Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  March 30, 2023 9:00pm-9:23pm EDT

9:00 pm
a, a a breaking news on r t a new york run jury reportedly votes to indict donald trump over a hush money, allegedly paid to an adult film star. it's the 1st time in u. s. history. the former president would face the criminal charges. also, i had on the program, moscow lumped on washington's advice for all american citizens to leave russia. thing it just fears more of it buys will get caught red handed knots after a wall street journal reporter was arrested on claims of involvement in espionage by the u. s government ramping up the rhetoric just ahead of a visit to china. the european commission president is beijing's desire for
9:01 pm
a multi quarter world. the cold shoulder will so warning that country should hold the western agenda if it once normal relations with wherever you're counting the program from today. welcome to moscow on the global news roundup. on our t we begin with breaking news. donald trump has reportedly been indicted by a grand jury in new york. the case is focused on an alleged hush money payment to a porn star. during his 2016 election campaign, mr. trump would become the 1st that former president to face criminal charges in the history of the united states will get the take on all of that from legal and media analyst lionel. later in the program,
9:02 pm
russia is foreign ministry spokeswoman has slammed. washington is the latest advice to all americans in russia to leave the country. maria is a horrible saves us. authorities are only telling the citizens that go because they fear more turn, lists engaged, and espionage will be caught. it comes after a reporter for the wall street journal was detained by russian authorities amid spying claims. please heed the u. s. government warning not to travel to russia. us citizens residing or traveling in russia should depart right away. as the state department continues to advise. i think john care be forgot to ed engaged in espionage before the word americans. it must have been said between the lines of moscow court on thursday rules to keep the wall street journal reporter behind bars for the next 2 months, pending further investigation into the case. ortiz, marina costs river has been following developments. for us. there's
9:03 pm
a lot of thrust here at the moment, waiting to catch any glimpse all of the american journalists and any time the black car behind me makes any sort of noise like right now. we believe that the american journalist is in that car right now. the black car that is deporting this courtroom, he can see there we go. and we believe that even girls school, which is now leaving the moscow court. and as we can see, there's not only lots of thrust here, but some heavy duty armed guards. and that's because earlier in the day this court received a bomb threat and had to be evacuated. this is shortly right before even getsco's actually made it here. but since then they checked everything, everything was okay. and the preceding returned back to normal. and we heard that the chief investigator asked for even girl courts to receive espionage charges. now once again, this all comes after the f as be released,
9:04 pm
the statements where they said that they detains on the american journalists in the city of you got it in book while he was receiving the secret information. now 32 year old reporter. ah, he's been working for the moscow bureau of the wall street journal. previously he worked for the moscow times. i who worked for agency france price. he was in accredited a journalist. he had an accreditation from russia's foreign ministry right now, they'll be looking into his activities here in russia were heard from all the crumb and spokesperson mitre prescott earlier said that he was caught red handed, meaning that they have the evidence to charge him. i would assume so right now will be waiting to see what the outcome is after this hearing and will no doubt, we've given you more information as soon as we have it. well, among the reaction we got to develop men said on the day was from independent journalist, mike jones and former us marine john, mark duke,
9:05 pm
and let's listen to him 1st. it's no secret, especially in this day and age that the american journalistic structure. all of them just about are working for the united states government. it really depends on what this individual was trying to get. but if you're trying to get military secrets related to like weapons, like how much they're producing or anything like this, that's very detrimental to russian security. and you know, they can't just let something like that go, unfortunately, trying to gather a secret information is not a normal thing that journalists do. i mean, they report on the ground in different countries, but in nature you're not really supposed to be going to weapons manufacturers and trying to obtain the secrets. i would expect a lot of spin on it down playing his role and why he was there,
9:06 pm
were speculating at the moment, but i wouldn't be surprised if it were to do with perhaps even the production of ammunition levels. because we know that the west is very concerned, you can't seem to ramp up their supplies. and perhaps he's trying to ascertain just how capable russian industry is. if indeed this is as it is, claim to be. again, it's another level of desperation. i feel of the u. s. in the collective west as they desperately try to scramble to gain some advantage in that huge blunder and mistake that they've made and they're desperately trying to trying to back pedal well back to our top story. the report that a grand jury in new york has voted to indict former president a donald trump on attempts that he had tried to by the silence of a porn star. mr. trump denies the allegations. well,
9:07 pm
let's get the thoughts on all this and speak to legal and media analysts, lionel, good to see you, lionel. so donald trump wouldn't come. the 1st former president, the face criminal charges in the entire history of the united states. your initial thoughts on developments. well, shocked at 1st, but let me make sure everybody understands what this is. an indictment merely means he was charged. an indictment is a formal document that is, that is delivered by a grand jury. and a grand jury needs probable cause or reasonable cause to deliver this. the best definition i ever heard was, he probably did it. it's just the 1st step, alvin brag. who was the district attorney for new york? a state level court is going to have to prove this case. now it's not that donald trump allegedly putatively pe, either hush money to someone that he had a dalliance with that is not against the law. nondisclosure agreements are,
9:08 pm
are done all the time. in fact, they are the, the bread and butter of hollywood. i mean, they're not, they're not at all risk. what they are alleging is that through some kind of of machination that this team it, that was made to stormy daniel's a former enter retainer, that this somehow subverted campaign laws. and that there were falsified records that were provided. and it gets even more labyrinthine. and i am not going to bore you because you will fall asleep. but what i'm saying is, it is one of the most convoluted and most complicated stretches for him to be brought to the, to the felony level. this is not the end of all of the charges, all of the potential investigations that president in trump is facing. but what's
9:09 pm
interesting to know now is one of the most brilliant movie arrested on tuesday, no case. and then right to day minutes ago we find out he's indicted. so none of receive. but here is the interesting question. all president there life. how can you incarcerate? so i'm jumping the gun. sure. will he have to show up and be fingerprinted? yes. will he be monkey gutted, guess? will that picture become probably the the most important mean to photo in the history of human guide? most probably it, it'll, it'll slip up. it's meant to embarrass but the but the thing in which so interesting is that what will this do to him? politically, right. many people believe that this is going to elevate him, that this will ensure that he gets, it seemed counterintuitive. but that this will guarantee him the 2024 domination because people will think that he's been through too much remains to be seen in dot is the point is and that this is a which front so that renee
9:10 pm
a verdict of guilty in my boroughs of new york in question it, it comes down to this and i find it interesting. under the laws of our country, you can be in prison. ace, we have others, i don't want to bore you with it, but there's a morrow lot. as one warrior said it he, they've crossed the rubicon, the other armed political detractors at this case. thanks. it is ridiculous. it's a waste of time and then shop. he's got a history of beating the thing else for a year or 2, and then it gave a $130000.00 thought. this cavalcade of witness is a convicted felon. 0. your lead up? it's going to be. it's going to be in credit line. all we so appreciate coming in the program and giving us your view on all that. i'm sure we'll be speaking in the near future again on any, on all developments line, all legal on media analyst on r t. thank you. thank you, sir. the european union sage relations with china are
9:11 pm
dependent on the country stance in the ukrainian conflict, suggesting beijing should follow the western lead agenda. however, that does not fit with the principles of a multi polar world order that china is pushing for something that's concerning brussels. any piece plan which would in effect consolidate russian annexations is simply not a viable plan. we have to be frank on this point ho. china continues to interact with proteins. war will be a determining factor for each china relations. going follow it while lookout china, the unelected queen of europe. ursula vander line, and the self appointed hall monitor for the global school yard is telling you that she and europe are going to be watching you while you hang out with russia,
9:12 pm
which it considers to be a bad influence on you. and just might decide to punish you if she doesn't like what she sees. and he's coming over to beijing next week with everyone's teachers, pet french president, a menu. and michael, and what you going to do, he's going to go over there and weigh your finger in chinese president. she's in pings face. father, mine said that china was becoming more repressive at home and more assertive abroad, as she runs over to china, to assert herself on behalf of the e. u. in the wake of an entire winter during which she and european leaders are cracking down european shower time. no, that's not repressive at all. it's the kind of rhetoric that we've seen all over the mainstream western press talk about china preparing for war. even though it's the us that's been doing pretty much everything, it actively can to gin up tensions between china and taiwan. particularity within the context of the conflict in ukraine,
9:13 pm
in which ukrainians are pretty much playing the role against russia on behalf of western interests. that tie, one would be playing for them against china in the event that a conflict ever went hot and popped off. and there's been no war since all of these kinds of headlines have started appearing back in 2020, at the very latest, but constant talking about war is and china and it's just been ongoing in most telling of underlines, said we're president. she's parting words to russian president vladimir putin on the steps outside the when, when he said right now there are changes the likes of which we haven't seen for a 100 years. and we are the, was driving these changes together, chinese communist parties. the a goal is a systemic change of the international order with china at its center. we have seen it with china's positions in multilateral bodies which show its
9:14 pm
determination to promote an alternative vision of the world order. and we have seen the show of friendship in moscow, which says a 1000 words about this new vision for an international order. okay, so she singled those words out. you can off to wonder why she, so bothered by the prospect of multi polarity, which is essentially what the 2 men were talking about. perhaps because the risks losing its clout in a multi poll overall in which the u. s. doesn't run the show with europe riding shotgun, in which case you think wagner line would have eased up on the threats like the one she made to reassess the massive trade deal. the e. china comprehensive trade agreement on investment ratified in 2020. but what it was then frozen is when he's, when he won after brussels in beijing sanctioned each other's officials. still were
9:15 pm
talking about the use largest trading partner in a time when it's still paying a really high price. and of course, the citizens, especially from cutting itself off from its top provider of cheap energy, which would be russia. so wagner line also sounded during this, talk that to fi the last few years, totally publicly bad mo thing. the host, our relationship with china is one anywhere in the world. and how we manage it on black or white. chris with china, brussels basic, it is emerging from brussels interests of europe to achieve peace in ukraine as soon as possible because of the economic damage being inflicted on the continent through its own sanctions on moscow. initially, nato was created as an alliance. the purpose of which was to protect the member states from armed conflicts on their territory. now, nato is participating in the united states game using ukraine as
9:16 pm
a puppet. in reality, it is not in the interests of the european union to support the continuation of the ukrainian conflict and the sanctions regime against russia. however, many you politicians want to escalate conflict rhetoric. well, german of the german console for constitution and sovereignty grouping. ralph t ne meyer believes europeans are growing increasingly concerned about their economies with the sanctions against russia, largely having the opposite thing. you know, since that time that we are suffering from the gas prices from the energy crisis away, economies are suffering. we lose jobs, we have a high inflation that is due appropriating people directly. so this was the time that people say, they don't want to support ukraine anymore as much as they used to do. and more than half of the population says already, no arms please do more diplomatic steps. on the 5th of december 2022 to you
9:17 pm
commission, anti german government had said that during bar pipeline, that us getting us oil from iraq from russia will be shot on the 1st of january 2023. now, do you commission when to cause us time to negotiate that they deliver oil that we are electric now from rushing supplies since the 1st of january. and this was commencing, they said on the 1st of april and about 3 days. now that last talk that russia would consider that to stop that because they can, because it was about pipeline network is owned by russian state companies. they controlled company and they could of course say no. so i bagged the crap isn't actually in my position as an oppositional leader. i said please let state oil from cover stand through your pipelines because our economy cannot have that. and i know
9:18 pm
that mr. charlotte system that books because he said he would arrest mr. newton, if you've ever come to germany in order, you know, we have to put this rhetoric aside and find pragmatic solutions. and of course, lift the sanctions because the only damaging us less russia lawmakers in the us are pressing the biden administration to investigate israel's use of american weapons. as criticism grows over scenes of violence involving palestinians, and the actions of the new right wing is really government. we urge immediate action to prevent the further loss of israeli and palestinian lives. we call on your administration to ensure that all future foreign assistance to israel, including weapons and equipment, is not used in support of gross violations of human rights, including by strengthening end use, monitoring and financial tracking. the letter signed by 10 democrats, criticized as the israeli government, and several, a cabinet members, particularly the national security and finance ministers. the list of concerns
9:19 pm
include an escalation and violence, the killing of both palestinians on this release, westbank settlement expansion, unused u. s. weapons in human rights violation for 2023, congress appropriated $3800000000.00 in aid to israel. the defense were this year got off to a particularly deadly start with more than $85.00 palestinians killed since january, including 16 children or last year was the deadliest for those in the west bank since 2004 co director of the international action center, a think tank sorry. flood leaves. washington news exactly how they weapons it sends to israel are being used. i know exactly what those weapons are doing. they're intended to kill palestinian people. it's not a surprise. it's not o g. we lost sight of a few guns. a know the from the very beginning,
9:20 pm
that's what the weapons are intended to do. and that is very much what they achieve . so it's what the bombs are meant to do that bring down entire apartment complexes it's, it's what the weapons that kill children are meant to do whether on the west bank and gaza, or within the existing borders of israel to day. they're meant as repression against the palestinian people, and they're also meant for war on the surrounding countries as we see it. so they don't lose sight of these weapons. they know what they're doing and they're doing what they're intended to do. they'll wanna share this with you as spokesman for the un secretary general appeared somewhat puzzled this week. but whether the u. s. has a military presence in syria. the confusion came to light in an exchange with a reporter from the c g t in news that we're at this. what's the, what's the difference is related to it and syria is no patricia in syria and the
9:21 pm
situation. you're crying, there's no us armed forces inside of syria. and so i'd, as i don't have a, it's not a herald situation. you're sure there's no, there's no u. s. u. s. military personnel. i, i believe this military activity. yeah. but a but a but in terms of ground presence in syria, i'm not aware of that. okay. 5 us service members were injured in that attack. if there's no, there were no us soldier service members in syria. how could they got injured? but that's weird, right? should i ask? well, it all comes after american military base in syria was attacked earlier this month . the mascot sounds accused the us of stealing the country's oil under the galleys of a supposed anti terrorism operation. washington, which is believed to have had forces in syria for nearly a decade, has openly call for regime change in the country stevens. so we need
9:22 pm
a journalist in syria is of the view america has taken the u. n. hostage, american appearance in the area. yes, it is illegal in any country if the government of the country and the leader of the country asked for help from an some states that cow syria did with iran, syria, the russia, that is legal appearance that is held from one prince to another friendly country but the united states came in due to syria and occupied that he's still, celia. we are all of the you will, the gas will, and the week of syria and are harvesting them and pumping the oil and gas, stealing them and giving it and, and using that money to fund the kurdish militia separate this want to separate and get a few yes and to pieces, and that is why, why? because they want to keep damascus week. does it give the student government and
9:23 pm
who's the president of a doctor, but i thought there was this week. why do they want this week? because he's outside the united states and he doesn't go under the orders of the united.
9:24 pm

20 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on