ah who and who's now for some 30 years and 2 different languages, all our business and through all that i believe news. ah, when i with what may be the most counter and to see while everybody is focusing on the south china sea, the middle east, there's this long standing tangle that could be potentially anyway, potentially capabilities. and they share a border that is both to troops recently in 2020, to 2021. bigger meander polish, the chinese and the in the,

this is all the way up in the himalayas where the land belongs to, in for versa, right? so while most people in the west coast certainly are and it displays food, because i think this is important. let's not forget, asian continent. they are part of a group of countries that make up 6 and for decades now, india and china had been locked in the indian defense official say that the chinese military, that they are ready to protect. that not only what they consider a territorial integrity of india's biggest rival to the area around pakistan which then leads wanda involved and all 3 of them have nuclear warheads of ish. it's dear. $17000.00 foot mountain ball. india says no, you weren't. they say they were encroach. this is indian politicians, right. example indian memo the government for not taking the chinese threat seriously on government. fact here. these are the words that he says that china is

preparing for war. the government, he says, is i minister. so who's right here and to the u. s. is seeming need to go after trust, gushing keisha europe, you're a political analyst, you understand this region, isab skirmishes, these battles really bench into it. first of all, what happens during these battles in may? and then they built up a little bit into us. exactly. and then in september, it nothing that has been so serious us to involve, you know, major the same time. i think the lack of attention to it in the current st. and visa the, the united states. well, what do you, what do you mean? what do you mean by a big pakistan traditionally has been an ally of china. it's related sometimes, not related to each other and it's created a states indo pacific strategy. yeah, that's why it's called india, australia,

japan and the united states. and india with plan of encirclement around china now will act india because of its alliance with russia. therefore, since then, the quad formation has weakened dependent role in many of these. ugh, ugh, united states and china and russia and how many miss holds? i think we're going to be able to put it on a map and you're going to see that if you don't, on the south side, there's a very little neck that's actually part of india and that it over geographical formation of it makes it look like it's really part of china, china reserve that and who doesn't really belong to issues to various differing borders at different times. they had really mean by that because i think you're being very polite. i think what you really forgot his name was he had a name, it's actually been named in an a crayon or a pencil entries part of china and part of india without any cultural june,

which are the ones that we're seeing play out. now. for example, in south korea and north korea, what happened ruler? deciding where the board is go, what do you make of this? come? and he said this for the whole world here, and i think about to happen any day. and, and to he seems to, and i'm not quite sure what he means by that. but what do you, what do you make of did half a board a war with in, in 1962. but the last time there was actual shooting war was in 1962 borders, 14 land borders, and most of the time, not quite a bit of territory. how concerned should the countries in that area, all of which have concerns me the most is that the united states war that bleeds out china, we already see the going down to guar or it has been this conflict. and i think the same thing applies all along the board. i'm not saying that, but i'm saying that

a lecture will, you will see a larger or smaller degree situation. essentially what we're looking at is a conflict it towards plural polarity or multi polarity. the u. s. wants to right back with 30 jango by the way, we talk about success when we talk about growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast, and i'd be in conflict from a u. s. perspective. is this something offense? very dramatic development and talk d 9 during the 1st post soviet wave of nato's that a c. like by now as a crunching sound dream. yeah. still luna beach but i see you what i do to historical disagreements left over from the soviet union. but what i see is great idealism. it's a political, those are one type of place.

so i'm thinking if number one enemy, our government is trying to fire happens to guam and the japanese islands and australian eas magnate. but still, china's economy keeps differentiated strategy. now to be able to, so what's the key? what's the key to the west? i would say the answer is in a word with it, in essence taking sides against china, against russia and against all. and that may be why that border clash is more worthy of attention. we're back now with k j no, to continue. the united states would probably like an india and the china. and while that's unsettling to why the united states would go would, would, would almost been russia and ukraine and seeing how the united states is just plain

to ukraine. i'm thinking this sounds to me like a money me to want to go a lot with it. well, this certainly the us sink tank related to an honest manufacturer, or if you're put at kindly, military canes units and where you're stoking up economist is design in the fact that the u. s. is, and it has been working its plan and planning its work, which became the trump doctrine, which is now the but that want to see this escalation, not simply because it's so see as the greatest challenges or greatest enemies than they were and coming out of the korean war and it seems like at the time of fury and these folks are about to take over the world and they're coming up. and you know. busy great journalism institutions like sing lied to by l. b, j, and by president nixon and all did the same thing after 911 and we used instead of the dominant, looks like we need a new argument. but there's a sameness to them the same strategies. so this time around china,

in my eyes and to attack it. and then having done that v of other countries against china. and currently the preventing conflict, anti one missile highly finds it will tie one island itself will serve the role of you will also be involved in units. i go the south green for this goes back to what you were talking about earlier. and i think fighting on the border with the, in these disputed areas with india cause and what's the root cause of all this. and as you're explaining the put, so as we put this chess pieces together, vinny, if we're going to consider the end the mind that you're making now for what the job . i mean it's goal, no ology of the indo pacific. beforehand it was always the asia encirclement, so they need so they need india. ah, the more battle the royals, as we said earlier, conflicts rushes oil when they sanctioned it. and now they're probably dissing

trips out partnerships along that da tried to steer a path between the soviet union and the u. nasha has close relations with china. now they are in thank you. pleasure to be with you. oh, the world. we've got to stop living in these little says, truth as everywhere. how much with very start. berlin encouraged the white colonists to settle elation as a cheap labor source. this was causing major pro daniel rule guys or will out the

2nd was fully de germany through it's 15000 well equipped army, all a barrier for years the germans killed up to 60000 south west africa are called the 1st genocide of the 20th century. yes. hitler's assault unit boat on the same brown colonial unit a need to our space fire between warring factions.