thought we don't want to watch because it might just change the way you say ah, the current it over representation of the west in the mail. when body undermines the very principle we for lot of industry, that's the message from russia's foreign minister and the, on the lines. the west, the tend to replace the international law with the detriment to the global economy . and egyptian military attached a strong dead by the power military group in the don as kale pacific for the 2nd week of the in the country with people are injured in a car running attack in jerusalem police there. the assailant was neutralized on to being sold by a civilian on the latest episode of going on to ground journalist seymour hersh, who published a report from a new cream attack,

se there's no diversity of opinions in the us media as the most outlet the bank one's back can be established with times response to trump in full force and january 6 for the invasion of the capitol. has there been, i think, to make a very distinct commitment to being provided with hello and welcome. you're watching all the international with the latest that world news out date is good to have you with. now, what's an attempt to replace the international law with a rule space to order the core of the unfolding? well, the can on the crisis that's according to russia's foreign minister speaking at the un security council. just listen to the snow. she still with the un centric system was currently going through a deep crisis. the root cause of this was the desire of individual members of this

organization to replace international law the and the un charter with the sort of rules based order billing. but no one has actually seen these rule cities. they have not been the subject of transparent international negotiation, pursue reduce the result is the fragmentation of global train over the collapse of market mechanisms. the paralysis of the w t. o and the final undisguised transformation of the i m f into an instruments to for achieving the goals of the us and its allies, including military objectives with russia, leading the un security council for the month of april, were having the here, the long awaited address to the 15 member body that leads the united nations from russia's foreign minister, sergei lab ra. now he emphasized how the united states is distorting the purpose of many international institutions than using them to serve the geopolitical ends of the united states. he discussed the activities of the united states in the pacific

region and how they are aimed to stir up tension when united states and geopolitical rivals. but the, you, the signal much that there are mechanisms of intervention and maritime security issues which are being created under the auspices of the united states with an eye to ensuring the unilateral interests of the west in the waters of the south china sea. but it is no secret that the goal of the indo pacific strategies is to contain china and isolate russia. you have this is how our western colleagues interpret effective multilateralism drugs in asia pacific region. now he also talked about how u. s. efforts to isolate russia around the world have resulted in food supply chains being caught problems in the energy markets and all kinds of consequences, global community. the emphasized that russia's vision is for world cooperating together and model of globalization that benefits every country within the gustavo

homelessness. genuine multilateralism at the present stage to requires the adaptation of the un 2 objective trends of formation square over multi polar architecture of international relations. mister, it is necessary to accelerate the reform of the security counseling by increasing the representation of asians, african, and latin american countries in it. the current, excessive over representation of the west in this main un body undermines the very principle of multilateralism. when the russian or minister spoke before the un security council, he reiterated what he said when he 1st arrived in new york city, which was the essential move by the united states. unable to approve the visas for the journalists who generally travel with the russian foreign minister that this move was an effort to suppress what he had to say before the council. essentially, the united states was trying to prevent the world from hearing the message he put forward before the un security council today explaining that russia would like to

see a peaceful resolution of the conflict in ukraine. and also emphasizing that provocations from the united states, such as the expansion of nato and the toppling of ukraine's government in 2014, have only served to escalate global tensions and resulted in the conflict as it is taking place today. now, at the un, it was emphasized that many bodies are being distorted by the united states not serving their intended purpose. not russia would like to see the global economic benefits of globalization truly play out. however, that would require the united states to stop stop pressing for economic dominance and stop pushing, militaristic confrontations around the world. international affairs and security analyst, moxley boat essays, the u. s. is against to any reform to the un security council that would undermine washington sentiments. the united states is bent on a policy of germany, of u. s. lead global military gemini,

and this is informed by the supremacist ideology of exceptionalism. and they have attempted to enact us. they speak of it 1st, they speaking as if they were the world. they speak for the international community, something that sergei lever off cold out. specifically while sharing the un security council today. he said, let's call a spade a spade. no one elected the west to speak for the rest of the world. they speak of this kind of law fair terms as a court rules based order that we make the rules and the rules are do as we say, not as, as we do. a lab office pointed out the many us hypocrisies and double standards when talking about things like interference and other countries affairs

regime changes invasions occupations over the last few decades and the like. but they feel that this a gemini is slipping from them and they have to act to contain and provoke conflicts with both russia and china. and the u. s. feels that it will no longer be able to military engaged both of those countries in their own backyards. and when following the security council session in new york say gala ross sat down for talks with you and chief antonio terrorist. they moser, for the black. the great initiative with lab rough stressing the need to implement all parts of the international deals to explore grain from both russia and ukraine . terrorist 100 lab rub. alexa, with his ideas on making the field was, is what the russian foreign minister had to say off the me coupling some that show to me. but the terrorists stress that the green agreement is

a package deal. this includes facilitating the export of grain from ukrainian important and similar obligations to russia. regarding the removal of barrier was created by western countries against the export of our grain and fertilizer. the secretary general spoke about the efforts being made to move the russian part of the deal forward. so far progress has been unnoticeable. we do not see any desires from western countries to truly fulfill what is necessary to fully limit the initiative new agency, ukraine as well as we can use the black sea humanitarian corridor. we carry out drones, strikes against russia sleeve. that's according to the defense ministry, which phase key has violated previous commitments to using the black see only for the export of ukrainian grade. marine drones were launched from the port of a debt on sunday and monday, targeting russian navy ships in crimea. but the attacks were repels, moscow. se is the renewal of the black sea great initiative due next month is now

in jeopardy due to the ukrainian strike, which had been branded terrorist acts author and political analysts. nicola markovich says the west doesn't want russia to benefit from the grain agreements. well, the barriers today are time between countries from the west are trying to impose these barriers. and there was supposed to be in the deal, an agreement for russia to export. also more of its grains export to some of its fertilizers as well. and we know that russia is a very big fertilizer export export or in the world. and we've seen barriers coming out from countries in the west, where i'm on the one hand, the the know, know that they do need russia. they do need material, the new need, a new goods and raw material coming out of russia. but they don't want russia to take advantage of it. so the broker deal, whereby they think only ukraine is going to get something out of it. and they forget that end is russia is supposed to be having its exports facilitated as well

. so i think that was not really blame, it's role in this. and again, they're using this treaty as a political leverage whereby it should just stick to the treaty itself. let russia and ukraine export their grains. so i think could be this would be a harmful for everybody if this is for sure. where to go away from this from this treaty. so i think it's in everybody's interest, russia, ukraine's, and the rest of the world to stick to the treaty and make sure that it is respected and to make sure that there's no, there are no ministers against it. so i think this isn't something which is, which is important. at the end, if russia retreats from this treaty, it's going to harm more ukraine and the rest of the world, and it will russia this with does something with, for sure, as well. meanwhile, is the number of countries including russia, india, saudi arabia, and yvonne and me than way from trading in do, i stole is a recent report by the financial times that say the greenback is weakening and its position is the world's reserve currency. my colleague peter scott discussed the

issue with our contributes a chris evans. we just have to have a look at the absolute fiasco. the united states government is made with their own economy and to do it because of that, we've seen this, you know, this is fluctuation, the dollar mass of inflation. and really if i met, if i were in the country, it's a bit like you and i, if you're going to send me pounds from the u. k, and i'm going to receive roubles of dollars. but one thing if you're paying for service, you don't want when that transaction is happening for that value to be less than what you sent me because i've been asking for more money course. yet if i'm a country looking at the global trade to buy billions or hundreds of millions of dollars worth of whatever product that might be, be down boiling gas and food products or anything like that. i'm going to try and find a currency. it is more stable for me, and as, as countries move away from the greenback, which currencies are the tendency choose instead. and what we've seen countries like saudi arabia start trading in the chinese women b. and just to understand the economy of china and how they manage their currency, there is very little fluctuation in it. you can see it pretty much flat line all

the way through, which again, for the reason i just stated is really, really good. if you're wanting to trade between i to be because you know that what you sent me is what i receive. i think it's really the chinese women be this winning. and you're also seeing other countries that are, you know, that are, that are allied with russia and buying russian oil and gas, also using the rubel. and even, even though the brazilian pesa was being used as well, which is a very large economy just allows, allows russia to control more, more of its price in that said, you know, when, when oil and gas is extracted, which is rushes, probably main export to that the international community, when that's extracted, obviously the cost of doing that is made in rubles. the fact is if, if they can sell that product in roubles, or even in chinese women be, which is pretty much as i said, more stable. it allows you know, more profit to be made by, by, by russian companies my, the russian state and really benefit everyone in this country were sat now a lot more than using us dollars. yeah. and to what extent has this, this tendency been influenced by some of the sanctions have been posed on impose on most of the war in ukraine. it left russia with no real choice,

but it also left. and i don't know how they didn't see this. it also left anyone buying things from russia with no choice. i mean, the united states stopped all the all russians folks, and she has been able to people with us dollars that ruins of the landscape for any investor that doing that maybe for strategic reason in order to get a discount on the price of the oil and gas with that, but i work with the london review books last time. you criticize a year old paper the new york times. now it's not so much the new york times, not printing important news of interest in the public interest about what's happening in europe and munos. whereas there actually and growing about aiding the f. b i and capturing alleged whistle blows. that's a new one, isn't it? in let me make a broader than the new york times because there's, you can't win an argument with the, you know, i just, i don't want to get into an argument, but i sometimes do. but, but trump terrified the press that he won. after all, the mocking they did,

and they're terrified again, and i will tell you there's a lot of people very worried that we may end up with a biden trump ticket in 2024. and so the times response to trumping all the, all the horrors, the january, 6 invasion of the capitol. has there been, i think, to make a very distinct commitment to being pro, by there's very little criticism about him. none of the stories i've written about buying. none of the allegation of the more than allegations with a lot of specifics i look, i know much more than i've said about what that mission took place in the base. it was based on knowing what we were doing. and so none of them follow the story in any way except the right counter stories given by the intelligence community. so the fact that the, it does was 2 ways. i, you know, you cannot be shocked at the times would be, as good citizens turned into the,

the height of the, of course i am, but you can. iran has slant sanctions on the ear, so quite supporting terrorism and violence inside the persian state. when it comes to thousands of the breath, those impose restrictions on to ron for alleged human rights abuses. if it generally hasn't athos, this time the i r g c, these womic revolution garza corps is also targeted by the sanctions. while on monday, the announced fresh bands on 8th iranian individuals and one iranian entity that one iranian entity is an iranian mobile service provider, called our young telecommunications company, which is allegedly involved in some surveillance operations against the iranian public. iranian lawmakers are also targeted the u. k was quick to follow suit and also imposed its own sanctions against the islam of republic. and it targeted the art you see quote in its entirety this time iran was quick to respond by announcing

its own reciprocal measures against the e u and the u. k. r, the iranian foreign ministry on the same day announced new sanctions on 17 individuals and 4 entities based in the u. k. and the e u. they slamming republic of iran, condensed the acts of the e u and the u. k. regime for support in facilitating and denying from countering the destructive acts of the form mentioned individuals and entities. and that is violation of international obligations regarding combating terrorism, announces that the acts of those unimposing and exacerbating cruel sanctions is obvious. violation of fundamental principles of international law set forth in the united nations charter. over the past months saw the u. k and in you are having posed are several so called sanctions packages against these la mac republic and against the r g c over alleged gross rights violations by the iranian officials. it

won't, in return, has called on the you to avoid taking a duel approach on the issue of human rights while keeping mom over. frances harsh cracked down on hundreds of thousands of protesters over microns pension reform plan. so now these la mic republic is advising the you to mind its own business and avoid interfering in other countries issues. as always, you can keep up with all the very latest news updates, documentaries, and interviews by checking our website, all p dot com. thank you for your company. i'm for choosing international. mm hm. ah ah, neutrality is one of the most flexible concepts and international relations that you

can imagine, which is why it's so useful. but why it is so inherently difficult to grasp. so that the chances we have is that countries fill it with the meaning that is useful to them and hopefully to, to all this because at its core it means i'm not taking decide of either of these completely. ah, so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be in arms. race is on, often very dramatic development. only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical time time to sit down and talk

february the 1st 2000 or 3 are the un security council meeting u. s. secretary of state colin powell showed a vile allegedly containing anthrax spores from iraq eventually contained laundry detergent, march 20th, 2003. the u. s. army and its allies invaded iraq. april 9th, 2003. the u. s. army and coalition forces entered baghdad and tore down the statue of saddam hussein in fear door square. lay the 1st 2003 u. s. president george bush declared victory in the iraq war. december, the 30th 2006. saddam hussein was executed december. the 15th 2011, a ceremony was held in baghdad to mark the end of the u. s. military mission. in reality, the u. s. army is still in iraq. but they still, here she is,

c m was did. nist is wendy porter. my mom was saying a student from iraq came to russia in 2015. he studying at kasan university. his.