the, the, therefore, if given russians to these developers, the west sees the less can we use defending, we will no longer rely on the west as a partner with whom we can find even minimal common ground with the russian foreign minister says moscow can have no dealings with the west, as long as it supports you praise policies in killing russian civilians. moscow marks cab over the number of missiles it claims to have down the same. the number is higher than the number actually large. this comes as russian forces destroy a us may patriot air defense system and cab china labels, former u. k prime minister list presses visits to taiwan, a political sconce that will bring nothing good for the u. k. also the find of

many of these authorities and entities that actually converted the just and the right just active, protecting our country with a desire to have a particular political candidate win or lose us. republicans call for the f b i to be shut down after the countries special council rules. the agencies investigation into trump should never have happened the good afternoon from the russian capital. this is our t international with the latest world news updates. i'm fair allies about it's great to have you with us. the russian foreign minister says the west has made its choice when it decided to support the key ever gene which aims to physically destroy all things russian. it is up at the west has made his choice and says that the russian must suffer. strategic defeat was give

a crime. yeah. betrayed the russian people in other parts of the former ukraine as well, that they are declared non human and their physical destruction for the states as the goal of the concrete for gms in the news. and we are doing live industry due by r t, corresponding don quarter to discuss moscow's latest statement. welcome dawn. could you tell us what else exactly was said during the russian foreign ministers interview or fiorella elaborate who was able to cover a wide array of topics and this 35 minute interview? of course the focus was mainly on the ukraine conflict. but on rooster phobia, more specifically actually, which began to intensify after the 2014 euro. my don qu, data and key of according to the russian foreign minister. because that's when a government came to power of regina that was backed by neo nazis arms neo nazis. and that regime began to wage a war on the russian people of dunbar slab. ralph called this regime that wants to kill russia and it's a regime that's being supported by the west. this is up, it's good. therefore, if the west says that this regime which kills russians,

gives russian culture the russian world in any of its manifestations. and physically destroys the russian people for white citizens. or if it's in this, that the west sees the values that this alaska region is defending us, but will no longer rely on the west. as a partner with whom we can find even minimal common ground with go to the russian foreign minister also accused the west of staying silent when it comes to keeps crimes while also somehow praising it for upholding democratic values. that's despite the fact that it's banned its own political opposition and it's using, like i said, armed neo nazis to accomplish its strategic military objective. now survey laughter . ups comments does comment made the recent interview, which ukraine's military intelligence chief carol, who donald has confess, kia may have been behind the assassination of a number of russian civilians. can you take us through those developments? that's right, keeps policy on civilian assassinations. it generally is just denied, denied, deny, even when the all the evidence over whelming li points to key of as being

responsible for these events. so it's of course, surprising when we see the chief ukrainian intelligence, the, the chief view printing and intelligence capable dawn of pretty much reiterating the russian position on all this. let's take a listen. i have not seen the quote, i am not able to talk on the veracity of it, the un not in the form of a collective of countries, but in the form of its the criteria it could not give any answer to this absolutely clear in your face admission, stefan discharge stated that she had not seen such a statement. so to reach us, there is no excuse for the you and secretariat as well. looks like actually we showed there the response to these statements that were, was heard in the united nations as well as from the russian foreign ministry. spokeswoman murray is a harvard to that because uh, obviously the human reaction was kind of lack luster. but um, in terms of what don of actually was saying after the,

after there was some sort of response to his statements, he said that he only met the men to people considered war criminals, which actually is a label that when it comes to key, if they can apply to anyone who doesn't like them, especially for example, daria doogan, who was assassinated, she was a journalist, she wasn't a soldier or is a harpy pretty lamp and who was also not a soldier either. and this is all really um, ironic to be honest because just recently the united states, um the state department actually said that it was, it was ready to still consider putting russia on its list of state sponsors of terrorism. and have there been any reactions from the west? uh, yeah, that's what we just saw in the in. well, actually we saw a reaction from the united nations and from the russian foreign ministry spokesman, right person murray is the heart of us. well, i think you'll keep us updated on the latest ortiz donald quarter. thank you.

versus defense ministry has mark you have over. it's claims that 6 russian did you all hypersonic missiles were allegedly destroyed during last night strike on care of it. will have not launched as many consoles as they allegedly should down every time with their statements. the number of so called ukrainian the answer sets is 3 times. why is that? we actually launch, they keep getting the miss outside prong. therefore they are missing down. russia destroyed a costly $1100000000.00 us dollar patriot missile system doing s, right? sorry, with the cab to cab in the hours of tuesday morning. the system was taken out by a kim jo hypersonic missile. now those, those ass strikes also to count ukrainian fruit positions and munitions depot on west and supplied a weapons. that's according to a statement from russia's defense ministry. now the us has not commented junk. kirby differed to ukraine. the defense officials, however,

they refused to comment. now the most go has denied ukraine's bold claims of shut down the control heart disorder. miss all, they need to try to do the cabin. as we've heard you crying has claimed to have shut down booming stalls and russia even fine. now you cranes, top ministry official, has gone so far as to say that ukraine shot down every single miss all the russia for that say what he said. old 18 me sounds were destroyed by the air defenses of the armed forces of ukraine. this isn't the 1st time the kid has made such claims and we have to say that there has been absolutely no evidence to suggest that it hurts. jump down any of these hard. this will make me sullivan. uh, just a moment. you cranes, the defense team cheated me to that so he trained doesn't have all types of types. he's on the control me. so i mean, this would be quite a feature in modern warfare. of course, the king's all miss all is a thursday, undetectable by of right all systems. i see

a russian apple said that 856 of the control miss all is doing the strike think you have on the, in the early hours of tuesday morning. it's not clear whether the pay to miss all system was you use it in an attempt to down the but it comes just $10.00 days off the key of claimed, but it has shut down a control miss out on may the 6th and this was a claim uh that was also backed by depends ago on my can confirm that they did down a russian missile by implying the patriot missile defense system may have of key everybody may create co, uh, of course recorded a video of it himself off to this event holding what he claimed was one of these uh, ken joe, a hypotonic missiles that was shot down. now this is it, me saw we can probably stay on the screen now. this is the missed all the coding to create codes of photographs and video footage. but whatever, please go was holding is play the notes i can draw a hypotonic missile a,

as you can see in the, in this for change, the control miss all is at least around 7 meters long and has a pointed tape. so this is not what we're saying increase, cuz foot is now the already is. of course, that's a very miss. all the kid plaintive down is the one that has destroyed the patriot missile system. that is so crucial to the defense of the city. russian military expert, alexander stephano of says moscow was able to destroy a patriot launch, or by over whelming, you creams, air defenses is a very important step in uh, of this culture. because now we understand that this, uh why the why, why j from all just uh add to science on systems like venture out in the west media . uh their trunk protects the capital all the q solution. uh so the, using the high procedure or working russian sides can easily destroyed such type or

for a different assistance. but uh surely would have to understand that. so the system uh well only want broke your told the system costs about $4000000.00. so in this way, because very expensive to use such that all arguments without a complex system using another type of software defense systems. so that's why it was easily destroyed. and the thing that russian science and. ready chase we're using the full star is you know, to make. ready ok inside the launch for the rockets and then the officer was using the mattresses and hyper sooner and change all. it distorts all this very, very important box of air defense system of few years. so i think it's very significant and did show the level of,

of high precision rushing made records. do you authorize the f b i? those are the calls coming from republicans after a justice department report revealed the failed f. b. i investigation into allegations of trumps ties with russia was based on biased and unsubstantiated information. i think that we have to de authorize the fang and the fund, many of these authorities and entities and a different task forces that actually converted the just and right. just act of protecting our country with a desire to have a particular political candidate win or lose. the durham report confirmed what we already knew. weaponized federal agencies manufactured a false conspiracy theory about trump, russia collusion. it reminds us of the need to clean house that these agencies as they've never been held accountable for this agreed just abuse of power. this needs to finally end shut down the f b i asterisk and yes, this is much more practical than it sounds. they are scum like cockroaches all over

washington, dc. after 6 years of claiming the trump, russia collusion, was a fact. us democrats at the conclusion of durham's inquiry, showed no new evidence. and the for your investigation was a quotes news west that says the us mass media was also quite to announce the failure of the durham report. human and labor rights lawyer, dan cabal, x. as the us democrats use, the russian gave stories to try and justify their loss to donald trump in the 2016 election. it was very clear from the beginning to, you know, those of us who were criticizing the russia gate claims that this was all manufactured by hillary clinton in the democratic party to make up for their own failings in losing the donald trump. they were so embarrassed that they lost to a candidate, frankly, who didn't have any qualifications to be president. and they were still

embarrassed. they said, oh, i guess it was rushes fault that we lost. it wasn't our fault for having, having not even campaign to wisconsin, for example, for having labeled a working class based, deplorable snow. that wasn't our fault. instead, blame russia. and who knew that about half the us population would go along with that. why? you know, i mean it's just a disgrace to the f b. i really led clinton off the hook for own, you know, missed speed and using your own private server to conduct official business official, the business as the secretary of state. and instead they focus on this red herring called russia gate r t corresponding taylor mopping, takes us through yet another drama in american domestic politics. the prosecutor

and john durham several years to look into whether or not the various investigations by us agencies in to donald trump. and alleged collusion with russia were done properly. the reports, conclusion is an overwhelming know the f. b. i've had no information in its holdings indicating that at a time during the campaign, anyone in the trump campaign had been in contact with any of us intelligence officials. there was nothing to justify the level of law enforcement scrutiny. donald trump was subjected to, there was no evidence to base these allegations of collusion on the report says this over and over again. the government possess, know those slides, intelligence reflecting the trump or the trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or calabrese relationship with the officials of the russian government . neither the us law enforcement to know the intelligence community a piece to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion. in the holdings, unlike normal investigations,

the api i just decided they were going to run with this, they skipped to their normal procedures. remember how russia gave was all the rage during the trump administration. how it was argued that in 2016 donald trump winning was the result of a big russian conspiracy that trump had sat down with putting in order to plot to take the white house. now, there was never any evidence to back these claims up a cnn house even admitted the whole thing was a big nothing burger. however, there was a wing of the us government apparatus that decided to act like there was a legitimate case there. and they did it for partisan political reasons. the trump campaign was offered helped by russia to influence our election from campaign cooperation with rushes. here are 18 reasons. trump could be a russian asset. trump has a lot of connections to russia through business collusion between then candidate charles his campaign and the kremlin, the new york times. and the washington post even won a pulitzer prize in 2017 for reporting on this story that we now know was

a total fabrication. the pulitzer board has refused to admit it made a mistake and handing them out. and the outlets are keeping their wards, top democrats decided to go all in on this vague new story. this week we saw cold, hard evidence of the trump campaign. indeed, the trump family eagerly intending to collude possibly with russia hostile foreign power to influence american elections. speaker ryan must allow a vote on an outside independent kit mission to get to the bottom of the trump campaigns, rule and brushes, assault on our democracy and prevent booting from ever doing it again. immediately parameter on report, oddly concludes, there was interference by russia in the 2016 elections just kind of throwing that in. after all kinds of details and testimony, the report pretty clearly shows that members of the department of justice of the u

. s. secret service and other wings of the american government were pressured to act as if there was evidence for this. when there was an f. b, i agent even committed a crime, putting forward false information in order to secure a warrant to spy on donald trump. from the f b i, a tony ken klein, smith committed a criminal offense by fabricating language in an email that was material to the f. b i obtaining a f. s a surveillance older. in other instances beyond personnel of working on the same f. i say application displayed at best a couple the attitude towards accuracy and completeness. all kinds with god for his actions was probation, and this all points to a pattern. at the same time, we had other prominent us political figures who essentially got a free pass on. they are questionable associations and practices, the claims and foundation, that's a both senior f b i. m department's officials placed restrictions on how those match as well to be handled. so it's the sense fully known investigative activities accumulates for

months leading up to the election. as he said this in what the hunter biden laptops scandal and notice how the intel agencies and the media cooperated there, you'll start to notice a pretty consistent pattern of behavior. the folks who run the main stream media and the intelligence agencies in the united states think they know what is best for the american people. they know who should be running the country and they have no problem manipulating things in a partisan manner to serve that agenda. failed mauppin, archie, new york, legal and media analyst line all says there will be no accountability despite the revelations of the durham report. the american public is under such a constant barrage of news in miss the information. this information i could write a story that is based on information which is inc. correct, provided to me by the government. and i do a great job and

a wonderful story. and i do a wonderful investigation based on an investigation by a government official or agency that's been correct. does that make my investigation incorrect? do i still when the future prize, even though what i'm writing is incorrect? i don't know. don't you think the whole notion of russian collusion, rushing interference, somebody somewhere should be able to say, where was it? would you tell me where it was? what did you, when a future prize for? i predict 36 hours. this story will not be brought up again. 36 hours, maybe another day, maybe a day and a half because it is, it's nobody is surprised. and what's also interesting is that the, there is nobody coming forth, demanding charges, or collections. what do you have to say, mrs. clinton? what do you?

nothing. it's just business as usual. what are you going to do? good job, mr. durham. thank you very much. well, that, that's done. let's move on here. yes, b, i has a history of using unfounded allegations and its investigations and shy away from facing those trying to expose the bureaus failures. jane turner, a former f, b i agent, and what's the blower was fired for bringing such failure? so like the f b i later retaliated against her with false allegations. jane discusses how us special services punishes those who dare to shed light on the government's wrong doings. in a new episode of the whistle, blowers you can watch a full episode throughout the day in the meantime. here's a quick preview. the whistle blowers are both persecuted and prosecute. i would certainly persecuted and went to trial. uh, the jury found that all those allegations that they launched against me that they

used in my performance report were not true. and government is relentless when they go after whistle blowers your career is over. i've never gotten anything in law enforcement sense of shame that you have the experience. they blackwall you, you're marginalized, it's, it's, it's tough to be a whistle blower. there are a former c, i, a officers spread all over corporate america, usually in security. but oftentimes, also in policy, this is especially prevalent in tech and in defense contractors. but now thanks to the twitter files, we see that former c. busy and former f b i, officers and officials were active in social media companies too. and we see that they had influence over a corporate policy. is this more common then americans realize or is this an outlier? and is it ever appropriate? i think john, that is more common than the public realizes and that's again,

i'm going to say that's why whistle blowers are so important. is to bring these situations to light. it should not be happening via the i sometimes gets involved in situations that they should not be involved in. mm hm. and that's so blower. so important is to bring transparency to our government. no matter if it's the f, b i the c i a n s, a whistle, blowers are critical to bring these actions either mouth seasons or corruption or misconduct to light. 2 this china has criticized former u. k. prime minister lives for us is visit to taiwan as a political done that will do the u. k. no good. british politician list trust the recent visit to type on is a dangerous political show, which will do nothing but home to the u. k. this provoked if the move has cost strong indignation among the chinese people. the chinese embassy strong words come

as truss called on british prime minister richie soon enough to label china a threat to the country. as she made a reported personal informal visit to the island before trus, a stint as prime minister which lasted just $49.00 days. she made headlines, as for in secretary, for claiming russia had no authority over its own regions during a trip met to de escalate pensions between cab and moscow before the war. i believe let's cross live to ross, find gold, asia political risk analyst. welcome ross. so how would you assess the former british prime minister's comments made during her informal trip to taiwan in a short term, which is basically the new cycle that we're, we're speaking about right now. it will get some international head lice, medium or long term. no, it's really good to remember that she's but one member of

a 100 rates in the u. k. parliament. she's not currently a government administer. so even though china is subtracting or we have to keep in mind again, she's not a government minister and uh, at the moment at least she doesn't really have much influence over you case foreign or defense policies. well, i missed a parent and from a visit. let's trust, also commented on nato expansion to the asia pacific. how will need his nero's presence affect regional stability in the region? that's been a hot topic over the last few years. will there be asian version of nato, or will nato countries have a greater military presence in this region? i mean, obviously the united states has a significant military presence, but a lot of the western european countries update periodically might have um, uh, or participate, enjoyed naval exercises or air exercises. we military's in this part of the world,

but the reality is whether it's the u. k. france or germany. the either for budgetary reasons, we're just because of popular opinion. it doesn't seem like they're really interested in it and a substantial, ongoing military presence here. and that's something that i think governments in this part of the world are aware of, even though we see a lot of talk from united states or the europe about your or the european countries, nato members about this. but again, the read, the reality is, and i think governments in this part of the world, including here in taiwan, notice i, they probably shouldn't assume that western european countries are going to have a significant military presence when the indo pacific. is there any other response that you think we could expect from beijing aside from what we just heard that? well, i think the china is increasingly concerned about number of members of parliament from different countries, whether that's in eastern europe, central western europe,

o, australia, japan, and the united states or canada, the members of what parliament are legislators. here are the case of the united states as united states congress who are coming here and some of the european countries have, have allowed deputy ministers some more junior level ministers to visit taiwan. and obviously that's a concern from china and drive is going to continue to oppose that even though again, they know that the very often the members of a parliament have no influence over government policy. but, but it's clearly trying is concerned about the pace of these visits, the frequency with which day a car. and some of them are high profile and routing. again, a former prime minister notwithstanding. she was only prime minister for 49 days in china, doesn't like to see that level of engagement between taiwan and other countries. so china will continue to object and maybe they'll take some kind of trade retaliation if not other types of diplomatic retaliation as well. you just mentioned the slew

of politicians from the west that have been going to tie one. former us national security advisor john bolton also recently visited. do you think that this is an ongoing trend that will continue from the west? the reality is that this is, has gone for, for many, many decades. so members of parliaments, warmer or government officials here, john bold, be a good example. somebody who's not in government right now. you did have a high level position in the previous administration of, of uh, president trump. uh, that is just not unusual. uh, but when we put it in the context of ongoing tensions between us and try to wear between china and taiwan, then it becomes a lot more sensitive for china and china is going to object to. but again, it's not unusual. and i think as we get closer to taiwan selection next january, the 2nd half of 2023, we probably will see many more these kinds of high level high profile. 2 western politicians visiting tar want, and we're going to see objections from china. so i would say a watch the space for

a lot more attention to call something to monitor ross, find gold, asia, political risk analysts. thank you. thank you. and that's her up on the, our coming up nato's approach to ukraine seems full of contradictions. one of them being the alliances claim. they're not part of the conflict for having supported cab militarily since 2014 dive into the discussion next on cross ok. they close, my colleague union o'neill will be taking over at the top of the hour the the,

the. ringback of course has changed. there were some disappears. i'm name is of the 1st i'm assuming we are, which is obviously due to the room and i'm going to do on the 8th and bridget national jump and so forth by producing these tips to my place. i have to split the crop this morning

. the boys, the easy to buy new lands and the hello and welcome to cross software. all things are considered. i'm peter live out . nature is approach towards you. credit is full of contradictions. we are told a win for russia is a defeat for the west, but ukraine is not a member of the military alliance. we're told nato is not part of the complex, but it is been supporting kevin with hurley since 2014 nato says a one.