ah, a journalist say if the american made to ai power search engine chance to pay the 2014 may done uprising a new claim as a crew to washington had the 100, among others that's installed contrast to the us now or tape it doesn't tend to fit in other countries, us mines president. com la harris, good land for unsolicited advice on human rights history. if it's gone up and a big boost washington's influence in africa, i'm just trying to say if it's open for foreign investors with us, then it takes an opposing song by considering a pill that would take talk, run today. national security risk by the white house, with

a very well commit to 11 pm here in moscow and disability international with the very latest world news update. it's great to have you with the public version of the ai driven chat to g p t. search engine developed in the us place, the 2014 maiden uprising and ukraine on a list of cruise. washington has been involved in that is to a shed on social media by an independent journalist. the u. s. government backed the ousting of ukraine's president. victor ya, new coverage in a crew that brought pro western leaders to power chat. gpc is perhaps the best known of these are artificial intelligent bots. it was one of those requests to write an essay about us involvement in coups, around the world as generated this embarrassing response that includes ukraine on the list. the u. s. on the eyes, of course, deny involvement in the overthrow of the ukrainian government in 2014 and insist that russia's special military operation was in fact an unprovoked attack. but chat

g p t apparently on said that the den ukrainian president jani coach, was ousted in a cood brought to power pro weston leaders. being a, i another one of the chat box. when asked, it produced a detailed time on of us involved in the coo, essentially said that the intervention was aimed to contain. and we can rush and it said it was dangerous and destructive. here's what they said, the q and its aftermath, those to effect the security and stability of the wider region, as well as the global order. the crisis has increased the risk of a wider war or, and nuclear confrontation between the united states and russia, which both have troops and weapons deployed new ukraine's board. us the. * crisis has also undermine good principles of international law and sovereignty, as well as the norms of corporation and dialogue and non major powers. so see where else has the us in involving cuz well, it's probably easier to list those places where it hasn't been involving, cuz i think perhaps most most notoriously,

in the 19 seventy's under operation condo, it was involved in the backing of desk or in the overthrow of democratically elected governments across latin america that it felt threatened u. s. interest, sir, most famously in argentine of calls where there was a dirty war that lasted a for decades and in kitty where the democratically elected government of the self proclaimed marks is salvador allende took place and he replaced with the cost a punish. i. now, tens of thousands of people were tortured, disappeared in and killed by those regimes and across in the middle east. of course, the u. s. was involved in the ousting of the iranian leader mohammed mossadegh who had threatened to nationalize the countries or oil which of course the u. s. has a vested interest in and they impose the, the, the pro u. s. pro western shaw, who was himself housed in the 1979 revolutionary war, natalie has been involved in cova operations in sylvia operation. timber sycamore,

where we saw $1000000000.00 us dollars a channel to a syrian opposition groups and peter overthrow president butter. alice had now said, you know, really mentioned africa, what's been going on there? what of course is there a huge operations are underway in, in africa, the speak of a secret war, their massive troop numbers, and they use a loophole to bypass congressional accountability u. s. her military has trained soldiers that have been involved in lea 7 coups in the last 2 years. washington is insist that it has shared values with many of these li leaders. is the head of the us, african being grilled on that issue. what percentage of the people we've trained end up participating in insurrections or coups against their own government? very small number. this is a kernel, mama de dom boucher and this is a photo of of him. did we train and equip him by name? i cannot identify that will, will that guy in the middle with the big red hat,

colonel mama, dad and bu yet that, that's him with a bunch of us service members outside of our embassy core values. is what we start off with in higher make programs. do we shape or values with kernel demilia, core values? i'll repeat that for values i know spectrum or math who we do. we share those values with kernel. absolutely. and our curriculum, he let it go. we do. okay, that's a very telling answer. now west africa, the south region in particular has been incredibly volatile. it's been played with . jihad is insurgencies and tribal disputes, but in particular, around the border areas. now since 2005, the u. s. is pumped millions of dollars to bring stability to the region. and since the 2 thousands, the united states has sent commandos in special operations forces to work with local 4th is on the ground, often even leading them into battle. now that intervention has clearly failed many, those countries are now turning towards russia for security assistance. president

putin has said at that the continent of africa is a priority for moscow. this perhaps explains washington's a recent interest in africa. and of course we have now seen the vice president, kamala harris is that latest senior official to be sent to africa on a charm offensive. what we've seen the impact of us intervention across the world. indications are at the moment, despite washington's denials. the u. s. involvement in the 2014 might, and coo and ukraine will not be a surprise. it was this on the civil war, and attacks on russian speakers that followed has led directly to the conflict in ukraine. and have until africa, where the u. s. lines president camel harrison on her 2nd day of the 3 nation tall, an attempt to revive washington's waning influence on the continent. i'm very excited about the future. i'm very excited about the impact of the future of africa on the rest of the world,

including the united states of america. this is howard his 1st trip to africa since taking office. she's also expected to visit tanzania and zambia. on monday harris mentioned the importance of supporting human rights on the continent that some local politicians hit back and advise the u. s. vice president to check her own nations track record before trying to lecture others. do you think the parliament of gonna is going to be guided by the opinion of the vice president of the country? that is one of the biggest abusers of human rights police. economic analysts from africa use of dodie essays, the continent once fair trade relations instead of unsolicited advice and imperatives from washington. an area that the west has used very aggressively in the past is the mechanism of divide and rule. so one of the mechanisms that america is likely to use in africa is to offer military

assistance to the government of the day discussion on human rights. and the respect for human life is really a discussion that we believe that the american really have no moral ground on which to talk about it in any meaningful way. i think africa is now beginning to recognize that this is not a discussion we're wanting to engage in because we have nothing to learn from these countries. what we want to be able to do is to have a relationship that trade related. that's economic development related. they want american radio talk show hosts on political analysts. garland nixon has questioned how western states would react if russia middleton protests in france, like washington did in ukraine, back in 2040. imagine if russian politicians joined the protest in paris

provided money, gave speeches of support and handed out cookies. that's what americans did in ukraine in 2014. well, that sounds they can stay and last protests him from the underway with president mcmillan's government deploying 13000 offices across the country with more than 5000 in paris alone. ah, a and he's one person has been injured in the french capital on tuesday during clashes with police unrest box onto the government bumps up the retirement age from

62 to 64. for almost 2 weeks, demonstrators have been confronted by officers who have responded with tear gas the and war to canon. all the while the french president has been supporting protest is in iran and georgia, despite coin knows, taking to the streets in france, illegitimate and nixon also says he believes that the french government should focus on their own internal issues rather than meddling in the affairs of other countries, to me, this is not just about the pension, this is about a series of a, basically years of changes in french policy that, you know, made it to where to the people that made it, made it obvious to the people in france that they did not have control over their government that the, the type of government that they have now is a, is a fraud and a farce. and that their government does not represent them whatsoever. you know, they made is what might as well say, you know,

people should stop hitting each other with sticks and running in different directions and lighting fires as opposed to the comments about georgia or the comments about iran or hong kong, where they call for structural change got structural co government change where they can do the government and the government's actions against the people here. they don't condemn the french government and they don't call for any structural change that were addressed the people that the issues that the people have brought to have brought to bear against the government. so we, again, the contradiction is obvious. here. iran foreign minister has touched down in moscow with the official invitation of his russian counts, a pause, a top diplomat. so i'll set to discuss a variety of math to think it in the iran nuclear deal, syria and afghanistan among others. let's get the details. now. correspondence shapers shake it to say you could you give us more details on the arrival place? yeah, well, the iranian foreign minister, mister abdulla ian,

has arrived in moscow to meet his russian counterpart survey. love rav. it's a working visit where the 2 men will discuss previously discussed issues at which the russian and iranian leaders have discussed. so they will be tried but meet on the bones of various agreements and aspirations regarding the economy and strategic co operation between these 2 countries. remember, this comes hot on the heels of the visit to moscow by the chinese president shing ping, who, of course, would have had a significant involvement in the recently brokered de taunt between iran and saudi arabia. so we see this visit in the context of shifting geopolitical and global, a global map, which is definitely changing. so as i said, the 2 men will discuss trade and ad uranian. a foreign ministry have said that they want to see trade increasing, that already russian investment into iran is increasing on

a day by day basis. and of course, at the take, the key issue is, you know, a deal will be brokers between the 2. regarding a pipelines and energy transfer also. and it's important to see that in the context of, of these a international sanctions with which russia and iran now of course, the most sanctioned states on earth. and there's a necessity for these 2 regional power brokers to cooperate more more closely. and the minister also agree to answer some questions for us and that we be able to bring them to you in the morning, nicky, if a for that that so our teeth shape ice or the data center now when it's late has been to limit paintings growing influence washington is that it sites on social media joint take talk while in contrasts. china is welcoming fine fans aiming to boast, aids already, fly the economy. china will open its doors wider and wider. no matter how the

international situation changes. china will, unswerving li, expand its opening up to the outside world. chinese economy has been deeply integrated into the global division of labor. sure, while china is very eager to court foreign investors and do business internationally. they just hosted the china development forum that was attended by apple ceo tim cook. we have the united states with a law being discussed in the us senate that would limit and restrict foreign technology and technology with links to foreign governments. here's some of the language. i think the white house is very in favor of this bill. we gave the secretary of commerce to tools to ban to force of sale, other tools. we got 150000000 americans on tip talk. average of about 90 minutes a day and how that channel could be used for propaganda purposes. right? or just information advocated by the communist party. the proposed risk information

communications technology act, also known as the restrict act, is about a lot more than tick tock. those who are concerned about civil liberties and freedom of information and property rights in the united states have some very serious concerns. among the harshest critics of the proposed law are the mrs caucus of the libertarian party. this is the assessment they gave of the restrict act, currently being discussed by the u. s. congress. the restrict act is not limited to just tick tock. it gives the government authority over all forms of communication, domestic or abroad, and grant's powers to enforce any mitigation measure to address any risk to national security now and in any potential future transaction. the law essentially enables certain us officials to declare any one person or any technology to be a national security risk. and then in doing so,

give them the access to seize everything. the bill has provisions for federal detention without due process. it also has provisions for $1000000.00 fines and the forfeit of all of the persons property, all in the name of protecting information and preventing foreign influence in the united states or foreign technology. now the bill also enables certain us officials to single out foreign adversaries. and with the approval of the president move ahead against all technology that would be essentially linked to them in any way. it's quite a big bill with a lot of provision that certainly about a lot more than 6. it's not simply about one and social media app. it has the sweeping power being given to the executive branch of the u. s. government, in order to crack down on those deems to be involved with technology or somehow a threat to the country overall. quite an extreme bill,

but the white house is supporting it even while those who believe in the american freedoms and civil liberties are raising some pretty strong objection. canada as prime minister, has failed to respond to a challenging question on the proxy war against russia. address to have faced by jealousy on the streets of mon trail while just introduce was walking around on a publicity stunt mister judah. message, you know. 2 why do you keep wrapping up the proxy war? why do you keep to got the proxy war with russia, mr. to go mr. turn? oh, you said you said more than $2000000000.00 in the service. proxy war by the end of the canadian government says it sent more than $1000000000.00 us dollars worth of military assistance. took care of since the outbreak of last year's conflict. the supplies include tanks and armored vehicles as well as how it says defense systems. anti tough weapons lie toms and can see

a non munition loss. most trudeau and non steven, more military, a pledging to keep helping key of for as long as it takes less now cross to, to eve angler, the canadian journalist and activists who grilled the prime minister video, which was still there. and many thanks for joining us. of the program this evening . what's your take on while your question to just introduce, fell on deaf is because he doesn't, he doesn't want to answer is basically humanity in our media that, that canada, pumping in tons of weapons, doing everything it can to, to support ukraine into, to fight russia. that that's just a good thing. so he hasn't really had to answer that question. and obviously he would prefer not to, not to answer the question. so he basically obviously has a big a big security team with them that was able to make it easy for him not, not to answer the question. i tell it, it has admitted to sending more than $1000000000.00 in military

a to ukraine. in your video, you mentioned more than 2000000000. why the numbers so different? on the one year anniversary of russia's invasion, a load of was my char paper, did a calculation tabulated that canada had sent $2260000000.00, canadian dollars in weapons already. and actually since then there's been a number of announcements. so i trust the newspaper more than i trust the government itself. so i think it's probably almost certainly over $2000000.00 and, and maybe more, but that's only a small part of it. i mean candidates providing intelligence, ukrainian military, you have canadian special forces on the ground. i, you have a former many former canadian soldiers that have been killed and that are fighting i consider what russia is doing, you know, illegal and brutal. but i also think that the canadian government has, has greatly contributed to the, to the roxy war,

as well as helping provoke the conflict. no more than a year ago is on the 1st time that you've tried to haggling quill officials in canada, on the credit. the other does any positive results again on the any, on since the one said no, no, they don't. they don't respond. i ask question freely no one point the the deputy prime minister, former foreign affairs minister who's a wheel hawk on this issue. i asked as to why simple, questionable, why did she doesn't support negotiations. and she got going quite, quite angry and just ignored ignore my question is likewise. similarly, the security just asked me out of the room but know the name politicians. you know, it's remarkable. i mean, somebody, even if somebody who's a strong supporter of what ken is doing in ukraine, should at least want a debate about it, but the media, the, the mainstream journalists, they don't even ask the questions. there's not really any,

any debate. it's just assumed that what candidates doing is good and the question is, should we do even more? not whether we, you know, helped in overthrowing ada code, which in 2014, not whether we undermine the mids to piece according to our operation. unifier training mission. not whether we should have, you know, opposed us moves to put more and more nuclear weapons in eastern europe. it's just to sort of assume that, you know, russia is all bad and our side is all good. and what exactly they need. so kind of what is kind of the actually getting in with him for supporting your claim with so much money and so many weapons. well, i mean, i think the arms companies always like more wars and more possibilities to deliver weapons is good to the arms companies. candidates founding the u. s. britain and canada found in nato before formerly founding 949 cameras, long been a very staunch pro nato force and, and,

and canada has, you know, if you go back to the crimean war of the mid 18 hundreds. there were canadians who fought with the british against, against russia. obviously, canadians invaded russia and early 19, you know, during world war one and just after about 6000 canadian from canada, long seen russia as a, as a geo political competitor. but i think that if you look at me in foreign policy and i looked at a foreign policy all around the world, canada is very closely aligned with washington. the canadian arms industry is completely integrated with the us arms industry. and so, canada, taking a very belligerent position and a very little cost, unlike germany or some of the central european countries, there's almost no cost for canada, right? energy prices have gone up and the, the spillover cost is much, much less than in some of the other nato. ready nato countries. so tax payment,

isn't it, do you think tax pays and vote the happy without that money is being spent? i'm well, yeah, i mean the is the polls have shown that the population is, is less supportive. it's, you know, that's just an weapons. a few $1000000000.00 more in other supports to the ukrainian government, which over $5000000000.00 in the total package over the past year. the poll show that the public is still majority behind, but the but is diminishing support. and, and, you know, if again, if you, if you've all you do is you read the dominant media, the, the portrayal is just, you know, so one side in the hall rolled at canada and us played in provoking the conflict is just kind of like, wiped out so, so if you just think that, ok, we're just doing a good deed, you know, you don't see this as like a proxy war, then you're just extending, you know, more fighting then you know, contribute $5000000000.00 might make sense. but if you look at it from, you know,

we did bunch of bad things in the lead up to about to this is the horrors that we're seeing. and we didn't need to keep, you know, kennedy, foreign minister didn't need to go to keith in january. you know, months before russia's invasion, didn't need to go there and push for nato expansion. not that was absolutely unnecessary. did you and other things we did to sort of stoke the conflict. if you don't know any of that, then you think that kind of just, you know, putting money into a good cause, in which case it might make sense. but know the public is increasingly viewing this as, as, as something they don't, they don't want to continue supporting. but i'm trying to say contest it. i really appreciate your time and your insight. canadian john, innocent activity. i'm glad that you russia and china have called a 3 day us lead from it for democracy and biased and politicized. the so called samus for democracy are clear manifestation of new colonial practices in u. s. foreign policy. behind the efforts to organize in convened them as the desire

to update and legitimize the american instruments of external control and interference in the internal affairs of silver and states. values reduce jagow. bush assured what are well, did today's not the summit for democracy, the types of confrontation and contributes nothing for the collection of response to global challenges. if you're not a conference office, all the geraghty that focuses on taking real actions to solve prominent global issues, or what we're earth the site to stop pointing fingers at all the countries to make an introspection of itself and corrected sections of violating the human rights of all the countries and undermining global democracy, i'm under the disguise of human rights and democracy in to hug and go to the summit for democracy as a platform with the declared goal of renewing democracies at home and confronting autocracy. the grows, events apply their washington dc costa. rica and south korea as well as the netherlands and zambia. despite the fact that around

a $120.00 countries are expected to attend washington's nato allies, turkey and hungary were not invited zombie and joe listened. diplomat hosting collab essays is fair to say that the summit is based on us political interests, not representing democratic countries. all along america has taken the official rule where being a global police, which is really unfortunate at the same damn, despite in such a booklet to go against us. the reports to be returned to us all democracy. we see that was on this last some it is a classic example the i agree. so i guess about global what is up in new york green . bless a korean war. i'm how interesting china just coming up where forced to live with military legal mom equally and political. so i feel this one is very fear america has no right to bliss. oh police in the country in the world. but us little

deltacare. i'm becoming more border by did, which is very unfortunate. so they left it with family. it is an offer that is here. so brilliancy of the country is not in the world class. and the reason i suppose been very fair. so i was james lewis was sick with, i think under same laws. i'm danny. i think the holly santo's, i'm been responsive. it is been free on or been he's on the respect for the award law. i'm the a sort of in a do all the country. all the countries are dealing with. it is lost all america. i'm the i saw or didn't, or like the states. let me while on march 23rd, beijing. how good 2nd international forum on democracy withholding 300 guests from either 100 countries. joining the discussions, i have a future of democracy, human rights and sustainable development. making out the event for my japanese permanent, a year kia has a yama,

accused the west of causing division in the world, and provoking a confrontation with china. was a former, it is not about days she becky told you, well, what is also worrying? is that the western countries are creating a clash of values, paid it, so send you the us, japan in the u. k. politicians talk about democracy versus authoritarianism and liberty versus dictatorship guy. however, it values such as democracy and human rights are excessively introduced into the diplomatic feel you countries with different values will be discriminated against and excluded going and the other side will take the same measures against them in the long run. it'll catch all in all the more the u. s. talks about value oriented diplomacy go, the more acute, the confrontation there will be between china in the us in corporate america, political analysts, filmmaker and screenwriter shown stone says that, but while beijing seeks to build an inclusive foreign policy for us under satellite insistent excluding countries like china and russia from the conversation, these global summits are interesting and important platforms for dialogue and

discussion. really what's missing and just in the hall and dialogue is the, is the, is the conversation across, you know, across the iowa. they say, you know, to the other party. so the fact that china is hosting countries, united states is hosting countries when in fact, we should all be dialoguing between each other. and we really want to have, you know, progress as, as a global, global human beings, right. on this planet, we really want to actually have dialogue between china and the us and russia. but that's not what's happening. so essentially, you know, china and russia are doing their own thing with, with the world and probably more of the world population. and the u. s. is obviously, you know, going forth with this idea of a global summit. really, i don't know what they're trying to achieve. us and, and europe have some serious concerns regarding the, their economies the united states has suffered in what their 2nd largest bank

collapse. i'm sure the united states is going to try to consolidate its economic power because to be honest, that's always been, i think, a greater concern than the illusion of democracy has always been the notion of economic alliance. anything for a company here or not and can i know we're back in 30 minutes with the very latest news? is that the indictment of a past president, a genuine call for justice, are politically motivated. plot i trumps adversaries all to get the former president in handcuffs and off the campaign trail. i'm going to use this addition of 360 view. we're going to give you a special inclination into the indictment of the 45th president of the united states. let's get started. ah, prosecutors at the manhattan.