to finding the weapons resigned, offered missing failure. now 20 years off to george bush claim victory. u. s. troops remain in the country on a rock is still fighting in iceland, insurgency. while the company's natural resources continue to be plundered. steve sweeney. now the full light from the response to cove, it is rapidly escalating with more and more lawsuits being drawn up by family members who lost their loved ones to to legit complications with some of the vaccines. next that modus operandi with host manila chun outlines why a busy time in the courts may lie. ah. the term strategic autonomy sounds good. the word strategic conjures up a sense of importance and autonomy presents a sense of independence. but when you consider the french president using this term,

then we are forced to wonder if he is a serious person. after all, europe is no longer strategic or autonomy. the hello, i'm manila chan. you're tuned into modus operandi. the stars covey to outbreak, are better known as coded, was declared a global pandemic by the w h. o. on march 11th of 2020, which sent government around the world into a panic. but by december of 2021, the organisation had a new concept to pitch to it's 194 nation members, a so called pandemic treaty. that should have civilians around the world in a panic. will tell you all about that with a former w h o doctor. all right, let's get into the m, the me

the locked down, the masking, the pressure to vaccinate the vax passes to travel or even eat at a restaurant. we all remember that, right? it was just 3 years ago that people were fighting over the toilet paper at stores in the u. s. in the meantime, the world health organization has been diligently putting together plans for the next pandemic in lieu of the great debacle in handling colbert 19 the w. h. ho wants to look that burden from local governments in sovereign states and have your country sign on to a pandemic treaty, which would remove any and all powers your own country has in handling a pandemic. as it sees fit, a trade for a universal process as directed by the director general at the w h o in geneva. oh, and the best part about this treaty,

it doesn't even need your country's president or prime minister or head of state to agree on the declared status. no, because once your country finds this treaty, your country relinquishes all health sovereignty over to the w h o. and it specifically states that your elected leader of your democratically elected system is powerless to object. you don't have to believe me. they have it right there on the w h r website. they're not even trying to hide it. it's out in the open. to discuss this shockingly undemocratic health treaty is a brave doctor who has spent years of his career at the w h o in geneva. now he's told me he has spent the last couple of years trying desperately to get the word out to no avail. because the mainstream media won't discuss it. so this brave doctor is talking exclusively to us. doctor david bell is a former

w h o doctor and scientist and has a background in epidemiology. he's joining us now from texas. now, dr. bell, the kobe pandemic seems to have offended the medical community writ large. the uniformity in which doctors were treating cobit patients across the u. s. is that normal for physicians, or like in pre cove id times? the doctor is treat patients more on an individual basis and where do treatment directives or protocols usually come from? is it the cdc, the and i h w h whoa is come. it's very unusual. what has happened, it's common to have protocols or guidance on what to do, but they are expected to be taking. you're supposed to take into account the clinical situation patient. so normally they're

a guide and you look at the patient exam and then take the history and then you decide on the treatment based on that situation is extremely unusual for speech of ours. for instance. and guidelines can suggest that you, certain drugs has done use other drugs, but the idea of banding so to make an an atrocity and whether or not. ready effective the id, or anyone for speech tract infection is complete. it test before and so the guidelines will come from cc, from show, et cetera. as i said, that they are intended as a guide and not intended to follow to. and in the, in the doctor patient relationship and the doctor's assessment of that patient,

there should be the final picture on what management is recommended. as the world was in the grips of cove, it in 2021. the w h o quietly pitch an idea to it's 194 member states so called pandemic treaty. that would not only give this organisation legally binding authority over its members decision making abilities on how to handle future pandemic. but it would include a digital passport and digital id system. would this effectively dissolve national sovereignty when it comes to people's health care? there's actually 2 things in progress from that of a show this the treaty and is amendments to the sexual health regulations. and they both do essentially the same thing in trying to different directions. so the health regulations that there's a vision already in place,

separate from 2005. and there's already is more house to the chosen people realize, but they amendment and they reflected in the treaty, the man who actually goes to cindy, which is coming in may of this year. and they only because they have for somebody special. ready or already se illustrated ations. and so the amendments on you need to be accepted. 50 percent of the delicacy, the treaty. oh, go next to your company the we're health assembly. but if the hill regulation amendments a pass that they were, you do what the treat during the so they, they work on a number of levels. they explicitly remove human rights. i found them into human rights from consideration. so explicit be the

amendments cross out phrases around the, the, they have to be instituted in the on the basis of the autonomy to human rights that are affected in the un declaration human rights from after the 2nd world war and their place that was worrying about iniquity, and they say that these human rights that these diversity equity, whatever they mean coherence based on economy and social status of the person. so they start off by taking away the idea that one is equal and putting the rights of the person based on economic and social situation. so that's a huge fundamental change to the whole way that people human rights. so

then they give a about panoramic or about any emergency and they state that the health emergency can be declared solely by the director general . so a single person in charge and it can be on doesn't have to be even an outbreak needs to be a potential or the director considers a potential for an upgrade. so that can be almost any health event. and when the director general doesn't had transferred to an emergency committee or consideration, you can make this decision then he, it gives him very wide range and powers so. so she is in countries the decrease of this are agreeing that recommendations binding to the country. they say that they

undertake to follow recommendations, so they're not recommendations anymore. their orders and they cover o range of scene. so that a disappear. it seems like consignment of people in quarantine, stopping people, traveling, injecting or medicating people and medical insisting on medical examination. so they even take way the role of government in i think very rodney forcing that is and they allow, so based in geneva to force anyone in the world and this is in the, at the amendments the w h o says, going this route, what level the playing field for poor nations when it comes to future vaccines or treatment for diseases like cancer. and i'm going to paraphrase. but when it comes

to sharing medicines or treatments, pandemic or not, don't allied nations already have mechanisms in place already to share. why would this particular measure be necessary? nations do already has these mechanisms and there's also international mechanisms such as the global fund, the true poor resources from different countries and on the basis of the so there are good mechanisms to do this already. much more in control of thompson's . so it won't live with the trying to it. i mean, that's a fallacy. this, the soviet union thinking everyone will be 12 years. you know, the level the playing field at the society did. so we can see from what has happened. so we have had a group of people in europe, essentially pushing for locked downs and metrics. nation through

subsaharan, africa, and asia, where it was challenging cove is extremely and large because a lot downs into mortality is growing up. malaria tv usage, these other large disease they have it going up. so what has happened is that we've seen the central authority move, the emphasis on hell away from what individual populations need and what they to something that they see is more important, even though it's a very low part of these nations. and these populations so that this will continue to happen. and it don't happen because underline this, there's a lot of changes in the way the debate is funded is increased product increase corporate funding, industry directed and corporate. and probably the interests will direct funding. so chose to work, but i wanted to where it's not where it's necessary the best for the countries

concern. so always and the eastern populations and communities knew what they are and they should be the decision making out. so this is up ending the whole basis of the lease and the state. it's moving everything back to a very centralized sort of colonialism and where people at the center will decide what is best for other than inevitably because of what happens in the situations. it will be what then end to end up being negative. so the responses massively increased inequality between countries, but also the mass substitute and i think it went into a reduction in gross domestic product and g p that that translates directly into increasing from what it was through lot downs closing markets,

closing travel with citrix and sometimes another issue on national sovereignty in this proposed treaty, which they expect to be ready in 2024 article 9 point one of that treaty states that the w h o would no longer need to consult with the state or even attempt to obtain verification from the member state where this, what they call reported event of concern is allegedly occurring before taking action. if unclear what those actions might be, what limitations to them if any, whereby the w h o director general determines the status independent of what the elected leaders of that country has to say. now you've expressed valid concerns as a scientist, but what are your views on this as a citizen? of obviously there's a reason why we have suffered to nation states and this because they understand the

needs of the people. so again, you know, the power directly if the trees read, but they also have power even if you don't buy they can influence other countries to stop travel, self trade, to stop supply lines, et cetera. so particularly the smaller countries is going to have a huge impact. so it very much puts them at the mercy of the people in geneva. and thereby of those who found those people dr. david bell is going to stay with us. coming up next to bill gates, pfizer, the united states, china, just to name a few. are the major donors to the w h. o. does this influence their decision making in geneva?

we're going to discuss that when we return to tight and we'll be right back. i lou ah, with 1937 militaristic, japan started a full scale invasion of china. the invading army was rapidly advancing towards the capital of the republic of china, the dying, the city of nagging, leaving behind the burned down villages and thousands of the dead. on december 13th, the japanese occupied nudging and stage real massacre. for 6 weeks,

the invaders exterminated the civilian population. they carried out mass execution, rape women, and were engaged in merciless robbery. the ruthless competition of 2 officers of the imperial army, go to the ocoee, my guy and to yoshi nota gained particular notoriety. they competed with each other as to who would be the fastest to kill $100.00 chinese with us. or this monstrous competition was widely reported in the japanese press. the nudging massacre claimed the lives of about 300000 people and became one of the largest crimes against humanity in the world history. after world war 2, many participants of the atrocity phase trial. however, the commander of the japanese army in the non gene operation breeds yahoo eco osaka

was able to escape the responsibility due to the interference of the american administration. ah, canada. outsourced is foreign policy to washington. and washington's agenda is one of the global hegemony. washington will not tolerate, and i think that they're not even, not even subtle about this. you know, they're, they will not tolerate a global rival. ah, a motion of them on you thought it all, not even being nuclear bomb up here or there is a little boy and a border with additional merge with you for the my listen look and you live muscles. if you look on the initial develop club,

not to get a dealer per se, done very well, be almost can use to put value when you, when you do origin. but you also still were saddam those all to give you a so much of that going to put that on the believe just was a what i see the senior bus is the little gear motivation says decent it done both. oh, welcome back to the m o i manila chan. dr. david bell, a former w h o scientist is sounding the alarm over this proposed w h o. pandemic treaty. now, doctor bell are renowned professor of international law. dr. francis boyle. he's a j, d, and ph. d at the university of illinois has been quoted by our of k juniors children's

defense publication called the defender calling this potentially illegal saying, quote, the proposed w h o treaty violates the vienna convention on the law of treaties. a fight in 1969 criticizing this new treaty as insidious and even medical totalitarianism. he says this will put nations into a scientific police state under the control of effectively the cdc bill gates and china, who pay a significant portion of their bills. what are your thoughts on that? i can't comment on the vienna convention from spoil and the rest of what you say. it's certainly true. we've seen the codes response and people are trying to pretend that locked down to normal . i in 2019 the debate. sure. released it's pandemic,

influenza guidelines, and they essentially didn't mention the word lockdown. it was never a public term before. it's a criminal, it's locked down to the child that they specifically said you should or should not current of the people you should not restrict cheda cetera. because it's just it's hands, it's greg from the benefit and it is proportionately low income people. so the release just a few months before they can change direction, introduce this term called lockdown and pretended it's no response. it's nothing more responsive hasn't been done before. there's an experiment in the fall or outbreak in west africa where they did it for a few days and it was shown to be fully effective and that each energy for the population, china supposedly locked down the in the saw on the term tearing society,

that locked in populations frequently for different reasons. so the, it's a huge, it's a new idea in public health. and the idea that you know, as we saw or you can stop people from visiting the funeral was at the time the can stop. pub is being present at the birth of the baby. you wrote the playground so the children's can no longer site these extraordinary nations. they don't have any irrational public basis to, especially with a virus like soft kirby to the coven fox, where we knew from the stop 2020, that it was almost 15. see, it's a really very old people and people with significant medical conditions such as diabetes. so it wasn't

a rational response, it was a very irrational one, and it is clear that there's no looking back and saying this was a bad idea and evidence. if you look at the pen, the push for the penn treaty aren't the change in the actual health regulations, etc. there's a very strong push to make this much faster and more intense in the future. so is that was essentially at least we went through this role by emergency to create and it was, can, it was using terms and actual actions that we normally used in prison for civilian populations, confounding. and so that is what is envisioned, people need to sort of grasp this. it's not normal, it's not easy to do with what democratic societies are supposed to be about. the w

h l got coded wrong, the cdc and i h got it wrong. doctor found g. bill gates, pfizer mode turner. the lot of them got it wrong. why then should the public trust these entities with their personal health care decisions going forward? i don't think most things go wrong. i think that the very start virus was even competition. the lancet. it's highly disproportionately affects all people except for the children and young adults or how the video affected that they didn't get around the new one. the virus was like a basic, they know, published into 19 if you do this sort of thing, it or just fortunately people and cause more health problems than you know, low income people cause more health problems. and so they knew. so you have to

assume that there are other motors, so there was a, it was successful in instigating a non priest shift in well from low to high income people. it was successful in showing that you can even in western populations and populations used to democracy that you can instill fear into people subsidy, they will sort of totalitarian dictates. so that was the purpose of doing this. i think i think both of those were important part of it then. so these entity was very successful. it wasn't successful from public health. it is hard to believe that the people are doing it and you that this was a very poor public response. it's hard to believe that was are

the w h ho really as, as noble and benevolent as they appear or as the mainstream media would present them to be. i mean, where does that money come from? where does that go and does it influence behaviors at the w h? ho? so the organization is those offices in geneva, 6 regional offices, and country offices in a lot of companies. it's a large mix of people. it does a lot of useful things in a lot of countries. it brings technical expertise to countries lacking in certain expertise. it gives a lot of advice that brings people together where they need to talk. so it does some very useful functions and i think there is a need for international hills coordination and guidance and support to countries that need us and ask for but it has changed. so these are,

is increasing private and corporate money, which is part of it budget and it's very directed. so you have to still functioning properties such the country level that you have all the power, the less the whole idea of community based public health and move to s a corporate model. so it during the coverage response, i think it was probably a net harm to the world, but it doesn't mean everything that is doing in a bad idea or that the idea of having some sort of entity with much rules on concept chest. and it's what they can actually do. it doesn't mean that that in itself is a bad idea. dr. david bell. thank you so much for your fearless honesty and

insight. today, the mainstream media will tell you this treaty will create a fairer system and more equal outcomes when it comes to health care. but fail to admit that when it comes to diseases, be it co bid, or cancer. no 2 bodies will ever respond the same when in fact it. but what this treaty will guarantee is that you no longer have medical sovereignty or dominion over your own body. that's going to do it for this weeks episode of modus operandi the show that digs deep into foreign policy. i'm your host manila chan. thank you so much for tuning and we'll see you again next week to figure out the ammo ah.

november 22nd 2022 outraged orthodox christians confronted ukrainian security service offices looking entrances and exits to keep the oldest monastery. were looking for an alleged russian spies among the monks. we mean dealer seen in the us are using the right form. the reason for the brutal crime down one church is parishioners had sung a song about ah, it's wrong been reason enough to condemn any all the dogs christian attack in prison and even kill them? russia what i knew, rush up on you to progress when you love store and you in your store of glass. lighter annual, your total so that as you use

a senior bomb, i used to miss darby. this seems to me just sat down with a headline story this hour. i must have stock pile of ukrainian onto your ammunition is reportedly destroyed in a powerful explosion as multiple missiles. strikes are a witness to major cities across the country. also ahead on this with the 6 west again and dwell camouflaged stands a d 30, how r t follows a russian artillery crew on the front lines in the bottle for key areas of don bath with indian accusers, key of, of insulting the country after it posts an image.