispersing protest is using a gas on the water cannon that's off the riots is broke through a barricade near the country's parliament while attempting to store the building. ah

ah. mode something to me since he has been blocked with mass arrests. so i reprinted some of the protest this had been seen during molotov cocktails and stones and police leaving several offices injured. ambulances survived to help treat to any casualties. he's a local journalist with more oh are you with. * earlier on tuesday, the proposed law sparks clashes between george and lawmakers inside parliament, despite the initiative being approved by the majority of employees. george and

president, fellow missouri bashfully who's currently in the us has address termination saying she supports the protesters. it's gone, this law can be cancelled in any way you want from day one. i said i would veto this law and i will veto it. i do not care about it's article by article discussion . it's similarity to the old american law, which we well know, serves as completely different purpose. those who support this law and those who voted for this law are violating constitution. you're taking us all away from europe. washington has oh, i also weighed in saying it does not move on the possibility of imposing sanctions against georgia authority over the controversial law, which the u. s. embassy and to please the has described kremlin, inspires today's a dark day for georgia. democracy parliament's advancement of these kremlin inspired laws is incompatible with the people of george's clear desire for european integration and his democratic development. presume these laws will demo george's

relations with his strategic partners and undermine the important work of so many georgian organizations working to help their fellow citizens, the process, and the draft laws res, real questions about the ruling parties. commitment to euro, atlantic integration processes into place. they could have been heard, shawn could be heard taunting on russian slogans, and some of the wife has also seen carrying ukrainian american and european union flags. this discuss these latest developments with american civil rights attorney. hello, now many thanks for joining us on the program. what do you make of the reasons behind these riots in georgia? i think it's a multifaceted issue that we're looking at. we're looking at a people's uprising and standing up against the current regime, which is in place, but also the interference of the western powers. when it comes to law, when it comes to the popular opinion of the citizens there, we've known for years that the western powers have sought to influence any country

that within russia sphere influence whether that be chechnya, whether it be ukraine, whether it be that we are people who are public of georgia, we're now seeing more western intervention and the central asian republics. it's keta pakistan and you're to stand to g stand. so i think the fingerprints of western governments are all of the protest. i can be reached at the timing of the events at all. i do think you can look recently into the timing because we are just passing the one year anniversary of the special our military operation. we're now seeing president biden visiting the of the war front. very ukraine will face an air raid sirens going off. and it's at a time when we're seeing more and more people in the united states for america seeking to the fed from the amount of military support that is being sent to the ukraine. many of their european allies are also starting to question the amount of support and how long this war going. and i think that the more of that the conflict can be fomented on the russian border and within the

a states within the orbit of russia. of the more they can make the case that they need to continue this money flowing into the crate at georgia as president is currently visiting the u. s. has spoken out saying she supports the protesters. could this be viewed as her in citing the riots in some way? i do think so. i think that we've gotten nothing, but miss messages on the one hand saying that guess we support protesters. but on the other hand, having very heavy handed police operations and a new pair military response to such if you support the protesters and sit down with their leadership, bring them in to the to government. we create peace, the courts that will bring it into the protest, but instead we're seeing the continued military of this for these protests and a lack of understanding or a lack of ability to negotiate a settlement or the u. s. has already way to and it's threatens to sanction the country. why do you think the us decided to weigh in already? well, i think that was being the,

the u. s. using it's kind of position as the world's leading economy as the new front ending in the fight for has a lot of power throughout the world. that they are able to use the threat of things and to stop any government action. we've seen that the fame comes against russia. 4th, apple have been very ineffective and stopping the stock and the rest of the economy from growing and proceeding going forward. however, countries that are not as big as russia not having robust fossil fuels and at for power of a nation. might russell, very much have been the whim of the work from how it was understanding the things of that nature could be bankrupt them and then create more civil unrest and strife among the crowds. the protest is in 2 places. we've seen people waving american flags, ukrainian flags, and the you flags which have like some observers to compare these events to the 2014 my done, the uprising and key of the you see any similarities here yourself. of the similarity that i see is that even in that situation, from the protest in 2014,

we've seen that ukraine has not been a position of rest ever since we, we saw something similar with the quote unquote air spring in the middle east. which ones that, that region in the chaos for a decade thereafter, a bit by, by continuing to support these popular uprising around the world. i. d, stabilizes government to prevent the economic growth from nations and creasing condition to insert your own public regime. that will be friendly to the west and friendly to the us. i commented on the situation that your foreign policy chief has said, the george and foreign agent law is incompatible with european values. and yet it's the countries themselves that have been binding media outlets like all t. what is the logic here? or there is a lot of this is our to you've been banding united states of america. these groups and individuals are very much speak out of both sides of their mouth when it comes to these issues of media censorship. when it comes to freedom of speech,

freedom of the press, i tell people all the time that the americans do not get the news that comes out on the other side of the other side of the pond. we do not get the other side of the argument, the other side of the discussion. we get simply propaganda. if you look at what's going on in the united states for the dominion voting machine lawsuit, we found out the many news anchors are the same things and text messages are private, which is directly contrary to what they say on the air. because that's the goes against the corporate stock prices in the bottom line there. these countries did not care about troup than justice, or the american waste of quote, unquote, they care about maintaining the status quo, maintaining his amount of power. we have the u. s. threatening to sanction georgia, that base proposed legislation in the us itself. however, has a law targeting so called foreign agents itself. why does it more? does the government thing except to go while george is law, is not the us when it comes to maybe these issues they,

they say do as i say not as i do. they criticize china for you come right violations while violating the human rights of african americans in this country. they criticize iran for subjugating women while they passed the law to subjugate women here in the state. they talk about the militarization of other countries. meanwhile, they spend more money on the military here than, than it's $10.00 countries combined. they're very much a rule for, again, not for me. out when it comes to who the united states condemned and what they want policy to be. and this comes made the ukraine conflicts, of course, georgia has so far been attempting to stay neutral in the conflict. i think i think that position might change perhaps on the some influence, i hope does not. i hope that more nations do not become drawn into this, like we've seen to you to check seen wars and in the ninety's who saw the war in george in 2008. we saw the beginning of this conflict in ukraine starting cry. me in 2014,

we're dealing with the situation between armine and our on and our of our sod. nicole car box going on right now, and those same areas. so we do not need any more nations shooting at each other right now. we have to find peace or listen to need to find a way to lower the temperature an international relations. many thanks for joining the program. really appreciate your time. american civil rights attorney, robert patello. thank you. and other developments australia faces the threats of war with china within 3 years, and we are not ready that's according to the sydney morning herald, which held a panel with guests from us funded think tank to discuss a direct conflict with china over taiwan ortiz, donald court who investigates who's really behind the war mongering rhetoric? the wheels of australia's mainstream media machine are moving towards war with china, a panel of so called experts have decided tambra should be battle ready and no less than 3 years time. not because there's any threat of beijing invading australia,

but to help us fight a war over taiwan. we have made our choice. if the united states goes to war with taiwan, we are going to support them one way or the other. we have deep interest in the preservation of ty, one's democracy, but also preservation of a border order where large authoritarians can't be predators on smaller democratic nations. australia preparing for war with china seems a little out of the blue. but for those who are funded by the u. s. military industrial complex, any occasion can be turned into a call to arms. that's exactly who these experts are. for example, mike ryan is an adjunct fellow at the center for strategic and international studies. a think tank funded by top us defense contractors like lockheed martin raytheon and northrop grumman. there's also peter jennings, levine, a lee and leslie c, back all contributors and fellows at the australian strategic policy institute. another organization,

bankrolled by the u. s. establishment. the australian strategic policy institute is the propaganda arm of the c. i a in the u. s. government. it is a mouthpiece for the americans. it is funded by the american government and american arms manufacturers. white is allowed to sit at the center of the australian government when it has so much foreign funding. i don't know if it were funded by anybody else. it would not be where it is at. many australians are understandably outraged by this blatant example of war mongering propaganda with the countries former prime minister, calling it a grievous and provocative to day sydney morning herald and h, front page stories on australia's supposed war risk with china represents the most egregious and provocative news presentation of any newspaper i have witnessed in over 50 years of active public life. it is way worse that the illustrated sampan shown to be coming from china and the build up to the war in vietnam in the 19 sixty's. the extent of the boys and muse abuses, i believe, unparalleled in modern australian journalism. after all,

australians are essentially being doused an antique china sentiment by the media sky. news recently claimed australia needs to double it's military budget. in preparation for an american war over taiwan, by the way, that network also has decades old ties to the u. s. government. because we fundamentally been in place for i to years, many people i serious, the on the on the ukrainians. this kind of stuff isn't just on the airways though. it's becoming australian government policy. the prime minister is expected to announce the building of a nuclear powered submarine fleet, as part of can burrows, deeper involvement in the anti china august military alliance with the u. k. and the u. s. unfortunately, it seems like australia's top officials don't understand that china presents a lot less of a danger than washington's provocations against beijing, which threatened to push the world closer to nuclear war. ah,

i think he ever know any western governments were involved in last year's booming of the node stream pipelines from russia to germany, as according to, to new western media reports for the shifting the blame for the attack to a pro ukrainian group. these claims contradict the recent investigation from police surprised when a seymour hush, who alleged that the u. s. government destroys the pipelines. officials who have reviewed the intelligence, said they believed the saboteurs were most likely ukrainian, or russian nationals or some combination of the 2 u. s. officials said no american, no british nationals were involved. the boat that was allegedly used for the secret operation is said to be a yacht rented from a company based in poland, apparently owned by 2 ukrainians. a response to these latest claims rushes foreign ministry spokeswoman faith. the reports are an attempt to distract from the alleged western role in the pipe planet types. the western media is bombarded by the news

that the investigation into the terrorist attacks against nordstrom has a version that this is a non russia, b, ukrainian groups. i wonder who allows such leaks filling the information space with them. the answer, those who do not want to conduct an investigation in the legal field and are going to divert the attention of the audience from the facts in every possible way. instead of leaks, the western regimes involved in the incident should respond to official requests from the russian side. and at the very least take into account the materials of the hersch investigation instead of replacing them with anonymous throw. when's so the german press claims to have gotten a hold of some bomb shell, new allegations about the german investigation into north stream pipeline explosions. these zeroed in on a yacht, rented from a polish company, owned by a couple of ukrainians, go figure on board. were reportedly 6 people including 2 divers and their assistance, plus a doctor and the captain of the boat, whose identities and citizenship is unknown, with a zeit online reporting,

that their passports used to rent the yacht were forged. how convenient? it's also not clear who gave them the orders. the boat reportedly set sail from a port in raw stocked germany 20 days before the north stream explosions last september 26th, where it picked up some cargo that had apparently previously been delivered by a truck to the port. investigators then say that they located it. the ship, the next day on the danish island of christiane. so where it was headed back or handed back to the owners, investigators reportedly found traces of explosives in the cabin light street out of a spy movie. right. the german process also reporting a tip from an unnamed western intelligence service to a european counterpart eggs indicating a ukrainian commando in the pipeline sabotage operation. with other intelligence, the merging of

a quote pro ukrainian group involved no indication as to whether the pro ukrainian suspect was named uncle sam. the entire west right now is one big quote pro ukrainian group. so it really hardly narrows down the list of suspects. but one thing's for sure, though, this reporting sure has taken great pains to leave kiev right out of it. instead attributing the mischief to murky pro ukrainian actors. by the way, surely, it's just a total coincidence that just an hour or 2 before the german press published this information, the new york times also announced that according to us officials intelligent, suggest that a pro ukrainian group sabotaged the pipelines. both german and american sources just happened to come to the same conclusion about some murky pro ukrainian groups, leading both us and german media to quote,

their respective countries unnamed and anonymous officials at exactly the same time too bad. this pro ukrainian group conveniently lacks an identity, so it obviously can't be held accountable. yes, that means that since q isn't officially involved according to these reports, then it's no problem for germany in the us to just keep delivering them weapons. no one's commenting on record except keith with a presidential advisor tweeting that ukraine had nothing to do with any of this. and he doesn't know any pro ukrainian groups, any kind of pun, shrugged it off. i don't know about you, but tom, i get angry when somebody borrows a library book in my name and it seems like he isn't too upset that somebody or some pro ukrainian groups are running around committing terrorism and basically linking them to it. legal on media analyst line, also the mainstream media has resorted to repeating,

instead of reporting while failing to carry any actual facts. i have read this story. 10 times, i keep thinking they, they must have cut off a portion of this just doesn't say anything. 3 authors, 3 from the once vaunted harold in new york times mainstream media today, i don't of it's american event western by mainstream media are repeaters, not reporters. they repeat their proxies, their agent, they're, they're correspondent, they're there, they're propagandist who had the motive. if you ask somebody nord stream to a pipeline between russia, germany who would have the motive, who would benefit from this coin, bono, qui pro dest. oh, benefit. ask yourself. and the 1st thing is,

i was russia. how does that work? well, because there so evil. what, what? yes, because this evil nose, no nose, no sanity is what is evil, apparently doesn't know. so now you have this which all of us now let me also tell you, i don't want to to make it even work be complicated or, or seemingly complicated because it's so obvious. when you have 2 leading officials saying, if you do this, that nord scream is true. and what happened? now come on. come on. why are we even discussing this? how is it to people? what do they happened to say that that really? that was just an expression. when i said something bad would happen, i, i didn't think you're really what happened. and the 3rd question which nobody is, may be explaining to me. and i'm just a layman. i'm just,

i don't know anything about demolitions. i've never destroyed anything under water or above water for that matter. doesn't it? take a lot of effort, aren't these pipelines really encased in concrete or stealer? when you leave something that important, unattended in the ocean? how is it that these people happen to go out in a road to dive down? i don't know how many meters use whatever equipment is available to story is so preposterous from the beginning. and meanwhile, nobody has ever said to seymour hersh. you're incorrect because of such and such, are your fax or that that paper. it's the very fact that we're discussing. this is a testament to the power of whoever is controlling the narrative. because this is obvious

. leave cove, it's studies for scientists. sounds stop politicizing the issue of the message from china's foreign ministry amid fresh claims in the us that the virus was likely released from a chinese lab. bating has also accused washington of weapon, isaac, the pandemic. you do, i should, daniel, i mean, for some time the u. s. has been insisting on politicizing and weaponized origin, tracing and using it as a tool to hyper ridiculous policies of biological weapons and leveling without any evidence. these acts have ruined the global atmosphere of science based wards and tracing. the u. s. keep saying it be great attention to virus origin tracing but never in wide world health organization experts to carry out orange and tracing cooperation or provides any preliminary data. we urge the us to stop the political manipulation of origin tracing and respond to the global communities, legitimate concerns as soon as possible. during the outset of the pandemic form

a cnn chief, jeff zacko, reportedly ordered his journalists who shun that the covert conspiracy ferry, calling it a trump talking points. however, sphere then has a very different angle when it comes to carrying the by did administrations, claims and allegations against china. permanent american journalist, glen greenwald, has condemned the us media bias. this lab league theory became a popular hypothesis in conservative circle. we know that this virus originated in china. we know that unfortunately, we will see future viruses and pandemic to come. and the fact that china has not been transparent in terms of allowing investigators and i think is a bigger concern. one down tend to go. a conspiracy turns to truth. it was never justify the treatise proven covered sooner, origin, nor any reason to mock the lab league theory. but media outlets did as because

cobra origin became politicized and media outlets as always started with their audiological tried political commentator, steve, gail, say say you turn in us media. narrative is a clear example of so called a tribalism, and the american political climate did become politicized. very early with president trump was focusing on being from hon was calling it the child. a virus was accused of, of being racist by identifying it from its origin. so it got politicized immediately by those who were opposed to try anything that they could do to try to make it a trump virus, rather than china, virus became their political agenda. i think the word tribal is direct. they immediately lead to the expense of their tribe. we now find the fact that the cia other federal government agencies know that it came from the lab, know that it was man made you now have solid documentation that dr. algae and his, his cronies. we're helping fund the development of this advanced weaponized type virus. and now the truth is, you know, kind of slowly leaking out. unfortunately,

got people like valgy and others denying they ever said any of what they said. although it's on videotape. ah, the us defense secretary has made an announce trip to iraq 2 days before the 20th anniversary of the us led invasion. we don't been met with the iraqi prime minister and states that washington wants to strengthen the partnership between the 2 countries. i look forward to continuing to consult with our valued iraqi partners and to advance for your interest and to improve the lives of the iraqi people. i am optimistic about the future of our partnership and united states will continue to strengthen and broaden our partnership in support of iraqi security. stability and sharpen to the pentagon chief's visit to baghdad is part of a 3 day trip across the middle east. he also met king abdullah in jordan on monday

and they said to travel to israel and egypt to sit down with top officials, they're ahead of the toward the u. s. announced that this the discussions would focus on the growing threat iran poses to regional stability. journalist and author daniela's on se washington was to build a new coalition of the willing against turan and the executive director of a well beyond war. david swanson, se cus is trying to convince iraq to keep some american troops in the country. the reason austin is going to iraq is quite clear. he's trying to shore up and increasingly rickety imperial structure, the u. s. needs iraq to, to put pressure on iran. it's major enemy in the persian gulf. busy so therefore, it's trying to bolster its government and bolster its economy as well. but the range of the iraqi economy is actually doing quite poorly the, the national currency, the dean, are, is in free fall,

due to us financial interference. america is trying to stop capital money from flowing from a rack into a ran because the u. s. wants to embargo ran isolated. but unfortunately that's having very negative economic consequences in iraq itself. and so austin's job is to somehow contain the damage and put things on better footing. presumably, part of the reason he's there is to pressure the iraqi government to keep the us troops there. there are still at least a couple 1000 us troops there and they want them to never leave. and the iraqi people are overwhelmingly opposed. continue as for every minute of the past 20 years to want every last us troop out. and he doesn't want that. the end this may backfire just as the, the iraq war backfired on the u. s. policy aims, you know,

they of course wanted tens of thousands of troops permanently there. they wanted iraq as a base for attacking a number of neighboring countries. but the, the goal in terms of us propaganda at the moment which may have little to do with his visit, he's visiting his pet dictator in jordan and various other countries on this trip is to portray the war on iraq has a victory as a success. 20 years later, this is what we're now being told us media that this was a success because there was a surge. how however, that logic works. and, and of course, they can't be a success without permanent us troops in iraq. so they've got to stay there. keep at stake now, the latest news updates it by taking our website r t dot com. thank you for choosing mazda international. ah

ah, ah, ah, ah, western capitals in the appliance corporate media continue to maintain the west is not at war with russia. however, the fact is, joe is a co belligerent supplying financial support arms and diplomatic cover for kids when the west claims. otherwise, it means it's losing.