to massachusetts, now it's understood that he leaked this information because he wanted to impress his friends on a discord server on social media. the individual is being portrayed in the media as a young man and was racist who is a, an advocate of firearms, very pro gun. other basically, painting him as an insurrection is linking him to the january 6. the protests and the attitudes of, from supporters and many are looking on and wondering if this narrative about who this young man is, is a little bit convenient. we've noticed that mainstream media has jumped all over the idea that this is a, this is a young insurrection. as a young, a young right winner, a young from supporter, is how they're portraying in very interesting emphasis from us mainstream media when it comes to the individual in question here, let's reveal, do have a domestic extremism problem in america. one of the greatest national security

threats facing our country comes from more with it within sometime individuals that have these kind of personality defects get through. and unfortunately, it caused the problem and he had some extreme views about some he thought the u. s . government was engaging conspiracy, the washington post, as you know, reviewed video of the suspect, yelling racial and anti semitic slurs. now it's interesting to note that john curbing of the us department of defense said there is no more to the story. nothing more to see here. the case closed leeker apprehended, he will face charges, and it's also worth noting that in light of these events, it is being confirmed that there will be more surveillance of the internet of internet chat rooms, more surveillance. so possible discussion groups, groups talking about these kind of things. so there is a stepping up of the u. s. government spying on its citizens in the aftermath of

these leaks and the apprehension of the leeker or the alleged leeker, the individual we're being told is responsible. so we'll have to see how this appears that or be in the u. s. department. don't want us to think or story. kayla, thanks very much for bringing those up to speed on those leads documents to correspond kellum open report in life in new york. thank you. was the may stories this our do had over to our websites r t dot com for more. and so for me peter, scott. but nicky aaron will be taking over the top of the hour. thanks very much for your company. ah. the did a major united states bank knowingly negligently and unlawfully provide and pull

levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the esteem trafficking enterprise. one island country has filed a lawsuit which says, so i'm going to use on this edition of 360 view. we're going to look at the latest charge against j. p. morgan chase bank. why the attorney general of the us virgin islands says the major bank should be held accountable for the monetary actions of jeffrey epstein. let's get started. ah, well, it seems the drama and we're still a huge cloud of mystery. regarding the inner workings of the epstein sex trafficking organization and the specific individuals involved the latest to come to light is the accusation against one of the world's largest banks. j. p. morgan chase bank regarding the actual financing of absence,

the various business ventures. joining us now to discuss is a journalist marlyn at injure, who has recently written about the virgin islands attorney general, who aspired for pursuing a litigation against jeffrey epstein. thank you so much for joining me. hey, thanks for having me. yeah. like you said around the new year attorney general of the years for going islands. nice. george was relieved from our duties is what the statement from the governor said, but the picture seems to be that she was let go because of tensions about this lawsuit that her office had filed against morgan chase. right before the year ended on december 27. what's the thing that's the latest development of, from everything that's going on to this attorney general to her actually who just secured. i mean, she just secured a $105000000.00 settlement from jeffrey. i've seen the state being dismissed by the governor, governor over the investigation. you said that you think that it's missile of, of denise and george by governor our brian junior, 4 days out to find a lawsuit against jp morgan chase. do you not think this could possibly be

retaliation or something else involved? does it not? res burnett, large enough red flag to cause some sort of investigation. that's what local media has reported. you know right when the story came out. publications like virgin island daily news and st thomas press. they said that there were these reports that there that he had been unhappy with her filing the lawsuit that he had and kept her updated that she had and kept him updated on the fact that she was filing a case. and then a few days ago the new york times reported something similar. they said that it was not necessarily because that but just vague. you know that yet hey, she hadn't kept him apprised. and the only thing that she could have kept him apprised of, of course, was this lawsuit. and the other thing that the local press has reported is that he's been unhappy with how many resources she's been expending on pursuing the epstein enterprise. but she just, she also received

a large summit from the previous case. it's not like she was bringing money, had to help cover her expenses. so now you want to look at this case than she actually filed. what does the case actually alleged? j. p. morgan chase did in regards to the scene enterprises. the language they use is pretty unequivocal. they say j. p. morgan, unknown, sorry, chippy norton, knowingly facilitated sustained and concealed the human trafficking that were operated by jeffrey epstein from his home and base in the virgin islands. and the way they said that, jamie morgan chase did. that was not just one way. first, it was allowing him to withdraw so much cash from his accounts. and this goes back to 2000 when his relationship with jp morgan chase began. you know, at the peak of his enterprise, he was withdrawing around $200000.00 worth of cash from his j. p. morgan chase accounts and banks have obligations to make sure their customers aren't

engaged in criminal activity. and that's a classic marker of criminal activity with drawing that much money from your account. so that goes back as far as 2000. and the reason he was withdrawn all this money was to pay off his victims. you would pay these women or, and also these girls money after these sexual massages to make it look like it was a, you know, a consensual transaction. and this was just a fig leaf over that. and then in 2006, he's arrested and prosecuted down in florida and sort of a sham prosecution. that was covered up and really just a slap in the risk. but by 2006 j. p. morgan chase knew that he was engaged in criminal justice. they had to have known before. they could have thought about deniability though not really because they have all this information with these constant withdrawals by 2006. it was public knowledge and in 2008, you know, they even make this point in the law. students that bernie made off,

his ponzi scheme came down and he was using a jp morgan chase account. and so they ordered it an internal review of other accounts to try to catch any other bad actors. they should have caught epstein is what this last it is around the opposition of. and the only way they couldn't know was through turning a blind eye and actively facilitating its criminal enterprise. i mean, a bank realizes that if you've ever drawn your debit card by charge, 50 cent, you would think they would recognize if there was something that could be to be done to far is that the funds that are being pulled out. but i have to focus on the fact that jeffrey, absence in 3 years since he's his death and several decades. and she was 1st and wrecked as you mentioned, why are we just now hearing of j. p. morgan chase? actually a lawsuit being filed against him for this. i mean, does it take the u. s. virgin islands are their attorney general's from various states who are also involved? who could have done this over the last 20 years? yeah, i mean, that's a good question. i guess the answer is yes, they could of,

and the lawsuit comes on the heels of another lawsuit which was filed by private attorneys in the southern district of new york on november 24th. and the reason was filed on november 24th is because new york state recently passed a law that with the statute of limitation on some of these crimes. and let's victims, sue for, in civil litigation for, for justice. so that could be a reason why we have this timing, you know, denise george, who has done a lot of spent a lot of time and resources prosecuting. i've seen only of her file these suits after he died. you know, and she faced those old a bit of crush before people are asking him, why aren't you getting him? why aren't you doing this? i can't speculate exactly what she was thinking. i haven't talked with her, but it seems like a lot of people became a lot more willing to do this after epstein as did die. and so i think the reason she filed a lawsuit now is she may have, you know,

she wanted to combine the lawsuit with these, this class action lawsuit. and so in addition to new york, and that's what has happened. i'll the suit in the southern district of new york, and now it's combined with these other cases. so this case isn't gone or that even though any church has been and been fired and still both on the docket and we will proceed before judge lewis kaplan. we have any idea of the new attorney general that the governor point is going to continue to pursue this case or what i have no that particularly, but the assistant attorney general has the current serving attorney general. she was on the lawsuit that denise george fire, her name is on it and was filed under the name of the office. she was involved in the figure. how can you read since she had put already probably put more hours into it with work and understand the case. but you brought something up earlier that kind of has me scratching my head about how a bank does have to make sure that its customers are not doing things with the money that they the legal things with the money that they have. so is there

a legal principle or does a bank have this ethical right to refuse customers or ask these questions regarding where the money is coming from? and should they be held liable for the crimes or clients are committing? in this case, it looks like they can prove that he, they did know this was happening and they still did nothing about it after his 1st conviction. yeah, it's not just an ethical right. of course, banks are subject to numerous regulations. there's a lock on the know your customer law. they have to know where this money is coming from. there's the trafficking victims protection act which 2006 is these lawyers argue they had to have known they were facilitating a traffic enterprise. so those are 2 laws are there, and in addition, just staley, who was the guy at j. p. morgan chase, who brought up on this these steps the ledge that he was pursuing this relationship . but such interest with epstein because asking was bringing millions and millions of dollars into the bank. and so that would, you know, it's also against

a lot of traffic to prost from a traffic and enterprise. these are some of the was the chief mortgages being alleged as committed even after epstein was arrested and actually j. p. morgan chase his board according to this last that had a meeting, whether not to drop jeffrey, i've seen as a client and 2 people going to the saw suit, mary, air. dot's who is now in charge of i believe the private breaking services edge. we're going to she, her department handles accounts worth 4 trillion dollars. so her merrier those. and just staley argued, strong in favor of keeping upstream. not only because of the money that he brought in through keeping his money in their accounts. but because he was bringing clients into j. p. morgan chase in a friend in glen duban on hybrid capital. and he brought glen duban and they did a deal with j. p. morgan chase, which earned him orange i $1000000.00. j. jeffrey. i've seen or before, may know,

maybe they don't got a lot of money from a guy named leslie works. there was always of the brand that owns a tory secret, right. he was a 1000000000 and he kept his money in j. p. morgan jay's accounts and they say here, just staley knew epstein if they did anything to get rid of epstein masters of mind would have been gone. epstein money would have been gone, gone doing what would it be done? so they profited judy from it. again, you can't profit from it. you know, any idea that this lawsuit is going to help us be able to shed some light, bring any more transparency to the fide. who jeffrey, i've seen was in partnership with who we had bank dealing with, who's check sydney deposit, who did he write checks to? is it also going to force them to open the books from his account? yeah, well in the us for it, and i do, i just, that's part of the reason why 5 minutes not to very jameson. it's the class action

suit. the legend, part of the reason why epicene was allowed to do this, was because of not just the financial benefits, the crew to them, but other benefits including forced sexual service. and they also allege that an unnamed financial executive abused one of the women in the suit, the class action, who has one jane doe number one who represents the class. but they say was about a dancer and united in new york when she met epstein. and that she was sent to that seems friends who were told that they could do anything they wanted with her. and there's an unnamed financial executive language or the still, they don't say who it is or by what financial institution was involved with. but you know, some that could come out and in the virgin island soon they also mentioned the eastern development commission, which was this part of me not the isn't development mission. the economic

development commission, which was this office and the u. s. virgin islands, which essentially provided tax breaks wow to abstain. and the economic development commission gave up seen a tax break or a company called southern trust. in 2014, a got a tax break of 90 percent on their income tax. almost a 100 percent on excise tax customs tax. the number isn't clear, but it's around a $100000000.00 worth of tax breaks. marlene marlene, i hate to stop here, written there is so much dive into here. hold on with us and let's, let's go take a quick break. i want to come back and i, they did some of those other specifics that you have is that work for you? sure. thank you so much. we'll be right back. because when we come back, we're gonna continue to have more with the model ettinger. and the very latest on the continuing drama running, jeffrey epstein. you're not going to want to miss it. ah

huh. ah. french president microns visited china, has the atlantis is world and neo cons of all stripes in an uproar. instead of being a mere cutaway in service of washington, the french president actually stood up for his own country. and europe put his macro above shore in a day late oh no, i was showing wrong when i was just don't a whole new world. yes. to shape out disdain becomes the african and engagement. it was the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. ah

oh, welcome back, i'm sky now here's and we're going to continue our discussion with marlene ettinger, a journalist who has recently read about the attorney general in the virgin islands, who was actually fired for pursuing litigation against jeffrey epstein by the islands governor. thank you. so much for sticking with us, you know, do you think it's like when you mentioned specifically before the break,

a few other i name sources, but you think it's very likely could send a lot of money involved. other banks who should also be named and possibly could be pursued at lawsuits down the road. yeah, well jeffrey up scenes relationship with gp morgan chase ended in 2013. it finally became too much for them to continue reputation. i. i and she then moved on to deutsche bank, which with a banker who had been a jp morgan chase. so the relationship was that was very close now. and, you know, deutsche bank has had mutation for traffic for being involved in a lot of they, they've been, they've been fined by few regulators over the years. i'll just say that i'm and yeah, deutsche bank is one for sure. you know, i have to ask you here all the time of accounting going out of the united states,

going to some of these caribbean countries just because of how their laws are and how flexible they can be. do you think he was kind of not thinking or did he did this a perfect purpose? was he that brazen? did he realize that he owned us politicians in us banks enough that he could do this? i mean, the fact that he chose the us virgin islands to set this up for something, somebody who knew he was doing wrong didn't seem like he really thought he'd ever be held in conviction of it. yeah, i mean, whole other islands. i think that's the reason he shows us virgin islands because the fact that you get these huge tax breaks, but it is true with which as you mentioned, it's a u. s. territory. he politicians there and maybe because it was such a place, it's easy politicians there. for instance though, what john junior, she worked at the office jeffrey obscene. it was the shell company essentially that japanese through which a lot of money was coming through these lawsuits. the lead,

she used to facilitate the traffic and you know, even the current to nice, george, his name is albert brian junior at the economic development commission in 2014, which gave me breaks. you know, i mean that day gives, knows that this is obviously, this is all the same family taking care og is no longer here. they still want to make sure that things don't come to light and has j. p. morgan, j. p. morgan actually issue to stay with one of the they've issued a sort of boiler pick denial they or, or they haven't respond right. there shows that they think that possibly they had to know with jeffrey that they didn't want to address it. and i guess once again, craziness of all of 2009 that this, this class action suit says there was a lot of civil litigation to the criminal arrest of people. jeffrey, i'm going to lay maxwell through the class action was filed by edwards plotting.

joe wrote a book for latin was pursue, he's in pursuing epstein for 2009. there was a lot of the civil litigation and they service of tina and j. p. morgan, in any of the civil litigation, and there was never any follow up to that. there was never any kept moving normal in a lawsuit. if someone does not respond, it's even more pressure from them to actually respond to the court. so there's all right. and then of course, be morgan chase of the monday rece. exactly on that side of it. so here's what this could possibly do because they are, could be held liable. do you think other companies might in the possibly provide knowledge of sex trafficking, could also be held liable. i'm talking about their even fixing electric poles construction firms. like you said, they rearrange the, are the owners of the landing strip where she's planes were kept it that was going to take his people, individuals going after these, these been involved in order to get, continue to shed light, to what all went on. you know, i'm not a lawyer, so i don't know the best legal strategy for that. i did these individuals. a lot of

them high profile or earlier last year there were a couple lawsuit filed against the on of a management fund called global huge billionaire for me, paid epstein tens of millions of dollars. and there's been been, been a couple of these lawsuits filed against him and you know, he is another enormously influential guy. bigger sions, to all sorts of politicians. i think he gave millions just seen, but he's, he's provide, you know, he's done it to both parties throughout the or that seems to be the strategy. a lot of these floors are going after going to than the individuals route this incredible . ok. so there have been, are there actual in place long periods of enterprises like ab scenes at the time, a lawyer but still, crockett system which could catch international sex traffickers. it's making impossible them to do business with large scale mainstream companies. it's out. he morgan, chase bank. this is a large bank. why is there not?

i guess that's a political question. well, enforce finance or regulations and bad things for people. i think obviously you know, this, you know, particularly this, it was such, it is involved but you know, all the agencies are undefined, it has no political will to prosecute people politically connected. there were all sorts of weird things going on where i just started places. he was, like i said he was given this tax break in coverage and they're in the virgin islands. they say that makes sense. that's not should be relevant. when you consider an application for a tax break, i'll let you go on as i just gosh, i think it's probably the work that you want to do. same as any of us have been covering this. do you actually believe as another element of this evil has come to light? do you feel we will ever find out a complete picture of all the dealings and full justice given to the victims who ever get a full picture or full justice? you know, i will say should that's been filed. and before i've seen in maxwell,

we're almost a decade with a less than a decade of the civil litigation a lot like bradley edwards and, you know, even to the federal got a fusion deal. i think those are good steps and can lease people just stick to stick on the story. you know, after go a max of a lot of people seem to think story was over and the others, a lot of people that you can speculate for a 1000000 hours, why they're not. well, that's the thing they want the story we ever, and i want to thank you so much for continue. we'll give you the floor anytime you can. thank you so much for joining us. journalists. thanks. you know, i've been covering the, i've seen case for almost the last 5 years, and sadly, very little more is known today than the day of his conviction. the fact that his to system regarding i've seen only makes the argument there are very go to great links to keep their identity secret. and while i am very critical of the united states government and their lack of ambition and finding out the to critical of the international community who has done very little to expelled with epstein outside

of prince andrew hardly ever. is there any mention of other powerful ties to individuals? the same individuals continue as they get their names, but you can't guarantee. there are dozens more who are just waiting out, waiting at the time, and with every men, dang it, and become even more secure. sadly, i doubt international sex trafficking ring with the most powerful to late in the world. and when good people who are sincerely investigating this kind of evil are it only empowers those in the business today to continue their sinful actions. mcconnell, jeffrey addison, you might be done terrorizing his victim circus surrounding his life and death is only to the benefit of those. i know he is, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you ah, whoa.

i.