like it behind the ledge leak to 5, russia already saying be released documents so honey dubious. and could be part of with this information campaign, the unverified paper supposed to point to the claims of divisions within the russian establishment of the ukraine for mercy. i, unless larry johnson say this, would they killer to see the us blaming russia? it's like an alcoholic trying to blame somebody else for their own alcoholism. they no recognition of the internal problem. this leak came from the us side. i am not convinced. in fact, i'm very dubious that this 21 year old just did this on his oh, the 23 years of experience. i have never seen one of the ca, operations center documents. never. so number one, hell, a 21 year old enlisted man can come across such document is beyond me, never to someone that of his rank, he was very low rank should not have any access to such information. number 3,

he was not in a room by himself. he was with commanders and he wasn't able to sit there and decide what his work duty was for that day it was being directed, so he's been made into a scapegoat. and if they can't accept, you know, they're not going to scapegoat him, they're going to try to blame russia, but it's kind of the rush. i had nothing to do with us, not at all of them. all the latest well means updates. you can visit our website, r t dot com. thanks for your company. how now to international look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except when such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about visual intelligence at the point,

obviously is to place trust rather than fear a with artificial intelligence. real, somebody with a lot less protective phone existence. with the did a major united states bank knowingly, negligently and unlawfully provided pull levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the of steam trafficking. enterprise one island country has filed a lawsuit which says, so i'm going to use on this edition of 360 view. we're going to look at the latest charge against j. p. a mortgage, hey, spank y,

the attorney general of the us virgin islands says the major bank should be held accountable for the monetary actions of jeffrey epstein. let's get started. ah well, it seems the drama and whether the power continues to spread. even after jeffrey, i've seen death 4 years ago. unfortunately, that doesn't necessarily mean justice or accountability for anyone who was involved does as well. never in modern day have you found a story which involves some of the most powerful people in the world, sex illegal activities and a whole laundry list of international crimes. get very little convictions and the legal system actually happening. despite revelation, after revelation, there is still a huge cloud of mystery regarding the inner workings of the epstein sex trafficking organization and the specific individuals involved the latest to come to light is

the accusation against one of the world's largest banks. j. p. morgan chase bank regarding the actual financing of absence various business ventures. joining us now discuss is journalist marlyn at inger, who has recently written about the virgin islands attorney general, who was fired for pursuing a litigation against jeffrey. i've seen thank you so much for joining me. hey, thanks for having me. yeah. like you said around the new year attorney general of the virgin islands. nice. george was relieved from her duties. is what the statement from the governor said, but the picture seems to be that she was let go because of tensions about this lawsuit that her office had filed against j. p. morgan chase. right before the year ended on december 27. what's the thing that's the latest development of, from everything that's going on to this attorney general to her actually who just secured. i mean, she had just secured a $105000000.00 settlement from jeffrey. i've seen the state being dismissed by the

governor, governor over the investigation. you said that you think that essential of denise and george by governor our brian junior, 4 days to find a lawsuit against jp morgan chase. do you not think this could possibly be retaliation or something else involved? does it not? right. and not large enough red flag to cause some sort of investigation. that's what local media has reported. you know, right when the story came out. publications like virgin island daily news and st thomas press. they said that there were these reports that there that he had been unhappy with her filing a lawsuit that hadn't kept her updated, that she hadn't kept him updated on the fact that she was filing the case. and then a few days ago the new york times reported something similar. they said that it was not necessarily because that but just vague, you know that he had, hey, she hadn't kept him apprised. and the only thing that she could have kept him apprised of, of course, was this lawsuit. and the other thing that the local press has reported is that he

has been unhappy with how many resources she's been expending on pursuing the epstein enterprise. but she just, she also received a large summit from the previous case. it's not like she wasn't bringing money in to help cover her expenses. so now you were to look at this case that she actually filed, what does the case actually alleged? j. p. morgan chase did in regards to the, at the scene enterprises. the language they use is pretty unequivocal. they say j. p. morgan, unknowing, sorry, champion organ, knowingly facilitated, sustained and concealed. the human trafficking network operated by jeffrey ups in from his home and base in the virgin islands. and the way they said that, jamie morgan chase did. that was not just one way. first, it was allowing him to withdraw so much cash from his accounts. and this goes back to 2000 when his relationship with jp morgan chase began, you know, at the peak of his enterprise,

he was withdrawing around $200000.00 worth of cash from his j. p. morgan chase accounts and banks have obligations to make sure their customers aren't engaged in criminal activity. and that's a classic marker of criminal activity with drawing that much money from your account. so that goes back as far as 2000. and the reason he was withdrawn all this money was to pay off his victims. you would pay these women or, and also these girls money after these sexual massages to make it look like it was a, you know, a consensual transaction. and this was just a fig leaf over that. and then in 2006, he's arrested and prosecuted down in florida and sort of a sham prosecution that was covered up and really just a slap in the risk. but by 2006 j. p. morgan chase knew that he was engaged in chronology and they had to have known before. they could have plausible deniability though not really because they have all this information with these constant

withdrawals by 2006. it was public knowledge and in 2008, you know, they even make this point in the law. students that bernie made off as ponder scheme, came down and he was using a j. p. morgan chase account. and so they ordered it an internal review of all their accounts to try to catch any other bad actors. they should have caught epstein as what this last it was around the opposition of. and the only way they couldn't know it was through turning a blind eye and actively facilitating this criminal enterprise. i mean, a bank realizes that if you've ever drawn your debit card by charge, 50 cent, you would think they would recognize if there was something that could be to be done to far is that the funds that are being pulled out. but i have to focus on the fact that jeffrey, i've been 3 years since he's his death and several decades. and she was 1st wrecked . as you mentioned, why are we just now hearing of j. p. morgan chase? actually a lawsuit being filed against him for this. i mean, does it take the u. s. virgin islands are their attorney general's from various

states who are also involved? who could have done this over the last 20 years? yeah, i mean, that's a good question. i guess the answer is yes, they could of, and the lawsuit comes on the heels of another lawsuit which was filed by private attorneys in the southern district of new york on november 24th. and the reason was filed on november 24th is because new york state recently passed a law that with the statute of limitation on some of these crimes. and let's victims, sue for, in civil litigation for, for justice. so that could be a reason why we have this timing, you know, denise george, who has done a lot of spent a lot of time and resources prosecuting. i've seen only of her file these suits after he died. you know, and she faced those a little bit of pressure before people are asking him, why aren't you getting him? why aren't you doing this? i can't speculate exactly what she was thinking. i haven't talked with her, but it seems like a lot of people became

a lot more willing to do this after epstein as did die. and so i think the reason she filed this lawsuit now is she may have, you know, she wanted to combine the law suit with these, this class action lawsuit. and so the district of new york. and that's what has happened, filed the suit in the southern district of new york, and now it's combined with these other cases. so this case isn't gone or that even though the new church has been and been fired and still both on the docket. and we will proceed before judge louis kaplan. we have any idea of the new attorney general that the governor point is going to continue to pursue this case, or what i have no that particularly, but the assistant attorney general has the current serving attorney general. she was on the lawsuit that denise george fire, her name is on it and was filed under the name of the office. she was involved in the figure. how can you read since she had put already probably put more hours into it with work and understand the case. but you brought something up earlier that

kind of has me scratching my head about how a bank does have to make sure that its customers are not doing things with the money that they the legal things with the money they have. so is there a legal principle or does a bank have this ethical right to refuse customers or ask these questions regarding where the money is coming from? and should they be held liable for the crimes their clients are committing? in this case, it looks like they can prove that he, they didn't know this was happening and they still did nothing about it after his 1st conviction. it's not just an ethical right. of course, banks are subject to numerous regulations. there's a lock on the know your customer law. they have to know where this money is coming from. there's the trafficking victims protection act which 2006, these lawyers argue they had to have known, they were facilitating a traffic enterprise. so those are 2 laws are there, and in addition, just staley, who is the guy at j. p. morgan chase, who brought f c on this. these steps the ledge that he was pursuing this

relationship with such a interest with epstein because f c was bringing millions and millions of dollars in the bank. and so that would, you know, it's also against a lot of traffic to process from a trafficking enterprise. these are some of the laws that their mortgage is being alleged as committed even after epstein was arrested and actually j. p. morgan chase his board according to this last that had a meeting, whether not to drop jeffrey, i've seen as a client and 2 people going to the saw suit, mary, air. dot's who is now in charge of i believe the private bringing services were changed. she, her department handles accounts for at 4 trillion dollars. so her merrier those and just daily argued strong in favor of keeping upstream. not only because of the money that he brought in through keeping his money in their accounts. but because he was bringing clients in the j. p. morgan chase for him, glen dubin, one hybrid capital. and he brought glen duban and they did

a deal with j. p. morgan chase, which are and learn jazz $1000000.00 to jeffrey i've seen or before, may know, maybe they don't got a lot of money from a guy named leslie wexler who was of the brand that owns a tory secret. right. he was a 1000000000 and he kept his money in j. p. morgan jay's accounts. and they say here just daily knew epstein if they did anything to get rid of epstein masters and i would have been gone. seems money would have been gone, gone do ones. so they profited judy from me again, you can't process from it. you know, any idea that this lawsuit is going to help us be able to shed some light, bring any more transparency to the find who jeffrey i've seen was in partnership with who we had bank dealing with. who's checks, did he deposit? who did he write checks to? is it also going to force them to open the books from his account?

yeah, well, in the us for it, and i do, i just, that's part of the reason why. for me, that's not divergence, and it's the class action suit. they lead to the part of the reason why epicene was allowed to do this was because of not just the financial benefits, the crew to them, but other benefits including forced sexual service. and they also allege that unnamed financial executive abused one of the women in the suit, the class action, who has one jane doe number one who represents the class. but they say was a ballet dancer and united in new york when she met epstein. and that she was sent to that seems friends who were told that they could do anything they wanted with her. and there's an unnamed financial executive, the language of the steward, they don't say who it is or in by what financial institution was involved with. but

you know, some that could come out and in the virgin islands soon. they also mentioned the eastern development commission, which was this part of me not the isn't development commission. the economic development commission, which was this office and the u. s. virgin islands, which essentially provided tax breaks wow to abstain. and the economic development commission gave up seen a tax break or a company called southern trust. in 2014, a got a tax break of 90 percent on their income tax. almost a 100 percent, an excise tax customs tax. the number isn't clear, but it's around a $100000000.00 worth of tax breaks, marlene marlene, i hate to stop here written there is so much dive into here. hold on with us. and let's, let's take a quick break, but i want to come back and i, they did some of those other specifics that you have. is that work for you? sure, thank you. i will be right back. because when we come back, we're going to continue to have more with a moment at injure and the very latest on the continuing drama reading,

jeffrey epstein. you're not going to want to miss it. ah. the president visited china has the atlanta. this is world and neil comes of all stripes that an uproar. instead of being a mere cut away in service of washington, the french president actually stood up for his own country and year. but his ma chrome above shore can a day late ah, well go back. i'm sky now. he is and we're going to continue our discussion with marlene and you're a journalist who has recently read about the attorney general in the virgin islands who was actually fired for pursuing litigation against jeffrey epstein by the islands. governor. thank you so much for sticking with us. you know, do you think it's like when you mentioned specifically before the break,

a few other a name sources, but do you think it's very likely could amount of money involved other banks who should also be named and possibly could be pursued lawsuits down the road? yeah, well jeffrey stains relationship with gp morgan chase ended in 2013. it finally became too much for them to continue reputation, really. and he then moved on to deutsche bank, which were the banker who j. p. morgan chase. so the relationship was that it was very close now and deutsche bank has, have you taishan for traffic for being involved and a lot of they, they've been, they've been fined by fear regulators over the years. i'll just say that. and yeah, deutsche bank is one for sure. you know, i have to ask you here all the time of, you know, accounting going out of the united states, going to somebody's caribbean countries just because of how their laws are and how

flexible they can be. do you think he was kind of not thinking or did he did this a perfect purpose? was he that brazen? did he realize that he owned us politicians in us banks enough that he could do this? i mean, the fact that he chose the us virgin islands to set this up for something, somebody who knew he was doing wrong didn't seem like he really thought he'd ever be held in conviction of it. yeah, i mean, well i think part of the reason he chose the us virgin islands was particular and he chose to spend a lot more time. there was particularly after his conviction, 2006. he was, he did become a little more concerned about public scrutiny. and being observed with these children and it was remote as islands in the us for island of his remote. he bought one in 96 and another in 2016. and there's even, you know, reporting that he had or not,

i guess it was reported gross and one of the was against his estate that he had remodeled the island. so it wasn't, you can see it from other islands. i think that's the, the reason you chose us virgin islands, aside from it just being a beautiful place and because the fact you get these huge tax breaks. but it is true that in the u. s. virgin islands, which as you mentioned, it's a u. s. territory, he had a lot of connections with the local politicians there and maybe because it was such a place it's easier to to buy off our dishes there. for instance, the wife worked at the office southern trust which was jeffrey obscene. it was the shell company essentially that jeff represented jeffrey watson on the island and was the company through which a lot of money was coming through the j. p. morgan chase accounts that he saw suits the lead. she used to facilitate the trafficking of these women and girls

and you know, even the current governor who fired denise george, his name is albert brian junior. he worked at the economic development commission in 2014, which gave experts he signed off on the tax breaks. you know, i mean that day it is not hard to put together. folks common sense says that this is obviously, this is all the same family taking care of family, even if the may in the may, patriarch, is no longer here. they still want to make sure that things don't come to light very, very concerning on this side of it and has j. p. morgan, j, j. p. morgan actually issued a statement. what they said about this lawsuit, if anything, they've issued a sort of boiler plate, boil tight denial they or, or they haven't responded. see, and that's that alone, right? there shows that they think that possibly they had to know with jeffrey obscene went down, that possibly this could be exposed,

but they didn't want to address it. and i guess once again, embrace and this of all of this in fact in 2009 that this, this class action suit says there was a lot of civil litigation around that time, which sort of led to the criminal arrests of people or jeffrey and maxwell, but, and by the way, the was through the class action was filed by edwards plotting jer, which is one of the lawyers bernoulli edwards wrote a book to relentless pursuit. he's been pursuing epstein for decades, but around 2009 there was a lot of the civil litigation and they service of tina and j. p. morgan chase. and they never cooperated in any of the civil litigation. and there was never any follow to that. there was never any ok there. right. okay, fine. you don't cooperate. ok. they just kept moving normal in a lawsuit. if someone does not respond, then they take the next steps and it gets even more pressure from them to actually respond to the court. so there's also no follow up either. right, and then of course, shaping morgan chase of the monday resources they can play defense as long as they

want. exactly that side of it. so here's what this could possibly do. if a bank like j. p. morgan, because they are, could be held liable. do you think other companies might, in the future who had not, who possibly could had knowledge of any sex trafficking, could also be held liable? i'm talking about utility companies who might have actually been out there even fixing electric poles construction firms. like you said, they rearrange the island. they didn't work on the house, or even the owners of the landing strip where the planes were kept. is that was going to take his people, individuals going after these, these businesses smaller type corporations that were involved in order to get continue to shed light. know the best illegal strategy for that. it seems like they're going after either these individuals, a lot of them high profile or the now the banking institutions, you know, earlier, last year there were a couple lawsuit filed against leon. plaque was the manager of a management fund called global huge billionaire, for me, paid epstein tens of millions of dollars. and there's been been, been

a couple of these lawsuits filed against him the cases. and, you know, he has another enormously influential guy, big campaign contributions to all sorts of politicians. i think he gave millions just to the recent republican senatorial campaign in 2019, but he's, he's provide, you know, he's doing it to us both parties throughout the years. a lot that seems to be the strategy. a lot of these lawyers are going after going to be sensitive financial institutions and individuals route this incredible. ok. so look into the future. should there have been, are there actual in place laws which would have forced more transparency of enterprises like ab scenes at the time? is it even legally possible to get a lawyer but still crochase system which could catch international sex traffickers? and what is the very least making impossible them to do business with large scale mainstream companies? it's not like they were,

he was with the community bank. he was with j. p. morgan chase bank. this is a large bank. why is there not more policing of it? i guess that's a political question. you know, there's not been a lot of well to enforce finance or regulations and it produces a lot of bad things for people. i think obviously sex traffic enterprises, maybe the worst. you know, particularly of this, it was such as nesting nature of children involved but yeah, there, i would say, you know, all the agencies are underfunded. there's no political will to prosecute people. epstein of course, got away with it forever because he was politically connected. there were all sorts of weird things going on where he wasn't properly registered in places. he was, like i said he was given this tax break in the virgin islands, despite being a registered sex offender in the virgin islands. they say that makes sense. that's not relevant when you consider an application or maybe it should be relevant when

you consider an application for a tax break. wow. well, before i let you go on, as i just gosh, i think it's probably the work that you want to do. same as any of us have been covering this. do you actually believe as another element of this evil has come to light? do you feel we will ever find out a complete picture of all the dealings and full justice given to the victims? i don't go ever get a full picture or full justice, you know, i will say that right now there's a lot of civil litigation that's been filed. and before epstein and maxwell were arrested, that came after almost a decade was less than a decade of the civil litigation ordered in the florida courts by wars like bradley edwards. and you know, even to the federal government because they had given this non prosecution bill. i think those are good steps and can lead to criminal prosecutions. as long as people just stick to stick on the story, you know, after doing, maxwell was prosecuted. a lot of people seem to think story was over,

and the others, a lot of people that govern probably should prosecute. and you can speculate for a 1000000 hours where they're not well, and i think they want the story to be over moreland. that's the thing. they want the story we ever, and i want to thank you so much for continuing your diligence on. i know you'll continue talking about it and we'll give you the floor anytime you can. thank you so much for joining us. journalists marlyn at injure thanks. i've been covering the upson case for almost the last 5 years and sadly, very little more is known today in the day of his conviction. the fact is so hard to get answers from our justice system regarding i've seen only makes the argument, there are very powerful force involved who are willing to go to great links to keep their identity secret. roy and very critical of the united states government and their lack of ambition and finding out the truth and exposing it. i'm even more critical of the international community who has done very little to expose their

citizens who might have been involved with epstein outside of prince andrew. hardly ever. is there any mention of other powerful ties to individuals? the same individuals continuously get their names, but you can guarantee there are dozens more who are just waiting out, waiting at the time, and with every minute their identities staying here and become even more secure. saddling. i doubt geoffrey epstein was the only one running international sex trafficking ring with the most powerful too late in the world. and when good people who are sincerely investigating this kind of evil are dismissed from their job, it only empowers those in the business today to continue their sinful actions, knowing they are less likely to be held accountable. jeffrey had see might be done terrorizing his victims. but the continued silent circus surrounding his life and death is only to the benefit of those like him. i'm scared now. he is, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching.

ah it up for but they really are not going to go. we use and i made it salem, but ideally chaslek knowledge was focal more of neat and clean. so keep i keep doing, muffle crow. this, of course, the thing to even see me from all to you all out when i was children, letty and i think you put us all, you can throw this up here, but i keep getting a call when you just want to get a better question. what bill now the key, for example, that watson is in a big rush, but as it books people please send me the income. when i tell a game or a book,

fair fair that you don't want gold. i want them alley from a do not need the inside. and so genia, i don't call mom dad to finish class the currency to deal with. cuz of the game, both immanuel good for us to nick is off, but i was on the way to got to waste oil by 5 in your chit of i was on the money. so of the capitol daughter, childress spoke with lucy shantell assuming in the modem, which really seemed ah,

ah, overcome the elation from other stable in the country cannot be isolated from others. china welcomes brazil, president on ministers, but delegates say that country is free to choose its trade partners without any a brazil turn to local currency for trade deals. instead of the u. s. boa. quick member states promotes financial multiple our to shifting away from the head. gemini, of the greenback, we discussed these developments with all get we have been creating bridget on many now with the india currency and there is no longer dependency on dollar. dollar supremacy is done so much damage to south america.