terms of making the world more secure in eradicating the nuclear threat, as well as a contradictory signal to the states that do not have nuclear weapons had planted. and more than anything this trend towards the making it nuclear weapons acceptable and exhibition of force acceptable is dangerous for humankind. recent history speaks of itself of the ravages of this category of weapons whose horrible consequences are irreparable. my country will never, never support the user, the threat of the use of nuclear weapons or any weapon of mass destruction. we like to reiterate our opposition to this absurd war, who that has lasted for much too long after 13 months of destructive and murderous fighting. this council must be a lot in the epicenter of new ideas on the way to do live in the to find a solution to it on possible possibilities of negotiation are on an engagement by

the parties to silence the weapons and bring peace to security to ukraine. my country recalls the belligerents 0 to remind them to respect international humanitarian law and refrain from any excessive action that could make the war last longer. it is unacceptable to continue increasing the suffering and death and to go into it and to threaten with destruction. channels of diplomacy must replace these of brutal force and peaceful coexistence should prevail. thank you all got long for the state management. i now gave the full to the representative of china. mister president morgan to begin with. i wish to thank. i represent her, the luck of mitchell for her briefing, who is nuclear weapons and others,

florida america? democrats hanging over our heads and wonder who china's position on the issue of nuclear weapons has been clear and consistent from new york, who sees its 1st day in possession of nuclear weapons in china, has firmly committed to a defensive nuclear stress intruder and civil oh no the pleasure to no 1st use of nuclear weapons at any time and under any circumstances from china has also clearly committed unconditionally not to use or to use nuclear weapons against no, no come up and states or nuclear weapon freeze on through water. read china is the only nuclear weapons state to have made these pledges. along golden china attackers going importers to the status of the treaty on the non proliferation of nuclear weapons. as the cornerstone international nuclear, disarmament and nuclear nonproliferation firmly opposed the authority effectiveness

and the universal nature of the treaty. and advocates, a step by step approach to vanish than yoko. ms. hammond says flood who you venture complete, ben and the total elimination of nuclear weapons. we call for the abolition of the nuclear sharing arrangement. and at what kate do know, a deployment out yoko weapons abroad by all nuclear weapons states and the withdraw of nuclear weapons deployed abroad. sagal, whose mil to trust and cooperation mom made a conscious ins are the fundamental guarantee for maintaining global strategic stability in january last year at the leaders of the 5 nuclear weapons states issue . the adroit statement emphasizing that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought, and a reaffirms that none of the nuclear weapons are targeted at each other or, and in any other state. against the backdrop of the current taste relations among

the nuclear weapon states, the special significance of this historic statement is all the more prominent toil from china horse on, or nuclear weapons lead to our bite by the vision of the statement which effectively reduce the risk cobra nuclear war and avoid any on conflict between nuclear weapons states. susan, mister president, hoover, that will turn his position on the ukrainian shoe is also clear and consistent with not long ago, china issued a paper on china's position on the political settlement up there. you'll create your current crisis, which comprehensively laid out china's position and propositions. they include as bags regarding opposing, armed my tags against nuclear power plants or other piece one your career facilities, emphasizing that nuclear weapons must not be used and nuclear war must not be full of that the threat or use of nuclear weapons should be opposed and that new crippled operation must be prevented, and yoko crisis avoided who didn't parking

a series of recent events, have once again proved that the resumption of dialogue and negotiation and the promotion of a political settlement should happen sooner rather than later. all parties must stay rational and emphasized restraint. avoid aggravating tensions in terms of supply in terms of buying frictions or vending the flames the firm, and stop or actions that contribute to prolonging the war and prevent the crisis one deteriorating further. or you been spiraling out of control. who, you know, from the international community should have a heightened sense of urgency to promote talks for peace and create conditions for the early resumption of negotiations. china will continue to play a constructive role when you're in seeking a ceasefire to end the conflict, easing the crises and restoring peace. thank you mister president. i representative of china for their statement. i now give

the call to representative of mortal thank you president. somebody with bank or just one of the comments from china or you and representative there as you and as meeting of course, in new york to discuss the possibility of russian nuclear weapons being positioned on beller, russian territory. one of the comments right there from the chinese rep saying that the global community needs to be talking piece for ukraine and not further prolonging the conflict by pumping more weapons into that country. more details about that right now at odd c dot com for now, the former us president donald trump says he faces the worst politically motivated to which one to the nation's history. that the manhattan district attorney secured criminal charges against. this is political persecution and election interference at the highest level in history. the democrats have lied, cheated, and stolen in their obsession with trying to get trump. but now they've done the unthinkable inviting

a completely innocent person in an act of blayton election interference. orient, i think, is related to suspected hush money allegedly paid to a former poem, start and stop leaks that could have damaged trumps 2016 presidential bid. a trump denies any wrong doing either expected to appear on court on tuesday, ultimately making him the 1st former us president to face criminal prospective peace initiatives and proposed in concluding gunnery. our firms a deep commitment to the sovereignty, bullets kind dependence enter integrity of increase. we reach rate also the directive people of craig and offer them our support for hope for peace efforts. i think so in the vicinity of ghana for the statement, i'll give the floor to russian federation a president with thank the hi representative is

a mean. i mean, so for her briefing today we've heard a number of critical observations against our country. the general logic of our former western part of this year to logic is that russia is responsible for all the ills or today's world when i was surprised by that. but we're talking about serious matters. it matters that they're on the security of our entire planet. but we so allow us to provide some explanations of who is truly supposing a threat to peace and stability. new. incidentally, we were only struck by the reference to atlanta. you cannot go with the chief of staff of delaware united cabinet bellis, a so called leader of democratic forces, the bellows, the give people so that we could just use the same success point to the opinion of

go, i don't or go to a we believe that would be no less authoritative in this home. a prison in recent years have seen the global security architecture subject to serious erosion logically brings what again under u. s. initiative and the initiative of their allies, those that proclaim themselves to be the victors in the cold war, the process of the destruction of dismantling mantle and other key arms control agreements and competence building structures. this process was systematic and consistent, and it was not provoked by any acts by our country. these steps were dictated exclusively by the aspirations of the u. s. to cement their own geopolitical domination, and to stand in the way of the object, a process of emergence of a multi polar world look at whatever multi polar world bird with the way we

would confirm that a nuclear war cannot be one of the music. this was an and shrine to the joint declarations of the leaders of the u. s. ad russia look up when a pool. however, we wish to recall who the of the go trends was to sort of toward the fate of the strategic stability agreements with 2003 in little saw washington take a unilateral step with abrogated these soviet american abn. treating the language in a similar fate do you was prepared for other critical strategic agreements with in 2019. it was the us precisely that who the withdrew withdrew from the i n f treaty . i need to go through and it wasn't russia as mendacious. lee was mendacious, we asserted by the representative of the us, would need me to leave. you go with him and then you know, look at these statements from that time so that they leave no doubt about the about who was the initiator of the withdrawal of the i. enough of with the u. s. has

forgotten about that and we can remind them consistent with steps up and rules and about who was the initiator of the district. so that agreement just leave a simple washington set of course to destroy the open skies treaty as well with this course, culminated in the unilateral withdrawal from the treaty by the us in 2020 in the u . s. has been consistent in violating the provisions of the treaty on the, for the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive weapons. so you started treating and never go to russia, decided to suspend the treaty on the 21st of february this year. they also did a washington what it was was not stopped from undermining the critical agreements on the iranian nuclear program. but even by resolution 2231 that resolution supported the j c p o n and the u. s. withdrew from the j. c. p. away in 2018

unilaterally little who as for international agreements on the nonproliferation of w. n. d 's, we wish to recall that the u. s. refused to ratify the c t b to you. and it has yet to implement its commitments under the c w. c. it is also blocking the strengthening of the b w. c. regime blocking the adoption of legally binding pro, a legally binding protocol and effective verification measured with measures. i'll turn out to the european continent, the good news. what happened back in early, in the early 2, thousands, the u. s. refused to gratify the agreement on the adaptation of the conventional forces in europe, the agreement, the c a v. in so doing the u. s. destroyed the foundation of common european security and predictability in the military domain. will recall what happened in 1999. we'll up with that year so the signing of the charter for european security that shorter enshrined the principal indivisible security and found it can that meant not to strengthen one's own security at the expense of others of makeup of

him. however, that was the ensuing expansion of nato to the west and the extension of the naval or been to eastern european countries. all these steps effectively buried that principle. finally, we wish to recall to those present what happened in 2021 for me to go. in that year we initiated a russian american comprehensive dialogue on strategic stability. in the course of that dialogue, we proposed consideration of all the security issues. we suppose setting out possible avenues for regulating these issues to political and diplomatic means including arms control mechanisms. luckily, however, our proposals on this front were rejected by the americans with a similar fate befell with the russian proposals about the establishment that the european security architecture in full compliance with the principles affirmed in the os senior leader,

there were revolutions by western politicians. they said that they were never even planning to engage in partnership with our country on equal footing. those revelations clearly indicate the true nature of the promises they gave at that time to the president. as for the objective reasons for the convening of today's meeting, especially the convening on the initiative of the us, we see no such reasons. russia in the ninety's undertook of all possible efforts to withdraw nuclear weapons from the countries of the former ussr and to bring them on to our territory time. and again, we called upon the americans to follow suit up those up, namely, to refuse to set aside the cold war mentality and to return all nuclear weapons of the u. s. to the u. s. is national territory and a true spoken 3rd review. incidentally, this is also said in a joint declaration of the leaders of russia and china, the one that was so avidly cited by other speakers in the song. we also called upon

us to eliminate the relevant infrastructure in europe. and to start with a practice that has continued for many years, a practice that has violated the n p t in the u. s. and other, remember, states violated in and talking about the joint nuclear sharing missions with public has said that this practice is at odds with the letter and spirit of the nuclear nonproliferation of, of the in p t. and we call upon data countries to bring their policies into line with the commitments they had undertaken. we recall that pursuant to article one of the n p t, it's members states the nuclear weapons states that is undertaken not to transfer to anyone whatsoever nuclear weapons or any other nuclear explosive devices or, and also not to provide the control over central weapons or explicit devices to anyone either directly or indirectly in turned on nuclear weapons states pursuant to article 2 of the truly that kind of took that to accept from any one such control either directly or indirectly,

which in turn we're pursuing cooperation with bellows 1st, we're doing so without violating our international obligations with regard to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons president couldn't, wasn't clear about the fact that we are not transferring nuclear weapons. we're talking about the transfer him to bellow, bruce operational tactical missile complexes. iskander in missiles that we're talking about, the retrofitting of airplanes of the bell russian forwards and the u. d. training of teams in the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory bellingers . and this will all be under russian control of your diversity under various estimates in the context of cooperation of nato countries. in europe, the, in the nuclear around there might already be deployed around $100.00 to $150.00 american tactical nuclear farms. and the modernization of the stockpiles and the potential delivery systems of nuclear weapons are only gathering,

stinging the exact locations of the american nuclear weapons. have not been unveiled, but there are some reports that they're deployed in the netherlands, some belgium and italy, germany and turkey. luggage is food. however, we must remember the heritage of the cold water running when she was such a storage facilities are deployed on the territory of other states. for example, in greece was new. in recent years we've heard cause to run the geography of the storage, the american nuclear weapons in europe to send them to the areas adjoining allied countries of a russian feller. as we recall in october, there was a statement public statement by the leadership of poland that the agreement was being reached about the participation of that is laden with nuclear, showing mission president against the backdrop of the openly declared aspirations band needed to deal russia in strategic defeat, it is clear that these acts require that we take all requisite measures in that

response that includes in the military and severe we need to do so in order to ensure the security of the allied states of russian sellers. this is precisely the world, the very asking aimed at with measures taken by russia's president. that was so scary to that. it was only to give his machine and his western backers. or were you really thinking that we weren't going to respond to lead to provocative and aggressive steps? the concerns about global stability from the western states seemed quite hypocritical, against the backdrop of their provocative steps taken outside of europe. many questions that come to late, not only because we're not the elements of these questions, but other states, have them to the questions that arise due to the us, great britain and australia partnership known as arca, cindy and how to plants to build nuclear submarines with time and again, the creation of this blog on the whole is still contentions. it is undermining effort to maintain peace and stability in the asia pacific region. it is laying the

groundwork for the beginning of a new spiral of an arbitrator to leave some of the americans in their allies as we are aware of a never been stopped by such considerations, they're worried only about preserving their own geopolitical supremacy. of course, this supremacy has stab surprising us a long time ago. the training crisis clearly demonstrates that the other, the interests of ukrainians themselves have never been taken into consideration by the west is one egregious example. a recent example on the decision by london to provide to key of armor piercing around with depleted uranium and we know very well about this severe repercussions of the use of these toxic ammunitions for areas where there used fully meters given this to be with the victims of the invasion of western states and yugoslavia and iraq had felt the full brunt of these repercussions and the others repercussions continued to reverberate. so as to this date, it would seem that the key of machine but supposedly cared so much on ordinary ukrainians,

should have space to bleed refusal such a.