sense and historical justice, it is fair to say who is using the united nations and who is not who is undermining the international order and who is engaging and hedge moni and bullying? i think i'm totally lost and confused about what's going on in america. we obviously have a lot of war mongers actually that are interesting having walls with people. but regarding the issue i try one, i think there are a couple of things that needs to be clarified. first of all, the bite and administration's attitude, and particularly as recent moves and public expressions, do attempt to play up the taishan across the taiwan straits, have gone beyond common sense to the extent that they can hardly now able to even wing the unanimous support domestically. because its absurdity is already more than

self evident. all right, and secondly, i think by creating a new set of rhetoric all around the topic of taiwan, the u. s. is trying to denounce china's sovereign right. a lot of it is a said that it will not allow the us sees bases on its national territory to stockpile weapons for potential conflict involving taiwan. the u. s. has access to those merchant facilities under a cooperation deal sign with manila and washington nearly a decade ago. shall we allow the storage material 1st by one operations will be guided by the provisions of the and our own national interest. and i think at this stage our, our, our main foreign policy is really to be friends too old. and therefore i think anything in consistent with that would not be also consistent with our position for emergency. but it is all set to be used by us forces deployed to the

philippines. they will be scattered locations around the country, including in a province facing the flashpoint in south china sea. nelson, long life, cham shanghai sense of rim pac on international study, says the philippines couldn't get dragged into a potential conflict of the u. s. is in this straight to fly one. the us is definitely pushing all fronts to try to instigate a wall across the taiwan strait. and i think the philippines offered themselves to be involved in helping the americans. they might regret already, but it's, it's a decision that has been made by the market government. so they say something that i think all the other countries in the region have seen very clearly. so

no, i think the americans are just going really out of their mind while last. so for me today, my colleague, rachel blevins, will be with you at the top of the hour. i'm not her mommy, was she all very present? ah ramsey's, the great new starter, kim l at a tech caesar augustus jo haro, a narrow room. alexander, the great king has long winston churchill napoleon bonaparte, all names of past leaders whose reputations have a great power supremacy and influence outside of their countries borders have left a legacy worthy of the history books. however, what a world leaders of the present day, who are the types of leaders and people are putting into power from the charming french president, a manual ma crone to the bullish donald trump, the various personalities being placed into a power around the globe are definitely not from a common moult i'm sky now huge,

and on today's $360.00 view, we're going to look at why certain populations are looking at different types of leaders and which leaders will leave the most outstanding legacy for the present day era. let's get started. ah, it's young leader can be quantified in many ways. does it serve today's society to a judge of the quality of our leaders on stereotypes formed by traditions made in the past? we are joined by our international corresponded roxana salon. what do you think of when you think a modern, strong, powerful leaders is a precedent for team writing a bare so you think donald trump making fun of his enemies regardless of whether or not we hold strong main eaters in all, or think they're throw back to unless civil life era,

it is clear that they're making at least a conditional come back. of course there's present in full team of russia while reviled in the western mainstream media. his own countrymen honor him as a leader who puts his people 1st. when he comes to domestic and international politics, his alliance, he knows, but name only with another strong man. changing being of china. it's challenging, almost a century long of us dominance of the global geo political scene. then of course, there was donald trump in the united states. he's a much as a no nonsense and the intellectual hero won him the hearts and minds of at least half of the american population. i mean, seem like he's upon is, has to move heaven and earth. so i was him. finally in 2020, most recently we have seen the rising power to el salvador. he unprecedented the book. he created a 40000 mega prison,

a part of his promise. when he took office to clean up the gang violence in the country 2nd through, we're going to allow both of them as well, so equal no, i didn't get in unless there is a set amount of policy there. and then i'll go get the got the owner part of it. they are much important to get when it comes up and that has got to be the what is your most important thing going on in and now viral speech to his strope. ok. like called on people to look to god and faith to live the country through hard times. el salvador had been crippled by gang related violence from m. s. 13, and by 18. a year of my incarceration had been greatly supported by the people of el salvador. but there are others who seem to feed this trend. derek balsam nero had the much of a tough guy in brasil before. he also lost his latest election to leather selva.

and in europe, there are other examples. big or bunch comes to mind. he's prioritizing of hungarian interest, has put him in direct conflict with the youth technocrats children. and then there is ga milanni in italy who though, while technically a strong woman leader, has you strong rhetoric on immigration to whip up the bass and drive her into office? of course we cannot go too far with the much a strong mind leader. certainly people like eminem alma krohn upfront and dusting her door faith into more, quote unquote, civilized much of a world leader. and they have certainly held onto power in their respectively countries effectively. but with the rise of national leave him an anti global lease in the world. over it looks like we could be seen more popular leaders coming to the for with rhetoric to protect borders. reserve traditions and to focus on the local population over against multinational corporations. for 360 view,

i'm brooks, i missile and join me. now this guys is author an international procedure, ashrebra thompson, and host of going underground action. thank you so much for joining us and i want to start off. do you think that president donald trump's election and it's whole persona actually set the stage for not only a strong, masculine type of leadership in the us, but also around the globe? i don't really think so. i mean, one has to admit that trump for all his sins, is a strong leader only in the sense that occasionally and very occasionally, during his presidency, did he appear to somehow not do what he was supposed to like. all residents are supposed to do. so is that strength occasionally very occasionally, and sometimes doing spectacularly stupid things against the advice over some would say the military industrial complex at other times,

actively pursuing policies that were good but weren't is that strong strength? we think of historically is the moss to minding a grand strategy, it's very difficult to see in the trunk from a most to strategy, although outer office, of course as being a grand strategy asthma to win the 2nd. what's interesting, you talk about strength of the strength that you personify to the outside and there's the strength. obviously the inner strength that a lot of leaders are expected to have. but when it comes to those that the stereotype it's put out to people, do you think this type of masculine strong man leadership is usually associated only with the right leaning movements and right wing populous leaders around the globe. i think the whole strong man idea of history champion by thomas carlyle at the end of the 19th century is largely debunked. it was promoted by william james, the psychologist, philosopher from new york in the 19th century and kind of destroyed all from

a bit of max labor on it. i mean, you know, it isn't great men that i'm not saying it was a great, but you know, the strong matcher individuals. it was structures of the treaty of versailles, arguably that capitalized and nazi germany. it was the other events that catalyzed napoleon it, the whole idea of great men in this way is a mit which actually protects power structures because it's after all the power structures that are there. and thankfully some weights and trump supporters would say there are structures in the united states that are willing to support and create the conditions in which someone like trump can actually overthrow prevailing opinion in the way it's always done democrat republican as usual kind of politics. so rather than a scribe, all the change and all the power to great men,

it really tends to be structures, i think, even when it comes to it goes on the left men like j, guevara and fidel castro, hand, you know, they quite a little left during strong men as well in history, let alone on the right was interesting to bring that up because you know, you look through history, you look at people like we were time out ramsey's the great, earlier we were talk about caesar, augustus you can bring in history and there are a variety of personality, so you're saying it's necessarily the structure, the create that shows strength, especially when you're looking back on history. not necessarily the personality of the leader that's elected at that time. i think so. i think we now know that it's not really to do with identity politics because recently i think 5 really me give me a call 27 called prince. maybe no, i think it was a serious serious war. the people began to understand queens in me or in the power of the great syrian ancient queen of syria. not an angel. i think it was the

famous director, director of which film was it now that he was scouting locations in the mirror before the war started to resurrect the idea of queens know better, of course in egypt, badger and gosh, the number of russian famous queens that were powerful and sold so much the same way as the great men is treatments continues as well. well, we also talk about there has to be an element of narcissism, that goes into those that run for office and, and there's obviously a difference between the legacy leaders, the ones that inherent their position in their power versus those that are elected by the people. you look at the current leadership around the world today, the countries of those that are being elected. and you cannot say that someone like a manual crone of and adjusting for joe is in the same category as those that i even say, you know, a, donald trump, or even

a bull scenario type personality. the for a completely different personalities in that side of it. so what do you say about the reflection of the people when they elect someone that might be considered more passive versus someone that's actually outwardly very bullish? i was just thinking of just intruder. i still remember that i encounter and she gin ping where he was just dress down like he was some little child. but then again was both on our really loud. tough was the detail here really that tough to to have. it keeps the u. s. maces there all the time was ballston are, was 7th, raleigh galks in brazil in which case and the people that are considered by many as strong people. are they not merely engaging with public relations and marketing and such ways to produce that image just to just ensure no for him? the idea is why don't, why don't i seem less of a big, powerful man. and that will help me when vote said you at my constituency level

that i want you. so i'm not sure whether this is really reading in different piano tactics. and the actually mostly does. maybe every lead that i will be pretty sad is that is well, no matter how narcissistic they are relatively weak and the prisoner of those structures. and the reason why they get to be those leaders is more often than know because they do reflect a wider opinion, even in countries that on to as see the democracies, they do reflect a wider opinion of what it should be to be a leader and of course the promises made by those leaders to those electrodes before more often than not, they promises. and the trust is all that hopelessly dashed when we come back, we will continue our conversation with ashley ritathui and look at why some of the most brash leaders seem to lean towards nationalism instead of globalism. ah huh.

oh, i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to play with you, whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that so different my little opinions that you won't get anywhere else work of it please. did you have the state department, the c, i a weapons makers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do, don't watch my show. stay main street because i'm probably gonna make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact, but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you think . oh, when i was showing wrong, when i'll prove,

just don't hold any world that is yet to see proud disdain. because of the advocate and engagement, it was the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look so common ground. i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. and the point obviously is to place trust rather than fear like to take on various charlene with artificial intelligence, real summoning the demon robot

must protect his own existence with oh, welcome back. join me again to continue. our discussion is author and international enter action returns the and host of going underground. you mentioned some of the great leaders of female ears that russia's been able to see in their history. we just saw george emma lonia or maloney elected in italy, taking on that very strong style at least publicly. it's not only for men correct when you look at some of the females that are being elected, they're actually a lot more bullish. they're a lot more. you know, stand up in the room than others would have to be that many, but would have to be do you think that that kind of style eggs, not just reflective in the men, but other women in history? i mean, i think either the politics,

we've seen the effects of it as identity politics is increased in base of a recent decades. is that the was that of killed wounded or displaced tens of millions of people. so i'm fearful of ever scribing those identity ideas to leadership. in any case would imaginative obama that'd be the white man. i mean the dropped bombs and predominantly people of color living in those places. it made very little difference. i suppose. if a l g b, g q leader, i think there are some, and they backed was that i'm in the l g b, g q. people died in iraq, afghanistan, syria, and other countries. so regardless of sex, i'm not actually sure that, that, that's not important. if we think of mrs. thatcher, the cabinet with famously old men and women, politicians said she, she preferred men around her, but then on the other hand, with the men pulling the strings around her in the premiership. as regards italy,

as so far, it has to be said, i've seen very little to suggest that she is going to depart from the scripts given to or i was going to say nature for me installed to work with actually probably from, from mr. blinking then the us state department. well, it's interesting cuz i think you had the now in the head, it has to destruction what's going on with the countries. and so far, right now it seems in the present. there's a lot of countries that obviously when they're not happy with how things are going, they look to a new leader to, i guess, adjust things and make things go in the other direction. in that idea, do you see a style of leadership fitting in with the trend? you're right, not identity politics, but maybe towards nationalism away from globalism. and how is that reflective in the type of leader that they elect when they're actually looking for someone that goes opposite of the path that, that country is on the current bone nationalism is. that wasn't, i suppose, because they, but then we should be aware that wary that, you know,

joe biden does cloak himself in the flag, doesn't. he's very proud of his relatives in their service regardless of the fact that he appears to ever more money into wars. but he knows nationalism plays well in the united states as well. and of course it happens the same in britain is the nationalism of those against the liberalism, more powerful, more vote to force food that lead to fascism as it does on the street. sometimes in their opposition, grand alliances from the extreme right to those that were nominally conservative, tried to overthrow the grand narrative neoliberalism. these are all questions that are being debated in the academy. but sure nationalism can go along with many things. tell me you're a student of history, you obviously look throughout history at different times, the different cultures and the people that they put into power. what is the big

difference that you see between countries who elect their leader versus one that inherits their position of power? is there a difference? do you find in their personalities and what is being expected of them? depending on how they actually rose to that office? you know, and so thinking johnson said, here on your program, i suppose haven't that. i mean, i know you're watching the crown too much, but by the event, it is a constitutional monarchy, no power to extort next to the taxpayer. hundreds of millions. it's been reasonably estimated from british public money to pay for his balances, inherited the leaders. i'm not sure they have them that many. i mean, the powerful countries. i think in nature, nations to know, go from media, they talk about change in thing is if he wasn't elected, i mean the kind of elections you need to go for to become. she didn't bring in china from the lowest chinese street up of the actual lawns,

doubt the most. i mean, it's very difficult to get information manual with career isn't that we know about north korea is arguably propaganda. because it's in the interest of nature, countries to build up on moments and spend public money in european union nations and in the united states to fight this unknown person. and we know that the korean people, they lost 20 percent of their entire population, men, women and children because of the killing by american, a british soldiers. and we know that their career prides itself and saying that will never happen again. so i'm not saying we know that much about him. we do, i suppose that the only president that's really taken seriously. the threat of north korea poses to the united states, and presumably that was shown to be shown to biden by knew about it, shown to trump it over the short term that i miss out because it los angeles as

a relatively short order. we know that trump tried to talk to kim jong and we know how hated at trump was trying to negotiate some kind of piece. ok, so i have to finally, you know, this last question with you. i want to talk on the flip side, you see a lot of lifting partitions like just entered out just into our den wielding a lot of authoritarian power. our durn is in new zealand and she seems, you know, you kind of, uh, even she can sometimes be very strong. sometimes a little bit less of a bullish figure. there is with very strict covered lock downs trudeau and administration. with response the trucker protest, do you agree with these all authoritarian actions? and if so, why don't these leaders get the bad rap of the so called strong man leaders? we have been discussing because we haven't put those 2 necessarily in the strong man category. i mean, i wouldn't call just in there and then or judo left wing in the slightest. i see them is extreme right wing politicians,

interest trudeau only in the past few months, was exposed as having a secret service that was sending sex slaves to isis british school girls to isis. that was a story not covered by many media. i see just intruder is extremely right wing and as a person who certainly impoverish is the poor of canada and otherwise is a absolute servant to antony, lincoln's foreign policy. as for just in dan, she's a slave all the nato. she is endangering a country by its opposition to the superpower for where she lives. china, which is on the left. i suppose it's a communist party that runs it. just syndrome then intruder both extreme right wing populists arguably. but of course, the media doesn't want to see it like that because they do play well on identity issues of sexism, racism, and until g, b, g, q issues, as if is if true,

those are support for the destruction of syria didn't kill women, and l g b t q people and just in their ident basing of troops in new zealand and wholesale belief in nancy lincoln. so world view isn't going to endanger women and people g, p to states us. it's all a lie. ah, well, we're going to save our debate as to whether or not just a 0 is left or right wing. i kind of might disagree with you on that, but that is a conversation i know that we can have in the future. astrophotography always enlightening a lot of things to think about. thank you for joining us. thank you discovery. i must admit, it's kind of i to compare the leaders of yesterday to those of today. you know, the 7 deadly sins have been around from the very beginning and throughout history. we later come to find out various leaders. we're guilty of many of them. mainly because of the lack of communication outlets at that time. big difference between

information being spread the word of mouth and stone tablets and the world wide web, as well as camera phones. now, could you imagine the tabloid headlines for the wife of the emperor claudius ready contest for the prostitute on? who could sleep with more men in one day? and i doubt any woman would accept it a date with king henry the 8th is to be heading over. the 2nd wife was life streamed on social media. but it's not just scandals which would have been able to be shown, but also leaders in their natural state. and it would be interesting to see if the people was still support if they knew the true intelligence and a mirror. of course, there are more leaders today who are put in power by the people than by birth than yesterday years. which leads us to believe that a leader is supposed to be reflective of what their elected base feels is needed to best handle society. and the various challenges present at that time. sometimes the people get it right. and sometimes they get it wrong i'll election day. but sadly,

as the integrity of elections around the world are becoming questioned, then the consensus of the people might not be considered the best measure of determining whether the best person for the job was actually picked. but only time will tell. this has been your 360 new thanks for watching. ah ah, ah. during the 2nd world war in nazi occupied poland valinda was a farming region. today is part of ukraine. between 1943 and 945 members of the ukrainian insurgent army led by step on bendara. nasa could thousands of poles in virginia in a diabolical ethnic cleansing process. the mergers were particularly horrific and brutal villages were burned and property looted. the valinda massacre is without

doubt one of the bloodiest episodes in polish ukrainian history. why are ukrainian politicians still reluctant to talk about these events? how to modern day ukraine and poland view this tragedy of the past. and why does the memory of belinda soon divide people ah, for generations people have been coming here to case of odds to get healthy, taking advantage of the mineral waters and the fresh air. today the city is at the forefront of cutting edge research, helping athletes, not by utilizing that in, but by depriving them from him. today we are speaking to the head of the innovation center of the russian olympic committee, world renown trainer. i would render christian ah,

ah, i knew 72 hours, steve fire is there on the table in sudan after more, the $600.00 people are killed in a week of intense by. those doctors without borders says the situation is becoming increasingly dire. but i know the quarter food supplies maybe seems the hospitality of the city of water shutting down, shutting down one after the other aging lashes out of what it calls washington's desire to arm tie. wanted to keep the plan as an active international. boeing they revoke their own constitution.