c, o by does is pushing us to world war 3. i mean, we should never be in this position. the u. s. has no business. mm. got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy going from out of development only. i'm going to resist, i'm time to sit down and talk. ah ah, mm. oscillation, grove has always been a hotly debated topic awful, and that population growth is causing our current environmental curtain that population clots due to low fertility rates. it's act, i'm christy,

and you're watching the cost of everything. where today we're going to is something we should be worried about, or not a populous country by the end of the decade. overtaken china, according to the late elliot in 2030 from 1400000000 and 2022 to fall slightly from 1.42 to 1.4. 1 will remain significantly ahead of other nations global pot. and between now and 2050, more than half of the gulf, the democratic republic of congo, egypt, ethiopia, is, and the united republic of tanzania. and the last case death rates. this was caused by reduced infant mortality rate proved access to medical care. this has led to many, quite adequate for feeding. the general population som has laid nearly every environmental problem we're currently facing from clive or land. natural landscape have been transformed to be adap and buildings. people are rapidly displacing watts and this

fear has contributed to millions of forger, bangladesh, and india, as well as china's trinity's environmental for, has led them to the side to have fewer suspects to announce that they would have no more than 2 for the sake of the planet, out in the developed world would reduce a person's annual carbon emissions like more times the savings from not owning a car. so the child might actually take an extra vacation, let's just calling to peru would be between $3.00 to $7.00 metric ton equivalent of 6 cetera. and that's a single vacation, and that had. so how many people is too many people? what estimates very, but according to the us, we are expected to reach peaking 9400000000 and 10400000000 people for of global sustainable developments at nottingham trans univer milestone. why did thing over population is a big problem? how many people do you think the earth can reasonably sustain a kind of

a clear cut number or, and there's no way to really be certain with this kind of thing. centers more around the environmental impacts of environment, nexus and basically how sort of stability and have and have a carbon footprint that's, that's, you know, the question is more, not too much around the numbers, but the focus is an abundance of evidence that they are committing over the years that shows that it's at times bigger than the average citizen, and i mean the country in africa. so the question i'm interested in is, what are the time changed? we've seen that the has that is a much bigger predictor of environment, the decline, the population, but population growth rate actually peaks 50 years. years ago, we were able to live sustainably on this planet. right. and earlier on in a blue sherry history, you would eat it linking to this term that we use. a lot of scientists use an a human imprint is, is ubiquitous. it's everywhere we was become one of the domino competed

a well bacteria virus as yet. but that's kind of the to the 2nd world war with bass production of goods. you know, a technological advantage. dramatic increase of a dramatic shift in our relationship with the but the, the sort of. so in general, global population growth fact in many places in the world, we're seeing a decrease in birth rating off. and it's not to the case that we're still distance and 19 seventies. it's the pictures not quite that the dramatic as a detrimental for the planet. however, carbon footprint many, many times larger than the child born in a high fertility country. i mean it's, it's so many things. it's so many factors like us makes us a very comp looking at. yeah, the impact of inequality, of the political. so like hoops of money into climate and our campaign. so the impacts of politics and it's so many felons. and now people say the overpopulation is the main call number of people. but is that really true when a whole emissions? so isn't that just me directing the blame for society uses on average, just

a quarter of the carmen of something in the, the blaming population growth itself as a key driver of content factors and drivers. i'm so that the statistic he brought up again, the colossal on the other, another kind of equity sat that came out in a recent research last year. over the course of a year is 14 times higher than the average wanted citizen goal of limiting warnings to degrees by 2100. so it's very within countries, in terms of, at the, at the national level as well as when you look at corporation. it's those statistics are they tell a very powerful story. they show that the situation and even if you go down that route, that's as a whole other the racial and gender dimensions of previous attempts to, to the curb where the, this is always been had a very racial undertone. the says population control cause harm in terms of promoting racism. and yeah, i mean if you look at the history of population control panes and attempts to limit the population in most cases of african national nathan minorities in these things . so the focus is often on and it's not just because it's,

these are in some areas places that have often had that kind of rate research gendered undertone. and when we talk about this kind of thing, and especially when it comes round coercion, there, we'll see you back after the rec and when we come back, while others are ready to colonize other planets with human life. ah, ah, i'm to rush him, stay cool. never, i've some, some of course about with the kremlin media machine. the state on russia today, old brand on youtube. ah . mm. children at st. andrew's eventually school suffered nightmarish attorney general,

suppressed thousands of pages of police and evidence that identified don't i was, it was 7 years or 1st. i used to run over here to abuse somebody and run here from cell. some of them are my relatives didn't, but it made me make me pay her. i don't give up with anything. investigation was indigenous to many of the worst criminals got away, never got charged. that technology should work for people with hundreds at conflict with the 1st law. show your identification, we should be very case trust rather than fis, real summoning with robot must protect its own existence with a border. if you'll

listen, look a, do you live muscles? do you look on the initial do when used to put value, what do you do origin. but you also still were saddam most judges from october 24th . and i've gone gone. the billing to blue. you've moved. asian says diesel duty dumbbell soup thing. now on the other side of the camp, you had those who believe that what a population collapse is a more likely event than over problematic decline in global birth rates. with many developed economy, seen there in japan's population is expected to fall dramatically and will set an when the population declines so drastically. this will have made, most importantly, available young workers. i've now back in 1960, there were 6 people. there will be 3 for every one by 2030 percent. this will have profound implications for helen's will need to spend more on pensions and

health care. but at axis, this will cause the government to go further into debt. there will also be less innovation, as young people are more likeness. this potential brain pool will be less gift. now, it's a key concept in economics. the more the more they can consume. so population growth is the best entries, partly achieved their wealth. globally, the add a little more than the replacement love of $2.00 for population to stay the 2nd to plummet rapidly over the world. today, 6 of the replacement level, including 40 of the $42.00 countries lecture of global sustainable development. it needs more resources, things like food, energy, goods, eroded. i mean, yes. so going back to you to minimize the impact of the kind of in terms of the current numbers that we have, that redirect funds towards people who are struggling, who need to feed their fat to heat their homes, you know, and give them another option for the diversity,

so these things have not gone affects. also how we eat and land that are is used to raise cattle to then ship it to west free up a significant amount of space in terms of plan and resources, as well as reduce that people fear uninhabitable. lands from climate change, but because that land is also uninhabitable. so really is all landscape to suit our needs. yeah, i mean, that's the holidays, the moon and other planets for resource as well as tara forms. number one, it's assuming that that, that the earth is done or that there is, there is so much still that can be mitigated and preserved, and the earth and, and go to other places. and it's usually, i mean, if you look at the price of the average game that they're playing and ads about the fact that every single rocket, long $20.00 americans have been an entire year. and if you're feeling the problem but too late, and we know what we have to do when it's not easy, but i would really help scale back a lot of the damage in that population. growth is already slowing down naturally

without any intervention of factors. i mean this, this one thing called the demographers called the demographic kinds of reducing generative qualities and social factors like when women get educated of gender. we've seen that, you know, women for instance, have kids or cultural factors and especially around around reducing charts already . so how do we keep the global economy healthy? i mean, yeah, so population a sort of demographically, completely reverse their, their natal is policy. so they have that, you know, what's the policy? what can i have with climate as the climate crisis gets loads of people moving around the world, hundreds of millions of people in search of new, habitable places. because there are plenty of and you know, for the palate, there are plenty of peak. and if, yeah, it's kind of these, these populations are kind of it, especially when you have the narrative around reducing migration. this is a help the production, roughly stable would be, would be ideal. but then thank we talk about population. it is usually aimed at developing because losers, as they're the ones most often blamed for overcharged. it becomes deeply racist.

and while it is true that the consumption of these resources and the impact of this consumption, which is half 1000000000 people, which is only 6.5 percent of the population dioxide emissions. meanwhile, the communities that do the leader brunt of the impact of climate crisis. so perhaps needs of the people we have and planned for a better future rather on building a planet that enables everyone to live their lives freely. and we'll see back here next time on the cost of everything. ah. ringback because they already had cars, i met you at your store, theory of racial superiority, finish style, 4 years of 30 full prisoner of war, labor camps. 10 prison them unions. and you're still in a senior. i need in the chest leading at all like 25000 people when through the occupy go a finish camps according to the if the ship did, you toil, leggett,

my dear, you're with salmon, didn't giving up a lot of the authors will need, you know, what's the jeep, if you go to the city agreeable to it, but it doesn't go those thousands of testimony and i wanted to do this because maryan gerard. julia. yeah. what a good i feel like it, but there's dang yet. that was, but it, lula oh, i wanted it now to the world because the multi national corporations keeps being nurtured in care of who are in love and, and so you've got a lot of heal. united states of america is different. wearable people long to be free, a fight about it all. ready? basie. so the city and the job is one among several means to run

the hell of us. weston did you call? are they so no. the final goal of these thing revolutions is to ensure that they're in with you, whatever you do, you do not watch my, your show, you won't get anywhere else. welcome to please. if you have the state department to see i x for you go, i change and whatever you do, don't uncomfortable my show is called direct impact. but again ah, watching a a

journalist is killed in a bomb attack in a st. petersburg county submitted critical condition. the attack.