with more di polarity, i mean the character such recent trips as the intention of really solidifying relations with those countries. dad chose not to simply follow the policies that are being carried by the united states and nato members and who seek a sort of more independent position, which is the keys. a resume in particularly i don't really think was in here called for him to sanctions because sanctions have to be understood as a political to, to really for states into following particular agenda in the keys of the states which don't comply with the broad one which is imposed by the united states as the world this really facing one mental change. now we see the balance of

power really. ringback changing not in favor of united states, but rather in favor of what we would call more people in the pentagon, knew the identity of the bomber who targeted the cobble airport, but chose not to act on it. that revelation came to light during a fiery session of the house oversight committee into the chaotic us withdrawal from the dentist than we are the bomb. or are you guys did their work? the by did ministration, would not authorize the shooting, nor the arrest of the bomber that killed the start date. americans and ordered 70 of our african allies wounded a maimed many, many others y y y. well the hearings on. busy capitol hill brought us back to the debacle surrounding the us military's whole out of afghanistan. and there was

that horrendous bombing that killed 13 us service members. and a 170 afghans were gathered at the airport, trying to flee in mid the pull out. now, what is important to note is the testimony pretty clearly established that 4 days prior to the bombing, the united states became aware of an i d bomb test that was being conducted when was anticipating some kind of terrorist attack and that among the crowd, it was picked out who the bomber was and they were waiting for the order to either shoot or arrest the potential bomber. here's some testimony we heard from a us marine over the communication network. we pastor, there was a potential threat and an idea attack eminent. this was a series of a could get request engagement authority, while my team leader was ready on the i'm on 10 some automatic cyber system. the response leadership did not have the engagement authority for us. do not engage.

now the man you just heard testifying there a us marine sergeant, i was told to go among the crowd and find a translator. and while he was in the crowd looking for a translator, the last occur and he lost his arm and his leg in that devastating bombing. now, in addition to hearing the testimony from u. s. military personnel about what went on amid and chaotic afghan whole out. we also heard from robert stork representing the u. s. department of defense and he testified about the need for oversight and how the pentagon has adjusted some of its procedures. following the withdrawal, we pivoted our work, a d o d i o i g to deal with some emergency air drive time my time has expired. do you have data regarding, well, what i, what i was going to say is we've not an oversight work on that now. but as i testified, we did obtain a copy of the administrations after action and we're actively reviewing that now.

and if there's additional oversight, we're already new, i'll do it wash. now, while biting wouldn't authorize the effort to prove that this horrendous bombing from occurring and the hands of the military appeared, had been tied in preventing this, this devastating blast. what was authorized was a retaliatory strike by the united states afterwards. and in that strike the world saw how 3 adults and 7 children lost their lives. or we're all former u. s. army officer scott bennett, believes that the in action against the bomber is inexcusable. i think this entire scenario is 2 explanations. number one, either the c, i a and state department were handling an asset that they did not want compromised or. ready expose that asset may have gone bad. an asset may have been a different party, different targeted individual or whatever reason that c,

i, a state department instruction then allowed the failure of american political american military leadership to make a command decision. when the marines were specifically requesting fire command to allow them the authority to shoot and kill a terrorist that had been identified for 24 hours and the military leadership refused, it is absolutely unforgivable. there will be no interest in the washington post or the new york times, or any of the traditional mainstream america media because they have turned into the propagandists of the far left woke climate trains transgender globalist agenda, which biden is pursuing. so the american media has really lost all of its independence and integrity, and they will not be examining the story any further. they will touch it once and

never touch it again. facebook has taken a position on the debate over who is behind the nordstrom pipeline the explosions, by flagging the report by prominent investigative journalist seymour hersh. as false, the bombshell story detailed, the secret ro, washington played, and the destruction of the pipeline which russia has called an act of international terrorism. but facebook has decided to red flagged the article and it's news feed and is limiting the content and labeling and as false. the social media giant said it vetted the stories are an independent norwegian fact checker, as, as a site called stop. thank dot org, which happens to be based in ukraine. hirsch's revelations about yet has been flagged. according to wiki leaks, the online platforms role as cop is simply taking its cue from western mainstream media where negative information related to the ukranian conflict is ignored. i point out the most of the western mainstream media ignored this report by seymour

hersh in an essay to me, the sucker bird cop says that a reputable and independent organisation ruled that the report is false. when you look at it, the judge in the case turns out to be an association and key f in ukraine. stop failed information is not available about the financing of the association. however, it is informed that it is through free donations collections and sponsors. only a few of them are named, including the british embassy and key f and the check foreign ministry. according to her exam, while i a senior research fellow at the global policy institute of women, facebook as known for censoring content to stay in the good graces of western leaders. they have been doing the bidding of political leaders and censoring content as this information and vague in accordance with the political wishes of their masters. it's essentially

banning, removing from its platform of anything at all as is displeasing to the political leaders of the west. stop for a dog, which is in ukraine. it enjoys funding for from western governments. then you have the person that they assign fact checking to which is been nimo who is employed by the atlantic council. the atlantic counselors will cause a nato think tank. what counts as fact tracking is simply a, using official western governmental sources to challenge other views of alternative media and trying to abuse that government find offensive. i fill out the in parliament has outlined any public celebration other than may, 9th, anniversary of the soviet victory over. and i'll see germany in authority have

banned all fireworks for sessions and other public festivities on may 9th. and until 7 in the morning, the following day, the vote was unanimous despite the fact that more than 40 percent as a lot b, in population or ethnic russians. the editor in chief of vault news outlined the reasons behind the ban. and before my ease, russians are been forcibly re educated because russians in lot of we are no longer have any rights. they have been deprived of the opportunity to receive education. in their native language, the russian language has been removed from the public space. and now holidays and their heroes are being taken away from them, their paternity to honor their memory. this isn't a question of solidarity with the key of political elite. this has been done consistently with the aim of depriving russians in latvia of all basic rights and the opportunity to remain bean russian. therefore, now, even if not every one, but many people, s s d crenan regime as new narcy. and it is clear that symbolism has definitions

and made the 9th, when it comes to valleys and memories. lottery wants to break this connection. there are no political forces in lot via the could vote against the ukrainian situation. and if there was such a brave person who would vote against, there was simply be expelled from politics. there are such mechanisms when people can be accused of treason and criminal cases can be initiated. they have always been anti russian sentiments in law fair, but a green light has been given to day. so everything is allowed. for example, arresting russian activists initiated fabricated criminal cases and forcing them out of the country. the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and honor their heroes. a contract is the waiter in poland and france is hindering ammunition deliveries to kiev that says, the 2 countries topped it will not fail to reach agreement over where the spoils

from the e. you will end that are taken care of your rachel mars. it has more. queen ursula, literally just finish admonishing all the kiddies in the u. schoolyard over the need for unity at all cost against china. and already it seems like they found something else that they disagree on. sources are now telling the western press, the countries are caught up in arguing about whether funding earmarked by brussels for ammunition production or ukraine and to replenish member states own supplies should be spent inside europe as france is arguing, or whether that cache ultimately taken from the pockets of taxpayers of member states, let's not forget, should fuel weapons production in the us or in the u. k. as pulling recorded the wants, arguing that it would mean that ukraine would get the ammo faster. right now, the made in europe camp is reportedly winning the debate, but it's not settled. and here's how important it, chief, you, diplomat years of burrell considered this issue to be back in february. we love

anything we can use in the beast, facilitate to provide financing, looking for dig, waiting ways to be in defense agency and again, commission altogether. we can do to come and purchase asked the member to stage to gave bob political files for the ukrainian army is his most urgent issue. he will fate on that. really the result of the will is in danger. look, you're not getting anything but grief out of the conflict in ukraine. the block now has an over dependence on pricey american energy, and the result can be seen in the streets across europe. routinely with citizens protesting inflation and cost of living increases with no real end in sight to any of this either. and european industry is being tempted to jump ship to the us with subsidies. and while the fact that they also have energy over there that is not in short supply. so when the

e u reaches into this giant black hole of cash into which all the members state contributions just typically disappear and proposes to start handy out free cash from it. like how we handy to weapons manufacturers. it's a no brainer that countries like france that largely subsidized other you countries, light pole in through the block and also have weapons manufacturers are going to seize opportunity to take whatever cash, shaking yet. and if france in europe want to maintain strategic autonomy and independence from washington, a concept that french president a manual that call has been promoting and that seems to have been gaining traction recently. according to european council president shahan michelle. then they're not just going to want to sit back and let the u. s. military industrial complex be the only western economic engine that gets fed by all the public cash being blown on this western spending is free for ukraine. it's not exactly surprising that poland is going to bat for manufacturers outside of the u, though just last month,

britons on the asked the pay to replace the for britain or so also received while is soil. no reaction to that, by the way, from the enviro conscious, you guess they were too busy calculating the carbon footprint of how flatulence. so it now looks like the interest of poland, military industrial, complex or elsewhere. and that's also where they would like the you funding to go now please elsewhere. hey, here's some news for warsaw. yes. who's paying the use bills? and therefore your bills, france largely and germany as well. the 2 big donors to the block and poland sounding a bit like a spoiled kid who doesn't seem to care if mom and dad are struggling financially. because well, there's always the option to go hit up sugar daddy, uncle sam on the other side of the atlantic, but now by demanding that you funds be spent outside the block. it looks like poland also now wants mom and dad to pay for uncle sam. from big bird to baghdad, be popular children's

t v. program. sesame street is set to turn his attention to a rock and its culture as part of a special u. s. government project. but they can't just buy washington leaving one of the bloodiest wars of the 21st century, which claim tens of thousands of civilian lives. u. s. a. i d as the program will promote inclusion and respect among children. iraq is historically known for its diverse cultures, religions and ethnicities. decades of conflict and economic strife have left a mark on the country and its people, especially children, learn about how usaid and sesame, what shall by celebrating a rog, diversity. this is such a heart warming an exciting project. i'm a special looking forward to the sesame street character beep who was born without an arm and has only one nostril because the u. s. military contaminated his tone with depleted uranium. this is what diversity looks like. how exactly did they end up with decades of conflict and economic strife?

any ideas, samantha, i hope to learn more about how a rog reach such a state with the help of us aid and puppets. just to remind you, the iraq war began back in 2003 with the us led coalition aiming to topple the government has saddam hussein be conflicts lasted a decade and claimed the lives of at least a 100000 civilians. according to a rocky estimates, an independent politician we spoke to says the program would never be acceptable for a rocky t v. we and iraq self her greatly and still suffering on the occupation of the you as forces after 2003. and the responsibility of the occupying forces did not raise of the standard of they're treating a treatment of iraqi people on the opposite side. they, they allowed corruption,

their loud violence, they instigated the sectarian violence in iraq, and they cause the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent iraqi civilians. and here in iraq we have enough seats of the parliament to block any such educational programs. this is something completely unacceptable in the middle east. and as i said to, we have enough seats in the parliament to block any such interference in the local affairs. all for the republican iraq. washington says it will continue to supply weapons to taiwan, but taught us officials have declined to speculate on if or when the chinese military might use force against the island. oh, a

united states plays a major strategic role in the, in the city with 375000 personnel. there's a vast network of operations that extend from hawaii move away to india. ah, we've talked a lot this year about the growing threats we face from the ccp. they've triple defense spending in a decade. and that's what they admit to. oh, [000:00:00;00] a,

what's most alarming is the increasingly provocative actions. president z has taken in recent years, pushing out china's borders with new defense agreements and military bases, and for nations illegally building militarized islands and try to limit freedom of navigation in the south china sea, threatening our allies in the region when they worked with us. and cozying up to putin and the toller and other tyrants. a has gotten to the point where these foreign ministry is now seeking to intimidate the speaker of the house and other members of congress, just for supporting democracy and self determination for the people taiwan. ah,

i a g s m c. manufacturers, 90 percent of the advanced global supply of advanced semiconductor shifts. if, if china invades and either owns or breaks us, we're, we're in a world of hurt, you know, globally, it, congressman, it almost sounds like the case that would be made in the 60 seventy's and eighty's or by america was spending so much money and military resources in the middle east, oil was so important for the economy is, is this sort of the 21st century version of that? i think it's about democracy and freedom. ah, that's all for now. be sure to check out our

t v dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates. we'll see you next time with you. ok. defense secretary ben wallace recently said i'm optimistic between this year and the next year. i think ukraine will continue to have the momentum with it and a position of strength. he also said, there is no magic one moment when russia collapses, in what the universe is, wallace reside with for only one main thing is important for naziism,

internationally speaking to that is that nations, but that's allowed to do anything, all the mazda races, and then you have the mind, the nations who are the slaves americans, brock, obama and others have had a concept of american exceptionalism. international law exist as long as it serves american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist by turning those russians into this. danger is boy man, that wants to take over the world. that was a conscious strategy. so some golf out of it on your own, i mean i not leashed off tim zip on and tablet block. nato said it's ours. we moved east. the reason us, hey jim, it is so dangerous, is it the lie? the sovereignty of the countries, the exceptionalism that american uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. if nato,

what is bad shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in large obs companies would lose millions and millions? or is business and business is good. and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion. and i'm rec center. and i'm here to plead with you, whatever you do, you do not watch my, your show seriously. why watch something that's so different opinions that you won't get anywhere else. welcome, it pleases you to have the state department, the cia weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your facts for you, go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't watch my show, stay mainstream, because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you think

. o, social media has given birth to many trends from viral make a looks to crazy shopping halls and insane challenges like the infamous tortillas lab. but it has also given rise to fast fashion as these influencers need to rotate outfits quickly. in order to keep up with their content, fast fashion refers to clothes that are designed quickly and cheaply to keep up with trends. things like czar forever 21 h and m, she and, and others. and while. 7 historically, fashion trends lasted about a decade. the cycle is now much faster lasting, only 3 to 5 months. i'm christy i and you're watching the cost of everything we're today. we're going to be looking at the fast fashion industry and the true cost of this fast paced life cycle and how it affects production to the environment.

mm. with fast fashion is quite distinct from other retailers, as these retailers design produce and deliver fashion goods to consumers. in significantly less time, given their agile supply chains. fast fashion retailers, legs are on h and m are generating successful financial results when compared to non fast fashion retailers, or only generally, 7 percent profit margins. fast fashion retailers aren't 16 percent profit margins more than doubled, that of comparable stores. so how do they achieve such high margins?