protect his own existence with the term strategic autonomy. sounds good. the word strategic conjures up a sense of importance and autonomy presents a sense of independence. but when you consider the french president using this term, that we are forced to wonder if he is a serious person, after all, europe is no longer strategic or autonomy. o needs to come to the russian state to never. i've side us on the most lansky investment and also to set up with the group in 55 with this big. okay, so what i need to find must be the one else calls with. we

will van in the european union, the kremlin. yup. machines. the state on to russia today, and school ortiz spoke mckibbin, our video agency, roughly all brand on youtube with silly put forward question. did you think it would twist with? oh, hello, i'm manila chad. you're tuned into modus operandi. the sars covey to outbreak are better known as cold. it was declared a global pandemic by the w h. o. on march 11th of 2020, which sent governments around the world into a panic. but by december of 2021, the organization had a new concept to pitch to it's 194 nation members,

a so called pandemic treaty. that should have civilians around the world in a panic. will tell you all about that with a former w. h o doctor. all right, let's get into the ammo. ah, the locked down, the masking, the pressure to vaccinate the vax passes to travel or even it at a restaurant. we all remember that, right? it was just 3 years ago that people were fighting over toilet paper at stores in the u. s. in the meantime, the world health organization has been diligently putting together plans for the next pandemic in lieu of the great debacle in handling kobe 19. the w h o wants to lift that burden from local governments in sovereign states,

and have your country sign on to a pandemic treaty, which would remove any and all powers your own country has in handling a pandemic. as it sees bit a trade for a universal process as directed by the director general at the w h o in geneva. oh, and the best part about this treaty, it doesn't even need your country's president or prime minister or head of state to agree on the declared status. no. once your country signs this treaty, your country relinquishes all health sovereignty over to the w h o. and it specifically states that your elected leader of your democratically elected system is powerless to object. you don't have to believe me. they have it right there on the w h a website. they're not even trying to hide it. it's out in the open. to

discuss this shockingly undemocratic health treaty is a brave doctor who has spent years of his career at the w h o in geneva. now he's told me he has spent the last couple of years trying desperately to get the word out to no avail. because the mainstream media won't discuss it. so this brave doctor is talking exclusively to us. dr. david bell is a former w h o doctor and scientist and has a background in epidemiology. he's joining us now from texas. now dr. bell, the cobit pandemic seems to have offended the medical community writ large. the uniformity in which doctors were treating cobit patients across the u. s. is that normal for physicians, or like in pre cove id times, the doctors treat patients more on an individual basis and the where do treatment

directives or protocols usually come from? is it the cdc, the and i h that w h. whoa, it's come. it's very unusual what has happened. it's common to have protocols or guidance on what to do that they are expected to be taking. you're supposed to take into account the clinical situation patient. so normally they're a guide and you look at the patient and then take the history and then you decide on the treatment based on that situation is extremely unusual for speech of ours, for instance. and guidelines can suggest that you use certain drugs and use other drugs, but the idea of a safe job to make an an entrepreneur and whether or not they are effective the id or anyone for speech check infection is complete. it test before and

so the guidelines will come from c, e c from show et cetera. as i said, that they are intended as a guide and not intended to follow. and in the, in the doctor patient relationship and the doctor's assessment of that patient, there should be the final picture on what management is recommended. as the world was in the grips of cove, it in 2021. the w h o quietly pitch an idea to it's 194 member states so called pandemic treaty. that would not only give this organisation legally binding authority over its members decision making abilities on how to handle future pandemic. but it would include a digital passport and digital id system. with this effectively dissolve national

sovereignty. when it comes to people's health care. there's actually 2 things in progress from that of the treaty and is amendments to the instructional regulations. and they both do essentially the same thing in trying to different directions. so the instructor health regulations, there's a vision already in place. it was updated in 2005. and it's already use more pounds to the debate. people realize, but the amendment and they reflected in the treaty, the man who actually goes to cindy which is coming in may of this year. and they only because they have for somebody special. ready or already as c illustrated agency. and so the amendments need to be accepted. 50 percent of

the treaty will go next to your company the we're health assembly. but if the health regulation amendments a past due, what the treat during the so they, they work on a number of levels. they explicitly remove human rights. i found them in the human rights from consideration. so explicit be amendments cross out phrases around the, the, they have to be instituted in the, on the basis of the found them in human rights that are affected in the un declaration human rights from after the 2nd world war. and their place that was worrying about diversity iniquity, and they say that these human rights, that these diversity equity, whatever they mean coherence based on economy

and social status of the person. so they start off by taking away the idea that you're going to equal and put it in the right. so the person based on economic and social situation. so that's a huge fundamental change to the whole way that he couldn't even roger. so then they use a about pandemic or about any health emergency and they state that the health emergency can be dictated solely by the director general . so a single person in charge of this and it can be on doesn't have to be even an outbreak that needs to be a potential or what the director considers a potential for an upgrade. so that can be almost any health event. and when the

director general doesn't have transferred to an emergency committee or consideration, you can make this decision then he it gives in very wide range and powers so. so she is countries that agree to this are agreeing that recommendations binding to the country. they say that they undertake to follow recommendations, so they're not recommendations anymore. their orders and they cover whole range of seen. so they base to cover things like confinement of people in quarantine, stopping people, traveling, injecting or mitigating people and medical accepted in city on medical examination. so they even take way the role of governments in i think very rodney forcing that is and they allow,

so innovation based in geneva to force anyone in the world. and this is in the, at the amendments the w h o says, going this route. what level the playing field for poor nations when it comes to future vaccines or treatment for diseases like cancer? and i'm going to paraphrase. but when it comes to sharing medicines or treatments, pandemic or not, don't allied nations already have mechanisms in place already to share. why would this particular measure be necessary? so nations do already has these mechanisms and there's also international mechanisms such as the global fund that true poor resources from different countries and allocate him on the basis of the. so there are mechanisms to do this already. much more in control of functions. so if one live or the

trying to, i mean that's a fallacy this. so you need thinking everyone will, well, here's you know, the level, the playing field at the society. so the we can see from what does happen. so we have had a group of people in europe, essentially the damage i pushing for locked downs and metrics. nation through subsaharan, africa, and asia, where it was. allison cove is extremely large because a lot downs into mortality is growing up. malaria tv usage. these other large disease they have it going up. so what has happened is that we've seen the central authority move, the emphasis on hell away from what individual populations need and what they up to. something that they see is more important, even though it's a very low part of these nations and these populations so that this will continue

to happen. and it will happen because underline this is a lot of changes and the way the show is founded is increase product funding, increase corporate funding, and it's very directed and corporate and private interests were direct funding. so during the w h o to work they wanted to where it's been and not where it's necessary the best for the. ringback countries concern so always and the eastern populations and communities knew what they are and they should be the decision making out. so this is up ending the whole basis to be sure. and the state is moving everything back to a very centralized colonialism and where people at the center will decide what is best for other than inevitably because of what happens in the situations.

it'll be what then end to end up being a negative. so the responses massive increase in the quality between countries, but also the mass, sub saharan africa went into a reduction in russ domestic product and g p. the translates directly into increasing from what, how did you this was through lot downs closing markets, closing travel with citrix and sometimes another issue on national sovereignty in this proposed treaty, which they expect to be ready in 2024 article 9 point one of that treaty states that the w h o would no longer need to consult with the state or even attempt to obtain verification from the member state. where this, what they call reported event of concern is allegedly occurring before taking action. it's unclear what those actions might be, what limitations to them if any,

whereby the w h o director general determines the status independent of what the elected leaders of that country has to say. now you've expressed valid concerns as a scientist, but what are your views on this as a citizen? yeah, obviously there's a reason why we have suffered nation states and this because they understand the needs of people. so again, you know, the top it's, or what have power directly if the trees read, but they also have, even if you don't buy it, they can influence other countries to stop travel, self trade, to stop supply lines, et cetera. so particularly the smaller countries is going to have a huge impact. so it very much puts them at the mercy of the people

in geneva and they buy those who found those people dr. david bell is going to stay with us coming up next. bill gates, pfizer, the united states, china just to name a few. are the major donors to the w h. o. does this influence their decision making in geneva? we're going to discuss that when we return to tight. and we'll be right back. i ah ah, candidate is outsourced its foreign policy to washington. and washington's agenda is one of the global hegemony. washington will not tolerate. and i think that they're not even, they're not even subtle about this. you know, they're,

they will not tolerate a global rival. ah, who is the aggressor today? i'm authorizing the additional strong sanctions today. russia is the country with the most sanctions imposed against it. a number that's constantly growing. i think you know, each of the problem was the cosigner as you speak on the bill in your senior mostly mind the shooter were banding all in ports of russian oil and gas. new g. i suffering the price for it. i know they plenty of holes with lower griffey fed said the super letter from, you know, we're pretty good regarding joe, by imposing these sanctions on russia. you has destroyed the american economy, so there's your boomerang. huh. ah,

welcome back to the ammo. i'm manila chan. dr. david bell, a former w h o scientist is sounding the alarm over this proposed w. h o. pandemic treaty. now doctor bell are renowned professor of international law. dr. francis boyle. he's a j. d, and ph. d at the university of illinois has been quoted by our of k juniors children's defense publication called the defender calling this potentially illegal saying, quote, the proposed w h o t. ready violate the vienna convention on the law of treaties, ratified in 1969, b as insidious and even medical totalitarianism. he says, this will put nations into a scientific police state under the control of effectively the cdc bill gates and china, who pay a significant portion of their bills. what are your thoughts on that?

i can't comment on the vienna convention comes to spoil the risk of what you say. it's certainly true. we've seen the codes response and people are trying to pretend they're locked down to normal. i in 2019 the debate. sure. release. it's pandemic, influenza guidelines and they essentially isn't mentioned was locked down. it was never a public term before. it's a criminal, it's locked down to the child that they specifically said you should not close or to see the currency of the people. you should not restrict cheda cetera because it's just it's hands greg from the benefit and it is proportionately low income people. so it's released just a few months before they can change direction,

introduced this term called lockdown, and pretended there was no response. it's nothing more response that hasn't been done before. there's an experiment in the fall or outbreak in west africa where they did it for a few days. and it was shown to be fully effective in each energy for the population. china supposedly locked down in the san upgrade us here in society, that locked in populations frequently use a different reason. so the, it's a huge, it's a new idea in public health. and the idea that you know, as we saw or you can stop people from visiting the funeral, was at the time the can stop. pub is being present at the birth of that you wrote playground so the children's can no longer cite. these are extraordinary nations. they don't have any irrational public horse races to, especially with

a virus sauce, kirby, to the coven fox, where we knew from the start of 2020, that it was almost 15. see, it's a be very old people and people with significant medical conditions such as diabetes. so it wasn't rational response. it was a very irrational one. and it is clear that there is no looking back and saying this was a bad idea. and looking at the evidence, if you look at the pen, the push for the pendant treaty, the change in the international health regulations, etc. there's a very strong push to make this much faster and more and since in the future. so is that was essentially a please say that we went through this by emergency decree. and it was,

can, it was using terms and actual actions that we normally used in prison for civilian populations, confounding. and so that is what is envisioned, people need to sort of grasp this. it's not normal, it's not easy to do with what democrat societies as the w h. l got coded wrong. the cdc and i h got it wrong, doctor found she, bill gates, pfizer mode turner. the lot of them got it wrong. why then should the public trust these entities with their personal health care decisions going forward? i don't think most things go wrong. i think that the very stuff virus was even competition. the lancer it's highly disproportionately fixed. all people except for

the children and young adults are to be effected. so they didn't get around the new one. the virus was like a basic published in 19 if you do this sort of thing, you know, just fortunately people and cause more health problems than you know, low income people cause more health problems. and so they knew this. so you have to assume that there are moses, so there was a, it was successful in instigating an unprecedented shift in well, from low to high income people. it was successful in showing that you can even with some populations and our populations used to democracy, that you can instill fear into people subsidy. they will sort of fascist hotel here in d types. so if that was the purpose of doing this,

i think both of those were important part of it then. so these entity was very successful. it wasn't successful from a public health when it is hard to believe that the people are doing it, knew that this was a very poor public response. it's hard to believe that was are the gobby way, joe, really as, as noble and benevolent as they appear or as the mainstream media would present them to be. i mean, where does that money come from? where does that go and does it influence behaviors at the w h ho so that it shows a financial organization. it pays offices in geneva, 6 regional offices and country offices in a lot of companies. it's a logic of people. it does a lot of useful things in other countries. it brings to new expertise to countries

electing and. ringback expertise, it gives a lot of advice that brings people together where they need to talk. so it does some very useful functions and i think there is a need for international hills coordination and guidance and support countries that need us and ask for either change these or is, is increasing private and corporate money, which is part of the budget. and it's very directed, so you have to make sure that is still functioning properties such in a country level that you have all the power clearly lists the whole idea of community based public health and move to s a corporate model. so during the code response, i think it was probably a net harm to the world, but it doesn't mean everything that child is doing is

a bad idea or that the idea of having some sort of entity with much rules on being chased and what they can actually do, it doesn't mean that, that in itself is a bad idea. ah, namibia, from the very start, berlin encouraged the white colonists to settle in south west africa and take away the best land from the local drives. the germans were actively draining natural resources and using the local population as a cheap labor source. this was causing major protests and led to a rebellion. in 19 o 4, the hero and nama tribes rebelled against german colonial rule. kaiser wilhelm the 2nd was fully determined and ordered to suppress the rebellion with the utmost severity against the inhabitants of nam may be

a germany through it's 15000 well equipped army. all around the country concentration camps were built. in humane medical experiments over citizens were conducted within the period of 4 years. the germans killed up to $60000.00 people, among which there were 80 percent of the hero tribe. and 50 percent of the nama tribe. the events in south west africa are called the 1st genocide of the 20th century, and not without reason are compared to the holocaust just 2 decades later after the massacre in namibia hitler's assault unit foot on the same brown colonial uniform which push the world into the chasm of the 2nd world war. ah, ah,

ah, a dan. ah, ah, the headlines on algae international as to civilians are killed and 14 wounded after a russian border region comes under ukrainian shell and local officials say that probing weather and all the incident could be considered a wall with

labor day celebrations and power of descending into violence with beliefs using tear gas and water cannons against protecting union work is also in the solid program for new delhi kohls l t. f. a. posting the depiction of a hindu goddess, rising from a fire that erupted during a ukrainian drone attack on premier with locals. i woke the world that a ukraine's approach.