is again at the nexus of american politics. he's also the 1st american pres, hire legal apparatus of the state, appears to be aligned against trump. can the rule of law survive this legal odyssey with the recent events surrounding the world cup have shown a possible inequality in the application of disdain. for countries who do not show a quality for homosexual rights, i'm sorry, no huge. and on this edition of $360.00 view, we're going to examine if the west is exploiting homosexual rights and countries as a way to disrupt them and the complaints of human rights abuses. and why this only

happens in countries which are considered to be adversarial. let's get started. ah, at the end of 2022 fans tuned in at various hours of the day to cheer on their country and watch the world a comp cup competition and guitar. now, despite knowing the policies of guitar, 7 years before when the country was 1st pick and knowing they were very unlikely to change, there were still demonstrations and protest at the lack of rights for the homosexual residents of the country. now the golf countries being air muslim nations are very well known as being anti, what they call the gay agenda. according to them, it is against their culture and religion, and they do not legally tolerate it in any of their countries. but weeks later, no changes have been made to the policies regarding homosexuals who live in guitar

. but this has not been the only time the subject of homosexual rights has actually been used to create public discourse. and most often, the issue only becomes problematic for countries which seem to not embrace the agenda of the wes. so is this a coincidence? well, joining me now discusses tim gordon. other of several books, including the case where patriarchy and catholic youtube and podcast are welcome. tim. thanks a 1000000. great to be there is a lot of mainstream detraction of those who criticize the gay agenda or the global homo as it can be called as some of the stronger critics like to call the gay agenda. so let's start from the basics. in your view, is there a gay agenda or a global homo agenda that is pushing specific policies, both in the west and more traditional countries? without a doubt, without a doubt, global homo is

a real phenomenon and it's expressed to in every single expression that we see world wide of globalism in all of the globalist entities. whether you're talking the un, the e, u, the w e f. there are many, many more subsidiaries of all of these, but if you look to agenda 2030 of the united nations, which i'll be citing at least a few times and i'll talk you today. the 17 sustainable development goals include several references to l. g, b, t, and the exportation of it from the west to, than on western countries. that is to say, the only hold outs, those countries that cling to either christianity or islam depending on their location, need to be converted. and that's, that's precisely what it turns out. the goals of agenda 2030 are, is conversion of hold outs in the west isolation of christians or

muslims in the west or in the east economic isolation and alienation ostracize ation of them. that's goal number one. goal number 2 is to convert and to condition aid as the means of that conversion. those non developed countries that are either christian or muslim. so it's an absolutely explicitly codified set of goals, set of parameters that are not incidental to globalism but seem to be at or near the center of globalism. and hopefully we could talk some about the animating principles for such expressions of globalism today. but it's definitely codified. yes. and it's definitely an agenda why it is interesting. i want to look at something is obvious that the arab countries are actually, i think, very united and standing against it be keeping up the term christian. i think this is something that many people, if you are a christian, you riser, is a divide amongst christianity right now. the united states is

a huge number one religion. the u. s. is still christian, yet obviously they're one of the more proponents of a global gay agenda. what is that divide look like amongst the christian that the people have faith because like i said, very few countries that are actually christian is the dominant is actually sticking to it. they're the ones pushing a part of the agenda on 2 more arabic nations right now. well, i can speak most explicitly to roman catholicism, which is not to put too fine a point on it. the most doctrinally, unilaterally lasting li, anti gay, a christian denomination of them all, and i'm not using anti case, the slur. i'm using it as a compliment. and so we see those of us. commentators within the catholic tradition is a decisive attempted shift that reverses the by millennial catholic tradition of strong a catholic, moral theology,

the catholic intellectual tradition of moral theology to reverse that in the name of this most recent pope, we just had our beloved benedict, the 16th pass and beginning immediately after francis's election, ending in 2013 attempts at a decisive shift that can't happen because in roman catholicism it's a government really of laws not, not pope's. there is nothing he can do this. this is a deep de feed, a matter comes from scripture, it comes from tradition. there can't be a reversal in the christian orthodox. it's basically the same thing. you don't have the pope's, but you have the strong bi millennial tradition which, which basses itself on a lot of the same scriptural and patristic fathers. and they all say one thing they speak in one direction against homosexuality. it's one of the 7 sins that cries out

to heaven for vengeance. just like it's really clear in islam protestantism, another roughly 39000 different denominations of protestant. and that is, as all questions and protestantism really pastor centered the question of whether or not a given protestant denomination will be open, open to change on b, l g, b t q. question. and generally speaking evangelicals or not, whereas mainline protestants have proven themselves over the last 15 years to be sadly open to it. so, so there is some distinction to be made within the broad heading of christianity. but there's not a distinction to be made amongst those that hold to by millennial doctrine, the teachings of the early church. fathers, patristic anti l g b t q. as it's come to be cool. and i want to be with the governments mandated

policies that are being pushed into certain countries who might not protect those pauses because of their religious spaces. and that's where i think we need to have the discussion in the world right now. somehow that lines become blurred, but we're talking about policies and laws being enacted here. so who do you think is actually behind this agenda? do you think it's western governments or do you think that certain individuals or factions inside these governments can review some of the agenda 2030 caught a 5 points that are on point that has been shown to be super national entity that are more important and determinative of what certain western demarco, liberal democracies seem seemed to be inclining toward with regard to the l g b t q agenda. but it is as a matter of import export, it has been a few countries. and i'm sad to say the united states is one of the primary ex

borders of the l g b t q, agenda. but, but also the e u and the un countries have been really, really aggressive. nato has been really, really aggressive in conditioning aid to 3rd world countries like africa, some in south america, upon the acceptance of what, what, what a roman catholic like me would call an in anti life agenda, which is inclusive of contraception, abortion, and l g b t q in 2015, for example, or i'll read to you something that i found in my research. the un general assembly adopted agenda 2030, which outlines 17 sustainable development goals to guide international development . for the next decade. the s t g 's build off the previous set of global goals. these come from agenda 21. they're called the millennium development goals, and they identify a $169.00 specific targets focused on creating an economically socially and

environmentally sustainable world. what this means is creating a world that is unilaterally pro secular liberalism and a key piece of establishing an order of post christian secular liberalism is pushing l g b t q. really hard. yes, yes. in the law affair, i agree with you. but also in the culture. well, and that's the question i don't think and maybe i'm over sorry. banner for i myself . i don't think anybody should ever be killed for a choice like that. i don't think that's the place that any bay should stand and some of these governments do take that position, that is different for i think from overall what we're talking about here. i do think that that is something that could be worked on. not necessarily the pushing of the agenda within the education system, the social system, those sorts of things, which makes me wonder, what did these western countries think they stand again, from pushing this agenda?

do you really think they're in it just to save people's lives? so those that might be actually being, being victims in these countries, they're being brutalized or is it really what they claim it to be? do you think they support the rights of marginalized people who identify as homosexual or you think there's a bigger reason, as we've seen time and time again, this is just being used as an excuse. certainly it's being used as an excuse that you're certainly right, scotty to distinguish between christian nations and islamic nations, where that's in previous christian law affair, even in this country, prior to a case called lawrence versus texas in 2003 the individuals that we have a robust tradition of states rights in this christian nation, where, what, what justice scalia called the, the individual states, the labs are a forums of experimentation. we're allowed to develop moral laws that were to be developed not by the congress,

but by state legislatures. and therefore you had more or less 2 kinds of states, red and blue. and prior to 2003, it was left to that, the moral legislation to be against pro gay law fair was left up to individual read states. after 2003, you have a force set an illegal i zation of bands on sodomy after 2015 in this country. there is a forced illegally zation of individual state bands on gay marriage, much as you had a movement to illegal eyes, illegal ising certain vices from the perspective. the decisive perspective of the christian tradition on issue such as contraception, abortion pornography, those were all individual cases that rose before the supreme court under the warren court. 1965 contraception in in griswold versus connecticut. they made it

illegal for individual conservative states to illegal ice contraception. 4 years later in 1969, a case called stanley versus georgia. they made it illegal. they the supreme court to illegal eyes, even if you're a conservative christian state pornography 3, we all know they made it illegal to illegal lies abortion. and they did so in 2003 with regard to sodomy in lawrence versus taxes. and they did so with regard to individual conservative states that would illegal eyes gay marriage in 2015 under o burger fell versus hodges. so 11 important american distinction that ought to be made is this country stands for the proposition of states rights that the federal congress should really only be making. last resort legislation that's not moral in character that's codified him or 10th amendment or 10th amendment, codified,

something called the general police powers, the powers to regulate health, safety, welfare, morals, and security. and that means that with the individual, 50 state legislatures resides the power to moralize. their should basically be 2 kinds red states and blue states. but the supreme court, starting in the sixty's, made it illegal for the conservative states to legislate in one direction, which would be against porn contraception, sodomy, gay, marriage, et cetera. that's what we have to reverse in this. well, and tim gordon, let's continue this conversation. i'm a talked about the idea that marriage is something that goes across state lines and how that argument was used to push for a federal and at federal acceptance of the law. when we come back, we will continue to look at how authentic he west purse for homosexual rights in foreign countries really is going with our guest. him gordon state. ah huh.

ah ah ah, what if i told you that the key to understanding the universe was a tiny particle which is nearly impossible to detect so much so that they are even called ghost particles. they do exist and they are called neutrinos. this brings us here to the caucasus mountains, here in cub vino berkadia, where we're going to visit the unique box on neutrino observatory. and it might surprise you. we're not going to find it out here in the open, but instead we have to go about 2 kilometers deep underneath this mountain range. mm. ah, nice to come to the russian state. little, never the tires on the northland scheme,

davis. i'm not getting all sons. i'm up with within the 55 with okay, so mine is 2000 speedy. one else question about this even with will van in the european union? the kremlin media machine, the state on rochester date and square r t spoke neck. even our video agency, roughly all band on youtube with oh, well, come back. we're talking about the global, clear agenda with author of the case for patriarchy and catholic youtube,

or in podcast or tim gordon. welcome back to him. now before the break, we were talking about marriage obviously, before we get to the global issues, that's very, very important. for the one case of a said marriage cross state park lines, that's how they were able to get around the 10th amendment and states rights. what was your answer back on that and why gay marriage was allowed the us? well, that would be a good something called an accommodate clause provision. and that's not actually how was argued. inno burger fell like all of the other so called substantive due process cases. i've listed all of the progeny cases of substantive due process, which are inclusive of griswold versus connecticut. stanley versus georgia roe vs wade. lawrence versus texas. they simply argued that of all of these issues, contraception, porn sodomy, a gay marriage, unmistakable vices from the decisive perspective of the christian tradition. our natural rights are natural rights that cannot be reached by law,

even state law, which is supposed to be sovereign in the realm of moralizing legislation in this country. they said, look, these rights are so important that they are what we call thought they received fundamental rights protection. which is nonsense because in cases like 2005 q over city of new london, they're taking away the fundamental right of private property. they're taking away the fundamental right to life, which is actually a natural right along with property it by roe vs wade. one of the cited cases that allegedly stands for the proposition of fundamental right to abort. right? so there is a fundamental lee caught a fire war at the heart of what constitutes a fundamental right. ok so, so i want to stop you there because i said, i want to run out of time without us talking about global issues. and this is what kind of brought this conversation today, because i know you watched all the protests and these public displays against

guitar, regarding their lack of rights for homosexuals and their countries. nothing new. this has been with him for hundreds of years. what was your impression of the situation and did those protesting actually think they were going to be able to change something that was rooted in religious law? not just government law? well, it's interesting isn't it? because in islamic nations, the problem of amick ability, or accommodation of liberal western democratic tolerance is globally speaking at its lowest. so there's not a lot of risk in these islamic countries of capitulation to the aggressive world wide l g b t q agenda. and you'd pointed out, well, in, in, in some countries and i identified those as the islamic ones instead of making it illegal merely, they are actually punishing with death,

homosexual acts and things like that that isn't the tradition in christian country have accommodated the l. g agenda and we were slowly over the, you know, since the, from the french revolution to now christian countries have been infiltrated is the best word. and it's because we had a, not necessarily a softer stance, but a more lenient penalty for such vices. as sodomy, gay, marriage contraception pornography than in those islamic countries. we were a softer target. and i think that's, that's the best way to make begin to make the explanation that the christian countries were the west who lost their faith, lost their religion and sold out to the one world globalist l g, b, t q, agenda. and i mean, i think, i think you're acting as much in this interview,

is there an agenda? if so, what drives it? that seems to be a little bit of a mystery, but there is one and it was the civic. i think that's the bigger question is why does it always feel like, especially like the current by administration, the united states? are they fair when they're advocating for homosexual rights in one country and saying, look, you're not doing this so therefore we're not going to give you aid. but they're ignoring the lack of another's based, basically on which country is considered a friend or foe. saudi arabia versus iran side area versus the united versus dubai. it's amazing how they somehow don't ever think about those same rights and they're dealing with a country they considered to be an ally. sure, i mean, all i can say with certitude is that there's the question is closed the if you, if you look to the, the sustainable development goals of agenda 2030 they, they make provision time after time after time, that countries that aren't developed to use their term if they want to join the

rest of the world and it's, it's implied to receive aid the way most western countries give them some aid, then they're going to have to get with the times and drop either their erstwhile christianity or their erstwhile islam. so that, that the question that question is closed is really, it's been codified and it comes strongly in a cultural way. it's in tones strongly out of organizations that are globalist in nature like the w e, f unesco, even even the c f r. the council on foreign relations, which is a, in american kind of global as center prize. they strong, they have documentation of this. it's strongly, it's evidence strongly in documents go and look at. well, i also think it's interesting because you have african nations and leaders who have also been very outspoken when it comes to their resistance. the gay agenda also within the christian church themselves as they put it. these are traditional

countries with traditional morals in the west has no right to put pressure on them to change their culture. but there's a lot of strings attached to western aid and one of them being adopting a more liberal oddity when it comes to sexual customs. and acceptance, do you think that the west will actually succeed in breaking open these african nations into accepting these types of lifestyles? and should have social issues like home sexually actually be. youth is the reason to withhold aid and loans only if they agree to change the laws and customs. well, of course not. and no one ever accused secular left ism of believing its own platitude of tolerance, right? in the 90s, in the early 2, thousands, a left this was most often heard and toning the platitude. you know, agree to disagree, that's gone the way of the dodo in the last couple of decades. they don't, they don't say agree to disagree anymore. as they gain power, particularly as the l g b t q. agenda, game power. but yes, if a like

a good leftist or number one goal was in saving hungry peoples of the 3rd world. then of course, they would, it, would it be conditioning 8 meals to actually starving individuals upon accepting some idiot, logical premise, especially if the ideological premise is not a matter of life and death. so outside of the islamic country of it would set aside the islamic countries where i think they exaggerate largely the degree to which it's a matter of life and death for gay people. but there's at least a nugget of truth to it. set those aside in places like christian nations in northern africa. why would they have to jettison their most deadly held belief in order to get free meals, food or whatever it is unesco pennies. if, if they truly believed it was a matter of life and death, they don't. and it's

a relatively c through vale of that saturday. well, timothy always great to chat with you. thank you so much for joining us. thanks a 1000000 for have me of use on homosexual marriage have been changing over the last 2 decades with the increasing acceptance. this is a change which is happening based on the opinion. jeff people mainly not necessarily being forced on them by a government. it is very hard for a government to scream, a quality when they're only finding it convenient, based on their agenda when to push for this acceptance. this is where the cries for fairness become exposed as not being authentic. rather, they are just a vehicle used to create chaos or trouble for a country, which happens to be at odds with the west. now favored nations or an alliance by the west means not only do you receive positive benefits, but you avoid the potential of disruption in your st. and the name of social justice and humanity. a blind eye will be given to

a country's actions against its own people, as long as their policies favor and coincide with the west. and whether it be a large sporting event, entertainment, or social media push, or small situation, which possibly staged turns into a demonstration. and chaos outrage will be flamed as long as it can capture the public's attention and create pressure on that government a public caving on whatever the issue is not the goal. rather, it's behind the scenes submission by the government all to the west control. often this means replacement of those in power to one guaranteed to be less resistant. meanwhile, social issues like home sexual rights when we place to the wayside, no longer needed as an excuse with those empowers knowing rules. and there regard will never be changed because it policies in their regard are deeply rooted in the only thing which has more power than the government. and that is their religion.

i'm here and this has been your 360 view. thanks a lot. the me i i may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities. another comes the united states of america is different wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the united states. ah, with a little bit of weight about 80 balls. anybody basie, she's only sitting p draw. you look at the insanity of each cigarette. color.

reverend notions is one among several means to reach the goal of conquering foreign lands and bringing them on to the help of u. s. weston economic interests. people in sadie, i didn't that needed to go by the demo? correct? yeah. let me check correctly. so no, we must say low there, softball m a cat. the final goal of these thing revolutions is to ensure that there are no independent players in the world anymore. ah yeah, now i mean if it's typical, i bought a qx, nancy in kim's, in a book that probably naturally she,

they did young showcase in under nathaniel. that sounds good. it's a, it's a boy. why is it w a a for medium on that. now there will be a quote, i'm not sure the water doesn't want that much extra money, but i know it's a good bit whole ah ah, one person is killed and 7 others in

a car roaming terrorist attacking televi. israel's prime minister has ordered a paula of military and for the police reserve. also ahead with they're not even hiding the fact that if russia has conquered the next target will be china and any country that dares to act independently along the lines. the collective west agenda of targeting moscow and staging as the russian diplomat meets with susan.