so if you go with the 90 states, his name is the main initiate of antique russian policy. in general, the west policy of weakening russia is called a hybrid war. the new type, the new foreign policy concept assumes an absolute rejection of neo colonial practices and hedge monism, of course, is being set for a strategic partnership with our great neighbors, china, india and countries of the islamic world. the latin american countries, the countries of africa and countries of south east asia. earlier, i discussed russia's vision with a correspondent, marina cult. the updated foreign policy concept has some 76 points who won't go through them all. but just to give a main just of things, basically it's all about, as they said in the document, abandoning the dominance of the united states and working on strengthening corporation with other countries to make sure that this is a multi polo world. something that we've been hearing about rory for

a couple of months, but this is not really cemented this now in the document. it's decree that was signed by vladimir putin and what it states here is, for example, we've seen that the u. s. is the main source or say, of this answer russia policy and the document urges other countries, for example, to abandon the answer russia policy want. and also to get a greater independence from the united states. and russia for its part is planning to help developing countries, for example, to play a greater role in the global economic affairs. one of the things that we put in was saying was that the global economy is going through serious changes, switching to new centers of power for the new multi polar world order. putin saying this is a key trend. it is a key trend. and also in this document, it does say, it does face that there will, there are forces trying to break apart certain partnerships that russia is forming now with these other countries. and that will work on eliminating that. and when it sees something interference happening, it will act and respond also. there will be tackling, in terms of

a humanitarian policies abroad. the priorities are bruce, to phobia. we've seen how much that's changed, especially since the special military operation began, protects in the russian language. russian culture were sports. they're trying to cancel anything russian, that seniors now in europe and around the world. slab, rope before minister keeps playing host to all these other for a minute. just keep rushing to moscow and if they're not rushing to moscow, marina, they're going to beige, for example, next week. macros. the teacher's pet is going to beige with some of angela and i. so i assume that go and they would, that catherine had because they know the multi polar world is already departing. exactly. so will be interesting to see what they achieve. if anything, when they go to beijing and what happens there, but also again, just to return to this updated foreign policy concept in it. the 1st point actually does states in the very beginning that russia does not seats off as an enemy of the

west. it does not want to isolate the self from the west. me and your name was make sure we know isolating ourselves from the west. we have no initially hostile engines towards them, but they must understand the interaction with russia is possible with the rejection of confrontation. so accept the reality that this is becoming em all type whole world that can no longer deny it. and what they're trying to do is to make sure that they don't hurt all the countries while they're trying to hang on to that dominance because russia will no longer allow it's, china will no longer allow it. there are other countries, bigger power houses in the world data already and they're coming together. they just feel it back to one week or so ago when the chinese president came to moscow and as he was leaving food and what was the one thing that he said we're witnessing the biggest changes in a 100 years and you and me are driving these changes and i'm at peut and simply said, i agree. yeah. and they're not the only ones saying this, everyone is aware of this nothing. this is why they are so concerned in the way,

because this is a power house, the union that we're seeing now. the global trend hash tag be dollarization is certainly gaining steam. now, for example, india's new economic policy features a bold move away from using america reserve currency and international transactions this month. so the plan comes together to help promote india's foreign trade and bolster domestic production. the indian ruthie is now being used more often in global trade. and russia has joined a list of 18 countries that are using the roop to settle accounts with new delhi. that's a lift the lid on this. it's a story with broad implications as a seas shaped bows explains like it or not. we're living in times of global change as the much vaunted multi polar world takes shape before our eyes center stage to target that the u. s. dollar. now has on its head this week, brazil and china struck a landmark deal to drop the american greenback in favor of using their own currency

to settled bilateral trade, an agreement and setting pain and things. one has been signed with brazil, which greatly facilitates our trait. we are planning to expand corporation in field of food and mineral extraction, and to search for a possibility of exporting goods with high added value from china to brazil and from brazil to china. the expectation is that this will reduce costs, promote in grade to my natural trades and facilitate investment. this effectively means that 2 major bricks countries have now done. the dollar. china is brazil's largest trading partner racking up a $150000000000.00 in imports and exports last year. now it's time to recalculate those numbers into chinese, you on this comes only days after china used its own currency to import 65000 tons of liquefied natural gas from the u, a. e, with a french company, total energy settling the deal. there's also a sense that

u. s. foreign policy is compounded the dollars. woes would even eel on most, waiting into the debate. you asked polish has been too heavy handers, making conscious, want to ditch the dollar. and it's not just the bricks heavyweights getting in the act. recently, egypt sought to make payments for essential rice deliveries and rupees. in february, iraq announced it will allow trade with china to be settled and you are with bangladesh making a similar announcement in september. meanwhile, members of the china led shanghai cooperation organisation agree to increased trade and local currencies. you're already on your credit, mr. so we discussed the need to increase trade and transactions in national currencies. it grows gradually, not sauces would want, but it moves forward. none the less. russia has also been pushing to drive trade. true alternatives to the dollar with round after round of western sanctions. driving that reality, russian now uses the rouble indian rupee chinese you on. and the you,

a durham bypassing uncle sam lou, lou, we would continue to use the dollar, but they won't let us how we supposed to make transactions. so we use currencies, they're agreeable fraud, trade partners, the you on is one of those currencies, especially as it's also used by the i m f. so as we watched the multi polar world evolve before our eyes. it's clear that there's a real international desire to do things differently. there's a sense that a better, more just way to do business can deliver positive change by moving away from the u . s. dollar. that props up the american rules based order and is allowed to print trillions for free while it's try to make the rules and give the orders. members of a ukrainian nationalist group, the right sector have gathered in front of the orthodox monitoring key of threatening and demanding the parishioners. there leave a members of the group, a note for their extremist views, and their popularity has, in fact, risen since the might on coo of 2014 attention. the area have risen as kia,

has been seeking to evict monks and clergy. members from the 1000 year old site on saturday, the head of the monastery, metropolitan popple was sentenced, a 60 days house arrest over his religious ties to moscow. i here is his reaction to the ruling. yes, this is the intro, is what i didn't do anything. i know this is a political case because i was told to switch to the key of back to orthodox church of ukraine. but i said, no, i was threatened. the security services of ukraine came to me and said, a criminal case should be opened against me and it was, i don't know who planned it. i'm not going to figure that out because it's not my style to settle accounts. and now the head of the orthodox koji is being forced to wear an electronic ankle bracelet for the period of his confinement. his lawyer said he would appeal that decision, citing health concerns, adding the place where he set to be held for the next 2 months is not even fit for human habitation. so open out to our senior correspondent for more details on the

background. it's not, i'd guess, dia, head of the key of creatures flava was detained earlier today, he was taken so caught hearing, he felt poorly was taken the hospital and forcefully by ukrainian security agents taken back to court. we knew that he is being charged on 2 counts. one is sparking and finding inter religious hatreds and enmity, the subject matter the evidence we haven't seen, but also with rejecting the premise of the russian aggression which in care of and whatever ukraine is seen, something as, as gospel that russia is, the aggressive should be resisted everywhere of the scenes from the monasteries the key of which of lava ah harrowing for many orthodox folk for not justin in ukraine. but all over the world. their sending shudders through worshippers. a v. as you know,

such that supports us those against the eviction and the takeover of for you kids. what have you quince? largest monasteries is that they're there. they're praying, they're trying to resist without violence. and you have ukranian nationalists also at the scene. radicals who haven't the slightest interested in religion, but a just happy to be somewhere where, what they deem what are being called per russians are being evicted. you have seen showing people praying on their knees and around them dancing ukrainians, dancing nationalists, sorry, radicals, chanting insults, threats. also we have heard from the ukrainian government which again for us has since 2000. 1 and 18 made it a policy to try and replace the ukranian orthodox church, which it sees as independent and unruly and far too per russian with the orthodox

church of ukraine which, which is a very different thing and teaches a very different religion. although claiming to be the same, they, they, for example, teach the ukrainians should never have children with russians that ukrainians should only him to mix with ukrainians to keep the blood pure. we've also heard a presidential advisor come out and comment on what is happening saying now is the dawn to eliminate the unruly clergy. a unique chance when everything could be resolved very quickly and painlessly was during the 1st 3 to 6 months of the war. then it was possible to simply physically clean out many pro russians. today, it is a little more difficult. but again, a little harder does not mean impossible to day we must use legal and tough means to sweep them away. you credit government, as i said, has been added for years and in recent months of the pothole for you. so these, these efforts to clamp down to pressure to dismantle the ukranian orthodox church

have only ramped up in a deal broken by china, long time regional rival saudi arabia and iran had begun to reconcile relations. a move that's given hope to yemen, that a resolution to the war in the country perhaps will be within sight of the nearly decade long conflict has claimed at least a 150000 lives while more than 200000 others have died from famine and a lack of health care as a land sea and air located is basically deprived essential goods and services from reaching the country. the prime minister for humans, national salvation government sat down with outs he for an exclusive interview. and he says, the violence in the region should end, does new political powers image ah, why do you think china was a country that mediated these talks between iran and saudi arabia? why wasn't this something done by western nation considering their decades of

intervention in the middle east, sula hammer hames, according to zealand, and name of god most merciful. i would like to thank our tea for having this discussion. first of all, it is normal for the wall throughout history to undergo gradual changes that eventually paid the way for the rise of 2 or 3 different forces of our in the world . the force of power, of the well superpower is dominated the well since the fall of the soviet union in 1991 is nato, led by central power the united states. his force of power is gradually declining after the rise of 2 other superpowers in the world. the russian federation is the 1st superpower and it succeeded insecure. a position of strength, invite the technological minute train economic fields in the world. it's also important to note that the people's republic of china is the other superpower in the world, as they produce and have a massive economy, which is now the main competitor to the united states. currently, the power that existed in america, europe, is being sway to the east towards russia and china. consequently,

it's only natural for these 2 superpowers to be the focus of a wide range of interests throughout the world. among these interests is the maritime region in the middle east and the gulf of arabia, as well as the interests in fuel, another natural resources in the region. saudi arabia and iran have very close ties, and economic relations with china is in the interests of china who broke this dale to play a main role in this political breakthrough. there are many people who was surprised that china took this political initiative because china has been known to direct most of its efforts into developing its economy. however, with the natural progression that occurs within nations, china is ready to advance is well position and broker a deal between 2 nations who share various interests with china and with the military power in the middle east. this is the reason why china mediated this deal . the party, so the conflict in yemen have agreed to a historic deal to exchange a 187 prisoners. why was this prisoner exchange made possible?

could this be a result of the agreement that was signed between iran and saudi arabia? c. so i am ha, loveless, the so i will, with saudi arabia is entering its 9th year. we are at war this very moment during this phase of the war, negotiations with saudi arabia have not stopped, as we continued to negotiate the military security and political situation. over the years we've held talks in saudi arabia, son, i am on stock home and switzerland and in kuwait. negotiations have always persisted and so has the military battle. this is a normal situation when 2 nations, ards wool, we presented a number of conditions to saudi arabia to give them the chance to establish close to ties with us and build friendly relationships. we asked them to end their aggression, opened the apples and seaports and to exchange all prisoners. the 4th condition was to pay government salaries in order to improve the humanitarian situation in yemen . none of these conditions are met. we can begin to discuss the political situation

was the humanitarian situation is resolved than we can engage in political talks, the saudi arabia and the u. a. e. we can even hold talks with the agents in aden and in al mahala santa is willing to hold talks with all agents. i most raise of saudi arabia under one condition, the aggression must end. but because they are continuing their aggression, we've refused the whole talks about the military and political files in yemen. we have saudi prisoners. we have sedans, prisoners, american prisoners, and we have jamini prisoners. we were fighting alongside saudi arabia. likewise, saudi arabia has many prison, his vows of holding many talks in geneva, we both came to an agreement to release these prisoners mentioned. there's certain you mean out issues that exist. yes. spectrum who are our agents or axes, or serving the easiest. suddenly we eat an external nations system hasn't been okay for it's b. politicians that want to structure and

but are too dear in place specifically to serve the interest of a born nation. for example, the united states government. it will be o t for there to be a us, how titian a u. s. sadder who is an agent or serving the interest of russia? in fact, they would be arrested, prosecuted and pass se. so wizell t in yes, the little spectrum wizell erie out distance st. really government bar in ass. well, he certainly is, is saudi arabia and e commerce nations. i, to be honest, this is not normal. it's a big shame that some of yemen politicians want to please their allies. to the extent they become agents to saudi arabia and the u. e. we can be friends, in fact, saudis and emerald, ease our our brothers. however, they most respect that

a yemen politician should only serve yemen, serve his nation. unfortunately, this is not been the case. some of yemen politicians convinced themselves that being or becoming an agent is a good thing. they convinced themselves that it is a big accomplishment to being servants, of riyadh abitibi dough, and quite that convince themselves that this was the smart and clever they do for the truth is the only time or relationship least politician should have or develop with any nation is one established upon the foundation of serving the interests of the many people and the yemeni government, and to never deviate from this, especially when saudi arabia and the u. e. a launch a war against yemen. in this situation, a yamani politician should firmly stand against this aggression because this war is being declared on his own people, and he is sworn to protect and serve a coalition of countries that were equipped with sophisticated us and british made weapons, declared war on your government in 2015,

but they did not succeed in achieving their goals to defeat the on satellite back movement. why do you think that is the case? why did the saudi la coalition fail to defeat the on satellite movement? and do you expect that the u. s. and the british government will continue to wage their war on yemen through saudi arabia under coalition. so he asked if, could he, this law that was declared against yemen for 9 years is a school of its own. how much have we learned about was in history? how much have we read and learned about world war? one welled war 2 and the 30 year was the 100 year war. and the american civil war histories taught us a lot about was that occurred in the past and also the ground 0, a war in which while power was launched, wall against the russian empire. today, the war in yemen, which has persisted for 9 years as another lesson in the history of wars. this is because we do not have the same level of sophisticated weapons possessed by the us and british governments. where we do have is a stock pot of russian and soviet union weapons. they've been stored in yemen for

many years. that's the 1st point. secondly, our gemini ami has been able to take these old weapons and upgrade them and transform them into more powerful and sophisticated weapons. there were those who claim and continued to claim that these weapons being provided by ron to santa. however, this would be impossible because saudi arabia and the coalition claim, they've blocked all and drain exit points in yemen from land and sea. so how could these weapons from iran reach us? the 2nd question is, how many weapons would iran have to provide to us in order to put up this resistance for 9 years, it would be impossible for us to continue to war for 9 years. if we did not have the technology resources inside our country, we have students who study for many years in russia has study for many years at russian universities. we have a long history of students who went to russia and studied over the past 30 years. we're seeing of witnessing the result of this education, the russian weapons we have proven to be very effective. this is because these russian weapons are being carried by gemini person who has

a solid will and character and has a solid and honorable leader who is the leader of the revolution. they're fully necessary conditions have been fulfilled in order to revive. we have a leader, we have weapons and dark horse is just the empty people to fighting to protect themselves, to protect their interests and protect the nation. this war is an aggression against us and not the other way round. we are not the ones transgressing against abbot debbie or to buy riyadh or jetta. we only began retaliatory attacks after being bombarded for 3 years straight by this saudi led coalition. what can you say about your most political future once the war is over? who will govern the country? how will the new jamini government in the future deal with the southern separate us regions, alcorda and nor bad airline? we said that after the war ends, we will end to political negotiations for 234 months to a year at the most. the sienna politicians involved in the negotiations must come

out of the dialogue with decisive results. though she wants an independent southern state demanding this because they've been and are being oppressed, therefore we have to know how to resolve this and what is the solution? the solution needs to come within the framework of the unified yemen. the solution can never come from the scope of separation. a divided yemen will only be the beginning of more pressing issues ahead and will plant the seeds for was for many years to come. international humanitarian organizations have reported problems with funding their activities in yemen. often they have not had enough money to provide humanitarian aid. why do you think a large number of countries have enough money to fund ukraine with weapons, but they do not have enough money to alleviate the suffering of the many people. alyssa, offer. this is a good example of the double standard culture possessed by european nations. european politicians do not have the humanitarian morals and ethics to resolve the issue is happening in the world. they distinguish between which refugees they like

and don't like they distinguish between assign him seekers and nations and those who are in need a practice. what can be categorized as a double character or double standard. they have double standards in morals and principals. they talk about not having enough resources to fund humanitarian aid, but on the other hand, they from the ukrainian government with money and weapons. imagine in just one year, 200000000000 dollars were allocated to the nike regime while the rest of the world any receive $20.00 to $30000000000.00 in funding. this proves that these european nations do not care about humanity. they do not care about refugees. speaking of refugees, they only like ukrainian refugees because they have, they didn't have blonde hair and blue eyes. they do not like the refugees that come from palestine or syria or iraq or afghanistan or pakistan or such nations. this is the moral and unjustified double standard. we have a witness from european nation, the way, according to major western opinion polls, most people in africa and asia, view, russian and chinese policies. positively. what do you think?

distinguishes china and russia approach to international affairs from that of the west. do you have stories about how you have experienced the difference in these approaches? see, i will have that she'll see shulty of getting this new eastern alliance that we're seeing develop placed by nations that are not colonial nations that are not raving pillaging and exploiting other nations. in south america, africa, and in asia, they do not practice colonization of other nations. the 2nd point is, i remember the russian philosopher, dostoevsky. who once mentioned that russia should never lean towards europe because he will treat them unkindly. however, russia should head in the direction of the east because they will be treated like royalty and welcomed with open arms. this is a russian philosopher who mentioned this about 200 years ago and advised the russian leaders at the time. china and russia capable of being a source of power for people seeking to liberate themselves from colonialism. russian china have always supported movement, seeking to liberate that nations against imperialism against european expansionism,

including that of france, hall in germany and british domination. the western alliance any seeks to stale wealth and extort nations natural resources. this is their policy with nations in the middle east. they deal and communicate with elite politicians of that nation and can spy with them to transform the people into slaves. china and russia do not engage in such manners. these tendencies and policies never have and been enacted for at the history by russia and china is not part of their philosophical moral approach. therefore, why shouldn't we allow this relationship to foster? this is not just my personal opinion, it is an unbiased assessment of what the west represents to the population in africa, asia, and latin america. what the east represents to these populations, for example, chinese belt and road initiative involves 150 nations. therefore, the west has no other option, but to reluctantly accept china's economic victory of western economies. just as the west enjoyed the fall of the soviet union in 1991. europe must now drink out of

that same cup of defeat. that was tasted by the east. is it because the rise and fall of nations hinge on their economy and also the foundations of enlightenment? this is why we're seeing russia and china thrive on a global stage. you have said that the british government is committed war crimes by selling arms to saudi arabia, which in turn it uses against the many people to day britain is supplying large quantities of weapons to ukraine. do you think london should be responsible for deliberately instigating and prolonging wars around the world? i am unable to highly yes. i mentioned this to one of the british networks at the beginning of the word yemen. i mentioned that britain supply saudi arabia and the u . a entries infrastructure has been destroyed. crane by european nations, just as in the case in yemen. they supplying a fascist nazi light ukrainian regime because they hoped to destroy the would of the russian army, west coast and plotting ways to defeat the russian army. this is the main goal they need to accomplish in order to achieve their other goals, destroying the political,

cultural, and economical foundation, the russian federation. how does your shuttle amendment deal with terrorist elements operating in yemen? who was supporting these terrorist elements and for what purpose? athena and other don't has plagued us with these terrorist elements which had been planted by the american and british intelligence. i'm referring to what is known as isis now caught up. if you do research, you will find that they are indeed a product of british and american intelligence that there are many proofs of this us in britain entered a rock and siri under the pretext of fighting al qaeda. however, it was exposed to the well that the u. s. army and to syria, to protect ices in southern and central syria. this was during the same time that the russian army was supporting the syrian government against these terrorist elements. this is the same situation in yemen. the terrorist groups here operate in the same areas where there is an american presence. u. s. and british forces exist in the province of al,

mom were in order to protect these terrorist groups. however, the jamini army and all of our institutions are not any fighting these groups were actually approaching them from route to stem from old yamini land. a lawyer for the british government, james eddie described the u. k as a non party to the war. but said that the u. k. help saudi arabia with training on air operations and understanding international humanitarian law. is it impossible to continue to call britain, quote, not a party to the conflict here in yemen. i'm with them. we've said he since the 1st week of the war and yemen, arab nations like saudi arabia and the li kuwait's, bahrain, and cas older glad war on yemen. and wave repeated that if it wasn't for the protection of american britain, they would not have been able to declare this will. when they decided to launch this operation, it was launched with logistical political and diplomatic support and protection provided by these countries, america, britain, and france with.