public space and no holidays and their heroes are being taken away from them, their paternity to honor their memory. this isn't a question of solidarity with the key of political elite. this has been done consistently with the aim of depriving russians in latvia of all basic rights and the opportunity to remain dean russian. therefore, now even if not every one, but many people assess the cranium regime as new narcy. and it is clear that symbolism has definitions and made the 9th, when it comes to valleys and memories. lot, we have wants to break through this connection. there are no political forces in lot via there could vote against the crane and situation. and if there was such a brave person who would vote against their will simply be expelled from politics. there are such mechanisms when people can be accused of treason and criminal cases can be initiated. they have always been anton russian sentiments in law fair. but a green light has been given to day, so everything is allowed, for example, arrest in russian activists initiated fabricated criminal cases and forcing them out of the country. the motivation is absolutely ridiculous,

what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and other they heroes. for 360 view at scottie, nell hughes gets going next. catch that after the shortest breaks, they'll be here at the top with all of the end of the work in weeks tom news stories to join me that ah you ok. defense secretary ben wallace recently said, i'm optimistic between this year and the next year. i think ukraine will continue to have the momentum with it and a position of strength. he also said, there is no magic one moment when russia collapses. in what universe is? wallace reside? ah, ramsey, the great mustafah kimmel at

a turk, caesar augustus jo a haro a narrow ru alexander. the great tink has long winston churchill napoleon bonaparte . all names of past leaders whose reputations of a great power supremacy and influence outside of their countries borders have left a legacy worthy of the history books. however, what a world leaders of the present day, who are the types of leaders, people are putting into power from the charming french president, a manual ma chrome to the bullish. donald trump, the various personalities being placed into a power around the globe are definitely not from a common moult. i'm guy now hughes, and on today's 360 view, we're going to look at why certain populations are looking at different types of leaders. and which leaders will leave the most outstanding legacy for the present day era. let's get started. ah,

it's young leader can be quantified in many ways. does it serve today's society to judge of the quality of our leaders on stereotypes formed by traditions made in the past? we are joined by our international corresponded roxana salon. what do you think of when you think a modern, strong, powerful leaders is impressive in food team? writing a bare so you think donald trump making fun of his enemies regardless of whether or not we hold strong men eaters in all, or think they're throw back to unless civil life era, it is clear that they're making at least a conditional come back. of course, are present in full teen of russia while reviled in the west or mainstream media. his own countrymen honor him as a leader who puts his people 1st when he comes to domestic and international politics. he's a law, nancy, no,

but name only with another strong men cheating being uptime, nor it challenged in almost a century long of you as dominance of the global geo political scene. then of course, there was donald trump in the united states. he's a much as a no nonsense and the intellectual hero won him the hearts and minds of at least half of the american population. i mean, seem like he's upon is has to move heaven on earth. so i'll see him finally in 2020 . most recently, we have seen the rising power to also the dorian president, the book he created a 40000, make a prison, a part of his promise when he took office to clean up the gang violence in the country lab bus. second through, we're going to allow whole lot of going as well. so i didn't get in unless there is a set amount of quality there. and then i'll go get the got the owner part of the go much important going on because i lit up in that has got to be that. what is

your most important that going on in a now viral speech? still his strope. well, kelly called on people to look to god and faith to lead the country through hard times. el salvador has been crippled by gang related violence from m. s, 13 amber, 18. a year of my incarceration had been greatly supported by the people of salvador . but there are others who seem to feel this trend, dera balsam nero had too much of a tough guy in brasil before. he also lost his latest election to la selva. and in europe, there are other examples. big or bunch comes to mind. he's prioritizing of hungarian interest, has put him in direct conflict with that youth technocrats. and then there is ga milanni in italy who though was technically a strong woman leader. has you strong rhetoric on immigration to whip up the bass

and drive her into office? of course, we can not go too far with the much of strong mind leader. certainly people like emma norma croner friends and dusting to feed into more, quote, unquote, civilized in much of a world either. and they have certainly held onto power in their respectively countries effectively. but with the rise of national leave him an anti global lease in the world over. it looks like we could be seen more popular leaders coming to the for with rhetoric to protect borders. reserve traditions and to focus on the local population over against multinational corporations for $360.00 view. i'm roxanna, solon, join me now. disguise is author an international bridge or ashrebra tonchee and host of going underground action. thank you so much for joining us. and i want to start off, do you think that present donald trump's election and it's whole persona actually

set the stage for not only a strong masculine type of leadership in the us, but also around the globe? i don't really think so. i mean, when i asked to admit that trump for all his sins is a strong leader only in the sense that occasionally and very occasionally, during his presidency, did he appear to somehow not do what he was supposed to. like. all residents are supposed to do. so is that strength occasionally very occasionally, and sometimes doing spectacularly stupid things against the advice of some would say the military industrial complex and other times actively pursuing policies that were good but weren't is that strong strength? we think gov historically is the moss to minding a grand strategy, it's very difficult to see in the trunk from a most to strategy, although outer office of course as being a grand strategy asthma to win. the 2nd bill was interesting. you talk about

strength of the strength that you personify to the outside, and there's the strength. obviously the inner strength that a lot of leaders are expected to have. but when it comes to those that the stereotype it's put out to people, do you think this type of masculine strong man leadership is usually associated only with the right leaning movements and right wing populous leaders around the globe. i think the whole strong man idea of history championed by thomas carlyle at the end of the 19th century is largely debunked. it was promoted by william james, the psychologist, philosopher from new york in the 19th century and kind of destroyed bob from a bit of max labor on hitler. i mean, you know, it isn't great, man, i'm not saying it was a great, but you know, the strong matcher individuals, it was structures in the treaty of versailles, arguably that capitalized and nazi germany. it was that other events that

capitalized napoleon it, the whole idea of great men in this way is a mit which actually protects power structures because it's after all, the power structures that are there. and thankfully, some weights and trump supporters would say they are all structures in the united states that are willing to support and create the conditions in which someone like trump can actually overthrow prevailing opinion in the way it's always done. democrat republican as usual kind of politics. so rather than a scribe, all the change and all the power to great men, it really tends to be structures. i think even when it comes to go to the on the left men like che guevara and fidel castro, hand, you know, they quite a little left during strong men as well in history. let alone on the right was

interesting to bring that up because you know, you look through history, you look at people like we were talking about ramsey's. the great, earlier we were talk about caesar, augustus, you can bring in history, and there are a variety of personality. so you're saying it's necessarily the structure, the created that shows strength, especially when you're looking back on history. not necessarily the personality of the leader that's elected at that time. i think so. and i think we now know that it's not really to do with identity politics because recently i think 5 really me give me a call 27 called prince. maybe no, i think it was a serious, serious war that people began to understand. queens and me are in the power of the great syrian, the ancient queen of syria. not an angel. i think this is the famous director, director of which film was it now that i was scouting locations in the mirror before the war started to resurrect the idea of queens. you know, better, of course in egypt. badger and gosh, the number of russian famous queens that were powerful and

sold so much the same way as the great men is treatments continues as well. where we also talk about there has to be an element of narcissism, that goes into those that run for office and, and there's obviously a difference between the legacy leaders, the ones that inherit their position in their power versus those that are elected by the people. you look at the current leadership around the world today, the countries of those that are being elected. and you cannot say that someone like a menu or a crone of an adjustment for joe is in the same category as those that i even say, you know, a, donald trump, or even a bull scenario type personality. the for a completely different personalities in that side. of it, so the people when they elect someone that might be considered more passive versus someone that's actually outwardly very bullish. i was just thinking of just intruder. i still remember that i encounter and she gin ping where he was just

dress down like he was some little child. but then again was both in our really that tough was very detailed, very, really that tough to to have. it keeps the u. s. maces there all the time was, ballston are, was 7th oligarchy in brazil. the in which case and the people that are considered by many as strong people, are they not merely engaging with public relations and marketing and such ways to produce that image just to just intrude over for him? the idea is why don't, why don't i seem less of a big, powerful man. and that will help me when vote said you at my constituency level that i want you. so i'm not sure whether this is really reading in different piano tactics. and the actually mostly does, maybe every lead that i will be pretty sad is that, is that well, no matter how narcissistic they are relatively weak and the prisoner of those structures. and the reason why they get to be those leaders is more often than know

because they do reflect a wider opinion, even in countries that on to as see the democracies, they do reflect a wider opinion of what it should be to be a leader and of course the promises made by those leaders to those electrodes before more often than not, they promises. and the trust is all that hopelessly dashed when we come back, we will continue our conversation with ashley ritathui and like why some of the most brash leaders seem to lean towards nationalism instead of globalism. ah huh. oh no, no one else seemed wrong. when old rules just don't hold any new

rules that we have to shape out this day becomes the advocate and engagement. it was the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look so common ground. i am rick sanchez and i'm here to play with you. whatever you do. do not watch my new show. certainly why watch something that so different my little opinions that you won't get anywhere else work of it. please do have the state department, the cia weapons makers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your facts for you, go ahead. i changed and whatever you do, don't watch my show, stay mainstreet because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change and the way mm thing

i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order is a conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. the point obviously is to race trust rather than fear i would like to take on various jobs with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot. let's protect its own existence with oh, was reason is meaningless credit and that if you speak russian,

keep your voice down while out and about a couple. don't put your human symbols on display a guy. so you guys don't talk to strangers. 7 i avoid noisy gatherings with your colleagues and perhaps also your friends think you're guilty because you'll russian a specific social with

welcome back. join me again to continue. our discussion is author and international presenter action returns the and host of going underground. we mentioned some of the great leaders, female leaders that russia has been able to see in their history. we just saw georgia maloney or maloney elected in italy, taking on that very strong style at least publicly. it's not only for men correct when you look at some of the females that are being elected, they're actually a lot more bullish. they're a lot more, you know, stand up in the room than others would have to be that many would have to be. do you think that that kind of style is not just reflective in the men, but other women in history? i mean, i think either the politics, we've seen the effects of it as identity politics is increased in base over recent decades. is led to was killed, wounded,

or displaced tens of millions of people. so i'm fearful of ever scribing those identity ideas to leadership. in any case would imaginative obama that'd be the white man. i mean the drop bombs and predominantly people of color living in those places. it made very little difference. i suppose. if a g, b, g, q, leader, i think there are some, and they backed was the, i'm in the l g b, g q. people died in iraq, afghanistan, syria, and other countries. so regardless of sex, i'm not actually sure that, that, that's not important. if we think of mrs. thatcher, the cabinet with famously old men and women, politicians said she, she preferred men around her, but then on the other hand, with the men pulling the strings around her in the premiership. as regards italy, as so far, it has to be said, i've seen very little to suggest that she is going to depart from the scripts given

to or i was going to say nature for me installed to work with actually probably from, from mr. blinking the us state department. well, it's interesting cuz i think you hit the nail in the head. it has to destruction what's going on with the countries and so far, right now it seems in the present. there's a lot of countries that obviously when they're not happy with how things are going, they look to a new leader to, i guess, adjust things and make things go in the other direction. in that idea, do you see a style of leadership fitting in with the trend? you're right, not identity politics, but maybe towards nationalism away from globalism. and how is that reflective in the type of leader that they elect when they're actually looking for someone that goes opposite of the path that, that country is on, at the current moment. nationalism as being and as always, being potent regardless of the it has to be say, said the kind of ivory tower academy views the national of the berlin wool.

philosophized about this. now we have nationalism as another means a rebellion, a rebellion against neoliberalism. and that is what's been happening, of course, around the world. but then we should be aware that wary that, you know, joe biden does cloak himself in the flag, doesn't. he's very proud of his relatives in their service. regardless of the fact that he appears to ever more money into wars, but he knows nationalism plays well in the united states as well. and of course it happens the same in britain is the nationalism of those against new liberalism, more powerful, more vote to force that lead to fascism as it does on the street. sometimes in their opposition is grand alliances from the extreme right to those that are nominally conservative tried to overthrow the grand narrative neoliberalism. these

are all questions that are being debated in the academy. but sure nationalism going to go along with many things. tell me you're a student of history, you obviously look throughout history at the different times, the different cultures and the people that they put into power. what is the big difference that you see between countries who elect their leader versus one that inherits their position of power? is there a difference? do you find in their personalities and what is being expected of them? depending on how they actually rose to that office? you know, and so thinking johnson said, here on your program, i suppose that doesn't mean i know you're watching the crown too much, but in fact, it is a constitutional monarchy. no power except to extort, extort the taxpayer. hundreds of millions. it's been reasonably estimated from british public money to pay for his balances, inherited the leaders. i'm not sure they have them that many. i mean,

the powerful countries. i think in nature, nations to know, go from media, they talk about children being as if he wasn't elected. i mean, the kind of elections you need to go for to become she didn't bring in china from the lowest chinese street, up the actual lawns of local parties, community parties, right through the country with the largest g, d, p in the world on the thing about barry, it's certainly not an urgent. i don't know which inherited ones can you think off. i came down north korea. i'm the he comes to mind. as probably went on this is, this is out the most. i mean, it is very difficult to get information about north korea isn't that all we know is about north korea is arguably propaganda. because it's in the interest of nature, countries to build up our moments and spend public money in european union nations

and in the united states to fight this unknown person. and we know that the korean people, they lost 20 percent of their entire population, men, women, and children because of the killing by american and british soldiers. and we know that the korea prides itself in saying that will never happen again. so i'm not saying we know that much about him. we do, i suppose though, the only president that's really taken seriously. the threat of north korea poses to the united states, and presumably that was shown to show to biden by knew about it shown to trump. it over the shock jump and miss l because it los angeles at a relatively short order. we know that trump tried to talk to can join. and we know how hated at trump was trying to negotiate. so i'm going to be se, okay, so i have to finally, you know, this last question with you. i want to talk on the flip side, you see a lot of less than petitions like just into though, just into or den, wielding

a lot of authoritarian power, or dern is a new zealand. and she seems, you know, you kinda even, she can sometimes be very strong. sometimes a little bit less of a bullish figure. there is with very strict covered locked downs trudeau and ministration. with response the trucker protest, do you agree with these all authoritarian actions? and if so, why don't these leaders get the bad rap of the so called a strong man leaders? we have been discussing because we haven't put those 2 necessarily in the strong main category. i mean, i wouldn't call just in their den or judo left wing in the slightest. i see them is extreme right wing bull edition interest trujillo, really in the past few months, was exposed as having a c service that was sending sex slaves to i says british school goes to isis. that was a story not covered by many media. i see just katrina is extremely right wing and

as a person who certainly impoverish is the poor of canada and otherwise is an absolute servant to antony, lincoln's foreign policy. as for just in dan, she's a slave all nato. she is endangering a country by its opposition to the superpower where she lives. china, which is on the left. i suppose it's a communist party that runs it. just hinder ident intruder. both extreme right wing populists, arguably. but of course, the media doesn't want to see it like that because they do play well on identity issues of sexism, racism, and until g, b, g, q issues, as if is if true, those are support for the destruction of syria didn't kill women, and l g b t q people and just in their ident basing of troops in new zealand and wholesale belief in nancy blinking. so world view isn't going to endanger women and

people g, p to states us. it's all a lie. well, we're going to save our debate as to whether or not just a 0 is left or right wing. i kind of might just agree with you on that, but that is a conversation i know that we can have in the future. advertising always in lightning. a lot of things to think about. thank you for joining us. thank you. scholarly i must admit, it's kind of naive to compare the leaders of yesterday to those of today. you know, the 7 deadly sins have been around from the very beginning and throughout history. we later come to find out the various leaders we're guilty of many of them. mainly because of the lack of communication outlets at that time. big difference between information being spread the word of mouth and stone tablets and the world wide web, as well as camera phones. now, could you imagine the tabloid headlines for the wife of the emperor claudius ready contest with a prostitute on who could sleep with more men in one day?

and i doubt any woman would accept a date with king henry the 8th is to be heading over. the 2nd wife was alive streamed on social media. but it's not just scandals which would have been able to be shown, but also leaders in their natural state. and it would be interesting to see if the people would still support if they knew the true intelligence and a mirror. of course, there are more leaders today who are put in power by the people than by birth than yesterday years. which leads us to believe that a leader is supposed to be reflective of what they're elected based feels is needed to best handle society and the various challenges present at that time. sometimes the people get it right and sometimes they get it wrong on election day. but sadly, as the integrity of elections around the world are becoming questioned, then the consensus of the people might not be considered the best measure of determining whether the best person for the job was actually picked. but only time will tell. this has been your a 360 view. thanks for watching. ah

ah. with during the 2nd world war in nazi occupied, poland valinda was a farming region. today is part of ukraine. between 19431945 members of the ukrainian insurgent army led by step on bendara. nasa could thousands of poles and valeria in a diabolical ethnic cleansing process. the murders were particularly horrific and brutal villages were burned. and property looted valinda massacre is without doubt one of the bloodiest episodes in polish ukrainian history. why are ukrainian politicians still reluctant to talk about these events? how to modern day ukraine and poland view?

this tragedy of the past and wide as the memory of aline, us doing, divide people ah, for generations, people have been coming here to case of odds to get healthy, taking advantage of the mineral waters and the fresh air. today the city is at the forefront of cutting edge research, helping athletes, not by utilizing that in, but by depriving them from it. today we are speaking to the head of the innovation center of the russian, the olympic committee, world renowned trina, alexander christian ah, they 72, our humanitarian, true, says proposed by a sudanese pardon. military grip has been engaged in fierce fighting with the countries armed forces since last weekend. we think the further humanitarian term

or in the crisis country goes to the end of every minute. there's a casualty of our scott there is looting robbery. all of this is happening in the countries in the state of extreme gas. a r t follows wagner group factories into the embattled city of our chima scouts. moscow save russian fruits or pushing ukrainian forces out of the western part of the city and inflicting severe losses. also be due to.