tv Direct Impact RT April 29, 2023 4:30am-4:59am EDT
4:30 am
13 the japanese occupied nancy and stage though real massacre. for 6 weeks, the invaders exterminated the civilian population. they carried out mass executions, raped women, and were engaged in merciless robbery. though ruthless competition of 2 officers of the imperial army yoshi akeem a guy and 2 yoshi, nada gained particular notoriety. they competed with each other as to who would be the fastest to kill $100.00 chinese with a sword. this monstrous competition was widely reported in the japanese press. the nudging massacre claimed the lives of about 300000 people and became one of the largest crimes against humanity in the world history. after world war 2, many participants of the atrocity phase trial. however, the commander of the japanese army in the non gene operation freeze yasu eco osaka,
4:31 am
was able to escape the responsibility due to the interference of the american administration. ah, hamrick sanchez. and i've been doing news now over 30 years to languages all over the world. here in the us, obviously, and i've interviewed for presidents, founded a $1000000000.00 business. and i believe after all of that, that the most important thing we can do when we communicate, especially with news, is be honest and be direct and b, impactful. and this is direct impact. ah okay, i want to say about something that happened recently. that seems very curious and
4:32 am
tells us a lot about many things. ok. it tells us a lot about president joe biden. no question. it tells us a lot about the puppet masters to really pull the strings and the strings of control in this country. and it tells us that somebody doesn't want us to know who may have actually been behind the assassination of president john f. kennedy. so what is it, what is it right? i want to take you back to this won't take you back to 1992. okay. we're in by team 92. president biden was then senator biden. and a bill comes up in the senate here in washington, dc from where i'm speaking to you right now to go ahead this bill said and vote to release all the secret government documents so that the public could finally see
4:33 am
all of the information available in the assassination of president john f. kennedy would have made sense right at the time, think it's 1992. after all. by 2017. all of the players who were involved would likely be debt. they're saying by 2017. you gotta release everything. just put it out there, let the people read it right. and the people of the united states should know, right, how their president died. does that make sense? so here's what the bill was called. it was called the john f kennedy, assassination records collection act of 1992 and had said that all documents regarding the president's assassination were to be released to the public by 2017. now, i should tell you something. this is fascinating at the time. at the time senator joe biden. as you can see here, as you look at his picture, not yet a candidate for cosmetic surgery. voted yes. the young senator from
4:34 am
delaware, the dashing young senator from delaware, voted that the record should be released to the public. all of them said joe biden, and most of the senators of the time all of them, but then this happens, i want to take you back just recently. just recently mr. barton. mr. biden is now the president united states. and he's asked to make good on that promise to release those documents. and what happens right? well, apparently he had a change of mind. he voted to withhold the release of 4300 records, which remain to this moment. redacted and what is inside those, those, those particular docs, right? what's, what's in there? why those 4300, why 4300, that cannot be changed, cannot be written that the people cannot know about. well, people know about this stuff. the people who study this stuff,
4:35 am
researchers say those particular documents contain information about lee harvey oswald connection to the ca and the f b i. for example, why was he in contact with agents and operatives? prior to kennedy's death, i was talking to people in the f, b i in the, in the ca. how he was perhaps in contact with agents in general ad why? where is the record of his call to the soviet union's embassy from mexico city weeks before the assassination of call. that was apparently wire tap by mexico's president at the time. a dude named adolfo lopez, my pals. and that we know the details of those of that phone conversation is contained in those secret records. why can't we hear it can be so bad in their as is the fact that he travelled to helsinki at the time and stayed in the luxury hotel despite the fact that he had no job and he had no money. and why was he in contact with the operatives at that time?
4:36 am
and how about the fact that the former marine, he was a former marine travel to moscow, where he asked a defect and didn't even keep it a secret when he asked the fact from the u. s embassy, like he wanted them to know. he went there and told them why. why is it that the guard who took his request at the time when he was there in moscow, the u. s. guard wrote in his notes that it sounded like he was reading a rehearsed speech. these are things people want to know, right? that was 1959 by the way. and then there's his very public stance in defense of fidel castro's cuba. you can see it an act that seemed to come out of nowhere and not in keeping with his thinking at all, which also occurred while he was in contact with suppose a c i, a operatives. so here's the, here's the thing. researchers with the nation's largest non profit repository of
4:37 am
the assassination records. the mary farrell foundation are saying that the. 6 c, a continues to withhold information, connecting past operatives with oswald. these are the folks as to who know this stuff as well as anybody. so the question is why, why are they withholding that information? what are they hiding? here is what we're getting now, and i want to share this from you with you from what the, by the ministration is saying, because they have to have a reason. right? and here it is. this is the memo that says that they are keeping the documents cloth classified because it would quote, reading to you here now from the document it would protect against an identifiable harm to the military, defense intelligence, operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations. that is of such gravity that it outweighs the
4:38 am
public interest in disclosure. that's what they say now, but listen to that statement again. and as you listen to what i just said, ask yourself, right. ask yourself, in case you weren't already sure whether our government was somehow involved in the assassination of our president. whether now after hearing that you are less so or more so if all was, was just a long not which is what they say. he was who decided one day he woke up and he started to kill the president. why now, 60 years later, 16 years later, we hiding information regarding oswald connections to. and i'm going to quote, the biden memo again, right? what is the by memo? say military defense intelligence, operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations. what would that have to do with alone? not what those agencies have to do with oswald. that has to be kept
4:39 am
secret unless he may be, wasn't alone, not after all. oh, the white house now says the j of k secrets will be withheld by the way, from the public again. now they've pushed the date back to june 30th, june, 30th of 2023. and we'll see what happens then. joyous hours a johnstone. ah, schanzer director, a actor has grown up in the movie making content, filling environment. what was it like for you and what are your recollections of the movie j f. k? when your dad was filming? sure, sure. i mean, it was a lot of fun. first of all, just to be on that, that production because, you know, he did his costume designers and the set designers in such
4:40 am
a beautiful job of taking us back when the story was set. and so in new orleans in dallas, at that time, the recreations, i mean it was, it was just very, it was very real to be in that world and member the heat when it was, we were shooting the courtroom drama scene. the final, the final court room scene, which is like almost an hour of the film and as he's amazing monologues in cost there. but we're just sitting there in the corner, listening to the monologues and we're all sweating because we got like a little 3 piece suit on and, and it's like there's, you know, this is before ac rights. there's have fans going in. it is dying of the summer is louisiana summer. he was just brutal and grueling. and you were in the movie. i mean you, you, you active in the movie. interestingly enough, obviously, as a child actor did you, did you ever, when did it dawn on you that this movie is the movie that to this day lives in the minds of so many americans when they're appalled and they say 60 to 70 percent of them were convinced that the government had something to do
4:41 am
with the death of j of k. yeah, i don't know if that necessarily suede because that's my recollection. those, those polls started even in the late sixty's or seventy's already. a lot of people said that they didn't do not believe the warren commission that oswald act alone. so that a long been an argument in the mind, the american public. it was great to see that it crystalized many of the books and that there was even executive action or something like some movie in the seventy's i think was like think it was a burt lancaster, isn't it someone like that out? that caliber doing a movie about a fictionalized version of the assassination of kennedy, but it was, you know, this was, this was known in many ways, many ways by the general population, but not the mainstream media perspective, right. make sure me carefully guarded this idea. and so j k blue that open into the mainstream. i was something about the movie and your dad's way of capturing it where you can. it's almost undeniable there's,
4:42 am
there's one seeing i can't remember what the words were. but we know that harvey lee harvey oswald was shooting from behind where the texas school book depository was almost at an angle from behind. and yet in the movie we see it goes, he, the bullet goes here and it goes back. the bullet goes here and it goes back the bullet here at his head goes back and you still wait, that's shot for that doesn't make any sense. right? well, that's the whole point. you know, the, so much of the autopsy did it make sense because there was, there was cover ups within the autopsy. right. in terms of who took over. right. it became like, you know, various military personnel stepped in and it was, it was, it was very messy to the place that kennedy's brain disappear. right? so you can even point say, well, what is the brain show as far as an exit wound? and so when you got a printer film and you can see that it's more of the back right portion of his head that blows off that, you know, then of course you're saying,
4:43 am
well then how can that be the exit? you know, how can be an exit wound from a rear shot? it makes more sense if it was a until shot. that's the exit wound. and so again that, that's a crew to film was what i was focusing on in the, in the film. and you know, again there's just it's, it's so difficult to, to nail it down because you can know one level that oswald couldn't have operate alone. it just doesn't, doesn't make sense for him to act alone. and yet the same time to say definitively who did it, you know, i father even has never gone to that place because it's all you can say is, you know, these are the suspects and this is the motive suspected motivation. but ultimately, to know, you know, who picked up the phone the 1st time and said, you know, this has to be done. who knows what the real question here is then, and the reason you and are having this conversation today is because just recently the president of the united states, joe biden, who as a senator said, we definitely should let all the information know it's been 60 some years time to
4:44 am
lead, so let's do it. he reports and the right. oh, sure. and there were plenty, i mean it was the, it was, i mean, my dad pointed out in the film, the film focused on jim garrison was a real person. you know, the real district attorney and new orleans and he was making a case against clay shaw and shaw. they deny that cliche was the i will, he was and that became out later. right. that was revealed later. but at the time he was trying to prove the shaw ca and of course, you know, he was going off of witnesses and you know, the jury, the jury and that it didn't ultimately buy it. well they, they certainly felt like there's something off the shop. but they couldn't quite say definitively, they was part of the conspiracy. but the point was the child was the de morn shell who was basically like it's harvey harvey oswald handler. this guy was very connected to more shelf. he was connected with the bush family. he was, you know, white rush and he was very, very connected person. so he's close the r b as well. david ferry was another guy.
4:45 am
yeah. close to oswald. so all these characters plus guy banisters for all these guys being close to oswald and then joined to deny and say, well, you know, it's all just this loan, you know, communists not it. just that, that story was so full of whole. right. and so we've, we've known this, but there's a difference between they always say correlation, causation, right? and so when you actually get the proof that oswald was either naval intelligence ca, all of the above f b, i inform it probably all the above. then you actually have something more substantial, but until you actually have that proof and documentation form, they're always in the say, it's the allegation. wow. johnstone, good friend, ah, good journalists, really, you kind of become a, you become a bit of an investigator and, and i know i know, i know you're not a journalist, but you certainly think like one which is sometimes why enjoy these conversations
4:46 am
that you and i have from time to time. thanks for coming on. thanks for sharing your wisdom with the shop impression yet. thank you. and by the way, i have a podcast where i as a journalist, as a latino, as an entrepreneur, tell my story, and share with you what i've learn throughout my own life. when i've success, when i've had success and when i failed to call the rick sanchez podcast, i invite you to check it out and i'll be looking for you there. so look, when we come back more on america's most disgust, conspiracy theory. the j f. k 5 ah ah
4:47 am
with for the clinic this is set up with them or do you have to be on with a white glove scale? no, we do a lot for me. yeah. because i thought that was good enough. i just wonder, was it for a little record what, what sandwich it is worth for those? you will do a bite b log on to something more that will be less room. would you do by
4:48 am
the plug back. i'm rick sanchez. i want to show you something. now it's a poll that was recently conducted and it's a graph. and as you see this graph, you'll get a better sense of what's going on. it was taken right at the half century mark of the j, f. k, assassination. and what it shows is that americans have never, ever, i didn't even know this until i looked at this graph. i've never bought into this story that j of k was killed by some low nut, right? some loan assassin never bought it. sometimes they bought it less than other times, but they've never really bought it. think about that despite all these years with all of the media and all of the government and all of the interested parties who needed seemingly americans to believe that oswald. busy did this all by himself
4:49 am
with no help. just got up one day and decided to do this. still, americans don't buy it. you know, by the fact that oswald did this alone. in fact, the numbers, as you look at him, look at that they straddle as high as 80 percent at some point and 60 percent, but always over 50, seemingly. and here's what's interesting about all of this. when, when asked ok, so who did it? americans are asked that question in poll after poll and americans, most usual suspects are the united states government. think about that, americans think the united states government or general majorities in pulls of americans like the united states government, killed its own press and was involved somehow in the killing of the president. they also say the mafia, that's number 2. and then they say the cia or they say some combination somehow all 3 of these and joining us out early. so he, right,
4:50 am
so the c i a and j of k, the secret assassination file is that like the most perfect guests that we can get to talk about this. and that's where we're going to begin. i got a lot to tell you about jefferson, but 1st, let's start with this. so $992.00. ah, jefferson. mr. biden, as senator biden says, we should release all of these secret docs no matter what. and the people should have a chance to read all of it by at least 2017. now, as president biden, he gets to make the call to let everybody read everything. and he box, what changed? i, the institutional power of the cia is there. they did the same thing to president trump, they said, you know, we can't possibly let these j f, k records be made public despite a very clear law to that effect,
4:51 am
that biden himself had voted for. and at the end of the day, the presidents feel they have to go along with the cia is extreme and suspicious demands for secrecy. but, but what you're saying is, let's stop and capture this moment what you're saying is jefferson. c. i is more powerful than the president on this issue you. it's hard to draw any other conclusion. the congress has spoken unanimously. passing that 1992, the intent. the spirit of the law is quite clear that everything should be released by october 2017, except in the rarest of cases. that deadline has now been blown a couple of times. we're 6 years late. and the c, i still retains probably 4400 assassination related records that still contain redactions. so yeah, it mean that the cia has the ability to keep this information secret despite
4:52 am
a very clear law from congress and very clear support and public opinion. no. there was a pol, done last december. i've been dixon monte polling firm and that of 2000, you know, mid term voters and 70 percent. when presented with the situation with j of k records, said president biden should release them all without exception. and that's across the board. democrats, republicans in independence. yeah. and it hasn't happened that the funny thing is, most americans just believe that somehow we don't know the truth still and the majority, whether it's $51.00 to $79.00 to $80.00, i've seen all kinds of reports, believe the government was somehow involved. so let's go to that, let's talk a little bit about the government apparently in those of 4 to 5000. the records that the president has decided the people should not see. researchers like yourself say, most of those contain information about oswald saw lee harvey oswald ties to
4:53 am
the government b at the cia or the f. b i is that you are taken and i wouldn't say that most of them do, but some of them do. yeah, you know, i mean, this is a mixed bag. some of what the cia is concealing is quite trippy. and i think that's intentional because he keep a lot of stuff secret so that the really important stuff is harder to find. and so this is why they're keeping this secret. most of this stuff, there's no harm that we had that, that. ok, let's go, let's go there. let's go there. if this guy is a low nut, which is what they say, ro, not guys one day just wakes up. whatever the, he's angry cuz he loves cuban, hates united states. he's really a super secret soviet citizen. he just a white job and the sides one day is going to kill the president, but he happens to be on unbelievable shut whatever their story is. if, if that's their story, why this? why keep anything secret?
4:54 am
and certainly why keep anything that has to do with potential ties to the government, because if he was a, if he, if he's really alone, not right. he wouldn't have any dies to the government. right. and in fact, i mean what you have here, rick, is the see. i kept a very big secret about oswald from the start and they're still trying to keep it secret. they don't want to talk about it. and that was this, this idea that the prep, this guy came out of nowhere and shot the president that's completely false. when you look at the cia spiral on oswald before the assassination. in fact, the see, eyes own file shows that asshole was very well known to senior operations officers 6 weeks before kennedy was killed and they signed off on a cable about him. they had that file in front of them. and that's what their height is. the pre assassination interest in the harvey. awesome. that's the thing . that's been radioactive for the cia from the start. and when we see, you know,
4:55 am
as we get down to the end and more and more, it gets declassified the stuff that remains the story that remains hidden. is the cia is operational interest in oswald before kennedy was killed just before he supposedly killed the president of the united states. lee harvey oswald was in mexico. apparently making a call to the soviet union that call was by the way it recorded by the mexican president at the time they say that's concealed in there as well, in these documents that mr. biden, to not release. why, what, what, why, why not release those? and is that significant? as far as you can to? i think it is significant. i mean the caea has always issued deceptive. any misleading statements about what it knew about asthma. and some of the details are still shrouded in secrecy. one that came out in december, we learned a little detail, which was the wire tapping operation that picked up on oswald was set up with the
4:56 am
help of the mexican president and the cia and the mexican presidency. were very careful to conceal that knowledge from the warren commission. the warren commission report because it was very sensitive because it showed that the c, i a knew far, far more about the suppose it assassin than they ever admitted. wow, jefferson morley on the book is c. i a and j f k, the secret assassination file. his website j of k, fax dot subs stack, dot com. oh, great place as a repertoire for all kinds of information and i would, i would recommend you get to know his stuff. he's been looking into this for so so long now. thank you again jefferson for joining us. thanks for having me, rick. i don't know what it is about the j f. k assassination, but i for one can't get enough. i'm. it does so many mystery. so many questions on
4:57 am
answered before i go, i want to share something with you. i want to remind you of our mission. what we like to do here are try to do simple, really. we want to be silo the world. we've got to stop living in these little boxes that we can't seem to be able to see outside of because true. don't live in boxes, they're everywhere, right? and i'll be looking for you again right here, where i hope to provide a direct impact a a, me, a few, but it is a way you burial power is raining and you re, theory, different articles, different journals here, that they are aware that their power is waiting,
4:58 am
they don't want to with a they must have blaze or upset, an oil depot in crimea with local authority. seeing a drone strike could be the cause of the fire warning, disturbing images ahead. wreckage on the streets of su down capital, including the body strewn across the bruce. some scenes are being witness despite and agreed upon truce militarized conflict. they're not into its 3rd week. north korea cues, it's washington on. so all of this stabilizing the korean peninsula after the 2 allies on vale, atlanta dot k, u. s. newton, her arm submarine inside korea. alta head on the program,
27 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on