and who is not, who is undermining the international order and who is engaging and hedge moni and bullying? i think i'm totally at a loss of confused about what's going on in america. we obviously have a lot of war mongers actually. that are interesting having walls with people, but regarding the issue i try one, i think there are a couple of things that needs to be clarified. first of all, the biting administration's attitude, and particularly as recent moves and public expressions do attempt to play up the taishan across the taiwan straits, have gone beyond common sense to the extent that they can hardly now able to even wing the unanimous support domestically. because its absurdity is already more than self evident. all right, and secondly, i think by creating

a new set of rhetoric all around the topic of taiwan, the u. s. is trying to denounce china's sovereign right. meanwhile, the philippines said it will not allow the us to use bases on its national territory to stockpile weapons for a potential conflict involving taiwan. the us has access to those military facilities under a cooperation deal signed between manila and washington nearly a decade ago. shall we allow the storage of materials 1st by one operations we will be guided by the provisions of our own national interest. and i think at this stage our, our, our main foreign policy is really to be friends too old. and therefore, i think anything inconsistent with that would not be also consistent with our position for new military bases are set to be used by us forces deployed to the philippines. they will be in scattered locations around the country, including in

a province facing the flashpoint in the south trying to see nelson. wong, vice chairman of the shanghai center for room pack and international studies says that the philippines could get dragged into a potential conflict that the u. s. is stirring up in the strait of taiwan. the us is definitely pushing on all fronts to try to instigate a war across the taiwan strait. and i think the philippines offered themselves to be involved in helping the americans they might regret already, but it's, it's a decision that has been made by the marcos government. so they say something that i think all the other countries in the region have seen very clearly. so now i think the americans are just going really out of their mind. and that's all

for now. be sure to check out our t. v dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates. we'll see you right back here at the top of the hour. ah, the news? the non to 10 conditions of a piece planned that would meet all of their brushes requirements. you mentioned that ukraine and international community need to recognize their new territorial reality,

which means that they should not only recognize the korean peninsula as part of russia, but also the 4 regions of care sounds approach you don't and that's kind of guns. why is that? so important for you, that's the international community, recognizes these regions as a part of russia. because as we know at this point of time, only 7 countries has recognized crania depart, russian. i think this international recognition is inevitable, rather rather than particularly important for us because the peoples of donors, republic and blue guns can public and people the pupils of those up our osha and harrison regions. they have made already their choice to rejoin russia, a choice that was

a result of free referendum and free deliberate voting by the most majority of the voters in the above mentioned areas. so from this point of view, we don't need any additional particular international recognition. because the choice was done, the choice has been done, it is reversible and nobody and nothing can change it from now on the same time, we are now doing think the special military operation in ukraine. and as soon as the goals of these special military operation are reached, i mean demilitarization of ukraine, dennis, if occasion of ukraine neutral non block status of ukraine and others

there. inevitably, this should be a recognition by the all parties concerned or a combination of the objectively existing new territorial realities. and that is all i, as we know european countries, the united states, us buying weapons to, ah, the ukranian army. and 1st and foremost, those supplies i mostly of benefits to the suppliers themselves to the night and states that the manufacturers but will so now there are some european countries, for example, as tanya i, it's renewing, actually it's arson out by a shipping of, it's our dated weaponry to ukraine and waiting for the new ends to come from the united states, bulgaria is actually doing the same. so and the which conditions and when,

and why can they finalists top pumping ukraine with this weapon away? what you just said, a one more or additional confirmation of for the, the nature of an or of the notorious nature of the nato policy. the u. s. and need to policy told ukraine, or because the consider ukraine just as a raw material for their aggressive purposes for reaching the aggressive purposes against russia. they are prompting ukraine or with the weaponry. and as you just mentioned, old weaponry air from her other a, from a, from many nato, her countries and in the main beneficiary of these kind of policy. now, in the, in the united states of america,

which no military and industrial complex industry is now or issue insured or orders for the years to come. and here they are making profit on the war. they are conduct a new cri against us. no, well, it's very cynical bulus it actually it's, it's a policy that you would completely ignores the core interests of the ukrainian people and to the policy that is aimed at creating a military threats to russia or using ukraine as a well maybe breach head or as a result of a ram against,

against russia. well maybe at the moment when they finally recognize that the inability of the key fuji of can you for jean or to continue military actions. they will stop, as we all know. and the presidents are freshman situation, vladin put in. i said after his meeting with his counterpart from china that shit and pin that china as ah piece plan. the so called china's piece plan may serve as a solid basis for the peace settlement in ukraine. as soon as he, if and western states are ready for that. so as for you, ah, how aligned are russia and china in their vision of their a post military operation world and ukraine and as well. first of all, are we are we're thankful door chain as partners for their sincere intention for

their since you reach out to contribute to the settlement or the ukraine in crisis. and we share many, many views. ah, or no. the principles which can be laid in foundation of this settlement, for instance, obedience or to the you are in charter or principle of indivisibility of security, which means that no country should insure is security at the expense of this security of any or other states. and in, and that is why, so russia and china as strategic are partners. of course they can,

i can work together to reach a peaceful solution in ukraine. but, you know, as president putin said, and some provisions of the, an beast bland, represented by our chinese colleagues are, can be a ground and basis for future future apiece. efforts are, and at the same time, i would like to underscore that russia has never avoided any peaceful talks. quite on the contrary. in march, 2022, it was russia who responded positively to the ukraine in her proposal in to hold her talks to hold these

talks and her both sides, both, both sides were close to an agreement. we ellen, her formerly to draft of her treaty with the gray about peaceful solutions on the conditions that were acceptable for both sides for the both sides. but unfortunately, it was ukraine that her seized these negotiation process and her did not respond to our draft. dated april, 152022 and her it is clear and fundamental our of has, in many times said it lead or who key if regime

i was stopped by its western mentors in conducting peace negotiations with russia. because the collective west or the united states and their satellites, they made their choice for what they call strategic defeat of russia on the ground. let us watch the really aim and then they what that is, what they really seek. and then of course it's, it's impossible, it's a girl that can be reached, but it still, they want to isolate, try should the want to weaken russia and her. that is why they use ukraine in just an instrument or to reach this. or let's

say, a hypothetical purpose and her task and her, they seem to be rated to continue this fighting until the last ukraine. and unfortunately, how do you see the future of us in a russian relations? can we call china, actually, friend of russia? not only a strategic partner or, i'm sure, and we all know that we are strategic partners. we are a friends and a friendly relations between china and russia. have never been better than now. and these relations have no limit for further development for further strengthening for further i'd say wide and broad world broadening this, what i can tell you, and of course are relations with china is one of the

priorities of russian foreign policy. and more to these are solid, friendly causes, base relations of strategic partnership between russia and china. are an important bases of are important basis of stability and security in the, in the, in the asia pacific region and global. so while the entire world was closely following the visit of shouldn't been to russia, his meeting with his, their russian counterparts for merck, a sheet, a prime minister of japan visited keith. and we'll know that japan has territorial claims, both against russia and china. so what may be the purpose of fire for making she does visit to the current to keep bridging from my point of view

her, mr. consider just continues her policy. he started many, many years ago. many, many martha go. since he assumed disposition of the prime minister of japan, you know that and japan is in a bid into l i o unit as days of america. and he plays his role as the, as a and a 1000000000 because resulted in versioning of russian japanese relations resulted in breaking, many mutually beneficial ties between russia and japan. will know that rushes concerns about the groups of ukrainian saboteurs,

so called cyber tourists, that potentially being sent to the bellows from ukraine to attempt acquitted in the country. do you think that stationing or technical nuclear weapons may serve as a deterrent for cave in this regard? the problem is not only what you mentioned, i mean the attempts of ukrainian sectors to infiltrate, to penetrate into the bill of russian territory and to conduct during the decks there. we know that there were several decks already, but the problem also is that the collective west is increasing their military forces on the borders with mill arrows on the way on the

borders of russia. i mean, on the western borders of our allied state and bid demands certain response from all part from our side. and that's what we are doing. you know, you know, that the united states of america has been stationing as nuclear weaponry in several european. nate, a member countries for many decades. and we've always been criticizing this policy of the notices of america demanding them to withdraw the nuclear weapons from europe. as we already done, i mean from the european countries that are not new, there are,

which are non nuclear states. we are strong supporters of keeping and nuclear weaponry within the territorial for countries, it possesses these nuclear weapons. unfortunately, the united states and his net or allies didn't respond and interest bond positively to these our demands. most of these we in, for a long time, we are tried to conduct negotiations with the nato side, about mutual security guarantees. and we were reject it in a very arrogant manner, back in january to 1022. and after we started the spatial military operation in ukraine, no, because we could not tolerate to the existence of,

or an end to russian state used by the need to as a reach head to do the harm to russia, to destroy russian interests. and to this day give us what they call strategic defeat. no, we also saw that turn, it all started increasing the military potential on the borders with russia and billows. and that is why we had to take her certain measures to counter these threads to counter this challenge to our security. and one of them is a deployment of tactical nuclear weapons within the miller, russian territory. montalvan authorities at the moment from what we see, make notes, no secret of the fact that they're trying to seize any corporation with russia. ah,

wow, my a sander is in power way. do you think there is any chance that i, our relations with my dog and our corporation with medulla will improve? well, unfortunately, the current mold in government and is, are, are pursuing through very unfriendly policy towards russia. a no, it has cut old dialogue channels. a contributes to the and a hostile policy of the collective west doors for our country. and at the same time, the current old owen mold, dave in government,

is basically accusing us of what they call interference, with domestic affairs, et cetera, et cetera. this is for actually the we and ukraine has been acting for, for a while for a long time against russia. and as we said for several times before in the collective west is considering mcdavia as who is considered considers will do in the role of ukraine against russia. i mean, as a, again is, and to russian state entity. unfortunately, we of course are who

we strongly condemned the actions that david government is taking now like banning russian speaking mass media like persecuting those politicians and actors who support further friend and relations between russia and david. we also mark, we also note that the policy of the current molded and government current told them in leadership is not accepted by the mold in public opinion. because need the promises that are,

that were made by these young, this mold, these motive in government are quite different from reality. they promised prosperity. but last year they were, there was 30 percent inflation in mall. david. they promised human rights and freedoms. but instead, we see the meaning m. s made it stand instead receive persecutions against those who have different opinions on what the mold though it element is a doing as far as russia is concerned, we are stay ready for you should have been official. good neighborly, and constructive relations with the mold it as soon as

the animal, dave and gallum into is ready for that. now unfortunately, at the moment i would agree with you. we do not see any, any sign of readiness to improve relations with russia. an for some to so and now during the easter weeks we also cannot help asking you about the treatment of the queen in both the dogs, george ukraine. in your estimation, what may be the outcome of the fight for the key if it shows? well, 1st of all, we and wire bravery and firmness of the amongst priests and congregation of the canonical ukrainian orthodox church in the fight for the faith we consider as

inadmissible attempts made by the key for regime to persecute the believers and the priests of the canonical ukrainian orthodox church and it is a part of an overall pressure towards russia towards russian speaking communities in ukraine, towards those who, despite all the nazi regime propaganda keeps it's believe keeps, is, it keeps, keep there, believe, keep their faith, keep their, their spirit and we condemn strongly attempts to seize by force, the properties of the canonical ukrainian orthodox church,

including key up at sheriff's come on history. we urged international community to pay attention to these arbitrary rule dan by conducted by the key free by keith regime. ah, you know, we are all minister or send a letter to the un secretary general mr. gutierrez. but unfortunately, the answer, the response from mr. durish was just to full moral fold for formal writing and or nothing more. and were mom the moments when the u. n. a secretary officials and say that they have no information about what is happening, what is going on a with regard to the canonical ukrainian also don't church though old made it

we're reporting we're reporting about this. so we will continue our efforts to, to sure legitimate drives oh, for the canonical ukrainian orthodox church and we will continuously now try to. mm hm. have the ukranian authorities stop? no, there are illegal and cynical persecution against the ukrainian orthodox church. thank you so much for your time. that's all i have time for. thank you very much. it will my pleasure to be here this morning thinking ah, ah,

who is the aggressor today? i'm authorizing the additional strong sanctions. today. russia is the country with the most sanctions imposed against it. and number those constantly growing. a list of questions as you speak on when you're sitting in the morning or wish you were banding all in ports of russian oil and gas, new g. i. g with the letter with joe by imposing these sanctions on russia has destroyed the american economy. so there's your boomerang with barbara, as wagner group dismissive as a provocation,

western claims that his group support student needs tara military in their fighting against the type of army, even counters that calls washington's desire to arms taiwan to the t.