a past one, if, if a, if such meeting is requested, i presume that minister level will be, will be ready to meet secretary link. but for that so we need to at least one condition and willingness their willingness to meet mister church coverage. yeah. only get square, which i'm not an investigator for body, you know that we believe it or not, but we have the division of power powers in russia. he was arrested on charges so we spent espionage, the investigation is going on. we hear statements are coming from the west. we are today secretary blinking talked to mr. level on that issue. or but that will be decided not by minutes. a lot of all the secretary blinking, but by, by investigation, by the evidence that the investigation could provide for the court. that's all i

can say on this, on the same topic. i would like to say that the, yesterday there was an assassination of russian blogger and journalist who is, whose nickname is that ascii his to his real name is, i mean, the suspect was apprehended, and she basically pleaded guilty for no reaction. we have from the international community or from the un or journalist organizations on that grade. so we're still consider that to be a little bit, not a little bit, but to less extent selective. when we're assessing the assessing what happened to journalist here and there. so to say, sorry, we've all covered stores, i'm, i'm, i appreciate it, but not a single world from those organizations that, that should have commented on it. so i have,

they would have commented on and if it was, if it were not the russian journalist, thank you. thank you. thank you, mr. bass said her, it us letter of from the associated press. a couple of follow ups to what you said on, on evan gosh garbage. i'm russian authorities that said that they caught him red handed. um, can you show the world the evidence and evidence that evan was providing information to a government rather than publishing it in articles in the wall street journal as any journalist would do. and apparently, ah, he has not been granted counselor, access and visit with his lawyers. why is the russian

government refusing to do that? um secondly, a follow up on of what you just said about the assassin and this whole gold rush and these information on the tissue. there are many others, of course, but they will not. i will not stop for here 22 sites, all of them. one on just quote you, you said, could you provide evidence? no, i can't, because i'm not in the investigative body and, and i do not have information on the details of her. and the, and the essence of accusations that were, that he was in it use the off her council axis as well. i think that so according to the counselor and diplomatic tradition, so it will be,

it will be provided. but at what station, when i also have no idea that is for the authorities must go to the sites. are you asked also on the on the assassination. right? yeah. and you answered that. okay. me. thank you. thank you mr. master susan honey from we on india, russia, lawmakers said recently that brick nations are in the process. russian lawmakers recently said that brick nations are in the process of creating a new payment, established on a strategy that does not defend the dollar or the euro. and i was wondering if you could confirm that if you have talked about this with your brake colleagues here at the un. and it was interesting because this news just came days before south africa

sent senior officials to russia to quote unquote, recalibrate the global order. can you talk about this recalibration of global order that we hear from russia? so often these days, thank you. we've been talking about the needs to try to delink us from the dependence on dollar a, another for in western currency long time. and that is not just an issue for russia, but to many other countries because we know we, you know, what happens after after you, u. s. and some other countries introduced, introduced to how they called health sanctions against russia. it didn't help much, but that tells us that they are not reliable. their financial system is not

something that we can rely upon knowing that they are at anytime they can switch off or other switched off the international, the payment system. i that's a dollar transactions are not reliable anymore. they sanctioned the door itself because now the dollar cannot travel to russia officially. so we have to find ways to how to know how to move to a new system or for over exchanges with countries that are friendly to us. and we need to find a not with the 22nd of february 2020 to we've been speaking that we need to get the rice, the world economy before it's and we want we want to involve for local currency, the country's currencies, more within the trade with russia, we do it successfully with china, with,

with other countries. we need to know to come of that, that are narcotic, her narcotic the needle, the door represents the south african senior officials coming to moscow to discuss the new, the new configuration of the world, or that that, that the dialogue goes a long time already. now it intensified with the current events and bricks, which is south africa is a member of is an active participant in these discussions. and of course the brakes . countries like china and south africa, brazil, india elements. so this new world policy center quarter that is emerging. so i see nothing, nothing criminal or suspicious in the, in south africa as africans traveling to moscow to discuss this issue. we discussed

these issues with the brakes countries and in, within the shanghai corporation organization in another 4 months regularly. thank you for that ambassador. this is there to share with tennyson for television to quick questions. now actually, many media outlets already started suspected that russia is going to abuse the presidency of the security council. any response. and we know that a large portion of the council members, they are in one way or another against russia federation in this way. how would you expect to work with them to maintain peace and stability with the what i call it mission impossible, which is to show the solidarity in the unity of the council. thank you. there are many articles on that issue before all presents here at a certain point. if you remember, there was

a debate within the western media and among some western leaders trying to question our, our new membership in the security council and our status as the governance member. i already answered part of that question, saying that as long as the current world or the state of the girl world are these based on the un charter. now where it says unequivocally how the, how the un is organized, including the security council, but nothing will change. it will still be the same. i think that these articles on these opinions, or rather a gesture of despair rather than something serious, intangible which can effect our work and the security council on or, or model and the security council. as i said, i don't thing a single country. and we've heard that even after february will presence when the

event started, who thanked us at that time for them. the 2nd thing is, is the role of the presence presidency of the security council, which we veteran church in wolves trying to maintain it. i remember my 1st presence in the council which came come, came on the 1st of july 2018, which a coin sighted with with the last veto over us in the security council. that was nikki haley who was p r at the time. and we were in the consultations room now, and there was a procedural issue because at that time, us wanted to make an amendment to a resolution of palestine that that was under discussion with its own resolution. as if an amendment to which i told him, look, i do not want to go into the u. k. book on the proceedings of the security council. i'm sure many of you are aware of what it is. very useful reference on the

1st day of my presence. i hate to think about it. so let's, let's behave profession. so we did and that simply testifies that we, we do not have used to work with the security council. whoever says that it is in the least biased or you said that many of them, many of our colleagues in the security council will be working against russia. i do not think that will be the case for today's a. p r. breakfast now demonstrated that they already are, they all ready to go along. and besides, the security council is not consistent is not composed all the piece

3 and a few other countries that might have might have been such thoughts, which they never betrayed. at least today, and i'm sure they will, the will during our presence, let's see at the final press conference and after the presence where you are a little thank you bet. think of it. are i ambassador? and have been zachary nelson from them. and i have 2 questions, i totally understand your point as the rule of the un amongst the presidency. but as you attach to the credibility of the un and the values, can you understand normal citizens feel offended, that a country can share the security council when its leader is under arrest warrant by the i c, which is i guess, judicial organ of the you and that's my 1st question. my 2nd question, you have a lot of issues as this month's that you're going to review me know, smile when me, when you're so are there any one where you think there will be any breakthrough?

and if so, which one we know you mentioned minister as me know, smile and smeal mean your so my question is like, what is the most important for you? do you think it's going to be a breakthrough on one of them all falls on the security council are important to us, but they don't want to. i do not want to make it too optimistic statements. i do not expect any breakthroughs on these files, but hopefully gradually we will be trying to achieve progress. some of them are on the credibility of normal citizens, which normal citizens to me or citizens and they, they take situation not as they do. i don't have been in the western europe, even in the western european here in the us, even here in the us that are various opinions on the issue. they're not as straightforward as you mention. now you said that the international criminal court

is a part of the international criminal court is not the part of the one that's point one. i want to make it very clear. sorry, no. secondly, i commented from the decision on the international. ok now quote, besides being stupid, so let's put things straight. hi. that is also also an illegitimate decision meals. now 0, nothing to us. her. and i think that those that encourage the decision, perhaps they already do to get the details. because as i said, what they did, it doesn't make curb us closer to any resolution of the gotten closer. we're leaving her so on the credibility to that. that's a debatable question. at least. thanks, ambassador, here, ah, b to you to quit the turkish news agency on

a dollar. the turkish president recently said that president putin may of is a turkey on april 27th, 14 aeration of turkey's 1st nuclear power reactor, which was built by air russian, a nuclear energy company. rosa thom has presented person received an invitation. it's so does the plan to travel to turkey. thank you. though there's a question that should be addressed to the presidential administration. i don't know about my presence of blood to travel role. if bro present putting respects president that has been another vice versa is very well as you are very well aware . so i do not excluded that. they, i cannot comment on behalf of the person. i have you heard anything regarding us? is that not you bullet them are each and go national news agency ukraine cretan form. i am sure you know the history,

sir. you know very well that russia is on the security council, as well as in the u. n. as a whole illegally, doesn't russia want to start the process of legalizing its membership in the un? as all the other newly formed countries dates after the former yugoslavia, czechoslovakia and the soviet union ceased to exist. thank you. thank you. you know, pretty well that the story is not. what are you great in colleagues in the council, in the mission? are trying to tell us this story is different than the the, the seat of the russian federation in the security council is fully legitimate. are we received it after we were recognized as continue it is of the name of the soviet union with all the legal name that and obligations that come

after it. there wasn't agreement by all the former members of the soviet union, including ukraine in for that. so you might have noticed that this issue that was sort of hot at a certain point was somehow somehow subsided recently. nobody's actively erasing it because they understand that this is better than rolled them. thank you m boss that are 7 am. i cannot, i wish it in new york and ambassador we just find out from the spokesperson for the secretary general, that a good terrorist plan. actually one late a, when a your foreign minister lover of come see it to sit down with them. ah, so my question, he's are what gutierrez, shoot, say,

or should propose it should come with something new. so our week get closer to piece and, and then another question very quick. how many people quoted me? no. last month i had nightmares sometimes about nightmare. about nuclear war. did you have any nightmare lately about that? on the 1st question i, i feel a bit. i find that little bit strange you addressing question on what the antonio dash has to say. the to minutes to level of thinking that from me. perhaps you could have us to stephan or, or as g himself as g himself. what he's going to the come up or forward with she

was saying as far as i know all the time that that he would welcome any initiatives that will lead to peace. secondly, he's ready to facilitate if he's been asked for her, so i don't think that he has a particular plan to offer, continues to love it for that is not the case. let's see when they meet. i'd be, i'd be happy if you could come with something tangible and realistic for, but i have not heard of any plans by the secretary general that are being discussed, discussed or prepared within the secretary within his office on the, on the nuclear war. i actually, well, because i, i know that at least us, we're not asking for the nuclear war when a threatening nuclear world is all this narrative that russia is threatening the world with the nukes. this is a part of

a propaganda as well. we've been saying long time consistently that, that it is not in our military doctrine, which provides for very few specific cases when, when the nuclear weapons can be engaged. and that is definitely not the situation of which, which is in our nuclear llc. but that would help me just have a very quick follow up on gutierrez, for your onset. do you think that the terrace in this, in the last month as being a foley? and i would say all say, now certainly of way follow he's mission has a secretary general, ordinary nation, or you should have done for rush. i should have done more for, for trying to find a way of peace. the question whether he followed his duties or the secretary general of the united nations, it provoked because whatever i answer would be that would be used against me as

they say when, when a person is arrested with a well, the secretary general is instrumental in, in promoting the black sea initiative, which we recognize as at the same time the black sea initiative is clearly one site . it's not because of his fault, but because because our weston colleagues claiming that the russian food experts and fertilize experts are not under sanctions, are doing the utmost to the blog. them basically which sure which is not in the interests of the countries, including the western countries, in particular, developing, developing new who are mostly in need of those fertilizers which, which might affect the future, the future harvest. no, that is perhaps the the main mission where the secretary general

engaged only grade besides, besides that situation in murray will which happen what i do some time ago where he was also also engaged with her. that's basically the rest of the rest. so i cannot to provide you with any information on what so who could do again, i said that the he offered his a good offices when the, when they are required, and that's where we stand them. thank you, mr. ambassador of the community. i am from the arabic daily. i'll quit so out of the i normally ask you about palestine, but this time i ask you 2 different questions. one on sports and one on syria and sports. the fever. i debated the participation of russian

soccer teams around the world and they put the conditions on russia to participate under a new thought flag 40 members of fif. i said, we don't want, we want to boycott russian teams and they lifted up to paris to invite russia for the alarm because 2024. however, the same standard did not apply to indonesia. when ended, he said, i don't want to receive israel immediately. it was cancelled and they pulled out the are the games for under 20. so is there more hypocrisy than that? i wanted to address this and the 2nd on syria, israel almost on daily basis. bomb some areas in syria, 15 syrians or their friends killed in courses. they are bond, i live for airport and it was, i went out of service,

the same thing with damascus airport and almost every, every day there is some kind of israeli or it's nc. however, russia is in almost at least with say, control, and of the space they have the radar, they have the capacity. what do you tell israeli, or you have good friendship with us or you have good relations. why you don't tell them stop vamping silly. like out without them still booming city, but they don't with the security council or of course that that is in admissible what they're doing. they're claiming that they're bombing the uranium praise presence and syria like the u. s. does. by the way, i article the recent briefing of deputy deputy spokesperson of the u. m, who was unable to answer about the syrian presence, present a story, the us presence in syria. that was how will they put

a diplomatically better refrain from commenting? i think you heard it always of yourselves that we do, but unfortunately, this is a long time is rarely practice that does not just concern city alone, but, but the lebanon, as well. and, and other states which israel considered to be to needed the danger as i said, that's an admissible that that's not only us who speak about it, but we speak perhaps most vocally not on sports recently. well, you, you asked what you focus. there is a lot of hypocrisy in this world and a lot of double standards. but my, i was, i was struck by comments made by the chair of the, the international olympic committee. thomas. bah, recently, who said

a few things on the barrister lympics, the 1st no russian teams are allowed to participate, or whatever they come on in teams sports are prohibited. secondly, athletes who are not associate, but to support the russian military operations are prohibited to participate. i mean, besides being the witch hunt, i have a question how they will be that they will be singling out those athletes that that support do not support military operation. no, somebody was saying to me, you have a sports club which is called cisco, which is the central sports club of the army. and indeed, when it was established long time ago, and it was the army club in the soviet times. today it's

a commercial commercial enterprise just bearing the same name. ah, so is it the criteria? what is the criteria that looks, that looks miserable, frankly. the way the olympic committee are far too far. i don't think they, they may condition the on the on wearing on, on wearing the insignia, the, the emblem. so whatever i think that they simply exclude at least we've, i exclude us from the, from the international competitions on the far own. the future woke up.