can you hear what's a good? i see, you don't want me to say, do you really sound to you because i'm you? but there is danielle worse, but in the mood along me. aah! with the united states, his name just the main, initiate of antique russian policy. the new foreign policy concept assumes an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices and head human is, as well, lays out into a foreign policy concept. it says where some flowers are engaged in a hybrid war against russia. foreign minister lab says the country would isolate itself and is ready to dialogue with the u. s. t o is becoming overshadowed by other national currencies as a global dean dollars, asian trends,

gain momentum and international transaction. you create in court, find the head of the country's largest monitor, 360 days of house. all right. i made a clamp out on to just because with a very well come to you from the in sy fi, international news seem live from much. let's take a look at the top stories that highlighted the week, as well as the major seems welcome to the weekly. moscow has accused washington of being the main initiator of m. t rush and policy among western powers that says the climate this week laid out its new foreign policy doctrine. for the coming e is because we thought deborah diplomat sat again, lab rob said russia is determined to build stronger relations with the developing

world glow in you serve them with lukewarm with united states is named as the main initiative, anti russian policy in general. the west policy of weakening russia is called a hybrid war. the new type, the new foreign policy concept assumes an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices. and hedgeland is of a course is being set for a strategic partnership with our great neighbors, china, india, and countries of the islamic world, the latin american countries, the countries of africa and countries of south east asia. my colleague, rory, so shave, discuss the issues with our correspondent marine across the river who broke down some of the main points of the doctrine. the updated foreign policy concept has some 76 points. we won't go through them all. but so just to give me just all of things, basically it's all about as it states at the end,

the document abandoning the dominance of the united states and working on strengthening corporation with other countries to make sure that this is a multi paula world. something that we've been hearing about rory for a couple of months now, but this is not really cemented this. now, in the documentary decree that was signed by vladimir putin and what it states here is, for example, we've seen that the u. s. is the main source or say of this, and so russia policy and the document urge as other countries, for example, to abandon the answer russia policy one and also to get a greater independence from the united states. and russia for its part is planning to help developing countries, for example, to play a greater role in the global economic affairs through our roches friends. we're talking about china, india, africa. it states that in the com and document as well, that islamic civilization, it's always seen in russia as friendly and they will continue to work on it. and the key point here, every time that we're talking about

a cooperation with another country, it's all about to be mutually beneficial. so they are benefits not only of russia, but the other country that we're talking about and make sure that this is a multi polar world where the interest not only of the united states and the west have been observed. but also all of these other countries. and so that these other countries play a bigger role and we're not talking about the monopoly or the head to money that we've heard from the west. and it's allies. of course, one of the things that we put in was saying was that the global economy is going through serious changes, switching to new centers of power for the new multi polar world order food and saying this is a key trend. it is a key trend and also in this document, it does say, does face that there will, there are forces trying to break up up certain partnerships that russia is forming now with these other countries. and that will work on eliminating that. and when it sees something interference happening, it will act and respond also. there will be tackling,

in terms of humanitarian policies abroad. the priorities are bruce, the phobia, we've seen how much that's changed, especially since the special military operation began, protects in the russian language, russian culture were sports. they're trying to cancel anything russian that seems now in europe and around the world. slab rope before a minister keeps playing host to all these other foreign ministers to keep rushing to moscow. and if they're not rushing to most marita, they're going to beige, for example, next week. macros. the teacher's pet is going to beige with sort of angela and i. so i assume they're going there with their captain hand, because they know the multi polar world is already departing. exactly. so it will be interesting to see what they achieve, if anything, when they go to beijing and what happens there. but also again, just to return to this, ob, dated the foreign policy concept in it. the 1st point actually does states in the very beginning that russia does not seats off as an enemy of the west. it does not want to isolate itself from the west. you mean,

you can make sure we're not isolated ourselves from the west. we have no initially hostile intentions towards them, but they must understand the interaction with russia is possible with the rejection of confrontation. so accept the reality that this is becoming a multi polar world. they can no longer deny it. and what they're trying to do is to make sure that they don't hurt all the countries while they're trying to hang on to that dominance because russia will no longer allow it. china will no longer allow it. there are other countries, bigger power houses in the world data already, and they're coming together. they just feel it back to what we call. so ago when the chinese president came to moscow. and as he was leaving putin was the one thing that he said, we're witnessing the biggest changes in a 100. yes. and you and me are driving these changes. i'm sorry, my putin simply said, i agree. yeah. and they're not the only one saying this, everyone is aware of this, nothing. this is why they are so concerned in the west because this is

a power house union that we're seeing now. the glow trend to da da arise continues, or the indian new trade policy features a decision to move away from using the solar and international transactions. the new policy comes into effect this month to help promote india's foreign trade and balsa domestic production. meanwhile, the indian rupee has been getting a lot of attention and even expected to become a global currency in the near future. our tea correspondent shabbos has more on the story, liked it, or not, were living in times of global change, as the much vaunted multi polar world takes shape before our eyes center stage is the target that the u. s. dollar. now has on its head. this week, brazil and china struck a landmark deal to drop the american greenback in favor of using their own currency

to settled bilateral trade, an agreement and setting pain and things. one has been signed with brazil, which greatly facilitates our trait. we are planning to expand cooperation and field a food mineral extraction, and to search for a possibility of exporting goods with high added value from china to brazil and from brazil to china. the expectation is that this will reduce costs, promote in grade to my natural trades and facilitate investment. this effectively means that 2 major bricks countries have now done. the dollar. china is brazil's largest trading partner racking up a $150000000000.00 in imports and exports last year. now it's time to recalculate those numbers into chinese, you on this comes only days after china used its own currency to import 65000 tons of liquefied natural gas from the u, a. e, with a french company, total energy settling the deal. there's also a sense that you as foreign policy as compounded the dollars was,

would even eel on most waiting in to the debate. u. s. policy has been too heavy handers making countries want to ditch the dollar. and it's not just the bricks heavyweights getting in the act. recently, egypt sought to make payments for essential rice deliveries and rupees. in february, iraq announced it will allow trade with china to be settled in you on with bangladesh, making a similar announcement in september. meanwhile, members of the china led shanghai cooperation organisation agree to increased trade and local currencies, nor did it on your credit. mr. so we discussed the need to increase trade and transactions in national currencies. it grows gradually, not bosses which one, but it moves forward. none the less. russia has also been pushing to drive trade. true alternatives to the dollar with round after round of western sanctions. driving that reality, russian now uses the rouble indian rupee chinese you on. and the you, a durham bypassing uncle sam lou, lou, we would continue to use the dollar,

but they won't let us how we supposed to make transactions. so we use currencies, there are agreeable fraud, trade partners, you on is one of those currencies, especially as it's also used by the i m f. so as we watch, the multi polar world evolve before our eyes. it's clear that there's a real international desire to do things differently. there's a sense that a better, more just way to do business can deliver positive change by moving away from the u . s. dollar. that props up the american rules based order and is allowed to print trillions for free. while it's try to make the rules and give the orders that are the cranes largest monastery has been confined to house arrest the 60 days in a dispute over his religious tires to moscow. the sentence was handed down during metropolitan pavlov 2nd court appearance. after the 1st one was halted due to an illness he had suffered. this was the clergyman reaction to the ruling. yeah,

mister mooney from his mom. i didn't do anything. i know this is a political case because i was told to switch to the key of backed orthodox church of ukraine, but i said, no, i was threatened. the security services of ukraine came to me and said, a criminal case should be opened against me and it was, i don't know who planned it. i'm not going to figure that out because it's not my style to settle accounts. the morning see in here has been at the center of a crime down by authorities over traditional ties to russia. the metropolitan now has to where electronic time for the next 2 months. is lawyer said the clergyman would appeal that decision due to health concerns. they also said that the exact place where he's being confined to is not fit for human habitation. senior course, what does it takes us through the background of the situation? he, if he jeffs lava, was detained earlier today,

he was taken to a court hearing. he felt poorly was taken to hospital of him forcefully by ukrainian security agents. taken back the court, we knew that he is being charged on 2 counts. one is sparking and finding into religious hatreds and enmity, the subject matter the evidence we haven't seen, but also with rejecting the premise of the russian aggression which in care of and whatever ukraine is seen. something is as gospel that russia is via aggressive, should be resistant everywhere of the scenes from the monastery, the key of which of lava ah harrowing for many orthodox folk for not justin in ukraine. but all over the world, their sending shudders through worshippers of v. this unit such that supports us those against the eviction and the takeover of for you kids. what have you quince

largest monasteries is that they're there. they're praying, they trying to resist without violence. and you have ukranian nationalists also at the scene. radicals who haven't the slightest interest in it, religion, but a just happy to be somewhere where what they deem what are being called per russians are being evicted. you have seen showing people praying on their knees and around them dancing ukrainians, dancing nationalists, sorry, radicals, chanting insults, threats. also we have heard from the ukranian government which again 1st has since 2000. 1 and 18 made it a policy to try and replace the ukranian orthodox church, which it sees as independent and unruly and far too per russian with the orthodox church of ukraine which, which is a very different thing and in teaches

a very different religion. although claiming to be the same, they, they, for example, teach the ukrainians should never have children with russians, that ukrainian should only intermix with ukrainians to keep the blood pure. we've also heard a presidential advisor come out and comment on what is happening, saying now is the time to eliminate the unruly clergy. a unique chance when everything could be resolved very quickly and painlessly was during the 1st 3 to 6 months of the war. then it was possible to simply physically clean out many pro russians. today, it is a little more difficult. but again, a little harder does not mean impossible to day we must use legal and tough means to sweep them away. you credit the government, as i said, has been at it for years. and in recent months of the past, off for you. so these, these efforts to clamp down to pressure to dismantle the ukrainian orthodox church of only ramped up an agreement broken by china for saudi arabia

and iran to reconcile their relations. has instilled hope in yemen for a possible resolution to his long rang civil war. the conference has claimed, at least a 150000 lives since it interrupted nearly a decade ago. yes, anne's pri mess has spoken to archie in an exclusive interview, saying the violence in the region should end with new new emerging geo political influence. ah, why do you think china was a country that mediated these talks between iran and saudi arabia? why wasn't this something done by western nation considering their decades of intervention in the middle east without ham anaheim, suckling zealand, and name of god most merciful. i would like to thank our tea for having this discussion. first of all, it is normal for the well throughout history to undergo gradual changes that

eventually paid the way for the rise of 2 or 3 different forces of our in the world . the force of power all the world superpower is dominated the well. since the fall of the soviet union in 1991 is nato, led by its central power. the united states is force of power is gradually declining after the rise of 2 other superpowers in the world. the russian federation is the 1st superpower, and it succeeded insecure, a position of strength in both the technological minute train economic fields in the world. it's also important to note that the people's republic of china is the other superpower in the world, as they produce and have a massive economy, which is now the main competitor to the united states. currently, the power that existed in america, europe, is being sway to the east towards russia and china. consequently, it's only natural for these 2 superpowers to be the focus of a wide range of interests throughout the world. among these interests is the maritime region in the middle east and the gulf of arabia, as well as the interests in fuel and other natural resources in the region. saudi

arabia and iran have very close ties, and economic relations with china is in the interests of china who broke this dale to play a main role in this political breakthrough. there are many people who was surprised that china took this political initiative because china has been known to direct most of its efforts into developing its economy. however, with the natural progression that a cause with a nation's china is ready to advance is well position and broker a deal between 2 nations who share various interests with china and with the military power in the middle east. this is the reason why china mediated this deal the party. so the conflict in yemen have agreed to a historic deal to exchange a $187.00 prisoners. why was this prisoner exchange made possible? could this be a result of the agreement that was signed between iran and saudi arabia? c serrano. ah, let us sir. i will with saudi arabia is entering its 9th year. we are at war this

very moment during this phase of the war, negotiations with saudi arabia have not stopped as we continue to negotiate the military security and political situation. over the years we've held talks in saudi arabia, son, i am on stock cove and switzerland and in kuwait. negotiations have always persisted and so has the military battle. this is a normal situation when 2 nations are at war. we presented a number of conditions to saudi arabia to give them the chance to establish close to ties with us and build friendly relationships. we asked them to end their aggression open the apples and seaports and to exchange all prisoners. the 4th condition was to pay government salaries in order to improve the humanitarian situation in yemen. none of these conditions are met. we can begin to discuss the political situation once the humanitarian situation is result than we can engage in political talks. the saudi arabia and the u. a. e. we can even help talks with the agents in aden and in al mahala santa is willing to hold talks with all agents. i most raise of saudi arabia under one condition,

the aggression must end. but because they are continuing their aggression, we've refused to hold, talks about the military and political files in yemen. we have saudi prison, as we have said, donny prisoners, american prisoners, and we have yamini prisoners. we were fighting alongside saudi arabia. likewise, saudi arabia has many prisoners of ours, of holding many talks in geneva, we both came to an agreement to release these prisoners, a rigid, there's certain you mean out titian's that exists. the uncle of spectrum who are agents or proxies or are serving asia saudi lee. ready and external nations says one hasn't been okay for it's b. politicians, them to structure and but are too dear in place. specifically to serve the interest of a worn nation. for example, the united states government. it will be on t for there to be a us,

how titian he was sadder who is an agent or serving the interest of russia. in fact they would be arrested, prosecuted and crass as you. so why is this okay? in the us little spectrum wise. okay, really positions st. we're really every government are in as well, and certainly it's is saudi arabia and e services. i to be honest, this is not normal. it's a big shame that some jamini politicians want to please their allies. to the extent they become agents to saudi arabia and the u. e. we can be friends, in fact, saudis and moratti's our, our brothers. however, they most respect that a yemen politician should only serve yemen, said his nation. unfortunately, this is not been the case. some the yemen, politicians convinced themselves that being all, becoming an agent as a good thing. they convinced themselves that it is

a big accomplishment to being servants of riyadh abbey, debbie doe. and quite that convinced themselves that this was the smart and clever thing to do. but the truth is, the only tidal relationship these politicians should have or developed with any nation is one established on the foundation of serving the interests of the eminent people and the yemeni government. and to never deviate from this. especially when saudi arabia, an u. e. a launch a war against yemen. in this situation, a yamani politician should firmly stand against this aggression because this war is being declared on his own people, and he is sworn to protect and serve a coalition of countries that were equipped with sophisticated usm british made weapons, declared war on your government in 2015, but they did not succeed in achieving their goals to defeat the on thought a lot back movement. why do you think that is the case? why did the saudi le coalition fail to defeat the on saw law movement? and do you expect that the u. s. and the british government will continue to wage

their war on yemen through saudi arabia and the coalition. so he asked if, could he, this law that was declared against yemen for 9 years is a school of its own. how much have we learned about was in history? how much have we rated learned about world war one welled war 2 and the 30. it was the 100 year war. and the american civil war histories taught us a lot about was that occurred in the past and also the ground 0, a war in which well power was launched, a war against the russian empire. today, the war in yemen which has persisted for 9 years is another lesson in the history of wars. this is because we do not have the same level of sophisticated weapons possessed by the u. s. and british governments, where we do have is a stock pot of russian and soviet union weapons that have been stored in yemen for many years. that's the 1st point. secondly, our gemini ami has been able to take these old weapons and upgrade them and transform them into more powerful and sophisticated weapons. and there were those who claim and continued to claim that these weapons being provided by ron to santa

. however, this would be impossible because saudi arabia and the coalition claim, they've blocked all entering exit points in yemen from land and sea. so how could these weapons from iran reach us? the 2nd question is, how many weapons would iran have to provide to us in order to put out this resistance for 9 years, it would be impossible for us to continue to war for 9 years. if we did not have the technology resources inside our country, we have students who study for many years in russia has study for many years at russian universities. we have a long history of students who went to russia and studied over the past 30 years. we're seeing of witnessing the result of this education, the russian weapons we have proven to be very effective. this is because these russian weapons are being carried by gemini patterson, who has a solid will and character and has a solid and honorable leader who is the leader of the revolution. they're fully necessary conditions have been filled in order to revive. we have a leader, we have weapons and dark horse is just the empty people to fighting,

to protect themselves, to protect their interests and protect that nation. this war is an aggression against us and not the other way around. we are not the ones transgressing against abu dhabi or dubai. riyadh jetta. we only began retaliatory attacks after being bombarded for 3 years straight by the saudi led coalition. what can you say about yes, political future once the war is over? who will govern the country? how will the new jamini government in the future deal with the southern separate us regions, al corda and no bad air land? we said that after the war ends, we will end to political negotiations for 234 months to a year at the most. the sienna politicians involved in the negotiations must come out of the dialogue with decisive results. so she wanted independence, southern states demanding this because they've been and are being oppressed. therefore we have to know how to resolve this. and what is the solution in the solution needs to come within the framework of a unified yemen. that

a solution can never come from the scope of separation. a divided yemen will only be the beginning of more pressing issues ahead of will plant the seeds for was for many years to come. international humanitarian organizations have reported problems with funding their activities in yemen. often they have not had enough money to provide humanitarian aid. why do you think a large number of countries have enough money to fund ukraine with weapons, but they do not have enough money to alleviate the suffering of the many people. alyssa, offer. this is a good example of the double standard culture possessed by european nations. european politicians do not have the humanitarian morals and ethics to resolve the issue is happening in the world. they distinguish between which refugees they like and don't like they distinguish between assign him seekers and nations and those who are in need a practice. what can be categorized as a double character or double standard. they have double standards in morals and principals. they talk about not having enough resources to fund humanitarian aid,

but on the other hand, they from the ukrainian government with money and weapons. imagine in just one year, 200000000000 dollars were allocated to the nicki of regime while the rest of the world any receive $20.00 to $30000000000.00 in funding. this prove that these european nations do not care about humanity. they do not care about refugees. speaking of refugees, they only like ukrainian refugees because they have and have blonde hair blue eyes . they do not like the refugees that come from palestine or siri or iraq or afghanistan, pakistan or such nations. this is the immoral and unjustified double standard. we have old witness from european nation, the west, according to major western opinion polls, most people in africa and asia, view, russian and chinese policies. positively. what do you think distinguishes china's and russia's approach to international affairs from that of the west. do you have stories about how you have experienced a difference in these approaches e?

i will have that shockey and get it. this new eastern alliance that we're seeing develop pleased by nations that are not colonial nations that are not raving pillaging and exploiting other nations in south america, africa, and in asia. they do not practice colonization of other nations. the 2nd point is, i remember the russian philosopher, dostoevsky, who once mentioned that russia should never lean towards europe because he will treat them unkindly. however, russia should head in the direction of the east because they will be treated like royalty and welcomed with open arms. this is the russian philosopher who mentioned this about 200 years ago and advised the russian ladies at the time. china and russia capable of being a source of power for people seeking to liberate themselves from colonialism. russia, china have always supported movement, seeking to liberate that nations against imperialism against european expansionism, including that of france, hall and germany and british domination. the western alliance any seeks to steal wealth in extorted nations, natural resources. this is their policy with nations in the middle east. they deal

and communicate with elite politicians of that nation. he can spy with them to transform the people into slaves. china, russia, do not engage in such manners. these tendencies and policies never have and been enacted for at the history by russia and china is not part of their philosophical mode approach. therefore, why shouldn't we allow this relationship to foster? this is not just my personal opinion. it is an unbiased assessment of what the west represents to the population in africa, asia, and latin america. what the east represents to these populations, for example, chinese belton road initiative, involves 150 nations. therefore, the west has no other option, but to reluctantly accept china's economic victory of western economies. just as the west enjoyed the fall of the soviet union in 1991. europe must now drink out of that same cup of defeat. that was tasted by the east as is it, because the rise and fall of nations hinge on their economy and also the foundations of enlightenment. this is why we're seeing russia and china thrive on a global stage. you have said that the british government is committed war crimes

by selling arms to saudi arabia, which in turn it uses against the many people to day britain is supplying large quantities of weapons to ukraine. do you think london should be responsible for deliberately instigating and prolonging wars around the world? i'm unable to highly. yes. i mentioned this to one of the british networks at the beginning of the war and yemen. i mentioned that britain supply saudi arabia and the u. a with weapons against the gemini people, and this is an act of a war crime that the british government should be held accountable for, should be prosecuted for because this is a war crime. many people have been killed by these british supplied weapons. children, the elderly and women were killed by these weapons. much of the countries infrastructure has been destroyed. a similar crime is being perpetrated in ukraine by european nations. just as in the case in yemen, they supplying a fascist nazi light ukrainian regime because they hoped to destroy the wood of the russian army, west coast and plotting ways to defeat the russian army. this is the main goal they

need to accomplish in order to achieve their other goals, destroying the political, cultural, and economical foundation, the russian federation. how does your shuttle amendment deal with terrorist elements operating in yemen? who was supporting these terrace elements and for what purpose? of the honda and the daughter has plagued us with these terrorist elements which had been planted by the american and british intelligence. i'm referring to what is known as isis, al qaeda. if you do research, you will find that they are indeed a product of british and american intelligence that there are many proofs of this. u. s. in britain, entered iraq and syria under the pretext of fighting al qaeda. however, it was exposed to the well that the u. s. army ended syria to protect ices in southern and central syria. this was during the same time that the russian army was supporting the syrian government against these terrorist elements. this is the same situation in yemen. the terrorist groups here operate in the same areas where.