product author and professor i draw, wrecked, and walk, believes that such actions by the u. s. government go against the core idea of capitalism. it's not just russia here. we have an example being set which could be extrapolated on to other countries like china, in which case we're talking about major market share being diminished, and reduced and eliminated. so really this is, this is the governmental intervention in the business. the state levying its own sort of the controls over business and completely shutting down free market enterprise where they prefer it not to happen. so it's a contradiction with the american capitalist us system. and it's, it's, it's very possible that this would have wider ramifications. this kind of example should apply even more broadly than de russia itself. ah

ah, i i'm after dancing and welcome back to going underground, broadcasting all around the world from dubai in the u. e. this week's u. s. u k. u armed warming of syria and human rights and geo denied access to u. k. jail journalist julian assange, the loan, the assassination of a russian journalist, blood, and out ascii in st. petersburg this week. no. there was just one big story in nato nations, the rest of popular opposition leader, donald trump, who spoke on tuesday of his possible death penalty less prominent was the prospect of nuclear war. as us politicians ignored warnings from begging not to meet taiwanese politicians,

sighing when in california for more on nater. second front is it fights russia through ukraine is collier host of the silicon seal podcast about chinese history. culture and politics is in bali in that foundational nation of an online movement. indonesia. gotcha. thank you so much for coming on after all these years. i think many people around the world, what's your trick round here? your podcast. let's just kick off thou with what you think of this taiwanese leda arriving. i don't know why. why do you think she's even in the u. s. she said she's going to guatemala and billy's, and it was just as she couldn't get a direct flight and had to fly through new york, which is presumably why she met the democrat. taught her house leader in new york and then on the akeem jeffries and then on the way back in the reagan memorial library to meet kevin mccarthy. the number 2 in the u. s. power structure. the house speaker. yeah, i mean, of course you can get

a direct flight right. and the whole purpose of the so called latin american kid is really come to us and to publicly challenge side, it is a highly for lot that moves us. those us knows where china is read by china said publicly taiwan can do whatever they want as long as they don't do not do clear. ready independence, but now us lawmakers are making a statement like tie one is the independent country. we should respect island sovereignty, which is going back there. all commitment to one tie to policy that was signed by president nathan back in 1900. 72, we premier july we formed the foundation on the final american relationship ever since. so us walking back on that because they know we're trying to spread like red light it. and just like what they do is they keep on question russia red light on

pushing natal east words they are now trying to push china's red light. and i want understand for china with the pilot just as ukrainian issue we the emotional issue that rushes for the chinese tie. one issue with the highly emotional recharge issue and the us just know. ready button to push and they, they're doing this because there's, there's a thinking among the pentagon that they have a very small limited time window to china, right? because china is continually to continue to write and even by spend years. so i will child, chinese economy will grow to scale that united states wouldn't be able coping china even if they want to. so the idea is happy campaign, china, they gotta do it now. get to the economic prospects in a moment. but i mean,

i know that you've said that that unlike ukraine, the ukraine issue, the p l a navy would quickly draw in direct us forces, of course, in ukraine. the u. s. is, has special forces there clearly and there are some personnel, but mostly which they deny. and there are billions of billions of dollars of equipment coming for britain in the urban union. and that once a u. s. warship was sunk, the biden administration would have to consider as they call them tactical nuclear weapons against china. yes. in fact, us, i recently did work on china us war over i one day. the conclusion issue is that without us a fall in 3 months and i saw many st. interviews on high one offered i knew. ready break out a lot of the people were surprised. they were surprised to learn that out for us

out because i thought of it from economy supplying all the semiconductors and chips in our phones. well, it is, but i went to the island on like you, craig, you, craig shares orders, we recycle pie one is the island chinese chinese. maybe you can just play block a around the island. and then, once all the ships cannot get out of diet, at that point you will have a choice, either intervene or sit out and you decide to intervene, direct work to nuclear arms for hours. and we good luck everyone. well, i know that there was a drill last time, nancy pelosi then how speak of visited that i one seeming to contravene the u. s. his own one china policy. but how did he come to this in the 1st place? the pentagon says as 313 bases, these, this is from the pentagon,

who knows how many black sites and what else? 313 basis before than i new ones in the philippines. that's out of the $750.00 outside the continental united states. why has it taken so long for china to respond as it slowly been encircled over these decades? let alone responding to the economic warfare. it's been around for quite a few years now. it's not just a tick tock. suddenly it was while way and others from the european union, sanctioned by britain for instance. so that's crazy, right? because 1st of all, you actually circling on china is not a nothing in the started $949.00 after the stablish china. and we the 1st half of the cold war, us place, bases around china that started to change $972.00 when nathan, lately, china car off against soviet union. and what last and 15

years in the united states realize certainly china, contrary to popular belief, china could actually innovate. they are not actually, technologically, militarily, economically, and many people in washington, that is a law to the us, germany of the world, they challenge. and so they have to do something about it for china, for a long time, trying to sell baker's field work with the united states to do work with globalization effort that was led initially by united states. because china mostly benefit all globalization, trying to receive large action with of them, the terrible legacy, maybe a 1000000 killed at the behest of washington in the indonesia. how far can global south leaders like widow go in indonesia? how can they support bricks in the jaguar ration organization because he's been

saying de dollarization decoupling changing in the economy. he must remember that easy and history and what happens to global leaders who talk about a multi polar world by right now. but he's talking about the dollar radiation, brazil, just sign a p agreement trying to trade in ron and friends, friends concluded allan g deal with china to be concluded, chinese r and b. so this is not just the global out. now, my problem over convey g and you have, you had us congressman marco rubio again. you know, we don't have much time because the world is going to pass dollarization. so bad a 5 years i won't be able to, thanks to a country because our, i mean, you would just basically admission what is going to happen regardless

lead us government. in fact, us government actually right now is pushing the dollar right. nation to accelerate because everyone, you know, asia would be sanctioned next. malaysia could be. thank you. next. that's why malaysian prime minister just recently made a speech. he says that malaysia should not pied is involved in only 2 to the dollar, only to the best, $80.00. you know, he's talking about exploring alternatives and money malays you want, can expect, arguably, my, my home and famously refusing the m f advice. as regards privatization neoliberalism in response to previous sessions, but what about the important ones in the region? japan, south korea. the philippines, i mean, is, is the beijing just going to watch these 9 new bases appear in the philippines that can attack mainland china? well, they both have in us client, they follow us

a large presence in both countries. interesting case because long inside of us you're influenced. but ever since you walk through our day looking at. busy trying to explore alternatives we china was. ready and even today with the new president, he's trying to get on the both of us, he can get some military from china, get acknowledge investment, right, right, right. doesn't offer anything other than a weapon you to china is the one that told me to do to which of course ne donation media say, oh, in fact we got john perkins on the conventions of the globe hit man, he's turned against china and said chinese replacing the washington consensus institutions of bretton woods. they're just going to be the same. they're leaving indebtedness in the global south. well, what china

a joy and give offer our heard before we only have a global domination can only charge lie a world bank loans. and we all know that credit to the nature of that and world bank. now they can go say, hey, i can, maybe i can get a better deal with china. i don't have the state would. you weighs you, world bank, but unless you give me a better term, you know, competition is always good. and at the same time, you know, nobody, china is not holding. i've gone to a actually been leaders to force them to, to sign, to sign on the initiative. african, you have to respect african countries for their own agency. this is the women that african leaders are willingly insure to remain. we shine in class. so it's not, it's kind of, i think it's kind of radiant to suggest that african don't know what they're. busy

back there, but what is the reaction going to be from the united states? i mean, you believe her, she is allegation that the, nor the stream is blown up and destroyed, and the worst eco terror attack by the, by an administration with the ca, presuming you do, do believe that, well, surely that can cause havoc to chinese investments right around the world if it's capable of doing that because they denied completely, can china and withstand, i mean, usually it just puts a drill on and does a bit of talking. it's not supplying lethal a to russia even for ukraine. arguably, saudi arabia, which doesn't take the phone calls in the us, where i'm speaking to you from doesn't take phone calls from biden. they just, well in the past week went for it regarding oil prices. what is china actually doing to defend itself? shina doing any signage is authorized the increase of

military budget by the percent. and the chinese navy has been expanding very rapidly. labels alarm kinda because they know if it's chinese surely mobilized. they can produce military hardware and much faster. ready to washington for the right. now, all the worlds industries in china, china is a country and they stayed us. you want to have a conditional where we try to china can, can, can produce, produce tons of joyous and, and destroyers than right now. the trying to help while i'm trying to maybe have world one the world's most advanced mr. ready 55 us us plan destroyer. yet people are looking at the other design and people wonder if

us just trying to copy the chinese except the us us, the latest us destroy, it won't be, won't be written, the budget won't be approved on the 2030. so, you know, so right now i don't think us when provincial war against but is a real danger, is whether it will need to include outlook because once a carrier and nuclear war, which never really mentioned in the native nation media, what about the europe, ian continent, do you see that is in a kind of terminal decline or the sanctions policy is it's arguably sanctions itself. and the weapon is ation. we can only go over against russia and trying to appear to fail. what is going to happen to western europe. european leaders cannot break out of the dish to washington. they're going, they're going down the path to decline that they're currently going through right

now. i mean, they, they're all washington is failed. which is washington, not euro. you know? like i said, the german industrialists are moving their plans to united states because the gas prices cheaper there. whereas the germany just got the price was the natural trade partners and major source of energy ration. it's quite ridiculous. any, any sensible person german person. ready to the district of germany, but right now, probably the european leader student people to watch the moment on the line to get smacked off. so we'll be happy to be when you started back will kasha? thank you. thank you. and that's for the show will be back on monday to assess the depth of economic catastrophe facing nato countries threatening china with author and chief economist, professor dan like i a but until then you can keep in touch my role as social media

. if it's not sensitive in your country and had to watch and we're going underground tv on normal dot com to watch new and old episodes of going on to grad see you monday. and only one main thing is important for naziism, internationally speaking to that is that nations allowed to do anything, all the mazda races, and then you have the mind, the nations who are the slave americans. proc obama and others have had a concept of american exceptionalism. and international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist by turning those russians into this danger is boy man that wants to take over the world. that was a conscious strategy and walked out of it on your own. i not

leashed off to exhibit in tablet block. nato said it's ours. we move east. the reason us, hey jim, it is so dangerous, is it? the law is the sovereignty of all the countries. the exceptionalism that american uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. if nato disbanded shareholders in united states and elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions or is business and business is good and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion. and ah, ah,

a senior us, well maker suggest there might be an american military presence in taiwan. the j already views washington's involvement with the island as a breach of the one china policy washington, it is deliberately provoking beijing, just like it did with moscow. that's the view this book and still podcast. host is a guess on the latest episode of going underground. and you believe the u. s. has abandoned its previous policy, which is walking back so that they know where china is fed by red light and just.