you for now, and the largest economy, the world having economic problems, going to have a snowball effect and everybody in the world we affect it. we've had recession every few years since the beginning of iraq. we're going to have more. don't worry, you will have lots to report, jam your way can sort of sound a little bit pessimistic about how things are going to develop in the and then next see is, or there's a little bit about this. about j. p. morgan bailing out this bank as it is going to pick up the crumbs getting $0.20 on the dollar. just to pick up some cheap bank. is that what j. p morgan will do or they are, they are lifeline. well yes, of course we always have strong people. well, finance people who, when problems develop, come in, take over the bad assets to start over. this is been going on

a few 1000 years moran and it's happening again in the us at the lower because we've had some big banks get into trouble, but they're going to be if history is any guide, they're going to be more big bags and financial institutions getting in trouble in the next 2 or 3 years, and some banks are going to suffer. i'm kind of the government regulator any more than it already does or who fall is it is. is there a wants to blame jim? my last question is the wants of name? yes or no? absolutely. yes. in washington dc is the central banking system in washington and the bank regulators. they, they get sloppy to. they get lax as well. not just in washington, but all over the world. and it's happening many big bad banks have had big, bad lows on the books now. and we're going to pay the price gym as always

good until then. thank you so much for joining me. see. let's hope we have more positive news. the next time you and i spoke, i think everything is here. you're going to have a good job security. don't worry. well, that wraps up this news. thanks a lot for joining us today. we will be back in just half an hour. we hope you're doing a ah, hello, i'm manila chad. you're tuned into modus operandi. the stars covey to outbreak are better known as coded, was declared a global pandemic by the w h. o. on march 11th of 2020, into a panic. but by december of 2021, the organisation had

a new concept to pitch 2 with 194 nation members, a so called pandemic treaty. that should have civilians around the world in a panic. will tell you all about that with a former w h o doctor. all right, let's get into the m l. me locked down the masking the pressure to vaccinate the vac passes to travel or even eat at a restaurant. we all remember that, right? it was just 3 years ago that people were fighting over the toilet paper at stores in the u. s. in the meantime, the world health organization has been diligently putting together plans for the next pandemic in lieu of the great debacle in handling. colbert 19 the w. h. o wants to lift that burden from local governments in sovereign states and have

your country sign on to a pandemic treaty, which would remove any and all powers your own country has in handling a pandemic. as it sees bit a trade for a universal process as directed by the director general at the w h o in geneva. oh, and the best part about this treaty, it doesn't even need your country's president or prime minister or head of state to agree on the declared status. no. once your country signs this treaty, your country relinquishes all health sovereignty over to the w h o. and it specifically states that your elected leader of your democratically elected system is powerless to object. you don't have to believe me. they have it right there on the w h a website. they're not even trying to hide it. it's out in the open. to

discuss this shockingly undemocratic health treaty is a brave doctor who has spent years of his career at the w h o in geneva. now he's told me he has spent the last couple of years trying desperately to get the word out to no avail. because the means exclusively to us dr. david bel air, at large, the uniformity in which doctors were treated times the doctors treat patients more on an individual basis. and the where do treatment directives or protocols usually come from? is it the cdc, the, and i h that w h. whoa, it's come. it's very unusual. what has happened? it's common to have protocols or guidance on what to do. they are expected to be taking you supposed to take into account the clinical situation patient. so

normally they're a guide and you look at the patient and then take the history and then you decide on the treatment based on that situation is extremely unusual for restrict you bars, for instance. and guidelines can suggest to you certain jobs and use other drugs. but the idea of banding safe to make an address, you know, whether or not they are effective. the idea for speech e tract infection need is complete, young presented before. and so the guidelines will come from cdc, from cetera, they're intended as a guide and not intended to follow. and in the, in the doctor patient what management is recommended. now as the world was,

would this effectively dissolve national sovereignty when it comes to people's health care is actually true things in progress from that of the treaty and is amendments to the sexual health regulations. and they both do essentially the same thing in trying to different directions. so the health regulations, there's a vision already in place. it was updated after the break in 2005. and it's already use more pounds to the chosen people realize, but they amendment and they reflected in the treaty, the man, that's why she goes to cindy, which is the governing body in may of this year. and they only because they have for somebody special. ready or already se illustrated ations. and so the amendments only need to be accepted. 50 percent of the treaty will go next

to the company that will help us in the. but if the hill regulation amendments a pass that they were to do what the treat during the so they, they work on a number of levels. they explicitly remove human rights. i found them in the human rights from consideration. so explicit be amendments cross out the phrases around the, the, they have to be instituted in the on the basis of the autonomy to him and rise that are affected in the un universal human rights from after the 2nd world war and their place that it was wording about diversity, iniquity, and they say that these human rights, that these diversity equity, whatever that, i mean. so here it's based on economy and

social status of the person. so they start off by taking away the idea that you're going to equal and putting the rights of the person based on economic and social situation. so that's a huge fundamental change to the whole way that people human rights. so then they get they about panoramic ser, about any health emergency and they state that a health emergency can be solely by the director general. so a single person in charge of that nature and, and when the director general and he doesn't have much consideration, you can make this then he, it gives a very wide range of powers. so, so she is countries,

the decrease of this are agreeing the recommendations since she binding to the country, say that they undertake to follow recommendations. so they're not recommendations anymore. their orders and they cover whole range of scenes so that they can cover things like confinement of people in quarantine, stopping people, traveling, injecting or medicating people and medical accepted in city on medical examination. so they even take way the role of governments in i think very rodney forcing that is and they allow, so innovation based in geneva to force anyone in the world. and this is in the, at the amendments. the w h o says, going this route would level the playing field for poor nations when it comes to

future vaccines or treatment for diseases like cancer. and i'm going to paraphrase, but when it comes to sharing medicines or treatments, pandemic or not, don't allied nations already have mechanisms in place already to share. why would this particular measure be necessary? nations do already has these mechanisms and there's also international mechanisms such as the global fund that true poor resources from different countries and on the basis and the so there could mechanisms to do this already much more in control. so it was live with the trying to, i mean that's a fallacy. this, the soviet union thinking everyone will well, the kids you know, the level, the playing field at the society there. so we can see from what does happen. so

we have had a group of people in europe, essentially the damage i pushing for locked downs and metrics. nations true subsaharan, africa and asia, where it more challenging cove is extremely large because a lot downs into mortality is growing up. malaria tv usage. these other large disease, they have it going up. so what has happened is that we've seen the central authority move, the emphasis on hell away from what individual populations need. and what they saw to something that they see is more important, even though it's a very low part these nations and these populations. so this will continue to happen. and it don't happen because underline this is a lot of changes in the way that is founded is increase product funding, increase corporate funding, industry directed,

and corporate and private interests were direct funding. so during the w h o to work, they wanted to where it's not where it's necessary the best for the countries concern . so always and the eastern populations and communities knew what they both are and they should be the decision making out. so this is ending the whole basis to be sure, and the state is moving everything back to a very centralized sort of colonialism and where people at the center will decide what is best for others. and inevitably, because of what happens in the situations, it'll be what then end to end up being a negative route. so the responses, massive being creased, inequality between countries, but also the mass substitute and i think it went into

a reduction in gross domestic product and g p that that translates directly into industries and from what it was through a lot downs closing, market closing, travel with citrix apartments. another issue on national sovereignty in this proposed treaty, which they expect to be ready in 2024 article $9.00 of that treaty states that the w h o would no longer need to consult with the state or even attempt to obtain verification from the member state where this, what they call reported event of concern is allegedly occurring before taking action. it's unclear what those actions might be, what limitations to them if any, whereby the w h o director general determines the status independent of what the elected leaders of that country has to say. now you've expressed valid concerns as a scientist, but what are your views on this as

a citizen of obviously there's a reason why we have frontier information states and that's because they understand the needs of the people. and so again, you know, the power directly, if the trees rest, they also even if you don't buy into other countries to stop travel self trade to stop supply lines, et cetera. so particularly for smaller countries is going to have a huge impact. so it very much puts them at the mercy of the people in geneva and they buy those who found those people dr. david bell is going to stay with us. coming up next to bill gates, pfizer, the united states, china, just to name

a few. are the major donors to the w h. o. does this influence their decision making in geneva? we're going to discuss that when we return that type, the emma will be right back. i ah, about this, you know, there they will not tolerate a global rival. ah ah, as much as one you thought about you, i mean you clean up he's you know, to go in a board or additional merge with you for the my listen look and you live muscles. nucular formula shall be one of them from us to

get her. do you live person really want to be often used to put by you when you, when you who did origin, but he also still received on the zone. if you're a newer supreme hold, judges from october 24th at all, gone. gone the believe just to see a what i see the student bussey's no group you motivation says decent it on both. oh well, come back to the m o i manila chan. dr. david bell, a former w h o scientist is sounding the alarm over this proposed w. h. o. pandemic treaty now doctor bow are renowned professor of international law. dr. francis boyle, he said j. d and ph. d at the university of illinois has been quoted by our of k

juniors children's defense publication called the defender calling this potentially illegal saying, quote, the proposed w h o treaty violates the vienna convention on the law of treaties ratified in 1969 criticizing this new treaty as insidious and even medical totalitarianism. he says this will put nations into a scientific police state under the control of effectively the cdc bill gates and china, who pay a significant portion of their bills. what are your thoughts on that? yeah, i can't comment on the vienna convention deferred from spoil and the rest of what you say, certainly true you. we've seen the codes response and people are trying to pretend that locked down to normal. i in 2019 are released. it's

pandemic, influenza guidelines. and they essentially didn't mention the word lockdown, it was never a puppy term before. it's a criminal, it's locked down to the child's that they specifically said, you should see the currency of the people. you should not restrict cheda cetera because it's just it's hands. it's greg from the benefit and it is proportionately low income. so the release just a few months before they can change direction, introduce this term called lockdown, and pretended or no response. it's nothing more responsive hasn't been done before . there's an experiment in the fall or outbreak in west africa where they did it for a few days and it was shown to be fully effective and that each energy for the population, china supposedly locked down in the south,

tearing society that locked in populations frequently use a different reason so the, it's a huge, it's a new idea in public health. and the idea that as we saw, you can stop people from visiting the funeral was at the time the consult pub is being present at the birth of the baby. you wrote the playground so the children's can no longer cite these are extraordinary nations. they don't have any irrational puppy horse faces, especially with a virus like soft kirby to the cove advisors. ready we knew from the start of 2020, that it was almost 15. see it's of the, of the very old people and people with significant medical conditions such as diabetes. so it wasn't rational

response. it was a very irrational one. and it is clear that there's no looking back and saying this was a bad idea in the evidence. if you look at the pen, the push for the pendant and treaty for the change in the international health regulations. there's a very strong push to make this much faster and more intense in the future. so yes, and that was essentially a, please say that we went through this role by emergency to create and it was, can, it was using an actual actions that we normally used in prison for civilian populations, confounding. and so that is what is envisioned and people need to sort of grasp this. it's not normal. it's not easy to do with what democratic societies are

supposed to be about the w h l got coded wrong, the cdc and i h got it wrong. doctor found she, bill gates, pfizer mode turner, the lot of them got it wrong. why then should the public trust these entities with their personal health care decisions going forward? i don't think most thing got it wrong. i think that the very stuff was it's competition. the lancet. it's highly disproportionately fixed old people, et cetera. the children and young adults are how the video that they didn't get around the new one. the virus was like a basic public. oh, they know published into 19 the if you do this sort of thing, it or just fortunately people and cause more health problems than you know, low income people cause more health problems and so they knew. so you have to

assume that there are other motives. so there was a, you know, it was successful in instigating a non presidential shift in well from low to high income people. it was successful in bring that you can even in western pub doing this. and i think i think both of those were important part of it then. so these entities, it was very successful. it wasn't successful from a public health when it is hard to believe that the people are doing it and you that this was a very poor public response. it's hard to believe that was are the w h ho really as, as noble and benevolent as they appear or as the mainstream media would present them to be. i mean, where does that money come from? where does that go and does it influence behaviors at the w h ho so that it shows

a free lunch organization. it pays offices in geneva, 6 regional offices and country offices in a lot of companies. it's a logic of people. it does a lot of useful things in other countries. it brings tenure, expertise to countries, electing and. ringback expertise, it gives a lot of advice that brings people together with a need to talk. so it does some very useful functions and i think there is a need for international hills coordination and guidance and support to countries that need us and ask for the change of these or is, is increasing private and corporate money, which is part of it. and it's very directed, so you have to show that is still functioning properties such as

a country level that you have all the power clearly lists the whole idea of community based public health and move to a corporate model. so during the response, i think it was probably a net harm to the world, but it doesn't mean everything that of a child is doing is a bad idea that having some sort of entity with much rules on concept chest and it's what they can actually do it doesn't mean that that in itself is a bad idea. dr. david bell. thank you so much for your fearless honesty and insight. today. the mainstream media will tell you this treaty will create a fairer system and more equal outcomes when it comes to health care. but fail to admit that when it comes to disease, it's be it co bid,

or cancer. no 2 bodies will ever respond the same when in fact it. but what this treaty will guarantee is that you no longer have medical sovereignty or dominion over your own body. that's going to do it for this weeks episode of modus operandi the show that digs deep into foreign policy. i'm your host manila chan. thank you so much for tuning and we'll see you again next week to figure out the ammo. ah ah hi. ah.

in 1935 fascist italy, led by dictator benito mussolini decided to expand its colonial empire in africa and take over ethiopia. by that time, ethiopia was the only fully independent state on the continent. back in 1896, it's inhabitants were able to defeat the italian colonists and defend their independence. since then, rome craved for revenge before the humiliating defeat. in the morning of october, 3, 1935 without any announcement the fascists attack ethiopia and bombarded it most severely. ethiopian armed forces fought courageously, but the brutality of the italians knew no bounds. they use not only massive bombing attacks on civilians, but also chemical weapons, toxic gases. this change the course of the war. as

a result of the occupation of ethiopia by the fascist 760000 people were killed. the capture of the african state was committed with europe's tacit approval . britain and france recognized the annexation, giving the green light to further fascist expansion in the world and paving the way for the outbreak of world war 2. ah, a massive so pile of ukraine and defense ammunition is rip, pull to the destroyed in a power explosion. the russian launches multiple missiles, drives on, midsize it in ukraine. also i had this news out the west again and well camouflaged stance

a d 30. how the follows a russian of to recruit on the front lines in the plaza. key areas of done by new delhi says it was a national installed key to.