says the smart tv, toyota gumbo sub ah, ah, and so for the, with the united states is made just the main initiated of anti russian policy. foreign policy, assuming an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices. and had you been in moscow, lays on new foreign policy priorities, branding, western actions against russia, hybrid war, foreign minister, lever off on the country, isolated on bays, ready for dialogue, and then you multi polar reality. saudi arabia agreed to join the shanghai cooperation organization. i was a dialogue partner. the move comes in at

a recent strengthening of time is between beijing. moscow state, the decision to station some updates and nuclear weapons and neighboring bella. ruth, is a direct response to nato expansion of atomic arms on territories close to russia. this is exactly the area that measures taken by the president of russia and which is so frightened visa lensky regime. and it's west and spawns is or did here seriously thing that we would not react to do a provocative statement and action with from moscow to the world. this is our take, great to have your company for the news. our, our top story, washington is the main initiator of anti russian policy. now it's the message from

moscow as the kremlin lays out its new foreign policy doctrine. for the coming years, the country's top diplomat, sir gala froth also said russia is determined to build stronger relations with the developing world. glow in them in you serve them lukewarm with b 90 states. his name is the main initiate of anti russian policy. in general, the west policy of weakening russia is called a hybrid war. the new title view. foreign policy concept assumes an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices. and hedgeland is of a course is being set for a strategic partnership with our great neighbors, man, china, india, and countries of the islamic world. the latin american countries, the countries of africa and countries of south east asia, the narrower columbia, with it as well. and earlier in the day or correspond marina cosser, if i broke down some of the main points of the doctrine, the updated foreign policy concept has some 76 points. we won't go through them all . but just to give, remain just store of things. basically it's all about,

as they says in the document, abandoning the dominance of the united states and working on strengthening corporation with other countries to make sure that this is a mold type. holo world, something that we've been hearing about rory for a couple of months now, but this is now really cemented the selling a documentary decree that was signed by vladimir putin and what it states here is. for example, we've seen that the u. s. is the main source, they're saying this and so russia policy and the document urges other countries, for example, to abandon the answer russia policy want. and also to get a greater independence from the united states. and russia for its part is planning to help developing countries, for example, to play a greater role in the global economic affairs to. 1 the roches friends, we're talking about china, india, africa, it states it in the com and document as well, that islamic civilization, it's always seen in russia as friendly and they will continue to work on it. and

the key point here, every time that we're talking about a corporation when another country, it's all about being mutually beneficial. so they are benefits not only russia, but the other country that we're talking about and make sure that this is a multi polar world where the interests not only of the united states and the west have been observed, but also of these other countries. and so that these other countries play a bigger role and we're not talking about the monopoly or the head to money that we've heard from the west. and it's allies. of course, one of the things that we put in was saying was that the global economy is going through serious changes, switching to new centers of power for the new multi polar world order. putin saying this is a key trend. it is a key trend and also in this document, it does say, it does say that there will, there are, of course, has signs to break up certain partnerships that russia is forming now with these other countries. and that will work on eliminates in that. and when it sees

something interference happening, it will act and respond also that there will be tackling, in terms of a humanitarian policies abroad. the priorities are bruce, a phobia, we've seen how much that's changed, especially since the special military operation began precise than the russian language. russian culture were sports. they're trying to cancel anything russian. it seems now in europe and, and around the world. flavor of the foreign minister keeps playing host to all these other 4 emitters. does it keep rushing to moscow? and if they're not rushing to moscow, marina, they're going to beijing for example, next week. macros. the teacher's pet is going to beijing with o'sullivan de la, and i, so i assume they're going there with that cap in hand because they know the multi polar world is already departing. exactly, said will be interesting to see what they achieve. if anything, when they go to beijing m, what happens there, but also again, just to return to this updated to a foreign policy concept in it. the 1st point actually does states in the very beginning that russia does not see itself as an enemy of the west. it does not want

to isolate the self from the west. be me what the issue he was mature, you know, so isolating ourselves from the west. we have no initially hostile intentions towards them. but they must understand the interaction with russia is possible with the rejection of confrontation. so accept the reality that this is become in a multi paula world. they can no longer deny it. and what they're trying to do is to make sure that they don't hurt other countries while they're trying to hang on to that dominance, because russia will no longer allow it, china will no longer allow it. there are other countries, bigger power houses in the world data already, and they're coming together. they just slip back to wallow, week or so ago when the chinese president came to moscow. and as he was leaving putin was the one thing that he said we're witnessing that biggest changes in a 100. yes. and you and me are driving these changes inside of my putin simply said, i agree. yeah. and they're not the only ones saying this,

every one is aware of this. nothing less is why they are so concerned in the west, because this is a power house union that we're seeing them. well, some reaction, we got to all this, jackie shun, do a political analyst in south africa, told us that as russia expands ties, particularly with the global side, it makes the long dominant west uncomfortable since the clubs are them over. so do you watch for a wide variety of reasons why russia has not had that central, no expression in prisons in world change, and for too long for the west in particular, united states and britain? not sure we have enjoy that. so i was was, you know, when there is a realization certain death in africa that, that was sick and tired of hearing all these negative things. rushes,

which seemed really have no basis in truth and reality. africa has experienced russia and china, in terms of mutual respect, mutual benefits, mutual dignity, more often than not. we've experienced the west as this big monster that an imposed look, so that dictates that keeps ultimatums. meanwhile, saudi arabia has agreed to join the shanghai cooperation organization. other dialogue partner, the move comes amid the strengthening of ties between riyadh and bay sharing, the saudi cabinet session approved the decision earlier. china has been fostering allies in the middle east. the country u. s. influence. recently brokering an agreement between the rehab at iran that revive their diplomatic relations. additionally, the saudi states energy company, our, i'm co, i think, to major deals with beijing on oil cooperation. earlier, my colleague,

re sushi, discuss the saudi reaction to joining the s c o plus the at dollars place in the world today with retired commodore in the saudi arabian navy of de la tiff along to him. so there's joining, it's a dialogue not, not, not for the membership. so now this looked like some things, the importance of saudi arabia, saudi arabia is doing all these things. so diversify the income, the relation, or know the whole. or you're going to want to come security trade, which is that, that would cover about every but i don't think it's a bad ending the united states because you're not list. so the number one he's on the whole world. and one very, very important point is that it's china to the home or as it's

willing because he was very big responsibility. and this is very, very big burden and, and time i need to do a lot regarding how they been hands to the outside world. but leading, i mean, leading that well, mr. m. okay. my mainly i like how you said that, but you're saying china is not ready to lead the world like america is, but america, sorry to say is a war mongering nation. look at all the countries that america has invaded over how many decades and you're telling me that china is not ready to leave the world. well, i'm not, i'm not here to, to sort of one, but it is, it is china ready to take the response of the responsibility of the whole world. the united states is many powerful in economy and culture, indication, innovation and technology. so there's a, something b and also note that the,

even the chinese currency, it's technically tied up by a price to the us dollar dollar. it's being slowly pushed out by members of the s c o, the bricks, the assay, and the global stuff. how can you tell me, how can you tell me for the dollar it will be taking forever. it's already fading around the world. people are pushing it out. there is nothing really, you know, economy is one of the world of the economy at the time. when the populations 5 percent, whether you agree with us politics or disagree with them, like them, don't want them until today. we've been here in the seventy's about the diminishing done. and there's going to be a nice yes. so the area is something more and more with that, but that doesn't mean that we are going to all of a sudden with a push button, disregard of the,

the stuff that you gave relation with the united states. okay, another news line to bring you aware of today rushes ambassador to the us call for the withdrawal of all american made nuclear weapons from non us territories. he also stated moscow cannot sit idle in the face of a growing number of nato allies conducting nuclear weapon drills. it should do it so doodle. rushing in the 90s took all measures to withdraw nuclear weapons from the territory of the former usaa. we urged americans to do the same to abandon the thinking of the cold war period to return all us nuclear weapons to the territory of the united states. we also called for the elimination of the relevant infrastructure in europe and the cessation of the practice of the united states and nato by conducting nuclear missions. the practice is incompatible with neither the less and nor the spirit of the non proliferation treaty. we have asked nato to

bring its policy in line with its accepted commitments. the modernization of these huge reserves is only gaining momentum. us weapons are deployed in the netherlands, germany, turkey, and other nato countries. recall that poland also agree to participate in joint nuclear exercises. this is exactly the area that the measures taken by the president of russia are aimed at. and which has so frightened these the lensky regime and its western sponsors. or did you seriously think that we would not react to your provocative statements and actions? the 15 member body that leads the united nations assembled to discuss the issue of tactical nuclear weapons being deployed by russia in val roofs, and bella bruce agreeing to host those tactical nuclear weapons. now, many us aligned countries used this meeting as an opportunity to simply attack

russia to blame russia for the conflict in ukraine to a huge russia of various things that we've seen throughout western media over the past months. however, when russia took to the floor, they pointed out something that many countries have failed to acknowledge in western media has worked to just simply not mention which is that the united states has been withdrawing and getting rid of nuclear agreements. and he went over in detail all the withdrawals of nuclear agreements that we've seen from the united states from there. and he went on to highlight how you asked policy one has been aimed at trying to dictate and control other countries and escalate tensions around the world. here's what we heard from russian ambassador in a band. zia zeppelin is thrown of the can, will goes, western countries are simply trying to impose their own rules on the rest of the world. beneficial only to them in order to then demand this strict compliance from

other states. they themselves, of course, do not consider themselves bound by any obligations. such inherently neo colonial attitudes are aimed at ensuring the prosperity of the so called golden 1000000000 at any cost. neither we know our colleagues from developing countries can be misled, and he more a representative of bell roost gave a strong rebuke to the western critics of their partnership with russia. here's what he had to say. moving on the ground, we have repeatedly said we will repeated here that you should not meddle in our domestic affairs. and you should deal with your own countries and real human rights problems, life and dignity, health, security. and you shouldn't even attempt to find out about the desires of the bell russian people. when the bell russian, people are taking important domestic decisions in the country. you have no idea of what the bell russian people really thinking as we invite all the citizens and taxpayers to take an interest in what their own countries are doing. apparent

hypocrisy of the united states in demanding that russia not be able to deploy tactical nuclear weapons to bel roost. while the united states and its allies have nuclear weapons. that was made clear by the remark. buying to bend the before the council. china also called for the escalation and particular in regard to nuclear weapons and also emphasizing the need. ready a resolution of the conflict in your brain for negotiations to take like overall meeting highlighted very big differences between major countries represented on the council when it comes to their interpretation of world that russia made clear that the united states is acting in a way that is provoking conflict rather than seeking resolution and not really enforcing any of this rhetoric we hear about a rules based global order. russia, stephanie ambassador to the un, dimitri pollyanna, sky told r t. it's hypocritical of the west of coal light. moscow for stationing some

nuclear weapons and new bring bella, roosters, the us has been doing similar for years. i think that the west is trying to act within the concepts of rules based international order. where it's all, it's all alone sets the rules 6 that the others should implement these rules. otherwise, it's difficult to explain how the drive to ignore their own behavior by the states . first and foremost in deploying. ringback nuclear weapons in. ready the western countries for many years, for decades already. and then when the russia analysis simulate, lance simply says they already stop. she's julia trying to, to blame russia or kind of escalation. this is the same rhetoric but western countries were using when speaking about all these supplements on stability

reaching what we are, which we are undermined by washington. the best of you to be made. very good. good. i will say expose a of all these things, all the steps needs by washington which undermine strategic stability. so the only thing is really coming toward the mind of those who look at this is how, how can the way the rest be? so she put critical in dealing with this issue. meanwhile, despite russia's concerns about nato expansion, the block set to get even larger, the turkish parliament house decided to no bach. finland's bid to join the alliance after anchorage removed its initial opposition to the i welcome to vote. of the grand national assembly of tortilla to complete the recertification of finland, succession. this will make the whole nature thoroughly stronger and safer. so

finland now is joining nato. it adds another 1300 kilometers to the western military lights is border with russia. at this point, it's kind of like some guy at a party getting within 3 inches of your face and insisting that because he's not actually touching you, he's just breathing in your face that he's respecting your personal space. now we keep hearing from nato officials and western leaders that nato, as a defensive alliance, purely and strictly. but at what point does this endless encroachment just become offensive, particularly when there's entire liaison that law is to target russia and that it's become really bold in acting unilaterally on its own and circumventing the united nations security council when it comes to bombing other countries. that don't adhere to the western agenda like for example, serbia and libby i just to name a couple, one member of the hungarian national assembly expressed concerns today about what fin when's inclusion could mean for peace and stability. if finland joins nature,

this will increase the possibility of an escalation, as well as the risk of a direct armed conflict between the nato member state and russia. nato is participating in a game that the u. s. is playing beyond the borders of the alliance. the u. s. is using crane as a puppet. in reality, it's not in the interest of the e. u to support the ukrainian conflict and the sanction regime against russia. however, there is a bloodthirsty atmosphere of war among e, you politicians, finland, being a member of the european union, has also recently joined the chorus of western voices rationing up the pro war rhetoric against russia. and that's a new position for europe actually, which over the past few decades hasn't always blindly cited with washington for her french president jacques. she at auckland, german chancellor. gerhard schroeder, allied with russian president vladimir putin against the u. s. invasion of iraq,

for example. and that was at a time when washington was looking to build that so called coalition of the willing . and that descent is actually what kept europe out of that particular quagmire to the economic and other benefit of the entire block and people of europe. today though, where's the voice of reason in europe? well hungarian prime minister, victor r bon, is still trying to draw attention to the fact that europe's role as a peacemaker has pretty much gone out the window with the conflict in ukraine. we want the number of countries supporting peace instead of war has not increased at all. people want peace while e u leaders are taking a pro war stance for them. the main issue continues to be deciding which weapons to send to ukraine. it is slowly becoming a legitimate question among e u. leaders, whether e u. member states could send peacekeeping troops to ukraine in some form. not only

is the e u abdicating its role of honest broker or mediator between the west and the east, but it's joining washington and conveniently, exploiting the conflict in ukraine in which he keeps saying that it isn't directly involved to write a blank check for its own military industrial complex, as suggested recently by the blocks chief diplomat yo's, a bro, europeans have reduced investment in the defense industry over the past 20 years. but due to the radically shifted security environment, we need to increase that again. specifically, we want to deliver a 1000000 artillery shells to ukraine within a year, knowing how easily europe was willing to follow along with washington's project as militarized in the ukrainian border with russia under the guise at the mix. peace accords, the operative word there being peace. any new nato expansion along russians border within europe isn't exactly comforting for the future if you're

a p. n. p. security or stability. go to another story we are closely following. ukrainian court has rejected efforts by the countries orthodox church to maintain its stewardship of a prominent monastery and the authorities being cracking down on the clergy over their traditional religious links with russian. on friday, i cried, calling for the eviction of the monks arrived at the site and keep shutting insults and demanding the monks vacate the premises. was orthodox christians in kit have been helping to prevent police from entering the church. however, removing the clergy, the government has been seeking to cut century, all tallies between orthodox ukrainians, almost an advisor to the presidency. the church in ukraine needs to be, quote, physically cleans died. the unique chance when everything could be resolved very

quickly and painlessly was during the 1st 3 to 6 months of the war. then it was possible to simply physically clean out many pro russians. today it is a little more difficult. but again, a little harder does not mean impossible. and today we must use legal and tough means to sweep them away. among say the actions to a victim or a legal and that they have every right to stay in the monastery and a u. n. report has also question the validity of the measures. religious figures worldwide, including pope frances of expressed concern about church freedoms being restricted in ukraine. while a greek orthodox archbishop is calling on the international community to help stop the persecution describing the cracked on as an attack on all people could be. and a has an in the jerusalem church, which is one of the oldest christine orthodox churches in the world that we believe in systematic persecution, suffered by the paternal ukrainian orthodox church,

is an attack on all of us are on all orthodox churches in the world. all christian churches and on all noble humanitarian, ethical and spiritual values, cabs ruinous and the west are trying to strike the ukrainian old dr. judge, a raise it up against government is working hard to do this. i don't think the west is just silent. it's an accomplice in this crime in know, if we say that the west is just silent, we will not reflect the whole reality, the west of the system. and those who claim to be it's rulers, whether in the u. s. or elsewhere, trying to undermine the authority of the orthodox church or any crowd in the world . the orthodox church is under attack everywhere because it has preserved and maintains faith, morality and values, including family valuables, ada. now the 2nd down you old global democracy summit designed to promote, says the slogan, goes free, fur and transparent elections as they foundation of democratic governance has run into us. all of turbulence, attendees from africa,

have expressed on willingness to have values imposed on them at the u. s. government sponsored event. what we are against is the interference from any direction, whether from the western world or anywhere else with old like jews, the pipeline of democracy, to we pause certain values on the african people. if this continues, there will be a huge divorce of africa. nations from the pipeline of democracy as we note we therefore, i mean or challenge the western world to restrict the cultural, religious, christian, and social values of zambia. if we are going to continue being strong partners as we've been over the years, ah, we must be respected as it country. just like the islamic missions, i've been respected by the west and they don't discuss issues of eligibility q there with them. all the virtual summits being held under the banner,

renewing democracies at home and confronting autocracies abroad. it's being jointly hosted by the u. s. costa rica, the netherlands site korea and zambia to discuss the quote challenges and opportunities facing democracies in the 21st century. well, the u. s. has long criticized african countries for their stance on a number of issues on, on tuesday, vice president cumberland, horace colon you family values. bill being considered in ghana, ante l g b t, and on democratic during a visit there, the nations parliament speaker said the b p. had no right to lecture another, states on its own affairs. what is democratic that somebody else will have to dictate to me at what is good and what is back on head. because we have decided to devalue out and go

a begging come on. we have more than enough. what has good that's more than enough for every person get was looking at somebody else. shame not, not. we have enough in there where it bill will be. ha ha. well, african, a 1st specialist austin color that believes countries come to find the meaning of democracy in varying late it was in b c in there where they define their democracy. so it's wrong before, even with the 2nd student, the, where they define democracy is highly, highly questionable. and not along the way the tools don't define to define it to. so yeah, in this america is a lot, it's going to do even talk about the values of democracy. what are the ha,

a similar sort of democracy, easy digital you. but it does be super quoted. it has been really bad case. it has been globalized and be imposed on other than please, and i would assume w dot c t for other countries to follow it wrong, randal, to walk glossy, not the dictionary definition of the walk, and i see these to give you another man to say may be a miracle to walk us. remember one those times. not the way we other countries understand democracy. i think that's where the problem is. well, different values won't different effects while different beliefs who are different uses. by the way, the u. s. vice president. how's that are? i've been zombie as she continues her week long tour of africa, the crypt designed to strengthen washington's time. he's an influence in the region

. kamala horace started her trip on sunday in gala before flying to tell me in a week where she met the country's president. horace is the latest top u. s. official to visit africa in recent months with the country making a renewed effort to strengthen its presence on the continent down counter. russian and chinese influence in the region for political analyst beds and phony convince. washington's renewed interest will bear fruit at devotees we have seen historically has been one of them interference. you can see the hand of america. 2 militarily, being very anti democratic, if i put it does way. so they're, they're coming in to africa now with this channel offensive.