oh, i got you with it, all right, about $80.00. anybody pays eat? she's only sitting in fee. john? look, i've been put in surgery. so the cigarette a few color revolutions is one among several of means to reach the goal of conquering foreign lands and bringing them onto the help of usaa weston's economic interests. to put in sad it out that he, that's what i go by, the democrats. yeah, lou cheney color, sol, suite, buffet loader's of to power america. and the final goal of the scene revolutions is to ensure that there are no independent players in the world anymore. ah, hello, i'm manila chan. you're tuned into modus operandi. the sars covey to outbreak are

better known as coven was declared a global pandemic by the w. h. o. on march 11th of 2020, which sent governments around the world into a panic. but by december of 2021, the organization had a new concept to pitch to it's 194 nation members, a so called pandemic treaty. that should have civilians around the world in a panic. will tell you all about that with a former w h o doctor. all right, let's get into the m o ah. the lock downs, the masking, the pressure to vaccinate the vax passes to travel or even eat at a restaurant. we all remember that, right? it was just 3 years ago that people were fighting over toilet paper at stores in

the us. in the meantime, the world health organization has been diligently putting together plans for the next pandemic in lieu of the great debacle in handling, colbert 19 the w. h. o wants to lift that burden from local governments in sovereign states and have your country sign on to a pandemic treaty, which would remove any and all powers your own country has in handling a pandemic. as it sees bit a trade for a universal process as directed by the director general at the w h o in geneva. oh, and the best part about this treaty, it doesn't even need your country's president or prime minister or head of state to agree on the declared status. no. once your country signs this treaty, your country relinquishes all health sovereignty over to the w h o. and it

specifically states that your elected leader of your democratically elected system is powerless to object. you don't have to believe me. they have it right there on the w h o website. they're not even trying to hide it. it's out in the open. to discuss this shockingly undemocratic health treaty is a brave doctor who has spent years of his career at the w h o in geneva. now he's told me he has spent the last couple of years trying desperately to get the word out to no avail. because the mainstream media won't discuss it. so this brave doctor is talking exclusively to us. dr. david bell is a former w h o doctor and scientist and has a background in epidemiology. he's joining us now from texas. now, dr. bell, the coded pandemic seems to have abandoned the medical community writ large. the

uniformity in which doctors were treating cobit patients across the us. is that normal for physicians, or like in pre cove id times the doctors treat patients more on an individual basis and where do treatment directives or protocols usually come from? is it the cdc that and i h w h. whoa, it's come. it's very unusual. what has happened, it's common to have protocols or guidance on what to do that they are expected to be taking. you're supposed to take into account the clinical situation patients. so normally they're a guide and you look at the patient and then take the history and then you decide on the treatment based on that situation is extremely unusual for restrict you bars,

for instance. and guidelines can suggest that you used to use other drugs, but the idea of banding safe to make an address, you know, whether or not. ready affected the idea for speech she checked and need is complete, young presented it before. and so the guidelines will come from cdc, from show, et cetera. as i said, that they are intended as a guide and not intended to follow to. and in the, in the doctor patient relationship and the doctor's assessment of that patient should be the final picture on what management is recommended. now, as the world was in the grips of cove, it in 2021, the w h o quietly pitch an idea to it's 194 member states so called pandemic

treaty. that would not only give this organisation legally binding authority over its members decision making abilities on how to handle future pandemic, but it would include a digital passport and digital id system. with this effectively dissolve national sovereignty when it comes to people's health care is actually true things in progress from that of the treaty and is amendments to the sexual health regulations. and they both do essentially the same thing in trying to different directions. so the central health regulations, there's a vision already in place, updates that break in 2005 and it's already is more house to the debate show them people realize, but they amendment and they are reflected in the treaty demand. that's why she goes

to cindy, which is a company party in may of this year and they any because they have for somebody special. ready or already as d illustrated agency. and so the amendments i need to be accepted, 50 percent of the treaty will go next to the company that we're health assembly. but if the health regulation amendments a pass that they were to do what the treat during the so they, they work on a number of levels. they if you remove human rights, human rights from consideration. so explicit be the amendments cross out phrases around the is that they have to be instituted in the on the basis of the autonomy to human rights that are affected in the un

human rights from after the 2nd world war. and their place that was worrying about this iniquity and they say that these human rights, that these diversity equity, whatever they mean coherence based on economy and social status of the person. so they start off by taking away the idea that everyone is equal and putting the rights of a person based on economic and social situation. so that's a huge fundamental change to the whole way that pico and human rights. so then they use a about pen mixer, about any health emergency, and they stated a health emergency can be declared solely by the director general. so

a single person in charge and it can be on they doesn't have to be even an outbreak that needs to be a potential or what the director considers a potential for an upgrade. so that can be almost any health event. and when the director general need doesn't have an emergency committee or consideration, you can make this decision on then he, it gives him very wide ranging powers. so. so say it's in countries, the decrease of this are agreeing that recommendations are binding to the country that they undertake to follow recommendations. so they're not recommendations anymore. their orders and they cover the whole range of seen a color and they cover things like consignment of

people in quarantine, stopping people, travelling, injecting or medicating people and medical except in city on medical examination. so even take way the role of governments in i think very rodney forcing that is and they allow, so based in geneva to force anyone in the world. and this is in the wording that the amendments the w h o says going this route. what level the playing field for poor nations when it comes to future vaccines or treatment for diseases like cancer? and i'm going to paraphrase. but when it comes to sharing medicines or treatments, pandemic or not, don't allied nations already have mechanisms in place already to share. why would this particular measure be necessary? nations do already had these mechanisms and there's also international mechanisms

such as the global fund through poor resources from different countries and on the basis of the so there are good mechanisms to do this already much more in control. so it won't live with the change it, i mean that's a fallacy. this the soviet union, everyone will be 12 years level, the playing field at the society there. so we can see from what has happened. so we have had a group of people in europe, essentially the damage i pushing for locked downs and metrics. nations true subsaharan, africa and asia, where it was written code is extremely large because a lot downs into mortality is growing up. malaria tv usage. these other large

disease they have it going up. so what has happened is that we've seen the central authority move, the emphasis on hell away from what individual populations need. and what they saw to something that they see is more important. even though it's a very large these nations and these populations so that this will continue to happen. and it don't happen because underline this, there's a lot of changes in the way the debate is founded is increased and increased corporate funding, industry directed, and corporate and private interests were direct funding. so h o to work, they wanted to where it's not where it's necessary the best for the countries concern. so always and the eastern populations, communities knew what they both are and they should be the decision making out. so

this is up ending the whole basis to your needs and the state, it's moving everything back to a very centralized sort of colonialism and where people at the center will decide what is best for other than inevitably because of what happens in the situations. it'll be what then end to end up being negative. so the responses massively increased inequality between countries, but also the sub saharan africa went into a reduction in the mystic product and g p. the translates directly into increasing from what, how did you this was through lot downs closing markets, closing travel with citrix and sometimes another issue on national sovereignty in this proposed treaty, which they expect to be ready in 2024 article 9 point one of that treaty states

that the w h o would no longer need to consult with the state or even attempt to obtain verification from the member state. where this, what they call reported event of concern is allegedly occurring before taking action. it's unclear what those actions might be, what limitations to them if any, whereby the w h o director general determines the status independent of what the elected leaders of that country has to say. now you've expressed valid concerns as a scientist, but what are your views on this as a citizen? of obviously there's a reason why we had suffered nation states and this because they understand the needs of people. so again, you know, the power direct the, the tree is rest, but they also have even if you don't buy into other countries to stop travel

self trade to stop. yes. i'm sorry. on, on citrus sir to check least the small account. jesus is going to have a huge impact, so it very much puts them at the mercy, all these people in geneva and they buy those who panther's people are dr. david bell is gonna stay with us. coming up next to bill gates, pfizer, the united states, china, just to name a few. are the major donors to the w h out. does this influence their decision making in geneva? we're going to discuss it when we return, sit tight. the amount will be right back. ah

ah, i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order is a conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence at that point, obviously is to create trust rather than fear a very job with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot most protective phone existence with ah, no one, no,

no, not a job. no, no. well, dog more real than what they should end up unit 731 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short and build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program. that the world had ever known and real and you know, took production with it so it gives you or show that they're not eligible. no, you suddenly a keep on move my you know, margaret thought this meant union from all one of up on there and i got all my sales. i got your name. i understand. i wish to know about julie whole new.

i know you guys are more or less than a so i had to call them and all buddy bill, you know, it's nice to go. so i want this on this one, my new on it. i know i isn't all 7 on the you know, put them out to pick your boss. i welcome back to the m. o. i'm manila chan dr. david bell, a former w h o scientist is sounding the alarm over this proposed w h o. pandemic treaty. now dr. bell, renowned professor of international law, dr. francis boyle. he's a j d, and ph. d at the university of illinois has been quoted by

r of k juniors children's defense publication called the defender calling this potentially illegal saying, quote, the proposed w h o treaty violates the vienna convention on the law of treaties ratified in 1969 criticizing this new treaty as insidious and even medical totalitarianism. he says this will put nations into a scientific police state under the control of effectively, the cdc bill gates and china, who pay a significant portion of their bills. what are your thoughts on that? yeah, i can't come into it be in a convention from spoil and yeah, the rest of what you say, certainly true. we. we've seen the codes response and people are trying to pretend

they're locked down to normal. i in 2019 the debate. sure. release. it's pandemic, influenza guidelines and they essentially didn't mention the word lockdown. it was never a public term before. it's a criminal, it's locked down to the child that they specifically said you should or does, he should not current of the people you should not restrict cheda cetera. because it's just it's hands, it's greg from the benefit and it is proportionately low income people. so release just a few months before they can change direction. introduce this term called locked down and pretended there is no response. it's not even more responsive hasn't been done before. there is an experiment in the fall or outbreak in west africa where they did it for a few days and it was shown to be fully effective and that each energy for the population, china supposedly locked down in the south upgrade,

almost tearing society that locked in populations frequent nice reasons. so the, it's a huge, it's a new idea in public health. and the idea that you know, as we saw or you can stop people from visiting the funerals at the time the, you can stop. pub is being present at the birth that you wrote, playground so that children can no longer fight these extraordinary nations. they don't have any irrational public hills basis to that. especially with a virus sauce, kirby, to the coven fox, where we knew from the start of 2020, that it was almost 15. see, it's a really very old people and people with soon to be a medical condition such as diabetes. so then it

wasn't rational response. it was a very irrational one, and it is clear that there is no looking back and saying this was a bad idea. and in the evidence, if you look at the pen, the push for the pendant treaty aren't the change in the actual health regulations, etc. there's a very strong push to make this much faster and more and since in the future. so is that was essentially a please say that we went through this by emergency decree. and it was, can, it was using terms and actual actions that we normally use in prison for civilian populations, confinement. so that is what is envisioned and people need to sort of grasp this.

it's not normal. and it's not anything to do with what democratic society supposed to be about the w h. l. got coded wrong, the cdc and i h got it wrong, doctor found g. bill gates, pfizer mode turner. the lot of them got it wrong. why then should the public trust these entities with their personal health care decisions going forward? i don't think most things go wrong. i think that the very stuff virus was published in the last it's highly disproportionately affects all people except for the children and young adults or how the video they didn't get around the new one. the virus was like a basic public published in 19 if you do this sort of thing, it or just fortunately people and cause more health problems than you know,

low income people cause more health problems and so they knew. so you have to assume that there are other motives, so there was a, it was successful in instigating a non presidential shift in well, most high income people. it was successful in showing that you can even in western populations and populations used to democracy that you can instill fear into people subsidy. they will sort of fashion to tell us here in do types. so if that was the purpose of doing this, i think i think both of those were important part of it then. so these entity was very successful. it wasn't successful from public health. it is hard to believe that the people are doing it and you that this was a very poor public response. it is hard to believe that was are

the w way, joe, really as, as noble and benevolent as they appear or as the mainstream media would present them to be. i mean, where does that money come from? where does that go and doesn't influence behaviors at the w h. ho? so the organization is hayes offices in geneva, 6 regional offices and country offices in a lot of companies. it's a large mix of people. it does a lot of useful things in a lot of countries. it brings tenure, expertise to countries, electing and. ringback expertise, it gives a lot of advice that brings people together where they need to talk. so it does some very useful functions and i think there is a need for international hills coordination and guidance and support countries that

need us and ask for either change these or is, is increasing private and corporate money, which is part of that budget. and it's very directed, so you have to double each other, still functioning properties that sure in a country level that you have other power, clearly less the whole idea of community based public health and move to s a corporate model. so during the coverage response, i think it was probably a net harm to the world, but it doesn't mean everything that is doing is a bad idea that the idea of having some sort of entity with much rules on concept chest. and it's what they can actually do. it doesn't mean that that in itself is a bad idea. dr. david bell. thank you so much for your fearless honesty and

insight. today, the mainstream media will tell you this treaty will create a fairer system and more equal outcomes when it comes to health care. but fail to admit that when it comes to diseases, be it co bid, or cancer. no 2 bodies will ever respond the same when in fact it. but what this treaty will guarantee is that you no longer have medical sovereignty or dominion over your own body. that's going to do it for this weeks episode of modus operandi the show that digs deep into foreign policy. i'm your host manila chan. thank you so much for tuning in. we'll see you again next week to figure out the ammo ah

ah ah. working world with november 22nd 2020 to outraged orthodox christians confronted ukrainian security service offices, locking entrances and exits to keep the oldest monastery. they were looking for a russian spies among the monks. we mean deal of seeming or formal reason for the

brutal crime down one church. his parishioners had song, a song about a it's wrong been reason enough to condemn any old adult christian attack in prison and even kill them. russia, what are you russia, finance. when you love store and you, when you store pro offline, you in your store without us, you used to miss a sample. i used to miss dog with oh, canada is outsourced. its foreign policy to washington. and washington's agenda is one of global hegemony. washington will not tolerate, and i think that they're not even not even subtle about this. you know, they're,

they will not tolerate a global rival. with a must have stock pile of ukrainian, anti or munition is reportedly destroyed in a powerful explosion and has multiple missiles. strikes are reported in major cities across the country. also a head on the pope with the seat west. again. ned, well camouflaged stands a d 30. how a r t follows a russian artillery crew on the front lines in the key areas all don't pass that's coming off of is.