the only place in africa when the residents live on water. this whole place is build on filth, is often called african venice because of the numerous pathways and the houses that have been build fear on these pills. so much for africans can flim well well, well you're about to give the shock of your life with this is the only way to get about you and i go to school, get on a boat. you want to go to church, get on a boat. you and i will, is shot, you got it, get on a boat, but you just look around the poverty that's around this place, of course, takes it away from what you might know. as the romance and beauty laid tally and

begged rob it's name after this is the biggest fish market. apparently there is a leg was if you one fish from lay rose, you have to have a pot of mccorkle and you can see this from everywhere. so apparently it's not the women that fish, if they are men who catch the fish and then only after do their women get to sell it. they're an accountant number of people here because even during the last census in nigeria, in 2007, there wasn't enough. people counted here to have a legitimate figure. it's estimated there over 50 schools here that emerge in the size of the place and the population. if that is the case, the people here are mostly of burning origin. they were fishermen by trade. they moved here to try and look for a bed alive here on the outskirts of lee was just off of the 3rd mainland bridge

and they continue to live in these pathways in these land, mark always laid down. jose busy goose is a good place to one producing guess, fish markets and the whole of legos where you need to fish. remember, i'm up to down one the lucas bush. that's a part of how they live. we have to negotiate pathways. you have to negotiate everywhere. my smallest more, everything done a little bit more for you want to know they negotiate the a way to life. they negotiate their way through this place and doesn't want to have it another way. we have a more bio show that shot go around and then it sells food as it goes on my gold gold isn't ever a fantastic place. and that's the route for the our thanks for joining us for the latest breaking news and updates had over to r t dot com and be sure to follow us on all social media platforms. we'll see back very soon with

o. recent events surrounding the world cup have shown a possible inequality in the application of disdain. for countries who do not show a quality for homosexual rights, i'm sky now huge. and on this edition of $360.00 view, we're going to examine if the west is exploiting homosexual rights and countries as a way to disrupt them and level complaints of human rights abuses. and why this only happens in countries which are considered to be adversarial. let's get started . ah huh. at the end of 2022 fans wound in at various hours of the day to cheer on their country and watch the world a comp cup competition and guitar. now, despite knowing policies of guitar,

7 years before, when the country was 1st picked and knowing they were very unlikely to change, there were still demonstrations and protest at the lack of rights for the homosexual residents of the country. now the golf country's being air muslim nations are very well known at being anti, what they call the gay agenda. according to them, it is against their culture and religion, and they do not legally tolerate it in any of their countries. but weeks later, no changes have been made to the policies regarding homosexuals who live in guitar . but this has not been the only time the subject of homosexual rights has actually been used to create public discourse. and most often, the issue only becomes problematic for countries which seem to not embrace the agenda of the wes. so is this a coincidence? well, joining me now discuss is tim gordon. other of several books, including the case where patriarchy and catholic youtube are in podcast are welcome

. tim. thanks a 1000000. great to be ok. there is a lot of mainstream detraction of those who criticize the gay agenda or the global homo, as it can be called as some of the stronger critics like to call gay agenda. so let's start from the basics. in your view, is there a gay agenda or a global homo agenda that is pushing specific policies, both in the west and more traditional countries? without a doubt, without a doubt, global homo is a real phenomenon, and it's expressed in every single expression that we see worldwide of globalism in all of the, the globalist entities. whether you're talking the un, the e, u, the w e f. there are many, many more subsidiaries of all of these, but if you look to agenda 2030 of the united nations, which i'll be citing at least a few times and i'll talk you today. the 17 sustainable development goals include

several references to l. g, b, t, and the exportation of it from the west to, than on western countries. that is to say, the only hold outs, those countries that cling to either christianity or islam depending on their location, need to be converted. and that's, that's precisely what it turns out. the goals of agenda 2030 are, is conversion of hold outs in the west isolation of christians or muslims in the west or in the east economic isolation and alienation, ostracize zation of them. that's goal number one. goal number 2 is to convert and to condition aid as the means of that conversion. those non developed countries that are either christian or muslim. so it's an absolutely explicitly codified set of goals, set of parameters that are not incidental to globalism but seem to

be at or near the center of globalism. and hopefully we could talk some about the animating principles for such expressions of globalism today. but it's definitely codified. yes. and it's definitely an agenda why it's interesting. i want to look at something is obviously the arab countries there actually i think very united and standing against it be keeping up the term christian. i think this is something that many people, if you are a christian, you riser, as a divide amongst christianity right now, the united states is a huge number one religion. the u. s. is still christian, yet obviously they're one of the more proponents of a global gay agenda. what is that divine look like amongst the christian that the people have faith because like i said, very few countries that are actually christians, the dominant is actually sticking to it. they're the ones pushing a part of the agenda on to more air of nations right now. well, i can speak most explicitly to roman catholicism, which is not to put too fine

a point on it. the most doctrinally, unilaterally lasting lee anti gay, a christian denomination of them all, and i'm not using anti kessler. i'm using it as a compliment. and so what we see those of us commentators within the catholic tradition is a decisive attempted shift that reverses the by millennial catholic tradition of strong a catholic, moral theology, the catholic intellectual tradition of moral theology to reverse that in the name of this most recent pope we just had our beloved benedict, the 16th pass, and beginning immediately after francis's election, pending in 2013 attempts at a decisive shift that can't happen because in roman catholicism it's

a government really of laws not, not pope's. there is nothing he can do this. this is a deep de feed. a matter comes from scripture, it comes from tradition. there can't be a reversal in the christian orthodox. it's basically the same thing. you don't have the pope's, but you have the strong bi millennial tradition which, which basses itself on a lot of the same scriptural and patristic fathers. and they all say one thing they speak in one direction against homosexuality. it's one of the 7 sins that cries out to heaven for vengeance. just like it's really clear in islam protestantism, they are roughly 39000 different denominations of protestant. and that is, as all questions and protestantism really pastor centered the question of whether or not a given protestant denomination will be open, open to change on the l g b t q. question. and generally speaking evangelicals or not. whereas mainline

protestants have proven themselves over the last 15 years to be sadly open to it. so, so there is some distinction to be made within the broad heading out of distinction to be made amongst into certain countries who might not was being enacted here. so who do you think is actually behind this agenda? do you think it's the western governments or do they have certain individuals or factions inside these governments? i can read you some of the agenda, 2030 caught 5 points that are on point. that has been shown to be super national entity that are more important and determinative of what certain western demarco, liberal democracies seem seemed to be inclining toward with regard to the l g b t q agenda. but it is as a matter of import export, it has been

a few countries i'm, i'm sad to say the united states is one of the primary ex borders of the l g b t q agenda. but, but also the e u and the u. n. countries have been really, really aggressive. nato has been really, really aggressive in conditioning aid to 3rd world countries like africa, some in south america, upon the acceptance of what, what, what a roman catholic like me would call an in anti life agenda, which is inclusive of contraception. abortion and l g b t q. in 2015. for example, i'll read to you something that i found in my research. the un general assembly adopted agenda 2030, which outlines 17 sustainable development goals to guide international development . for the next decade. the s d g 's build off the previous set of global goals. these come from agenda 21. they're called the millennium development goals,

and they identify a $169.00 specific targets focused on creating an economically socially and environmentally sustainable world. what this means is creating a world that is unilaterally pro secular liberalism and a key piece of establishing an order of post christian secular liberalism is pushing l g b t q. really hard. yes, yes. in the law fair, i agree with you, but also in the culture it well, and that's the question i don't think and maybe i'm over sorry. banner for i myself . i don't think anybody should ever be killed for a choice like that. i don't think that's the place that anybody should stand and some of these governments do take that position, that is different for i think from overall what we're talking about here. i do think that that is something that could be worked on. not necessarily the pushing of the agenda within the education system, the social system, those sorts of things, which makes me wonder,

what did these western countries think they stand again, from pushing this agenda? do you really think they're in it just to save people's lives? so those that might be actually being, being victims in these countries that are being brutalized or is it really what they claim it to be? do you think they support the rights of marginalized people who identifies homosexual or you think there's a bigger reason, as we've seen time and time again, this is just being used as an excuse. certainly it's being used as an excuse that you're certainly right, scotty to distinguish between christian nations and islamic nations, where that's in previous christian law fair, even in this country prior to a case called lawrence versus texas in 2003. the individual that we have a robust tradition of states rights in this christian nation. where, what, what justice scalia called the, the individual states, the labs are a forums of experimentation. we're allowed to develop moral laws that were to be

developed not by the congress, but by state legislatures. and therefore you had more or less 2 kinds of states, red and blue. and prior to 2003, it was left to that the moral legislation to be against pro gay law fair was left up to individual read states. after 2003, you have a forced sep and illegal i zation of bands on sodomy after 2015 in this country. there is a forced illegally zation of individual state benz on gay marriage, much as you had a, a movement to illegal eyes, illegal ising certain vices from the perspective. the decisive perspective of the christian tradition on issue such as contraception, abortion pornography, those were all individual cases that rose before the supreme court under the warren

court. 1965 contraception in in griswold versus connecticut. they made it illegal for individual conservative states who illegally contraception 4 years later in 1969, a case called stanley versus georgia. they made it illegal. they the supreme court to illegal eyes even if you're a conservative christian state. pornography 3, we all know they made it illegal to illegal eyes, abortion. and they did so in 2003 with regard to sodomy in lawrence versus taxes and they did so with regard to individual conservative states. ah, that would illegal eyes gay marriage in 2015 under o. burger fell versus hodges. so 11 important american distinction that ought to be made is this country stands for the proposition of states rights that the federal congress should really only be making. last resort legislation that's not moral

in character that's codified them or 10th amendment or 10th amendment, codified, something called the general police powers, the powers to regulate health, safety, welfare, morals, and security. and that means that with the individual, 50 state legislatures resides the power to moralize. there should basically be 2 kinds red states and blue states. but the supreme court, starting in the 60s, made it illegal for the conservative states to legislate in one direction, which would be against porn contraception, sodomy, game, carriage, et cetera. that's what we have to reverse in this. well, and jim gordon, let's continue this conversation. i had talked about the idea that marriage is something that goes across state lines and how that argument was used to push for a federal and at federal acceptance of the law. when we come back, we will continue to look at how authentic the west personal homosexual rights and foreign countries really is going with our guest. him, gordon, stay to ah huh

. ah ah, donald trump is again at the nexus of american politics. he's also the 1st american president to face jail time. the entire legal apparatus of the state appears to be aligned against trump. can the rule of law survive this legal odyssey? no one else showed seemed wrong when all proofs just don't hold any world. yes, to see proud disdain becomes the advocate. an engagement equals betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart,

we choose to look so common ground. hello, welcome back. we're talking about the global, queer agenda, with author of the case of patriarchy and catholic youtube and pod cast, or tim gory, and welcome back to him. now, before the break, we were talking about marriage. and obviously i, before we get to the global issues, that's very, very important. for the one case of a said marriage cross state park lines. that's how they were able to get around the 10th amendment and states rights. what was your answer back on that and why gay marriage was allowed in the us? well, that would be a good something called an accommodate clause provision. and that's not actually how was argued in a burger fell. it like all the other so called substantive due process cases. i've listed all of the progeny cases of substantive due process, which are inclusive of griswold versus connecticut. stanley versus georgia roe vs wade. lawrence versus texas. they simply argued that of all of these

issues, contraception, porn sodomy, a gay marriage, unmistakable vices from the decisive perspective of the christian tradition. our natural rights are natural rights that cannot be reached by law, even state law, which is supposed to be sovereign in the realm of moralizing legislation in this country. they said, look, these rights are so important that they are what we call thought they received fundamental rights protection. which is nonsense because in cases like 2005 q over city of new london, they're taking away the fundamental right of private property. they're taking away the fundamental right to life, which is actually a natural right along with property it by roe vs wade. one of the cited cases that allegedly stands for the proposition of fundamental right to abort, right?

so there is a fundamentally codified war at the heart of what constitutes a fundamental right. ok so, so i want to stop you there because i said, i want to run out of time without us talking about global issues. and this is what kind of brought this conversation today, because i know you watched all the protests in these public displays against guitar, regarding their lack of rights for homosexuals and their countries. nothing new. this is been with him for hundreds of years. what was your impression of the situation in the dentist protesting? actually, i think they were going to be able to change something that was rooted in religious law, not just government law. well, it's interesting isn't it? because in islamic nations, the problem of amick ability, or accommodation of liberal western democratic tolerance is globally speaking at its lowest. so there's not

a lot of risk in these islamic countries of capitulation to the aggressive world wide l g b t q agenda. and you'd pointed out, well, in, in, in some countries and i identified those as the islamic ones instead of making it illegal merely, they are actually punishing with death, homosexual acts and things like that that isn't the tradition in christian countries in christian countries. we have accommodated the l g agenda and we were slowly over the you know, since the, from the french revolution to now christian countries have been infiltrated is the best word. and it's because we had a, not necessarily a softer stance, but a more lenient penalty for such vices as sodomy, gay, marriage contraception pornography than in those islamic countries. we were a softer targeting, and i think that's,

that's the best way to make begin to make the explanation that the christian countries were the west who lost their faith, lost their religion and sold out to the one world globalist l g, b t, q, agenda and i mean, i think, i think you're acting as much in this interview. is there an agenda? if so, what drives it? that seems to be a little bit of a mystery, but there is one and it was a civic. i think that's a bigger question is why does it always feel like, especially like the current by administration, united states, are they fair when they're advocating for homosexual rights in one country and saying, look, you're not doing this so therefore we're not going to give you aid but they're ignoring the lack of another's based, basically on which country is considered a friend or foe. saudi arabia versus iran side area versus the united versus dubai. it's amazing how they somehow don't ever think about those same rights and they're dealing with a country they considered to be an ally. sure,

i mean, all i can say with certitude is that there's the question is closed the if you, if you look to the, the sustainable development goals of agenda 2030 they, they make provision time after time after time, that countries that aren't developed to use their term if they want to join the rest of the world and it's, it's implied to receive aid the way most western countries. ah, we're breaking news russian foreign minister survey. laugh ross and his turkish counterpart are in on car discussing the bilateral agenda, including the conflict in ukraine energy cooperation and the black sea green deal. let's take a lesson about him as a better. andrew said they said about kind of making me creating an outcome

. so your foreign minister of rochester, elaborate last time when that again select the telephone that, that them, i'm sharing the foreign minister is meeting on the g 20 for the earthquake. russia has provided great assistance to our country. russia sent in their rescuers cruise to the common mirage. you should be. they ascend there and 250 strong rescuing team and they have also provided humanitarian really is sent and right away. immediately they san humanitarian relief from various regions of russia. we have received support in the safety of catherine and mirage and had tie and they have deployed field hospital and also would like to say that currently in this city or is inc in the head type

province. this sick, the damage mention one hospital is filled trading patients. so in this regard, i would like to express, some are granted here to the russian government to the russian people for it they support i have just mentioned it is argue we are in constant contact with started here. we have very busy agenda. and yesterday we met at the dinner and we talked, going through dinner and today 1st we thought that it was talked with between the 2 of us. and then we had a wider meeting for that larger scale meeting. and i would like to say that the meeting was paradox. if we also talked about the regional issues, especially it concerns all the ukrainian light. it says here, incidentally, damage in this matter is at priority on the verge. some glee,

i would like to say that unfortunately has been more than a year that there were, it was raging, that is damaging russia and ukraine and the entire world that we have expressed to our enemies. then get an understanding that only based on negotiations and international law, these were, should be and it shows image and we are rated to provide any assistance in this regard. and we make every effort to resolve this matter. and we stay in touch in contact with both parties. our president stays in contact with his counterparts few days ago in brussels. i also met with mr. calabria for administrative ukraine, and i also invited him to visit our account 3 today with sir g. a well, as i talked about the grain deal yesterday, we talked about the grand deal, eastern build grain agreement. we believe that diploma sin negotiations have

a yield results also very the change shown prisoner is and we attach a lot of significance to the extension of this deal. and this regard. we also badge great significance to the fact that the global food crisis was prevented because of that had helped to prevent this drivers in an indicator called. and we also believe we should remove all the obstacles. this is on the bound of exporting rushing fertilizers and rushing drains. and in this regard, there is also similar understanding on the un behalf, everybody and the secretary general law of the un is making efforts in this regard and perkins support. so this efforts and how should we spoke with mr. good farish in new york?

and we tell him about that. we are thinking about what we can do to gathered to remove this obstacle is special you with my counterparts from the u. k. from the us we discuss this matters with them the way i talked about what needs to be done to resolve all this issues so that we could extend the grain deal . and we also talked about other regional matters. and i like to say that to be and especially if the syrian does here weight scouts. a lot of that on the, on april, the 4th of this here, deputy ministers of our countries there was watery per tide meeting in moscow plant guidance that was attended to by us close by rush. i would like to express my gratitude, this or again, the foreign ministry of russia. we are grateful,

sir. again, the foreign ministry of russia for hosting this event, la rope himself. personally, you have an introduction remark to this meeting and moscow. all the parties were transparent and open, they expressed their as ation. and we believe that all the part is, shoud and holiday continue to work, came the transparent manner. and it is impossible to resolve a fabric thing in a couple of meetings. but we should continue the dialogue and i would like to say that this can, so patients must go on. it would be useful to continue this form it with this form and the quantity part time agenda at the level of a foreign ministers. and we've talked about this today, we consider days or so in the future. as soon as we receive information from russia, we will inform the media. well, as i talked about delay band us year, a t is important to start the preparation for holding democratic and transferring

collections and lead dana, i also would like to say that all the elements should be united in the country.