in iraq was a us led invasion with coalition forces, focused on overthrowing the government, led by saddam hussein and conflict lost a decade and took the lives of more than a 100000 civilians. according to iraq, yes them as we talks to independent position and to levy says the program won't be accepted on iraq. it's evie we and iraq says her greatly and still suffering on the occupation of the u. s. forces after 2003 and the responsibility of the occupying forces did not raise the standard of their treating. a treatment of iraqi people on the opposite side they, they allowed corruption bad, loud violence. they instigated the sectarian violence in iraq. and they cause the

lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent iraqi civilians. and here in iraq we have enough seats of the parliament to block any such educational programs. this is something completely unacceptable in the middle east . and as i said to, we have enough seats in the parliament to block any such interference in the local affairs off of the republic, off iraq while our own. so this is our scottie nell hughes is on the $316.00 view up next. them will be back in the top of the hour. ah, ramsey, the great mustafah kimmel at a took caesar augustus jo a harley now. ruth alexander the great taint horizon. winston churchill napoleon

bonaparte. all names have passed. leaders whose reputations have a great power supremacy and influence outside of their countries borders have left a legacy worthy of the history books. however, what a world leaders of the present day, who are the types of leaders and people are putting into power from the charming french president, a manual ma crone to the bullish donald trump, the various personalities a being placed into a power around the globe are definitely not from a common moult. i'm sky now hughes, and on today's $360.00 view, we're going to look at why certain populations are looking at different types of leaders and which leaders will be the most outstanding legacy for the present day era. let's get started. ah. is strong, leader can be quantified in many ways. does it serve today's society to

a judge of the quality of our leaders on stereotypes formed by traditions made in the past, we are joined by our international corresponded roxana salon. what do you think of when you think a modern, strong, powerful leaders is a precedent for team writing a bare so you think donald trump making fun of his enemies regardless of whether or not we hold strong men eaters in all, or think they're throw back to unless civil life era, it is clear that they're making at least a conditional come back. of course there's pressing and putting of russia while reviled in the west or mainstream media. his own countrymen honor him as a leader who puts his people 1st when it comes to domestic and international politics. his alliance in all but name only with another strong man. taking being of china. it challenged in almost a century long of you as dominance of the global geo political scene. then,

of course there was donald trump in the united states. he's a much, a no nonsense, i'm see. intellectual hero won him the hearts and minds of at least half of the american population. and it seemed like he so ponies had to move heaven on earth to oust him finally in 2020. most recently we have seen that rising power to el salvador im precedent nigi blue kelly. he created a 40 house and make a prison as part of his promise when he took off his to clean up the gang violence in the country. lap us sick goes through. you're going through a law, goes to lord gomez, florida, and was dancers was her mom of want to see us there than that. i'll go get lee and you got your own a thought they are going must important to get one on me because i lit up and that has got a portal here. most important, thicker one on the small, in a now viral speech to his stroke bouquet like called on people to look to god and

faith to lead the country through hard times. el salvador had been crippled by gang related violence from m. s 13 and by 18, a year of my incarceration had been greatly supported by the people of el salvador . but there are others who seem to feed this strength. darrow wilson narrow had too much of a tough guy in brasil before. he also lost his latest election to other selva and in europe, there are other examples, big or bunch comes to mind what he's prioritizing of hungarian interest has put him in direct conflict with that youth. technocrats want to and then there is ga milanni in italy who though while technically a strong woman leader, has you strong rhetoric on immigration to whip up the bass and drive her into office. of course we cannot go too far with the much a strong mind leader. certainly people like eminem alma krona front and dusting to

door faith into more quote unquote, civilized much of a world leader. and they have certainly held on to power in their respectively countries effectively. but with the rise of national lease, him an anti global lease in the world over. it looks like we could be seeing more populous leaders coming to the for with rhetoric to protect borders. reserve traditions and to focus on the local population over against multinational corporations. for $360.00 view, i'm from santa solon, join me now this guys is author an international procedure, ashrebra, tonchee, and host of going underground action. thank you so much for joining us. and i want to start off, do you think that present donald trump's election and it's whole persona actually set the stage for not only a strong masculine type of leadership in the us, but also around the globe? i don't really think so. i mean, one has to admit that trump for all his sins, is

a strong leader only in the sense that occasionally and very occasionally, during his presidency, did he appear to somehow not do what he was supposed to like old residents are supposed to do. so is that strength occasionally very occasionally, and sometimes doing spectacularly stupid things against the advice of some would say the military industrial complex, other times actively pursuing policies that were good but weren't is that strong strength weaving. gov historically is the masterminding a grand strategy. it's very difficult to see in the trunk from a most to strategy, although our to roth is of course as being a grand strategy asthma to win the 2nd though, what's interesting, you talk about strength of the strength that you personify to the outside. and there's the strength, obviously the inner strength that a lot of leaders are expected to have. but when it comes to those that the

stereotype is put out to people. do you think this type of masculine strong man leadership is usually associated only with the right leaning movements and right wing populace leaders around the globe. i think the old strong man idea of history championed by thomas carlyle at the end of the 19th century is largely debunked. it was promoted by william james, the psychologist, philosopher from new york in the 19th century and kind of destroyed all from a bit of max labor on hitler. i mean, you know, it isn't great, man, i'm not saying it was a great, but you know, the strong matcher individuals. it was structures of the treaty of versailles, arguably that capitalized nazi germany. it was that other events that capitalized napoleon, it, the whole idea of great men in this way is emit which actually protects power structures because it's, after all,

the power structures that are there. and thankfully, some weights and trump supporters would say they are all structures in the united states that are willing to support and create the conditions in which someone like trump can actually overthrow prevailing opinion in the way it's always done. democrat republican as usual kind of politics. so rather than a scribe, all the change and all the power to great men, it really tends to be structures, i think, even when it comes to it goes up on the left. men like j, guevara and fidel castro, hand, you know, they quite a little left during strong men as well in history. let alone on the right was interesting to bring that up because you know, you look through history, you look at people like we were time out ramsey's the great. earlier we were talk about caesar, augustus, you can bring in history, and there are a variety of personality. so you're saying it's necessarily the structure,

the create that shows strength, especially when you're looking back on history. not necessarily the personality of the leader that's elected at that time. i think so. i think we now know that it's not really to do with identity politics because recently i think 5 really him, it gives us a call 27 called prince. maybe no, i think it was a serious, serious war. the people began to understand queens and beer in the power of the great syrian ancient queen of syria. not an angel. i think it was the famous director, director of which film was it now. and then i was scouting the locations in the mirror before the war started to resurrect the idea of queens, you know, better, of course in egypt, badger and gosh, the number of russian famous queens that were powerful and sold so much the same way as the great men is treatments continues as well. we also

talk about there has to be an element of narcissism, that goes into those that run for office and, and there's obviously a difference between the legacy leaders, the ones that inherit their position in their power versus those that are elected by the people. you look at the current leadership around the world today, the countries of those that are being elected. and you cannot say that someone like a manual crone of an adjustment for joe is in the same category as those that i even say, you know, a, donald trump, or even a bull scenario type personality. the for a completely different personalities in that side of it. so what do you say about the reflection of the people when they elect someone that might be considered more passive versus someone that's actually outwardly very bullish? i was just thinking of just intruder. i still remember that i encounter with she jin ping where he was just dress down like he was some little child. but then again was both on our really loud. tough was the do tab a really that tough to to have. it keeps the u. s. bases there all the time was

both scenarios, 7th oligarchy in brazil. the in which case and the people that are considered by many as strong people, are they not merely engaging with public relations and marketing and such ways to produce that image just to just ensure no for him? the idea is why don't, why don't i seem less of a big, powerful man. and that will help me when vote said you at my constituency level that i want you. so i'm not sure whether this is really reading in different piano tactics. and the actually mostly does, maybe every lead that i will be pretty sad is that, is that well, no matter how narcissistic they are relatively weak and the prisoner of those structures. and the reason why they get to be those leaders is more often than know because they do reflect a wider opinion, even in countries that on to as see the democracies, they do reflect

a wider opinion of what it should be to be a leader and of course the promises made by those leaders to those electrodes before more often than not made promises. and the trust is all that hopelessly dashed when we come back, we will continue our conversation with ashley ritathui and look at why some of the most brash leaders seem to lean towards nationalism instead of globalism. ah huh. for mo, mo, no one else seem wrong when old rule just don't hold any new rules that is yet to say, proud disdain becomes the advocate. an engagement equals the trail.

when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look so common ground. i am rick sanchez and i'm here to play with you. whatever you do, you do not watch my new show. certainly why watch something that so different my little opinions that you won't get anywhere else work of it please. or do you have the state department, the c i a weapons, bakers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do, don't watch my show, stay mainstream because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change and the wing i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people.

a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about personal intelligence. and the point obviously is to race trust rather than fear like to take on various jobs with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot must protect his own existence with oh, welcome back. joining me again to continue our discussion is author and international present, or action returns the an host of going underground. you mentioned some of the great leaders of female ears that russia's been able to see in their history. we

just saw george emma lonia or maloney elected in italy, taking on that very strong style at least publicly. it's not only for men correct when you look at some of the females that are being elected, they're actually a lot more bullish. they're a lot more. you know, stand up in the room than others would have to be that many, but would have to be do you think that that kind of style eggs, not just reflective in the men, but other women in history? i mean, i think either the politics, we've seen the effects of it as identity politics is increased in base of a recent decades. this letter was that of killed wounded or displaced tens of millions of people. so i'm fearful of ever scribing those identity ideas to leadership. in any case, would imaginative obama that'd be the white man. i mean the drop bombs predominantly people of color living in those places. it made very little difference. i suppose. if a g, b, g, q, leader, i think there are some,

and they backed was the how many l g b, g, q? people died in iraq, afghanistan, syria and other countries. so regardless of sex, i'm not actually sure that, that, that's not important. if we think of mrs. thatcher, the cabinet with famously old men and women, politicians said she, she preferred men around her, but then on the other hand, with their men pulling the strings around her in the premiership. as regards italy, as so far, it has to be said, i've seen very little to suggest that she is going to depart from the scripts given to or i was going to say nature for me installed. it was actually probably from, from mr. blinking then the us state department. well, it's interesting cuz i think you hit the nail in the head, it has to destruction what's going on with the countries and so far, right now it seems in the present. there's a lot of countries that obviously when they're not happy with how things are going,

they look to a new leader to, i guess, adjust things and make things go in the other direction. in that idea, do you see a style of leadership fitting in with the trend? you're right, not identity politics, but maybe towards nationalism away from globalism. and how is that reflective in the type of leader that they elect when they're actually looking for someone that goes opposite of the path that, that country is on, at the current moment. nationalism as being and as always, being potent regardless of the it has to be say, said the kind of ivory tower academy views the nationalism was going to end somehow with the fall of the berlin wall. i mean, that was clearly a myths, and there were people on the left, predominantly, i'd say, who philosophized about this and wrote quite a lot about the importance of nationalism. i suppose, because they knew that nationalism is so often gone together with liberation. movements, whether in cuba or throughout the global south. now we have nationalism

as another means of rebellion, rebellion against neoliberalism. and that is what's been happening, of course, around the world. but then we should be aware that wary that you know, joe biden does cloke himself in the flag, doesn't. he's very proud of his relatives in their service regardless of the fact that he appears to ever more money into wars. but he knows nationalism plays well in the united states as well. and of course it happens the same in britain is the nationalism of those against new liberalism, more powerful, more vote and to force that would that lead to fascism as it does on the street? sometimes in their opposition, grand alliances from the extreme right to those that were not going to be conservative, tried to overthrow the grand narrative neoliberalism. these are all questions that

are being debated in the academy. but sure nationalism can go along with many things. tell me you're a student of history, you obviously look throughout history at different times of different cultures and the people that they put into power. what is the big difference that you see between countries who elect their leader? first is one that inherits their position of power. is there a difference? do you find in their personalities and what is being expected of them depending on how they actually rose to that office? you know, in so thinking joseph said here on your program, i suppose i haven't that, i mean, i know you're watching the crown too much, but in fact, it is a constitutional monarchy. no power except to exert, extort next to the taxpayer. hundreds of millions. it's been recently estimated from british public money to pay for his balances, inherited the leaders. i'm not sure they have them that many. i mean, the powerful countries. i think in nature, nations to know, go from media,

they talk about changing thing is if he wasn't elected, i mean the kind of elections you need to go through to become. she didn't bring in china from the lowest chinese street, up of the actual lawns of local parties, community parties, right through the country with the largest g d p. in the world. on the thing about barry, it's certainly not an urgent. i don't know which inherited ones can you think off. i came down north korea. i'm the he comes to mind. as probably went on it's, it's is out the most. i mean, it is very difficult to get information about north korea, isn't it? all we know is about north korea is arguably propaganda because it's in the interest of nature, countries to build up our moments and spend public money in european union nations and in the united states to fight this unknown person. and we know that the korean

people, they lost 20 percent of their entire population, men, women, and children because of the killing by american and british soldiers. and we know that the korea prides itself and saying that will never happen again. so i'm not saying we know that much about him. we do, i suppose though, the only president that's really taken seriously. the threat, the north korea poses to the united states, and presumably that was shown to show to biden by knew about it shown to trump. it over the shock jump, and then miss l, because it los angeles as a relatively short order. we know that trump tried to talk to can join. and we know how hated a truck was trying to negotiate, so i'm going to be se, okay, so i have to finally, you know, this last question with you. i want to talk on the flip side, you see a lot of left in partitions like just into though just into our din wielding

a lot of authoritarian power. our dern is a new zealand and she seems, you know, you kinda even, she can sometimes be very strong. sometimes a little bit less of a bullish figure. there is with very strict code locked downs trudeau and administration with response to tucker protest. do you agree with these all storage area and actions and if so, why don't these leaders get the bad rap of the so called a strong man leaders? we have been discussing because we haven't put those 2 necessarily in the strong main category. i mean, i wouldn't call just in their ident or judo left wing in the slightest. i see them is extreme right wing bull additions, trujillo really in the past few months, was exposed as having a c service that was sending sex slaves to i says british school goes to isis. that was a story not covered by many media. i see just to treated as extremely right wing and as a person who certainly impoverish is the poor of canada and otherwise is an absolute

servant to antony, lincoln's foreign policy. as for just in dan, she's a slave all the nato. she is endangering a country by its opposition to the superpower where she lives. china, which is on the left. i suppose it's a communist party that runs. it just hinder them intruder both extreme right wing populists, arguably. but of course, the media doesn't want to see it like that because they do play well on identity issues of sexism, racism, and until g, b, g, q issues, as if is if true, those are support for the destruction of syria didn't kill women, and l g b t q people and just in their ident basing of troops in new zealand and wholesale belief in nancy lincoln. so world view isn't going to endanger women and

people g, p to states us. it's all a lie. well, we're going to have to save our debate as to whether or not just a 0 is left or right wing. i kind of my disagree on that, but that is a conversation i know that we can have in the future advertising always in lightning. a lot of things to think about. thank you for joining us. thank you. scholarly, i must admit, it's kind of naive to compare the leaders of yesterday to those of today. you know, the 7 deadly sins have been around from the very beginning and throughout history. we later come to find out the various leaders we're guilty of many of them. mainly because of the lack of communication outlets at that time. big difference between information being spread the word of mouth and stone tablets and the world wide web, as well as camera phones. now, could you imagine the tabloid headlines for the wife of the emperor claudius ready contest with a prostitute on who could sleep with more men in one day? and i doubt any woman would accept a date with king henry the 8th is to be heading over the 2nd wife was life streamed

on social media. but it's not just scandals which would have been able to be shown, but also leaders in their natural state. and it would be interesting to see if the people was still support if they knew the true intelligence and a mirror. of course, there are more leaders today who are put in power by the people than by birth than yesterday years. which leads us to believe that a leader is supposed to be reflective of what their elected base feels is needed to best handle society and the various challenges present at that time. sometimes the people get it right and sometimes they get it wrong on election day. but sadly, as the integrity of elections around the world are becoming questioned, then the consensus of the people might not be considered the best measure of determining whether the best person for the job was actually picked. but only time will tell. this has been your 360 new thanks for watching. ah

ah. ah. during the 2nd world war in nazi occupied, poland, virginia was a farming region today. it's part of ukraine. between 19431945 members of the ukrainian insurgent army led by step on bendara. nasa could thousands of poles in virginia in a diabolical ethnic cleansing process. the murders were particularly horrific and brutal villages were burned and property looted. the valinda massacre is without doubt one of the bloodiest episodes in polish ukrainian history. why are ukrainian politicians still reluctant to talk about these events? how to modern day ukraine and poland view this tragedy of the past? and why does the memory of belinda soon divide people? ah

ah for only one main thing is important for knox ism internationally speaking, that is that nations that's allowed to do anything, all the mazda races, and then you have the mind, the nations who are the slave americans, brock obama,

and others have had a concept of american exceptionalism, international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist by turning those russians into this dangerous go. you man, that wants to take over the world. that was a conscious strategy. so some golf out of it on your own, i not leashed off. tim zebulon and tablet clock. nato said it's hours. we move east. the reason us, hey jim, it is so dangerous. is it deny the sovereignty of all the countries? the exceptionalism that american uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. if nature, what is valid, shareholders in united states and elsewhere in large obs companies would lose millions and millions or is business and business is good and that is the reality

of what we're facing, which is fashion. with today's paramedics, it offers a new 72 hours. these fly off to more than 600 people killed in just a week of intense fighting. a representative of doctors without borders says the situation is becoming increasingly need diet. people are running out for her food supplies, maybe seems the hospitality of the city of tomorrow, shutting down, shutting down one after the other man, he's a landing in us alexis, reject charges say you an exclusive interview with tony bruce. there is no freedom of speech in america to say why during this they revoke their own constitutional 1st amendment right.