was done by mostly believe, but not sport, the military operation in new york and just in the west and the russian invasion. so in this kind of cause it's limited but all the other side, if you see the data such as that cannot ignore it. you can say to beckett's efforts to bill is why my relation with democracy. so that's why we have been if you read all the data in the united nation, john family, what he may get regarding david, we are not boarding directions. we are not proposing. but as he says done, be upstairs on the resolution because the board is just, it's not so in the end of the play. so we are not here to criticize anyone

but we wanted to be. but dr. jeff, i think this is a very important point because the ability to see the situation in all its complexity rather than in black and white and taking sides is actually a very important marker of psychological maturity. and it is usually the children who are given each other, either or ultimatums, either you are with us or you're against us. adults tend to be far more sort of sophisticated in how they go about building a relationship. and i wonder why do you think the west or the united states in particular, which she's itself the only adult and international community is the only adult who has to decide for everybody else. why do you think they put such a storm ddc of choice before the rest of the world on the issue of russia? now i would understand the been treated russia in such a way. that's fine, but they also put the rest of the world in before the choice of either you or with

us or against us. do you think that's a wise choice and do you think that's an adult choice? i think that, you know, either without all with them is, will i fully understand better. we focus on these kind of the things we have to keep in mind during before was the long and i meant what was done. i use it with us of it, but this slogan became ready, consequential. after 911, when they told us either with us or with that it was lucky because you live in a car. so i shouldn't be operation or not to put it up in stock. but now we are living in a most the polo, it's not a unipolar world. in your, in your atlantic setting,

russia asserted, is your, is your best setting? janna asserted, i'm asking that fair check. yes, yeah. it has started from book was so much of it to do what you call it. it's the i mean dog dog, he thought of it were probably, i'm sorry for correcting you. russian didn't cut, capture them because they are not part of russia territory. their faith that i'm saying when they check after the judge. yeah. that grammy and then it it is. yeah, damascus pencil will be independent of some of those you can so similarly it tried to create some kind of a thing in because that's what you call it. i mean,

and because that's the dialogue but assertive med welcome tobacco. so i'm actually not dependent on a quad jana on india. so either way, those are with them is all, it's not a mature approach. that's why the master's been asked us do what again the speed a few. similarly, our prime accidentally was in moscow, but you didn't explore to be the action in the u. k. though we were did as a but as a binary level, then we did that up the, it was not diplomatically correct. and when did bilateral negotiation with the muscle and they got, it should do so. you know, with us, of it done is full well doctrine just for both russia and china to some extent have been pushing against this american pressure to submit down to one set of rules

beneficial for the americans. but do you think washington could have foreseen this kind of effect on other countries not only on russian china, but for example, in pakistan on indian, south africa, brazil, engineering. and many of those countries are involved in very pain staking decision making process one, they have to weigh in their own priorities versus the consequences and the costs of not agreeing with the americans. do you think that kind of a fag is in american interest and do you think they were after it? after all, i think that the, these sanctions that being hurting the american alive as well as the american days or days which are not understand, paid us. why is this just they heard out? that's why i thought and raise ship land bed the pipeline gas pipeline. and

we are not solving on this was because of the social sanction by, by the be your better on my understanding is that with the passive don't die. this sanction said, august sanction will be one good news in the back. why, dad, lose lose been back, because you see even know ben day, what we sanctions india started importing does better than the rest year. as 400 misers. the bottom of the 17, essentially. anyone was but jennings, remove the auto renew, auto medically under that. come under the back and saying,

so does it do all that was there for the day. that's what i read the sanction. but for the indian, damascus macon amendment. that's the reason, trustingly. this is a lot of you say to look at the right. yeah. the quadrant of the s 400 meters moved from india and that there was a note in america, me the select, they're close to book what a selective sanction. and they would be losing all the americans sanctions will be seen in the affective, due to pursue a. so what i'm hearing you say is that in picking up a battle with russia to punish russia and to make it a bay with the so called western lab democratic world. and the westerners and the

americans in particular are encouraging and very different that similar sort of behavior actually among other nations, when they not only continue to pursue deals that are in their own self interest. but they also a formal conscious about political choices that they're making. do you think that's ultimately in the interest of the western lab world, and they actually losing it in the exact thing that they're fighting for with russia? this is important because then the testing case when the sanction on the best, the guns i mean on the right. yeah. and the probate that you will not but just these things from there at the same time. they are driving them indirectly bit in dependency on that is probably the nature of countries is dependent too much on the united states. if you recall, when they're not on this screen, the pipeline guys,

2nd guessed by plan, started to constructed from because you have to be germany. this type of mistake was upset. yeah. i did them city jump and said you're upset because they wanted to sell you to be. yup. yup. is that it's costly for us? so these sanctions also him, me don't you guys said that was good sources. also, i got to what you're only going to me so that it can benefit you rather than others . so this is the way, but we have to see the countries mcdermott. you can say security georgie's are everybody has done on their own like india. it is not dependent on you can say, what is the lead security on that? why was certainly india can deny and then make an amendment in depth sanction rule

. so this is debate in a bedroom. that was the economy of your life was just said, well, you can even call it. i think some of the russian, i suggested that they answer your russian sanction should be called and to your sanctions. because not only the head and in benefiting the united states and great deal, but they are actually directly hurting the european economy well. but it's up to the europeans to make up their mind. what is up to us right now, doctor? just paul is to take a very short break, but we will be back in just a few moments. stay gent ah. a,

with 1937 militaristic, japan started a full scale invasion of china. the invading army was rapidly advancing towards the capital of the republic of china, the dying, the city of nudging, leaving behind the burned down villages and thousands of the dead. on december 13 the japanese occupied nudging and staged out real massacre. for 6 weeks, the invaders exterminated the civilian population. they carried out mass executions, rape women, and were engaged in merciless robbery. the ruthless competition of 2 officers of the imperial army, go to the ocoee, my guy and to yoshi, nada gained particular notoriety. they competed with each other as to who would be

the fastest to kill $100.00 chinese with a sword. this monster is competition was widely reported in the japanese press. the nudging massacre claimed the lives of about 300000 people and became one of the largest crimes against humanity in the world history. after world war 2, many participants of the atrocities face trial. however, the commander of the japanese army in the non gene operation breeds yahoo eco osaka was able to escape the responsibility due to the interference of the american administration. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy foundation, let it be an arms race is on offense. fairly dramatic development and getting to this i don't see how that strategy will be successful,

very difficult. i'm time to sit down and talk with. mm hm. welcome back to worlds, appoint with the foreign and boston, just poll professor at the school of politics and international relations. kite e, as i'm university in pakistan. dr. jasper, before the break, we discussed this. so with childish or you can call it info info tal american approach to foreign policy. either your with us or your against us. and i think there is an alternative. it was there in place even before the recent visit by chinese prison she to moscow. but i think in the aftermath of this visit, this new paradigm is far better articulated and what russia and china are suggesting, at least when it comes to their biological context,

but perhaps even more even broader internationally is a relationship that has a much lesser emphasis on exclusivity, in fact, they don't demand that exclusivity at all. they have a more room for understanding each, each other's differences and conflicts. while still putting a priority on having that relationship as a container for everything else that can be sold within that. is that only a trade of the russian chinese relationship, or they behave in a similar matter with that partners, including pakistan. a relationship will be every engage, positive impact on the central asia, staves. and it will be going to strengthen this be projects or employers to be at a project in the best or middle east, or maybe. but as a question,

go whatever you call it. certainly it would bring a piece in the neighborhood because if the direction the chinese join, then they are in a better position to manage the about fear and also our janet stoddick nomic cody too. so definitely if that is a bi lateralism between the chinese, it will be going to have a positive impact on the konami project, especially with just also renounced by the chinese. now you speak about pakistan. and so what passive fans russia in china influencing the events in this neighborhood. but don't you think that the times are also requesting a more active physician not only from pakistan, but many other regional power and b, iran, tory k. perhaps even india. i know you have a policy of neutrality,

but the policy of neutrality, i suppose, doesn't mean that you have to sit and wait until russia and china figure out everything else really wants to really try to balance, did not want it to be an extent, but you know that international policies is easier to say that you are a neutral, but it's different going to be a new drug, especially if this light was done, which is a very much look at it graphically if the legend and it says beaver in the side of a day which is a big stance with a bigger population nuclear fall, having if you test within the region and having a system to play in the global politics such as clarity is not an onset afloat. but tom has adopted a strict bilateral ism, that we can move in on issue issue basis. but we are hitting the decision

of product darian dictation from the us sometime from the others. but the chinese are not woken on this. but if you see whether we like it or not, that bad west was the fuse to la to sped in. this was gone all winter love baseball. was this when everyone was talking that distance from russia, but started brian. mr with didn't know when western lead nations invited us out of america specialized, but on our in our bottom is the listing the u. s. frequently. but in this demo, this is summit, which is basically indirectly against the guy. and that is why i and i yeah. so boss on refused to speak. we expect that we had to die maintaining good relations

ration the united states, but as the cost of our friendly state. absolutely, i can kick, can i ask you specifically about that? because i keep hearing back from anybody, just tiny thinkers and officials that you want to have a pragmatic peer relationship with the united states. after having done a lot of haven't listing for them in again, it's done losing a lot of your soldiers losing, losing a lot of treasure, not getting even the basic gratitude in returning them. yet. here you are saying again the despite, although dick the tauriel issue and says from the west, you want to have a pragmatic relationship or good relationship with united states. what is in your picture of a good or balanced relationship in the united states? because, i mean, i'm come to the, even to ask whether the united states is capable of having a relationship, a proper relationship, you know, back and forth with any other country rather than. and they're so sophisticated arrangements when they want everything for themselves and giving nothing in return

. so what's your view of a good relationship in that country? simple. by good relationship, i mean, it got to be a degree. that's one spectrum to the other spectrum. but sun is not clear that united states cannot be our department because it does show the india and we were begging the united states in order to balance the india individual context. now. and that does that assisting sporting? yes, nancy, i was trying to just book is normal. yes. on the economic just bought a book. but generally you're one of the biggest straight bottles of the us and the basket definitely don't like to lose it. the biggest market in the world, in a population does the projecting pilot, but that's gonna fuel. so because in that when i buy lateralism, i mean,

then we can follow that issue is relationship. so my one issue, let's say i'm asking you to publish it, but you the say you're alive, spotless, ship, all the tests that you're alive basically then it means that i should not mind it, let them to go, but i can meant in bed education, you better american population. so my good relationship by be what is practically available, keeping in mind the thought that i tried just my set. so everything which i use expect no, i'm no more known. well, you'll get the most alive. and at the same time, i'm asking also realizing that if they're not giving us and we're not expecting to be here with us now, or we mentioned the issue of i've got to stand where pakistan as i said, did a lot of haven't lifting for the americans and i don't know if you would find this

comparison appropriate, but i think something similar is happening in your brain right now when the ukrainians are doing a lot of sacrificing for the sake of the so called western democratic world in deep losing their people. losing that treasure losing their developmental prospects for the sake of a western interest. do you think they will get the gratitude or the support of the west as a whole for do you think it will last for a considerable period of time? because the reason i'm asking, and it's a very financial question, because i think pakistan is, holds for the same and did and got very little in return. i think that is too much in the guess applied done. and our analysts are saying that if you apply to know it was, was we had

a tries either to fight inside one of our base for directions on our own board. so we wanted to montana buffle. so that was the strategy that worked out of both the stop in the i think, even before 979 and america practically in doing the dog about the reagan to know support by 2000000000. you can see it package. so it's not at the same way and it gets uh, watered federalism. yes, they are, you know, with, with them we played independently. also, if you read the americans of the victor or the american analyst, then i believe the mag goes to begin with just those, then there should be death to indefinite to be but they are putting them if they're thinking that they're fighting, what the defense of the liberal democratic was i think they will be the losers. american look good. follow them super bobs. this is smallest it as

a bon under. just look. then they don't get it. does this gives you the solution if i put in that, well good. if i'm not good, it's not acceptable. so individual was, don't want to be by the policymaker or by the you can say from when you're done or when you're in the coming years that be for, for them. and they should give us know if the time to be a bother twice. and if i may ask you, we only have about a minute left. but i think it's a very important question. i heard you say before that the interest of russia, china pakistan, iran overlap, and i've got some will have a stake in that country being stable, more or less, and perhaps even developing economically that would boost our own interdependence, economic independence and development. now the americans in the west can no longer

provide security to guidance, and i think that's pretty clear. but do you think they could be in the position of providing insecure a tier to ganeth son through their support of various militant groups or otherwise for the specific reason of destabilizing both the region and many of the of the am is that happened to be in that region, russia and china included. i think that one is done is fraud. the prophecy wall. there's another military guy that lives on the central asian other, milliken grove, who goes just everybody goes can slide it, but it if you just google ca, army it, is that the more that to follow the blog instead of wireless stuff about it probably sources. so the imagine that no one is done,

they had disconnected then the 2 decades on the lease. it's now on the sideline, in this building. they did this. so by the, if the american was replaced by literally the big doctor and all we have to live in there. thank you very much for being with us. you're way too much. i'm thank you for watching. i hope to see her again on the world. the parts we must get our extension and i'm here to plead with you whatever you do, show it seriously. why watch something that's so different opinions that you won't get anywhere else. welcome, please do have the state department of weapons makers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations, to your fax for you, go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't watch my show stay mainstream because i'm

probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact. but again, we don't want to watch it because it might just change and the way you think the a new deal law exposure to you with what you need to have project with

idea with hello and welcome to cross stock. were all things are considered on peter labelle, western elite, or in the cute state of anxiety in america, there is a state sanction effort to destroy trump and his followers. europe, faces, mass protest and economic dislocation. when it comes to foreign policy,

western gemini, hinges on the fate of ukraine. overall, the outlook is bleak. ah.