and in the morning he would work as a dentist in the evening. he worked with social services, health and the elderly. and the, in some words, cannot describe the work he did. he was loyal and loving to his family and country and to everyone who works to serve people in justice. what right do you have to kill a person, his wife and children, a person who has devoted all his life to 7 people, the elderly and the in fun? what right do you have to kill him and stuff and that's a rap on the hour and coming up post. rick sanchez dives into china is emergence as an international piece broker. after successfully mediating agreements between arrivals or ron and saudi arabia, prompting strong criticism from the west. net on the impact. thanks for joining. take both the,

the part of buddy i'm rick sanchez. i've been doing news now for 30 years and 2 languages all over the world and here in the united states, and i've interviewed for presidents and found in a 1000000000 dollar business and you know what? i think i think new should be honest and direct and impactful, which is why we call this direct impact the it may be unintended consequences, it may be a fire may be, as it's infamously referred to by the c i a, you've heard this term right? blow back, call it whatever you want, but there's something happening right now with china, which is no doubt directly related to our government's actions. that's right. and the pattern goes something like this. the more that the united states, this is china, the more the china wants to assert itself,

globally. it began with she hammering out a truce, tries between 2 countries that have publicly hate and each other despised each other. now for more than 7 years. this year and between the a rod and saudi arabia is rooted in doctrine, in the history in the religious differentiation proxy wars that have dominated the middle east. headlights, but suddenly in steps of president, she who seemed to shock the global community by getting to ron and re uh, to sign an agreement we establishing diplomatic relations between the 2. the ron's foreign minister had described the meeting with the san d gone default as positive and emphasized that stability and sustainable security. and the common agenda were among the issues of lead upon

a to science will also study the prospect of resuming flights between the nations. while facilitating the visa process for the citizens. and no sooner than that, the deal was inc. it was onto another meeting. this is the president of china, another meeting, another attempt, the peace making. this time looking for a solution to the conflict between ukraine and russia. the . 2 so after establishing what appears to be an amicable relationship,

mr. she presents president putting with china is 12 point plan to end the conflict which calls for dialogue, respect for both countries, territorial sovereignty, an end to a beacon nomic sanctions. he also urges both parties to avoid nuclear escalation, and that by the way, did not seem like a major point or a relevant point when the plan was 1st presented. but then this up, did you hear about this? the u. k announces that it would send pegs to ukraine containing depleted uranium, which seemed to enrage russia who are saying the shells contain enough radiation to make dirty bombs. so as for the sheen plan in and of itself, here's our mr. brewton responded. i'm not going to use the search method. leslie knew me for you to when you 1st of all, these are so green. when kids initially, when we 1st moved a subsidy,

everything here, one that to a 100 to get to you my comment, this issue because now i'm stories for it is being supposed to produce to somebody junior. that's no obligation, as well as my name is level. no problem. did you need me to use this system from going into the grocery store and looks like they're joining us now? is journalist uh, marco fernandez. marco up. thanks so much for joining. i guess we have to start with your rod and saudi arabia agreement. this is historic. i mean, this seem to come out of nowhere, all countries, china stepping in and, and, and, and, and settling this thing, the evil communist hell bent on world domination as they've often been referred to . what's your reaction, how this happened? them? yeah. china. okay. make that's, that was a mind blowing agreement,

somebody's expecting and i just, i went excuse to tell a little story one minute. so feel a few weeks ago i was i didn't b, g. so i had to go to show high should a tv show there. so i went to the airport in the morning and i got to play and everything to shy. so i see by the window and look at my side and the runway and i saw a airplane official airplane of the islamic republic of your end. i saw a swamp, but what's going on? i, i didn't hear about any delegation running delegation in china. i mean, fall the news every day and present bracey just had been in the gene of like a couple weeks ago. so why is, is that things like okay, i don't know, i have no idea. so i will show hi, she go to log while i'm telling this other raven, you run in the country,

another country for 5 days and nobody knew about. it's very hard to happen. but in china they have, they have a way to say ok, this is top secret. let's discuss behind the scenes and then we come out publicly. so this is a 1st thing. but i would say also this does, that is a way of chinese diplomacy. that is being like, i think it more, more appearing appealing to the whole world, which is a different way of doing traditional relations. first of all is dialogue consultation sense is you know, that the chinese culture is very much based. the process is the culture is like daily life. so i think this does express in, in chinese diplomacy, but also of course as a comic interest. of course, i mean china is the largest buyer of almost everything, almost every commodity in the world right now. started rate, there is a 2nd um,

2nd largest exporter to avoid the china. you ran. i mean, china has a huge agreement with the run a couple of years ago. they say like, maybe $400000000000.00 in 25 years. it was providing oil and gas, the china, china is providing technology for structure, 5, g sub ways, trains, etc. so of course, i mean the 3 of them together have and of course china is in the middle. they had huge economic interest. so what it, what is, what is the best for them, is to okay, let's keep fighting wars, let's get paid each other and we don't talk to each other and we fund other. i don't know, melisha is against each other. i mean, guys, let's sit and talk like aids, and that's kind of, let's make business. of course it's about business, but it's about like a different, a best for development for the countries. so i think more and more countries,

especially the global solves look at the china say, okay, we get to deal with these guys. they're not coming here in the video country. julian, thousands of hundreds of thousands of people, devastating countries in and few years or after that, they just really, i mean, i don't know, they just got a sanction us 12 our economies. this is not the way the china thinks that should behave with other countries. so i think this is good, i mean it's, it's almost common sense, right. but i think this is a kind of common sense that the west mist long time ago. why do you think by the way, marcos, that uh, that they did it now or is, are they trying to send a message to the united states to the west? i think it turns into a message, of course, but i don't think this is the chinese a like see here thing. okay, let's, that's a message to us. oh, i mean let's, let's propose something different from the wolf to the world. which is not wars. that's not destroyed countries let's,

let's switch back to codes like respect other cultures. so in this says, it is a message. but as i said, again, this is, this is also and comic andrews. this is to promote interest. and at the end of the day, i think also the countries of the global south and more and more realizing that if we are divided among ourselves, we're going to be weaker to deal with with the western box. so guys, let's even talk because that's at the end of the day we, we global solve, we, people of color, we are 80 percent of population and will and, and, and actually we represent in the last years 70 percent of the growth of the global, the big growth, so the, the, the, the dynamics of the economy is shifting from, from the global knowledge of the global south. so why should we be divided fighting each other?

why should we not unite and go to the 20. i am as a united nations with us from the voice to do with this guys, our phone we go, my big china says that the united states antagonism towards them is the reason that they're, you know, establishing themselves what as we spoke about a little while ago, globally, do you think that's true? do you think this is causing china's emergence or desire to assert itself globally? that's a big question. re, i think i'd say the 1st of all i've seen take the example of china and rush both china and russia in domestic case. many sectors of society develop deeper relations with united states. nomic lee, even like culturally so this set to the side of talking about media is a,

be from business people to middle class is going to want to go to us studying the university of cetera. so more and more with this being crazy and rested in this of us against both russia and china. what is happening to this sector as a site? some of them just have to shut up because, i mean you, you can support a country who is like, bashing your country every single day. then when the icing, your nationalities, demonizing your culture. so that's the 1st thing. and i think this is clearly happening. and in both, i mean this, this, this both trying to rush uh, i mean, internally they are getting more united in the same as the global software shot of other countries. this also happening truly in china and richard right now in the nationally sectors. they tried a sectors. uh they tried to think would be the best word of english they was. is

guys. look, this is, this is what us is about united. loved us, but i'm sorry they don't log you. so i think this is happening. and finally, i think i a big mistake of united states in nature right now. and this is not mark will say, this is henry kissinger saying, guys, you guys are crazy. you guys are unify united states and china. i'm sorry, i'm a kissinger. i worked hard guys 50 years ago to put a match between russian and trying to divide them. that's why i went to debate gene . that's why we brought china together and we divided china and rush. so they doing that at the time. you guys crazy. now you guys are you, you united the, i'm sorry, this is so side. but the problem again, that was a mean this, this is our guess common sense, right? just like strategic concepts, but again, guys like blinking victoria nolan. i mean,

i think they are very behind common sense right now, and this will do these thinking because what they're doing now in 5 years from now, i mean, you saw what she told 14. so this is a shifting history that we haven't seen a 100 years, and we're driving this transformation. and i mean, this is the imagine move to happen 3 years ago, 4 years ago. but this is what you asked, has been producing marco, do me a favor, stay there, cuz we're gonna come back in just a little bit. i want, there's a couple of things i want. i want you to go over with us. okay. by the way, i should mention to you, i have a pod cast where as a journalist, as a latino, as an entrepreneur, i tell my story and share with you what i've learned about how to succeed, how to grow, and some of the things we talk about here on this particular show called the rick sanchez podcast. check it out and i'll see you there. okay. when we come back more on the growing tension between china and the united states, and specifically,

what china has to stay right there, the, the welding of the a sober tv. do you know great union tv? dougherty, a show name. yeah, i did. she ship a doctor, mean i'd ship for the control room for 2 of us. so we fixed you get them awarded by actually system really being you have enough. lots and lots of lots and lots of i'm assuming, yeah, we did the boom. so essentially it's strange of talk through this, but i'll let you drive both on the on their own crazy if that's where you store lot of the my software. but just do you still know satellite if she ever always get us, what are we shipping stuff just figured for a lift or slip that came over to them. i need deals says that you are in school. so that's

for and use a symbol when they each of them for a couple years, you know, to buy these folks, go to rescue. but i'm saying yes, i see the best way to take a picture of the day. so if you take a fresh look around his life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality. distortion by power to vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just because it shows you fractured images, presented to this, but can you see through their illusion going underground?

can the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. there's a new target in the war of words and deeds between china and the united states. beyond the military exercises along the taiwan straits, the rest of the daughter of the founder of walk away the spied balloon episode. and the dicey heated rhetoric between these 2 countries enter the tech talk or the us congress wants to ban tick tock, calling the social media sites were follow or share videos. a danger to america. and president biden seems to agree to talk see, a show has come out fighting. he's the 1st thing you did, even before meeting with congress, was he put out this video to all his talk followers in the united states.

hi, everyone is joe. here i'm the ceo of take talk. i'm here in washington dc today, and i have some news and updates to share with everyone here today. i'm super excited to announce that more than a 150000000 americans on take time. that's almost half of the us coming to take talk to connect, to create, to share, to learn. but just to have some fun. this includes 5000000 businesses they use take talk to reach the customers and the majority of these a small and medium businesses. now these numbers are amazing, and i'm so thankful to all of you. and the $7200.00 employees in the us helping us build this incredible community in america and around the world. now this comes at a pivotal moment for us. some politicians has started talking about banding to talk now this could take take tucked away from all 150000000 of you all be testifying before congress later this week. to share all that we are doing to protect

americans using the app and deliver on our mission to inspire creativity and to bring joy. let me know in the comments what you one your elected representatives to know about what you love about take talk. joining us once again, is marco fernandez to talk about this situation, this tick tock, thing this new thing congress is considering a bad on tech doc. it's one of the largest social media platforms in the world is you know, they think in fact they said repeatedly that it is a chinese by to visit. what do you make of that? well 1st of all, i think it's, it's important to, to remind that the child is accomplished by dance. they already agreed with a us government to be um, to have like a strong us, uh, supervision overview about about the data they. they agree, okay. we can store our data in the cloud. you guys tell us to do you guys have

access, you guys can control that. and they say no, you have to sell the company. so, i mean, it's clear what's, what's going on. they just want to steal the company to grab the company from the chinese because a very successful company. i mean this, i'm sorry, i'm a big godfather fan for me. i just just remember, i mean we will that make offer. you can't refuse. this is mafia. this is positive behavior, right? say no, this is obligations is our way or the highway. so this is for me is clear, but i think of course the, the, the issues of data it's, it's a very complex thing and get you the words. because i think you have more question about it. by the way, what do you, what do you think really is bringing this on and been at the china proper, again, antique china paranoia. but this is again, i think is it's a, it's a commercial issue. they, they just want to take advantage and brad,

the very successful company. which by the way, it's funny because you know that the talk doesn't make money and us at all actually lose a lot of money us where they really make money isn't try and why? because the way to talk makes money is that because i mean you and me like spend, i don't know like 20 minutes a day. just look into like buy stands for years and know that's not how they make money. they make money because and try that. they sell stuff, this is a huge platform. already competing with alibaba. we, j. d, people just sell stuff to live streams as we're doing right now. but we're just selling ideas or we're just exchanging ideas. they sell potatoes to mean thousands chinese beds and selling potatoes and getting potatoes to people in the big city close by. so this is all make money and why is, is possibly trying to in, not in us because china has a huge logistical infrastructure right now. it's great,

sometimes i get scared like a friend of mine was like just moves and then he said, oh i wanna tv isn't like saturday one and they go to like online. but for him, he buys a television in one hour, like 2 am in the morning and sat saturday and he got the tv. this is a crazy logistics. if a ship to china has us doesn't have they don't, they don't know how to do it. this is going to be a problem for them, even if they grab to the dock. let's see how they would make money because deduct is losing a lot of money in us right now. and one of the problems i think with these accusations is that i detect a bit of hypocrisy here on the part of our government. given that, you know, we often, or at least our politicians and our media often condemns countries for blocking social media for not giving free access to media for not allowing citizens to express themselves for reclaiming. as we often do. these countries aren't like us,

they don't respect free speech. is that kind of hypocritical, eric? i mean, there's a lot of hype brokers, e, a for one side, because we know that the fact that you, me, and our audience, all of us are reader instagram, facebook quest. that means state department has all of our data. they know us better than our sounds. you know, our desires that know what we like. we don't like what we buy, we don't buy. and this is data is a huge issue data. there's lot of people say the data is that you wild because this is what mean this is what makes money. now this companies sell the data that they have about us. so and us has access to everybody in the world but trying. so this is, i think is the 1st thing. the 2nd thing is that i would also wouldn't be nice in this issues of data because it's not that are we should just have

a free market and everybody know this is, this is also national security. i think china was at a very clever or a smart way, like few years ago where they come to us best on this. okay guys, you wouldn't be in china. this is chinese data. we need to have control. the same thing that i mean by day is proposing us oh okay. you guys have control. yeah. and trying this. okay. we need to talk. so we need to have access to we just had no way . google said no ways. ok, i so lease, you cannot stay in our country. of course people here in china, everybody accessed this, this, that phones with dpn. but there is this issue. so you cannot just say that data should be free. everybody should access. no, that's actually this is a, uh, this is a trip. uh, this is a kind of narrative. there's a trap for us because it's in the date, all the data goes to the state department. so i think there's a very complex issue. at the end of the day,

what we should discuss is how the states all the nations out should deal with data. because it's all data is my data, is your data, but is actually captured by private companies without any, i mean doesn't, they have no limits. so this kind of restrictions is kind of, i mean, this kind of, the base of policy is that we should, we should, we should have been doing in, in, in, in the countries. china is doing this right now. there's a big debate in the country about what is the act of the data who should control should not control. but unfortunately, most of our countries we just accepted. okay, twitter is amazing. i have to and of course, but i mean, it is dangerous because this is a way also of us to have access to all of us. how does china respond? if they do, how do you think china will respond? maybe better put to the blocking of this app will they response they,

they say. so they say so, and again, this is hard to predict. and i think of course china is being more and more tact now is to talk. but there's a whole issue about the chips to send somebody from doctor's and a hughes of war. them that right now us is kirby axis. uh china. we had a huawei issue, so i mean, i suspect they're gonna do something. they have been saying that, but we don't know yet what they're going to do back out. thanks so much. i really appreciate your time and look forward to talking to you once again. hey, before we go, i want to remind you of our mission here. it's simple, really, it's the silo the world. we've got to stop living and these little boxes, you know, because troops don't live in boxes. truths are truth is everywhere comics interest . i'll be looking for you again right here,

where i hope to provide some direct impact. the the at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local depot. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one

settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women, and children are shot when ever they can be met with squatter. henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as fast as these rightly described as blood soaked and races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against the aborigines has not been resolved so far. the

or the the, the city of will gone because the again been shell by your premium forces following fridays to missile attacks, which left 6 children injured is not the full, the west and colleagues is told on you crazy respect. really just freedoms. as across down on the orthodox church continues in you praying rushes ambassador to the un demands the security council looked into what is called a bridge breach of human rights. the turkish president dismisses claims of russian

meddling in the upcoming elections, accusing the west of being responsible for the real interference. the.