the me, the year was $938.00 germany saw the rise of fascist dictator adolf hitler. klaus schwab was born into a nazi germany on the 30th of march that year. now later that fall, crystal knocked the night that saw thousands of jewish people rounded up by the nazis of pogrom. that would start what the world now knows as the holocaust. now this is not to say that schwab had any ties to the nazis, but a young klaus certainly spent his early years under a fascist ruler who had dreams of a one world order lead by nazis. psychologist today regularly say that these early childhood experiences shape the adults that we become not to mention our parents and caregivers experiences. so that theory holds true. the world economic forum founders advocacy for

a globalized government is pretty easy to explain. but not much else is known about klaus martin schwab. he was born in 1938. he grew up, went to university, became a business man, an economist, and also a professor. then out of nowhere at age, 33, in 1971, became the founder of the world economic forum. so from birth to 33, nobody really knows. well, he did eventually marry a woman called hilda, who he met just before the launch of w e f, and married her in 1972. so she's approximately 10 years his junior class and hilda have 2 children, nicole and only be a they all serve and chair positions at w e. f. but this is about as much as the media knows about klaus it seems his childhood is a mystery. who was his best friend as a boy? did he have any girlfriends? did he play any sports?

nobody knows. it was as if one day he was born. and suddenly he was an adult and founded the w. e. f. it seems class his personal history only begins there in 1971 to talk more about schwab and the w e f. we are being joined by economist and an author of several books. his latest book is called the evil twins of technocracy and trans humanism. that book is out now. patrick would. the editor in chief at technocracy dot news is here with us. pat, thanks for being with us. first, can you clue us into cloud swamps early life? why in this day and age is there such scant information about his background? i mean, for a man as famous and powerful as he, how can there be such a gap in his public history? part of the reason is, is because clar schwab got involved with

a group of people that were at the time moving towards the creation of a very important international group called the trilateral commission. that was founded in 1973 by david rockefeller. and so big new brzezinski at the time, a few years earlier, schwab was at harvard university. and it was at harvard that schwab met henry kissinger. and kissinger, being a little bit older than schwab, was, became a mentor to him. he was an engineering student, actually already had his engineering doctorate, but he was an engineer. he was also interested in political science and economics. kissinger took a liking to him and not just because they both had a accent some sure. but he took a liking to him and kissinger role at the time. he was very much a known as

a rockefeller man. at that point, he was working for richard nixon, of course. but both nixon and kissinger were considered to be rockefeller. people are agents of the rockefeller dynasty, if you well, and their goal was to expand beyond the united states and other parts of the world . that's what the trilateral commission became. they, they went into gibbon, japan, and europe in north america. 2 to try and influence economic policy around the world. they call it the new international economic order back in those days. and schwab being from europe and from germany at that point. but he was actually born and raised in switzerland. ah, but he was german at that point, kissinger recognized that schwab was a very highly intellectual person. and that he had aspirations to

make a splash in europe of the same type that the trilateral commission was going to make him united states him again around the world. so he encouraged schwab to go back and start the early iteration of the, the world economic form. it wasn't known by that name. originally, the change of name soon thereafter is formed. and the purpose of the world economic form back then was to bring about a to see more, less a discussion group amongst some leadership of the region and europe to discuss policies related to globalization. and initially it was pretty much a meagre effort, but then so was the trilateral commission as well. it was a relatively small organization, just a 17080 people with i'm in that 9073. and, ah, at any case, the role that schwab played early on was to see was to create a beachhead for globalization. for this new type of globalization in europe.

kissinger was about to enter into the 1st membership role of the trilateral commission, $973.00. that was just a couple years later. and so over the years both organizations have grown and i'd have to say that klaus schwab is not the independent instigator of the world economic form at all. he was very much tied into the original crowd of that focused and i rotated round the rockefeller world. and he went on obviously become very successful in his efforts. so did the trilateral commission at this long story. we may not have time to get into it right now. but anyway, that was kind of the early genesis of the us and schwab has maintained connection with kissinger as a cup of as other mentors that he learned that he met at harvard. and in fact, i remember i can picture a conference that schwab participated in maybe 2 or 3 years ago,

where somebody ask him, who are the most important people in your life back then? and henry kissinger was, i think he said there's 3 people. and we, kissinger was one of those 3. so even to this day, there's this relationship here between that part of the quote unquote global elite . and i'll schwab in the world economic form that hopefully that kind of cover. so the question, now let's jump to today, the w e f is attended by the who's, who of the global elite there's, you know, industry ceo's president's prime ministers and so forth. why? and how did schwab managed to make global elite desire to take part in this? i guess we can call it a social club. why did they take part in the 1st place? explain for us if you can haven't w, f, w e as became a thing. the world economic forum is on one hand,

a discussion group. they don't, they're not like the united nations exactly where they make policy that has, that can be enforced in various countries. however, starting back in the early 19 seventies. again, the trilateral commission set about to create a new international economic order. that's what they called it. i now know that to be technocracy, that was not known at the time, but least to us, but that turns out that's what it, what exactly what it was, a new international economic system. and so as that new internationally can, i can order grew of course, all the businesses of the world are involved now have to be the international corporations, the global corporations that have no roots, any particular nation, or least, no loyalty to a particular nation. maybe like we have some companies in america for instance, that are not loyal to america whatsoever. they might as well just be in china or

uganda doesn't make any difference where they are. they operate globally. but when, when you shake the money tree in the world, people line up to get their share. that's may be kind of to simplistic. but when you're shaking up the international order and creating a new flow of money, a new flow of business activity, all the people that are playing in that space want to be intimately involved. and this is what happened at the world economic forum. the will, the comic forum brings all these business leaders together along with government officials, along with backing officials of you know, the heads of central banks is on. i mean it's, it's a place to go if you want to network and, and get in the flow of things. that is where you're going to go. now conversely, why is klaus was invited to events such as the latest g,

20 and bali. i mean that of that, for example, is supposed to be for elected leaders, heads, estates, foreign ministers, and so forth. why does he get invited to these big official events? good question to the world. economic form is not a nation state obviously. and however, the w. e, f has been recognized by many nations, well, including the united nations, but also switzerland and germany and a bunch of other european nations. they have been recognized as a global institution. and this is kind of along the lines of schwab's stakeholder capitalism idea. in fact, he's been pushing the stakeholder capitalism stuff since he 1st started 1971. and but the, um, the stakeholder concept means that outside parties can be involved with whatever it

is, is going on in a given country. and schwab is very open about the stakeholder capitalism. thing he says, well, you know, the environmental groups are stakeholders, they should be involved in meetings and stuff. and of course, the corporations are stakeholders and the government, people, government leaders are stakeholders and there could be, you know, other entities around the world that might be stakeholders. but in the, in, in the frame of, of being a stakeholder class, schwab use the world economic forum as being the most important stakeholder non governmental stakeholder in the world. and they've been declared to be an international organization officially and international organization. they have a birth that have the highest rating, for instance, with united nations. and so it's no surprise that he would get invited to and even if he didn't, he would just show up who's going to tell him to go away. wow. ok,

let's, let's take a moment to digest all of this. so coming up next french president emanuel, my crohn, and his ties to mr. swan patrick would, will be back to discuss it. the ammo will be right back. ah . hi, i'm rick sanchez and i am here to plead with you. whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different. my little opinion that you won't get anywhere else. look, if it pleases you to have the state department to see a weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations, choose your facts for you. go ahead. i change and whatever you do. don't watch my show, stay main street, because i'm probably gonna make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again,

you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change to wayne thing. a, with

a 2 atrocities and other countries, united states of america is different. wearable people long to be free. they will find a friend in the united states. ah, with a little bit about it evolved anybody, basie, she's only sitting p, draw the look at both a incentive cigarette. a few color revolutions is one among several means to reach the goal of conquering foreign lands and bringing them onto the helm of u. s. weston, they can all make interest to pop inside it. i did that he did to everybody get them. okay. yeah, yeah. we will train corollary sol, suite best, se loader,

softball emery can. the final goal of these thing revolutions is to ensure, oh, there are no independent players in the world anymore. mm. ah, welcome back to m o. i. manila chan were continuing to learn more about klaus schwab. patrick would thank you so much for sticking with us. so tell us more about the w e f. what is the, the nature or the point of these annual davos summits? what do they discuss? and are these topics really consequential to us regular civilians? very much. so i'm schwab wrote a book called recently called the great narrative. and one has to kinda get an idea of what narrative is all about, but, and i don't have time probably explain it right. the 2nd, but whoever crates,

the narrative, pretty much controls that down line of that narrative. and that's the most important thing that schwab contributes to the whole w e. f. crowd he crazy narrative. and so he wrote this book called the great narrative. and especially when code had he put out the propaganda line that this rep basically is paraphrase this represents a unique opportunity to call for a great we said that this is necessary. now with cov, it is happened in the world is on a, i down and, and we need a great reset to reset the economic system altogether. well, of course, as what a global crowds been calling for for decades, but they made it lat sound like us brand new idea. and so he wrote that what he wrote, a book called the great reset to but he then he wrote a book called the great narrative. and so when people meet and in davos

they hear elements of the great narrative. now they didn't, the people at 10 davos were not the ones that created the great narrative that schwab wrote about. i traced the history on this by the way, all of the contributors were named in the front of the book. i went and did a research project on all of to see where they're from, what kind of industry they were in and blah, blah, blah. and, and i found out that the vast majority, like 80 percent of the contributions to the great narrative came from academic institutions in the united states. not from europe, not from any country in the south, not from south america, not from africa. it came from academic organizations within the united states and very elite ones at that. so you have a foreign, essentially, a foreign narrative that's been created on how the world is going to look at 10 to

15 years with steps on how to get there. and this is the narrative that is promoted at the world economic forum. there's never another alternative narrative. there's never any pam b, whatsoever is always this one is present it. so how would you expect, i suppose any of those companies to act when they get drilled with this new great narrative, they're going to say, well, it sounds good to me if that's where the money is. that's where i'm going to be. and that's what i want to do. um and so they run off after the great narrative. i'm sure some of them don't even question it, they think, well this of the greatest thing i've ever heard. and you know, i can't wait to do it, can't wait to fulfill that. others might be skeptical. and they might say to themself, i'm skeptical, but i want to get rich. so i, what i've got

a fall of the gray narrative. either way, whoever controls the narrative controls everything this within that narrative, you know, us as time moves forward. this is exactly what's happening here. now talk a little bit about the world economic forums. young global leaders program, the why g l. what is it? who's graduated from that program? what do these people go on to do as alumni of this program? will yes, that the young leaders program was a stroke of genius on schwab's part. i'm sure to bring young people to the table to indoctrinate them with the great narrative at st as this is back to the great narrative. again, this is where you get a dr. nate. it doesn't matter what your education or skill level is or what your, your skill set or what position you might hold a government. but the young leaders program is basically, i hesitate to use the word brainwashing, sort of, but, you know, they're,

they're talked about incessantly about what this future is going to be with a crated. the young leaders are not invited to create the future. in other words, to have discussions about what the future should look like. no, that's left up the class schwab. and as it is high level cronies. but once they have determined, well, this is the way the world's going to go. then they're going to bring these young people in, and they're going to put them on that, put them in at the table or on the table, whatever to the pow this in their head. this is where it's going and you need to participate. you need to follow along with it and do the things that are appropriate that will get us down the road. so when they go back to society, whether they ever become something or not, some don't by the way there's been, i think, 3000 or more, more than 3000 graduates of young leaders program over time. some of them amounted to absolutely nothing. they just went home and maybe they became, you know, started

a business or some they never really got involved and global affairs. but others did. and for instance, half of the people, the top level people right now in the canadian government happened to be young, you know, graduates of the young leaders program and saw like a university. exactly. it is not like becoming a rhodes scholar either by the way. it's not that high level and, and, and it's not really educative. it's more, you know, conditioning of the people to think a certain way. and, you know, to realize that they need to play along with the game as a, as they move forward. and there's been lots of people that, that have been surprising that had been on the young leaders list. and the list is public, by the way it's, i don't not really sure who got it, but i've received a copy of it. and about 31 or 32, maybe 3200 people on the list. and i look through the actual, i read through the whole list, i was compelled, it just,

it took me awhile to get through it. it probably gave me headache too. but i looked at the whole list and there was a few names on the pretty surprise. i can't, i don't have any my mind right. the 2nd, but some people it's kind of wouldn't expect maybe would have done that, but they did. and they're all over the world is not just in one place. it's all over the world. now the young leaders program is interesting to say here, this is a training school. this was important to somebody like henry kissinger way back when and even over the decades. this has been an important issue. how do you train leaders to go into government to do the things that the great reset wants him to do that? will that will facilitate this new international economic order? the united nations is also picked up on this because they do a lot of training to, of course, you know, they, they take people and, and, and, you know, work them over really good somehow that they get un ideas in their brain. but the world economic forum and the united nations work hand in hand are very closely

aligned and it's all over the world economic forms website as well as the united nations website there. what virtually one in the same like 2 peas in the same pod as far as operational concerns go. is it fair to characterize class schwab as an, an elected world leader, as an unelected leader? no. i, personally, i would not. he is an academic, however, like henry kissinger wasn't academic and normally the, the power structure is not run by academics. more often than not is run by the international banking community. that would be the central banks and certain, and probably some commercial banks as well. you got some really giant banks around

the world like like the j. p. morgan chase like city group, like wells fargo, like deutscher bank, bank of england sawn. i'm but the power structure seems to be where the money flows. that was rockefeller's role in 1973. he was the chairman at that time of chase manhattan bank, which later became j. p. morgan chase and chase manhattan was the 3rd largest bank in the world. well, it does, it didn't mean exactly that. david rockefeller ran the world because he didn't, he wasn't like, it wasn't acting like a political liter. um, but it shows that the influence of the narrative, the influence of the other to on the other people that came in, who would be more interested in creating a new international economic order than a banker, a money person. that makes sense because money is the heart is the heart, the blood of the economic system. so over the decades we've seen

this banking institution flux a little bit where some banks would kind of maybe drop out, others would come in. but today, interestingly enough, the power structure in the trial out of commission especially, has shifted from what we would view as commercial banks to central banks. and there's not very many central banks in the world and one for every country, but one central bank, like our federal reserve does not serve other countries, just serves us or our government. but every central bank in the world right now, for instance, is working on creating a central bank digital currency. now that'll change, but the economy has that for sure. and you have at the top of that pyramid, if you will, the bank for international settlements and basel switchover, they are the ones that are, well, that's the central bank,

the central banks around the world. they pretty much set the policy and the tone for all the other central banks in the world. this more likely is where you see the power coming from. in other words, who orders the narrative? where does it? where does the narrative, the research for the great narrative come from? if you look at class, schwab's book, the call, the great narrative, you'll see that i don't know 80 percent or 90 percent of the people that contribute to the book. we're academics. well, academics don't act and apparently they don't just one day stand up as a, i'm going to write a paper about the world back or, or something like that. not, it's not the way it works. their pit, they work for pay, they work for hire. and the money that flows to educational or academic institutions to crate studies, the support globalization, they're all funded by somebody. question is, who?

because the funders are the ones that pick the topics. if you understand what i'm saying, they could pick exactly what they, what write a paper about is justified as policy, whatever was some type of, you know, do some academic magic on it. all. looks good to everyone that this is what we have to do. so the academic class, if you will, that section that layer of globalization academic class actually doesn't have any power at all. do they have influence? yes. is class schwab influencer? absolutely. but as a really a substitute comptroller, i dare say no. he's not pat. this has been enlightening. it's unfortunate. i have to leave it right there. i am out of time. thank you so much. patrick wood is the editor at technocracy dot news. and that is going to do it for this weeks episode of modus operandi that showed that dig deep into foreign affairs. i'm your

host manila chan. thank you for tuning in. we'll see you again next week to figure out the ammo. ah ha. this in 1935 fascists, italy, led by dictator benito mussolini decided to expand its colonial empire in africa and take over ethiopia. by that time, ethiopia was the only fully independent state on the continent. back in 1896,

its inhabitants were able to defeat the italian colonists and defend their independence. since then, rome craved for revenge for the humiliating defeat. in the morning of october 3, 1935. without any announcement, the fascists attacked ethiopia and bombarded it most severely. ethiopian armed forces fought courageously, but the brutality of the italians knew no bounds. they use not only massive bombing attacks on civilians, but also chemical weapons, toxic gases. this change the course of the war. as a result of the occupation of ethiopia by the fascist 760000 people were killed. the capture of the african state was committed with europe's tacit approval . britain and france recognized the annexation giving the green light to further

fascist expansion in the world and paving the way for the outbreak of world war 2.