back to it, i was, it's a 2nd, it's this is the 2nd largest in the us since 2008 financial crisis. but all, all there is any repercussions on the us financial system. of course, there are paper cautions, not just for the residential system, but also for the wider economy. what happens from now on board is that banks become concentration of concentration. risk goes up. so essentially, a measure of systemic risks actually act in order to prevent this leads to all kinds of market structures going on, which i can't my very it's giving more of a complicated but isn't going economy the global economy. i mean, do we need to be worried about it? we worried about it. if you know the next round of interest rate times by the federal reserve, the last round is not the final. and the printer though, has to high interest rate. what that we've been dis died that we've been seeing, whether it is an as b, b, or

a 1st time the monthly banks will become very all the lending activities at once. you know, then the credit squeeze in the market that inevitably i think it's that is not often to forecast of the yeah. you but i will be a my decision. but if there is a credit crunch the market that made your decision and you know, we all know what a media usa should mean and especially as a to hear a lot about them for another time. so, so look group, i'm, thanks much for joining us here. today and see always a pleasure. so thanks again. well, i wrote up this news i, my colleague, always to say will be with you at the top of all a very present evening. ah, the term strategic autonomy sounds good. the word strategic and autonomy presents a sense of independence. but when you consider that they were forced to wonder if he is a serious person, after all,

more economists ah, hello, i'm manila chan. the sars cody to outbreak are better known as cold, the hand down by the w show on march 11th of 2020 into a panic. but by december of 2021. the concept to pitch 2, it's 190 for nation members. treaty that should have civilians around the world in a paul about that with a former w h o doctor. all right, let's get in for the locked down. sure to vaccinate the vax passes to travel or even more that right . it was just 3 years ago that people were at stores in the us. in the meantime, the world health orly putting together plans for the next pandemic, arkell and handling cobit 19. the w. h o wants to immense and sovereign states,

and have your country sign on, which would remove any and all powers your own contract. it sees bit a trade for a universal pross. i the director general at the w h o in geneva, and the best part about this treaty, it doesn't even need your country or head of state to agree on the declared status signs this treaty, your country relinquishes all the w h o and it's specifically states that your likely elected system is powerless to object. they have it right there on the w h. r website. they're not even trying to discuss this shockingly on rave doctor who has spent years of his career at the ws, told me he has spent the last couple of years trying desperately to veil because the mainstream media won't discuss it exclusively to us dr. david bell. dr.

and scientist and has a background in epidemiology from texas. now dr. bell, the cold up ended, the medical community writ large, the uniform reading cobit patients across the u. s. is that normal for physician over times? doctors treat patients more on the where do treatment directives or protocol the cdc, the and i h w h. whoa. what 2nd? it's common to have protocols or got it. they are expected to be taken. you're supposed to take into so normally they're a guide and then take the history and then you decide on the it's streaming unusual for restrict you dollars. guidelines can suggest that you use the idea of banding safe. so whether or not they are effective.

the idea of any action is complete before and guidelines will come as i say that they are intended as a and in the end, dr. patients, the doctors assessment of that patient. that should be what management is recommend . now as the world when 2021, the w h o, quietly pitch an idea to it's so called pandemic treaty, that would not only binding authority over its members decision making a bill x, but it would include a digital passport. would this effectively dissolve national sovereignty when it is actually true things in progress from that of a show this amendment to the sexual health regulations and they trying to different directions? so the type of health regulation vision already in place, it was updated after this priority is more pounds to the child into

very amendment. and they reflected in the treaty or cindy, which is body in my and they any because they have for somebody special regulations. and so the amendments on the treaty will go next to you if the hill regulation amendments a passport. so they, they work on a number of level, explicitly remove human rights, human rights from consideration. so explicit the phrases around the in the on the basis that are affected in the un after the 2nd world war and their place that was wording that these human rights, that these diversity equity was here. based on

taking away the idea that one is equal. the rights of the person based on economy concession. so that's a huge fundamental change to the whole way that so then they mixer about any emergency can be solely by the director general. and it can be on the needs to be a potential or what the chart for an upgrade. so that can be almost any other than that. and he doesn't have true emergency committee can go on then very wide ranging pallets. so those are agreeing that recommendations essentially binding to the country and follow recommendations. so they're not recommendations

anymore. they're all they cover o range of scenes. so they cover things in stopping people traveling, injecting or medicating people medical in city on medical examination, the role of government in i think very rodney so based in geneva to force anyone in the world and the w h o says, going field for poor nations when it comes to future vaccines or answer, and i'm going to paraphrase. but when it comes pandemic or not, don't allied nations already have chair. why would this particular measure be necessarily? do already has these mechanisms and there's also international true poor on the basis and the so there are good mechanisms to much more in control.

so, i mean, that's a fallacy. this, you know, the soviet union level, the playing field at the society that we can see from what has happened. so we have had since the wor, pushing for lock downs, true subsaharan africa and asia where it is extremely low and large because a lot downs, malaria tv usage. these other large disease. ringback so they have it going up. so what has happened is that we move the emphasis on hell away from what, what they saw to something that they think it's a very low part these nations. and these populations happen. and it will happen because underline this isn't the way the show is funded is increase product on the preschool and corporate and private interests. will direct funding surgery and not

where it's necessary, but always in the eastern is that what they both are and they should be the decision making in the whole basis of that nature. and looking back to a very centralized colonialist mentality into will decide what is best for others. and inevitably, in the situations, it'll be what then end to end up being. the responses match the increase in the qualities, but also have an efficacy reduction in domestic product. and g p, the translates, are from what it was through last downs, closing markets. another issue on national sovereignty in they expect to be ready in 2024 article 9 points that the w h o would no longer need to consult with 10 verification from the member state where this what they call turn is allegedly occurring before taking action be what limitations to them if any,

whereby the w m and the status independent of what the elected lead. now you've expressed valid concerns as a scientist, but a citizen of obviously so frontier information states and this because they people so again, you know, the power directly if the tree is rest. even if you don't buy it, i can influence other countries to stop. you know, supply lines, et cetera. so i have a huge impact. so it very much puts that people in geneva and they dr. david bell is gonna stay with us. next bill gates, pfizer, the united states, china, major donors, to the w. h. o. does this info we're gonna discuss it when we return, sit tight. the m. o will be right back. ah,

ah, side to atrocities and other countries, united states of america is different when a find a friend in the united states. ah, with do we have it out of any body bolts? anybody crazy here in service that needs to get a few color revenues for means to reach that goal of come on to the help of usaa weston. and sadie, i do that. people would agree valley democracy, living with us a lot of soft power america to ensure that there are no independent players in the world in ah,

welcome back to the m o i manila chan. dr. david baptist is sounding the alarm over this proposed debbie. now dr. bell are renowned professor of his boyle, he said j. d and ph. d at the university of r of k juniors, childrens defense publication called the differentially illegal saying, quote, the proposed w h o convention on the law of treaties ratified in 196. this new treaty as insidious and even medical touch as this will put nations into a scientific police state underly the cdc bill gates and china who rebels. what are your thoughts on that i should say on that is certainly true. you we, we seen in to know that locked down to normal in 2000. she sits and in forensic our thoughts and mentioned the word lockdown. it was never

a public 10 before it's a criminal child that they specifically hope the people you should not restrict, cheda cetera. you grad from the benefit and it is proportionately slow in release just a few months before they can change direction introduced and pretended or no response . it's nothing more response. there's an experiment in the ball or outbreak in west it was shown to be fully effective and that idea in china supposedly locked down the military and society that locked in populations the. it's a huge, it's the idea that, you know, as we saw in the funeral, was at the time the consult palm as being you wrote the playground. so the children's can, these are extraordinary nations. they don't have any irrational,

especially with a virus software. we knew from the stop 2020, that it was the very old people and people with addition such as diabetes. so it wasn't rational, happy host response. it was a very irrational. it is clear that there is no looking back and saying this was a bad if you look at the pen, the push for the pandemic treaty, it's actual health regulations, and there's a very strong and more sense in the future. so that was essentially a site that we went through to create and it was, can it was you terms, an actual actions that we normally use in prison, confining. and so that is what is envision not normal. it's not anything to do with the w h. l got coded wrong, h got it wrong,

doctor found she bill gave the lot of them got it wrong. why it is entities with their personal health care decisions going forward? got it wrong. i think that the very stuff was it's highly disproportionately fix all the adults how the video affected the car. so it's like a basic they know that if you do this sort of thing, it just, fortunately more health problems than you know, low income people. they knew, so you have to assume that there are, there was a, you know, it was successful in children well from low to high income people. it was successful showing that you can even they since used to democracy. you can instill theory a sort of fashion to tell us here, indic types. so i think both of those were important. these entity

was very successful. it wasn't success. it is hard to believe that the people are doing it for public response. it's hard to believe that or the way joe, really as, as noble or, or as the mainstream media would present them to be. i mean, we're just oh and doesn't influence behaviors at the w. a challenge organization is office isn't genevas in a lot of companies. it's a lot of useful things in a lot of countries in countries lacking in certain expertise that brings people together where they need to talk so. so i think there is a need for international hills coordination support countries that need us and ask for this or is, is increasing private and corporate money,

which is very directed. so you have to double try that is still functioning in a country level that you have other parts of the base of to go and move to s a corporate model during the response, i think so the world. but it doesn't mean every, some sort of entity with much interest and it's what they can actually in itself is a bad idea. doctor david bell, fearless, honesty and in sight today. yeah. will tell you this treaty will create a fairer system to health care, but fail to admit that when it comes to door cancer, no 2 bodies will ever respond the same. this treaty will guarantee is that you no longer union over your own body. that's going to do it for the show that dig deep into foreign policy. i'm your host manila chan next week to figure out the ammo

ah with washington and washington's agenda is one of the global hegemony. and i think that they're not even, they're not even subtle about this arrival. mm mm ah, moscow claims a lot fence truckers is destroyed as russia launches multiple. miss allison deli, called out here for posting rising from a fire that erupt it during

a ukrainian drove the top head 4th.