and autonomy presents a sense of independence, but when you consider the french president using this term, they were forced to wonder if he is a serious person, after all, europe is no longer strategic for economists. ah, russia are the case makes exclusively to r t c off times newspaper deleted his comments about russia, thongs on the great conflict here about media freedoms in the u. k. the sins of shipping is becoming more and more serious. the website is view that this being sports sort of part of why is it all in many ways? and so people should know to make your view in order to make their own judgment to the west. she makes those comments, not even 2 weeks off of visiting beijing. mexico pushes back

against the c. i a long history of meddling in the countries politics. the several former president being referred to as assets with goods agency. with live up front loss go. this is our t, my name is rod on me, and so the minutes of news and views, thoughts about russia's ambassador to the case as censorship is becoming more a more serious problem in the country. out the times newspaper deleted an interview with him about russia, styles on the plane convict bow speaking exclusively to archie the end. well, it says why he thinks that british media outlet removed the article in the early case of times, a very experienced political observer has come and interrogate me during can i were and i was pleasantly surprised when i have seen the text over the girl. it was like,

it has been reflecting, in effect, what i have said with distortions or taking the phrases taken out of context. and i wonder how cedar. so the initial was on time, so respectful and very poor to a newspaper that they had to remove the call the whole article. and it is not revealed as soon as you does the audience, i don't like the phrase and that will stand them. but it looks like this is the case and the censorship in a breeze is becoming one of the more serious in, during the course of the conflict. because many people are here in britain are thinking differently and the to your point of view, which does not coincide with the narrative that is provided by the u. k. government

. and the majority of the newspapers is being requested of a people would like to know what is happening in the world. in general. the website is view that this being sports by, by them. and i think it is wrong in many ways, and people should know to make your view in order to make their own judgments. and as it is his article, the rest of the envoy notes, the keep i miss western boxes in russia must be defeated mid terribly. he said that makes it unrealistic to reach a potential peace deal. although russia is ready to negotiate with the union, o'neill is different. emphasize the importance of maintaining good relations between moscow. i london for them neutral benefits lunches destroy the whole like they should all the relationship starting from political and economical and going down to,

to the culture science education liaison between seed is and all the rest of it, the whole planet of it. but in the same time, i'm not seeing about the rapture of deployment innovation. she happens only when to come to the start in the state of wor, usually, of course, for us, it's important to end of this difficult and really discontent, national situation to maintain channels of communication. and as far as i understand also officials over london, what mystery and the government of the are the same to you or that we should keep context as full normalization of context. it. there's no the issue for today or tomorrow, these or should be the day can be opened when confrontational alliance, contagion that those our can 3 and we will be stopped and prepared to

take into account also. and not only think you get both dominance and then at this stage to impose it. so we've been watching major geo political events unfold really rapidly of late. do you have a sense why such fast paced changes are happening? no, they're so political system is changing all the turn the current to the issue. it has started not. no, not a year ago. i think it has started in the beginning of the my interest or even the probably in the end of the eighty's. this is a painful and low political process and we have just and put it into the new baseboard. eat when some campus has to change storage because the collective west of congress to look like it at all. they are trying to prevent and protect the position of minutes or billable dominance. no,

they don't want to take the least multiple abroad, which they have to leave. so what is happening in the ukraine right now? it is just one of the stage of big global reconstruction and political processes, and we have to leave with them probably getting can be coming 20 years. so let us hope that the common sense will prevail. and we will leave these peacefully and notable have if i think has been raging and saddam between surgeons and the north east african countries. murphy software reported sci fi quickly fell apart with both sides, trading claim loud explosions from heavy city fire in the national capital fighting was reported at the sudanese army headquarters as well as the cities international airport,

large plumes smoke billowed out of the apples that are being commission. wonderland has accused china of engaging and policies to divide the u. she made those comments off the recent trip to beijing. a strong european china policy relies on strong coordination between member states and you in situations and on the willingness to avoid a divide and conquer tactics that we know we may face. we have already in the recent days and weeks seen those tactics in action. totally because of china that european countries have different needs and interests and are standing up for those interests. i want to have friends present a minute. michael feels about queen ursula here suggesting that he's been manipulated by china when he's really not doing anything more than just evoking

that totally rational and common sense need for france and also for other european countries to cargo their own path in their own best interest independent of both washington and beijing, just a quick reminder of what michael said recently that has an elected european bureaucrats like vandalized, so bothered and had european diplomats running to complain anonymously to the western press. is it in our interest to accelerate cries of some taiwan? no, the worst thing would be to thing that we, europeans must become followers on this topic and take our cue from the u. s. agenda and the chinese overreaction. and also remember that european council president and former belgian prime minister shalumi shell, also confirm that in the back rooms at the e. u. leaders are quietly increasingly agreeing with michael's position of strategic autonomy. but for i'm elected, you bureaucrats, light vander light. it's always just about keeping up appearances of uncompromising unity at all costs. even if countries have to be bullied back into line,

like poland was recently overt wanting to protect its own farmers from a glass of ukrainian grain by fanny and along with hungry in slovakia, who are experiencing the same issues. but it wasn't long before poland, even the big cheerleader for ukraine in the us, threatened with being labeled pro russian by some e u. heavy weights to pressure war saw back into the unity at all cost lane. so european countries have disagreed on everything from weapons for ukraine to anti russian sanctions. and it's not because some foreign bogeyman was pulling their strays but really just because some of them actually might want to get re elected. ringback or hey, you know, they might even feel some sense of responsibility or accountability towards their own citizens. why? because that one that i elected you bureaucrats preference between unelected versus elected officials, which she seems to be, have some having some problems with. here's a bit of a hit,

the elected head of state medical, in this case, got the state dinner in china. the, i'm elected bureaucrat underline, did it, and tried to grab dinner with some pals and also had to go through normal airport security with the great unwashed masses on her trip to china with the french president. and now she's back in europe while she really didn't waste any time in brewing up this speech about quote, the need for a coherent strategy for you. china relations. ok then how would everyone just uniting in europe, in adhering to mac whole strategy of not jumping aboard the u. s. anti china bandwagon and just dealing with china like a deals with any other country. borderline reiterated europe longstanding one china policy. ok, so from that point, what's the problem? you're not going to be in lock step with every single one of your trade partners on absolutely everything, whether it's china or the u. s. at when, by the way,

there's been no big public proclamations or speeches from bonder line about the need for unity against us pressure tactics on the you over russia or over china or anything else. so what's the deal with all this public posturing over china? how just dropping the control free act for once and just chilly out? you know, maybe she can start with her hair, do their ease up a bit on the hair spray and just see how it goes from there. time it says the us as long gains in c couldn't surveillance itself. and what is happening now is political manipulation, that child response c. u. s. accusations that beijing of the stablish an overseas secret police agent based in new york provider you can do, maple china firmly opposes the us side. slander, political manipulation, malicious fabrication of the so called cross border repression, narrative and blatant prosecution of chinese law enforcement and cybersecurity.

officials, u. s. has long suppressed dissidents through secret surveillance, illegal monitoring, global hunting, and behind the scenes transactions. the label of trans national suppression is perfectly appropriate for the united states itself. u. s. authorities have a huge 2 chinese men of helping to establish a crime death. i'm police station in new york city on behalf of beijing aimed at fucking down and harassing chinese dissidence. while adam only denying the allegations, tyler stated that the station was sold to use as a place for his citizens to receive legal services. c, g t, n n correspondent, unit phase out says events fall in line with washington's narrative. well, it's basically an outcome of the pandemic for most of the time. because when chinese citizens overseas, due to the trouble restrictions,

a lot of them can all trouble back home. so they have to get there either driver license renewed or they have to deal with their citizenship as well as many other documents need to be renewed. it certainly has nothing to do with the so called the police station at the same time. it's just there another wave of the ongoing narrative or created by the us side. you know, last week, maybe taiwan the week before. maybe she, josh. so it's, it's, it's just as a series of anti china narrative. and johnny's for ministry has said that you as long surprised to just send it through the secret turbulent illegal wiretapping from the us side. offer the recently co classified pen to then documentary solution ledger, the reveal that washington has been spy of allies it. so the neighbor has responded . back to this message, your agents are and operative are not welcome. here are

t the shabbos, but it's about for us. mexico's president lopez abra door has been pulling no punches as he warns the u. s. that mexico won't tolerate any repeat of their historical interference in his country's internal affairs. that as recent media revelations about how the us spies on its enemies and friends alike, a highlighting increasing tensions with its closest neighbor. not willing acts of spine cannot be used to find out what are security institutions are doing. and furthermore, with the arrogance of leaking the information to the washington post abra door was referring to a lead us intel report that suggest increasing tensions within different branches of the mexican army hubbard. or later met with the u. s. ambassador can salazer, where he made it clear that mexico will not accept american agents operating on mexican soil,

not putting out it cannot be foreign agents in our country. no. we can share information, but its members of the mexican army, navy, and national guard who can intervene. this all comes as the u. s. drug enforcement agency claims. they've recently infiltrated one of mexico's biggest drugs, gangs with 28 members of the infamous in a lower cartel. facing charges for smuggling fentanyl into the us. of course the united states, as for when it comes to covert operations and mexico recently declassified documents, even suggesting that back in the seventy's and eighty's former president joe say, portillo was essentially a cia asset bill stir best. no said that mexico will soon have a new precedence and manhood have control of liaison for a number of years. the memo was focused on j. f. k. assassination. and how lee harvey oswald had visited mexico prior to the dallas assassination. this led to

a vast cia surveillance operation with a ca tap phone's and spy on senior mexican politicians. on surprisingly, portillo is not the only mexican president alleged to have worked for the cia with numerous mexican presidents being implicated, his c. i. a operatives from the 1950s right up to the 1980s. but it seems the current mexican president is in no mood to play ball with the cia. not unless we're not a protectorate of the united states or a colony of united states. we're not going to allow any foreign government to intervene in our territory, much less the armed forces of a foreign government. mexico is a free, independent sovereign in the country. we did not receive orders from any one. the people of mexico govern here. not getting on honor, they still have not abandoned the monroe doctrine. they do not want to change, so they believe they are the government of the world. they soon themselves to be the government of the world. so, as mexico lays down the law to the white house,

it seems unlikely that the u. s. will change its behavior with the unfortunate reality remaining. that whether you are a friend or a foe, it seems uncle sam is watching and listening to your every move. a nail times ours was about fired. the report did outs bitcoin money over his energy consumption, same it saying it causes immense pollution, but it has got into is as lashing out at the new york times. as critics say, the newspaper has an even worse impact on the environment. what happens when america's purported paper of records from august and the, and the vastly biased hit base against bitcoin, so called climate impact replete with shortly reporting wrong data, logical fallacies. and even dr. photographs, this is a paper mill, but it's more accurate described as a tree slaughter house. new york times profit from the murder of trish. she's in to

print a daily newspaper, packed full of corporate advertisement and propaganda. it's time to stop the presses. when i joined in the pseudo lit by all, she contributed chris sam's. chris, thanks for joining us here in the cedar. like neil times, we have lost the battle. is it neil mine was nil. so it's a one that's a really good way to explain it. murat, i think it really is just the genesis of the story. new york times went out, they could, they, they wrote an article about bitcoin mining, bring very bad to the environment, particularly in texas, in the united states. but it turns out that we did, they just cherry picked a lot of information love, it was factually incorrect. and they talked to the one group in the world that probably knows more about actually finding out dates than on the the, the tech savvy, the internet savvy. they went online, they googled it, found out that this is totally wrong. 90 percent of the energy being used to be quite mining right now. it's renewable energy, which is a lot more than could be set for the new york times. that prince daily print newspaper, as, as, as we said before for demonstrates and murders. you know,

hundreds of thousands of trees every year doing that, which is far more damaging to the environment than anything that i said for your little computer. we just got a bit which is a bit good. money could ever be to the environment. wow. and we ever had of the back flashes of this. well, yeah, we, i mean we had the backlash of elizabeth warren who at the moment is the crypto crusader who's going to try and obliterate any kind of innovation using cryptic currency in the u. s. we saw her comments on again saying with absolute rubbish that bitcoin mining is destroying the u. s. increasing energy bills, which is absolutely not true at all. if you look at any big money, big companies actually came into the u. s. in the industrialized zones and got them up and running again. the last thing they've done is taken any money out of the us economy and away from consumers. rather they've paid taxes and put money back into specifically in a states like texas, the very probate court. so it's absolute rubbish. it really is, i think, a massive, massive sort of shopping days when you can just send the journalist downside, the side of the whistlebury host and needed immediate access to 5 by this level to

contain the casualties up to the democratic republic and are useful for customers like looks like plastic, hold down because we are seeing that the lake is now clear from time to time. and you know, plastic is a product that never decomposes. it destroys the environment. lou, we sell the baskets that were made from waste. that helps us to not be unemployed and little by little. we take steps in this issue, thanks to plastic or a plastic or plays an important role in the sanitation of waste. the pooka, blue lake environment, and it is a visible impact on the employment of women and young people who have previously been with. mm.

or was this news i put in a val is on call next, so be sure to check them out. we'll be back. have a talk with

oh oh, when i was showing the wrong one, i just don't know. i mean you have to shape out disdain because the african and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. awe every spring and summer, the melting optic snow reveals abandoned machinery millions of rusty barrels and the detritus left by human expansion into this most inaccessible of territories. yet on the move. so take up a summer,

but he lowered it the post. it became as an issue antaeus, from clean arctic travel to heis island home to the biggest pola station on the french joseph land archipelago. via he asked me, but i lost my bosom more yet as it should. so him is its ebony yahoo! aimlessly, nasa monthly and i'm but somebody with a some stay on the oil stuff. looks like you feel like you are a mary from a serial number. zamiah's membership. when you to her of capillary bomb, cyril, no boys to premier latrice, chico me of that of the optic pioneers main objective was to explore and conquer these harsh lands. they had no time to think about waste management now and legacy could remain for centuries. when i had my choice of thought movies in maryland, it's pretty yet because just as long as it's going to plenty of the group, i don't really tune with deal to fish

ah . with hello in welcome to cross stock, were all things are considered? i'm peter lavelle, the term strategic autonomy sounds good. the word strategic conjures up a sense of importance and autonomy presents a sense of independence. but when you consider the french president using this term, they were forced to wonder if he is a serious person. after all, you are is no longer strategic or autonomy with cross sucking strategic autonomy. i'm joined by my guess. alford is i as in geneva, he is an author and a former you an independent expert on international order in paris. we have john

laughlin. he is a university lecture in history and political philosophy and in washington we cross matthew crossed and he is director of academic transformation at bowie state university. high gentleman cross sack rose in effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you in paris. i mean, you and i have known each other new, but on this program, as long as the french president micron has been in office and you and i have pointed out a number of times that enter dig gall trying to fight its way out of him. sometimes against the gall curious um, but i don't take him seriously anymore because even when he says those kind of things the next day says something different. i think that is really emblematic of europe's place in the world today. go ahead, john. yeah, i mean, the big difference between a menu and michael and a child to go live there are so many of them is that all would never have talked about your european autonomy to. gold talked about french autonomy. he understood

that autonomy can only be national and that any european dimension by definition was incompatible with autonomy. my colon doesn't understand that michael thinks that there can be such a thing as european autonomy. he believe all he occasionally, as you said in your question, p t, occasionally says that. but actually there are contradictions in terms. and we saw this, for instance, when he went to china because he took rosena from the line with him. that was supposed to show that he was coming as a representative representative of europe. but between him but no sort of the lion, there are very substantial differences. there she is much more atlanta cyst. i mean, he's pretty atlantis, but she's even more so. so what are him taking her to the china showed was that europe reduces its own autonomy by trying to be a permanent alliance because everybody pulls in different directions and the result

is the lowest common denominator. and in addition to the fact of course, that as we all know, the european project, including the military dimension of it, is into.