politics, however, bivens nato proxy war in ukraine against russia is turning into an exception. as long as it takes end blank checks are not going down well with the g o p base. can republicans afford to continue to support in 5 minutes war? with the united states is main, just the main initiate of anti russia, almost 8 foreign policy, a single episode rejecting the neo colonial recognizes. and had you been with las go laid out it new foreign policy priorities, branding, western actions against russia, hybrid war, foreign minister, left off the country won't isolated and is ready for dialogue and in multi owner reality. also ahead on the program this, our saudi arabia agrees to join the shanghai cooperation organization as

a dialogue that comes in a recent strengthening of ties between beijing. i'm, we add on moscow say the decision to station some of its nuclear weapons in neighboring valid route is a direct response to nato's expansion of atomic arms on territories close to russian. this is exactly the area that the measures taken by the president of russia is and which has so friday, sent these a length ubri team and it's west and spawns is or did here seriously thing that we would not react in your provocative statements and action with just a few moments into a brand new day. i'm not here in moscow. saturday, the 1st of april. my name is unit o'neil, and this is art international. washington is the main initiator of anti

russian policy. bounce the message from moscow. as the kremlin lays out, it's new foreign policy doctrine for the coming years. the country's top diplomat, sir, gala ralph also said russia is determined to build stronger relations with the developing world glowing them in you serve that a little bit you grow might be 90 states is named as the main initiative antique russian policy in general. the west policy of weakening russia is called a hybrid war. the new site of whom you foreign policy concept will assumes an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices and head human isn't glimpse. of course is being set for a strategic partnership with our great ne bisman china, india and countries of the islamic world. the latin american countries limited countries of africa and countries of southwest asia. america limited as well. yeah, there earlier in the day or correspond marina cost for a broke down some of the main points of that doctrine. the updated foreign policy concept has some 76 points. we won't go through them all. but just to give me just

the of things. basically it's all about, as they says in the document, abandoning the dominance of the united states and working on strengthening corporation with other countries to make sure that this is a more type. hola, world, something that we've been hearing about rory for a couple of months. but this is now really cemented the selling the documentary decree that was signed by vladimir putin and what it states here is, for example, we've seen that the u. s. is the main source or say of this, and so russia policy and the document urge as other countries, for example, to abandon the answer russia policy one and also to get a greater independence from the united states. and russia for its part is planning to help developing countries, for example, to play a greater role in the global economic affairs through our, the roches friends. we're talking about china, india, africa. it states that in the com and document as well, that islamic civilization, it's always seen in russia as friendly and they will continue to work on it. and

the key point here, every time that we're talking about a corporation with another country, it's all about to be in the mutually beneficial. so they are benefits not only of russia, but the other country that we're talking about and make sure that this is a multi polar world where the interest not only of the united states and the west are being observed, but also all these other countries. and so that these other countries play a bigger role and we're not talking about the monopoly or the head to money that we've heard from the west. and it's allies. of course, one of the things that we put in was saying was that the global economy is going through serious changes, switching to new centers of power for the new multi polar world order food and saying this is a key trend. it is a key trend and also in this document, it does say it does face that there will, of course, is fine to break apart certain partnerships that russia is form and now with these other countries and that will work on eliminates in that. and when it sees

something interference happening, it will act and respond also that there will be tackling, in terms of a humanitarian policies abroad. the priorities are bruce, a phobia, we've seen how much that's changed, especially since the special military operation began percents and the russian language russian culture were sports. they're trying to cancel anything russian that seems now in europe and, and around the world. flower off the foreign minister keeps playing host to all these other for a minute. does a keep rushing to moscow and if they're not rushing to moscow, marina, they're going to beijing for example, next week macro. the teacher's pet is going to beijing with osalla vandella and i, so i assume they're going there with their cap in hand because they know the multi polar world is already departing. exactly, said will be interesting to see what they achieve. if anything, when they go to beijing m, what happens there? but also again, just to return to this updated foreign policy concept in it. the 1st point actually does states in the very beginning that russia does not see itself as an enemy of

the west. it does not want to isolate the self from the west. be me. but the sheer yuki was much, you know, so isolating ourselves from the west. we have no initially hostile engines towards them before they must understand the interaction with russia is possible with the rejection of confrontation. so accept the reality that this is the common them all type paula world. they can no longer deny it. and what they're trying to do is to make sure that they don't hurt other countries while they're trying to hang on to that dominance, because russia will no longer allow it, china will no longer allow it. there are other countries, bigger power houses in the world data already and they're coming together. they just flip back to willow, week or so ago when the chinese president came to moscow. and as he was leaving po, invoice is one thing that he said were witnessing the biggest changes in a 100. yes. and you and me are driving these changes from vladimir putin simply said, i agree. yeah. and they're not the only ones saying this,

everyone is aware of this, nothing. this is why they are so concerned in the west, because this is a power house union that we're seeing them. well, among the reaction we got to the, the new doctrine was from jackie. shun, do a political analyst in south africa who believes not as russia expands ties with the global south. in particular, it makes the long dominant west uncomfortable says the collapse. so did you watch for a wide variety of reasons? russia has not had that central, no expression in prisons, in world change and for too long for you to west in particular, united states and pretty much a we have enjoy. so i was, you know, put on there is a realization, certain definitely in africa that, that was sick and tired of hearing all these negative things on russia,

which didn't really have no basis in truth and reality. africa has experienced russia and china in terms of mutual respect, mutual benefit, mutual dignity, more often than not. we've experienced the west as this big monster that an imposed look. so that dictates. and that gives ultimate comes. saudi arabia has agreed to join the shanghai cooperation organization of the dialogue partner. the move comes amid the strengthening of ties be tween ria invasion, not a saudi cabinet session approved the decision earlier. china, you may have noticed, has been fostering allies in the middle east country u. s. and recently brokering an agreement between re out under rum, revive. there are diplomatic relations. additionally, the saudi state energy company,

aramco has in 2 major deals are facing on or cooperation. for earlier, my colleague rory sou shade, discuss the saudi reaction to joining the s c o plus the dollars place in the world today with retired commodore in this saudi arabian navy abdullatif our team so that it is joining, it's a not, not, not to for a membership, so now let, let some things the, the importance of saudi arabia, saudi arabia is doing all these things. a sort of verse of why the income, the relation on the whole or disease is full of to come security. which means that that would cover whatever. but i don't think it's abandoning the united states because the united states was a total as the number one he's on the whole world. and one very,

very important point is that it's china did he to the home was as willing because he was, is pretty big responsibility. and this is very, very big burden and, and china, i need to do our last regarding how they been hands to the outside world. but leading, leading that well, mr. m. okay. my mainly i like how you said that, but you're saying china is not ready to lead the world like america is. but america, sorry to say is a war mongering nation. look at all the countries that america has invaded over how many decades and you're telling me that china is not ready to leave the world. well, i'm not, i'm not here to get to sort of one, but i don't. that is, it is china ready to take the response of the responsibility of the whole world. the united states is many powerful economy and culture, education, innovation, and technology. so there's a, something b and also note that the,

even the chinese currency is likely tied up by a price to the us dollar dollar. it's being slowly pushed out by members of the s c o, the bricks, the assay, and the global stuff. how can you tell me, how can you tell me that the dollar will be king forever? it's already fading around the world. people are pushing it out. there is nothing really, you know, economy is one of the water, the economy at the time when the populations, 5 percent, as i said, whether you agree with us politics or disagree with them like them. don't want them until today. we've been hearing since the 70s, about the diminishing done, and there's going to be a nice yes. so the area is something more and more with that. but that doesn't mean that we are going to all of a sudden with a push button. disregard of the the start to get deep relation with united

states. now rushes ambassador to the un has called for the withdrawal of all american made nuclear weapons from non us territories. he also stated moscow cannot sit idle in the face of a growing number of nato allies conducting nuclear weapon drills. it should do it so doable. rushing in the ninety's took all measures to withdraw nuclear weapons from the territory of the former usaa. we urged americans to do the same, to abandon the thinking of the cold period to return all us nuclear weapons to the territory of the united states. and we also called for the elimination of the relevant infrastructure in europe and the cessation of the practice of the united states and nato through, by conducting nuclear missions. the practice is incompatible with neither the lesson nor the spirit of the non proliferation treaty. we have asked nato to bring

it in policy in line with its accepted commitments. the modernization of these huge reserves is only gaining momentum. us weapons are deployed in the netherlands, germany, research and other nato countries. recall that poland are also agreed to participate in joint nuclear exercises. this is exactly the area that the measures taken by the president of russia are aimed at the one. and which has so frightened these lensky regime and it's west and sponsors. or did you seriously think that we would not react to your provocative statements and actions the 15 member body that leads the united nations, assembled to discuss the issue of tactical nuclear weapons being deployed by russia in bel groups and galleries, and bring to host those tactical nuclear weapons, now, many us aligned countries used this meeting as an opportunity to simply attack rata

to blame afore the conflict in the brain, to a huge rush of various things that we've seen throughout western media over the past months. however, when russia talked to the floor, they pointed out something that many countries have failed to acknowledge in western media has worked to just simply not mention which is that the united states has been riding and getting rid of clear agreements. and he went over in detail all the withdrawals of nuclear agreements that we've seen from the united states from there. and he went on to highlight how you asked policy one as been aimed at trying to dictate and control other countries and escalate tensions around the world. here's what we heard from russian ambassador and had been zia zeppelin. his throne of the chemicals, western countries are simply trying to impose their own rules on the rest of the world. beneficial only to them in order to then demand this strict compliance from

other states. they themselves, of course, do not consider themselves bound by any obligations, such inherently neo colonial attitudes are aimed at ensuring the prosperity of the so called golden 1000000000 at any cost. neither. we know our colleagues from developing countries can be misled, and he. busy more a representative of bell roost gave a strong rebuke to the western critics of their partnership with russia. here's what he had to say. moving of the growth we have repeatedly said. we will repeated here that you should not meddle in our domestic affairs. and you should deal with your own countries in real human rights problems, life and dignity, health, security. and you shouldn't even attempt to find out about the desires of the bell russian people. when the bell, russian, people are taking important domestic decisions in the country. you have no idea of what the bell russian people really thinking as we invite all the citizens and taxpayers to take an interest in what their own countries are doing. just the

apparent hypocrisy of the united states in demanding that russia not be able to deploy tactical nuclear weapons to bela roost. while the united states and its allies have nuclear weapons that was made clear by the remark, buying the band via before the council. china also called for the escalation particular in regard to nuclear weapons and also emphasizing the need for a resolution of the conflict in your brain or negotiations. take like overall meeting highlighted very big differences between major countries represented on the council. when it comes their interpretation of world of that russia made clear that the united states is acting in a way that is provoking conflict rather than seeking resolution. and not really enforcing any of this rhetoric we hear about a rules based global order. well, despite russia is concerns about nato expansion. the block set to get even larger.

the turkish parliament has decided to not back finland, sped, to join the alliance after uncle, his initial opposition to him. with i welcome to vote of the grand national assembly of tortilla to complete the recertification of finland, succession. this will make the whole nature family stronger unsafe her. hey, i remember that all tagline from former vice presidential us candidate says sarah palin and alaska governor sarah palin. she said famously, i can see russia from my house that should be nato's tagline. so finland now is joining nato. it adds another 1300 kilometers to the western military alliance is border with russia. at this point, it's kind of like some guy at a party getting within 3 inches of your face and insisting that because he's not actually touching you, he's just breathing in your face that he's respecting your personal space. now we keep hearing from nato officials and western leaders that nato was a defensive alliance,

purely and strictly. but at what point does this endless encroachment just become offensive, particularly when there's entire hazel that is to target russia and that it's become really bold in acting unilaterally on its own and circumventing the united nations security council when it comes to bombing other countries that don't adhere to the western agenda like for example, serbia and livia, just to name a couple, one member of the hungarian national assembly expressed concerns today about what sin wins, inclusion could mean for peace and stability. if finland joins native, this will increase the possibility of an escalation, as well as the risk of a direct armed conflict between a native member state and russia. nato is participating in a game that the u. s. is playing beyond the borders of the alliance. the u. s is using crane as a puppet. in reality, it's not in the interest of the e. u to support the ukrainian conflict and the sanction regime against russia.

however, there is a bloodthirsty atmosphere of war among e, you politicians, finland being a member of the european union has also recently joined the chorus of western voices rationing up the. busy for wars rhetoric against russia, and that's a new position for europe actually, which over the past few decades hasn't always blindly cited with washington for her french president, jacques chirac and german chancellor. gerhard schroeder, allied with russian president vladimir putin against the u. s. invasion of iraq, for example, and that was at a time when washington was looking to build it so called coalition of the willing. and that descent is actually what kept europe out of that particular quagmire to the economic and other benefit of the entire block. and people of europe today though, where's the voice of reason in europe? well hungarian prime minister, victor r bon,

is still trying to draw attention to the fact that europe's role as a peacemaker has pretty much gone out the window with the conference in ukraine. the ones that the number of countries supporting peace instead of war has not increased at all. people want peace while you leaders are taking a pro war stance for them. the main issue continues to be deciding which weapons to send to ukraine. it is slowly becoming a legitimate question among e u. leaders, whether e u. member states could send peacekeeping troops to ukraine in some form. not only as the e u, abdicating its role of honest broker or mediator between the west and the east. but it's joining washington and conveniently, exploiting the conflict in ukraine in which it keeps saying that it isn't directly involved to write a blank check for its own military industrial complex. as suggested recently by the blocks chief diplomat, yoseph bro,

europeans have reduced investments in the defense industry over the past 20 years. but due to the radically shifted security environment, we need to increase that again. specifically, we want to deliver a 1000000 artillery shells to ukraine. within a year. we are providing a total of $2000000000.00 euros for this. as part of the european piece facility with a reimbursement rate of 50 to 60 percent, we can allocate around $4000000000.00 euros with this new package. yeah, well it's now part marshall of creating problem that now has to conveniently ramp up the defense spending for. well, i guess if you cut yourself off from cheap energy with sanctions as europe did with russian gas in your industry, is suffering or bailing to the united states. then transferring a whole lot of taxpayer cash to ramp up weapons production will have to do. it's kind of like you losing your day job and then just deciding that, hey, you can be a drug dealer instead. knowing how easily europe was willing to follow along with

washington's project of militarize in the ukranian border with russia under the guise at the mix. peace accords, the operative word there being peace. any new nato expansion along russia's border with in europe isn't exactly comforting for the future of european p security or stability. ah, the 2nd annual global democracy summit designed to promote free fur. i'm transparent elections as the foundation of democratic governance. that's the title anyway. has run into a spot of turbulence. it's after attendees from africa expressing on willingness to have values that imposed on them up the u. s. government sponsored events said just that what we are against is the interference from any direction, whether from the western world or anywhere else with old like jews, the pipeline of democracy,

to we pause certain values on the african people. if this continues out, there will be a huge divorce of africa, nations from the pipeline of democracy. as we note we therefore, i little challenge the western world to respect the cultural, religious, christian, and social values of zambia. if we are going to continue being strong partners as we've been over the years, ah, we must be respected as it country, just like the islamic nations. i've been respected by the west and they don't discuss issues of eligibility q there with them. la virtual some, it's being held under the banner, renewing democracies at home and confronting autocracies abroad. it's being jointly hosted by the u. s. costa rica, the netherlands, south korea and zambian to discuss the quote challenges and opportunities facing democracies in the 21st century. when the u. s. as long criticized african

countries for their stance on a number of issues. on tuesday, vice president carmella horace called a new anti l. g. b t. bill being considered in ghana on democratic during a visit there, the nations parliament speaker said the v p had no right to lecture another state on its affairs. what is democrat that somebody else will have to dictate to me at what is good and what is back on head. because we have decided to devalue out there and go a begging come on. we have more than enough. what has good that, what enough for every person he get was looking at somebody else. shame not, not we have enough in there where it bill will be. ha

ha, specialist on african a 1st chip be symphony believes countries can define the meaning of democracy's inverting ways. it would be in that way, they define their democracy. so it's wrong before we even goodness against the way they define democracy is highly, highly questionable. and not on the way the tools do you find to define it to. so yeah, into this america is a lot, it's going to do given to about the values of democracy. what are the ha, a similar sort of democracy, easy directed to you, but it's just been super quoted. it has been really bad case. it has been globalized and imposed on other countries. i'm, i would assume w and that city for other countries to follow it wrong, randal to walk. lassie nodded it, dixon definitional, what could i see?

this should give it another man to say, maybe a miracle democracy. maybe one those times. not the way we other countries understand democracy. i think that's where the problem is. what different values won't different effects while different beliefs to all different histories. while the u. s, vice president has no arrived in zambia, she continues her week long tour of africa. the trips designed to strengthen washington ties and influence in the region. kimler har started her trip on sunday in gamma before flying to tons and near mid week where she met the country's president. horace is the lead, his top us official to visit african recent times with the country making a renewed effort to strengthen its presence on the continent and counter russian and chinese influence in the region of political analysts should be there and fully again isn't convinced. washington renewed interest will bear fruit. it's

activities we have seen historically as been one of them interfere us. you can see the hand of america militarily being very anti democratic. if i put it does way. so they're, they're coming in to africa now with this channel offensive talking about democracy, i think that it does not for many people, we are able to see through it, russia and china that he started really good relations with most african countries because of not only because of the role in deliberation struggle of the continent. but also that post independence,

russia and china continued to provide a lot of technical support, material support, financial support. the most of the african country. any media isolate in ukraine can now be banned without a court ruling bounce after a new media law came into power. on friday, the law expands the powers of the ukrainian council on television and radio. broadcasting making at the sol, regulator of mass media, the international federation of journalist has called on key to review the policy which has faced criticism from a run the world. the move comes as all opposition parties were earlier bombed in the country, including a major faction that picked up 2000000 votes in the last election. while all is due to welcome live onto the program, serbian american journalist and senior writer at our teen bullshit knowledge. now welcome to you. indeed. are you surprised at the lack of western pushed back to

this man's? not in the least. i don't think anybody should expect the west to condemn this for all of their public commitments to democracy and free speech. we could do in fact, argue that the ukrainian model is being implemented at home. i mean, you've seen what the american authorities have been doing just this past week, cracking down on anybody who just who is a political opponent or is it any way criticized the current government? i would imagine that, you know, the biden administration would love to have this kind of law implemented at home. and given that they've already declared the landscape, the next best thing to a st. and that the in there i see can do no wrong. he's already banned all the, you know, all the opposition parties. he's already nationalized the media. it's just one of those. if i run it because it, this decision comes the day after the western journalists are shrieking about the

rest of the wall street journal reporter who was reportedly caught red handed, trying to spy on russia. and that's obviously their eyes attack on freedom of the press. but this is not because it doesn't matter what you do. it's only always who you are. that's. that's all there is to it. it's quite a statement, isn't it? the ukranian government has banned all opposition. parties and you have washington seemingly just shrugged their shoulders at the same time, as you say, seeing it's, it's helping protect democracy in ukraine are, are they thinking them? well, it's, it's, it's war time. so extreme measures and all that and things are just going to go back to normal in the future. i would say power like that, very much corruption. once you've got the ability to, to trump pull on a party, i'm not sure it's going to go right back to.