did my son sinister? so we both have significant capacities. we have good cooperation regarding all things clause. and if we join our hands and support one another, we can neutralize the sanctions. another side of the oil embargo, so they want is the absence off for a tech providers from a rosalind projects. this is where to volunteer for the remote on his chinese and russian for us to invest in the sector. our main business is uh, just as you see, a us approaching sound this or a yukon oxygen pounds. we mean we can produce, produce called the box crowd, genic tanks, and so on. and so far we have more than about $26.00. so 2, you produce the ross and the we had very good corporation was our cons. we're glad to see if you run companies here and we think that these excuse me, is a great opportunity for us to have more meetings for having you agreements.

if we want to have some agreements we, we will find ways to have this sync agreements. the sanctions have also prompted to have on some surface focused oil firms to wrap up production experts here say more than 85 percent of the country's portfolio and supply 65 minutes before we decided to produce drilling beats domestically. we had to import for him, beats this issue in both staggering expenses, no country. so the sanctions force us to rely on our expertise and start producing erosion in pbc fits. this is the case for other sectors of fire countries for industry as well. since there was charges 1st, oil reserve back in 19 o words, it has capitalized from wind gold as the main driving force of its economy. now is the west continues to turn the heat to all positive on the one in government, scrambles to keep this for egypt sector, flux. now organizers believe this sex all from us. the one with the road maps to

achieving this goal. usability are 2 to one. next we had to, the modus operandi issue is where i'm going to let you on this funding by for another risk down of the big global issues affecting our lives under pockets. today try that. the what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy foundation, let it be an arms race is on authenticity, very dramatic. the only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very political time. time to sit down and talk

the hello. i'm the know a chan you are tuned into modus operandi. us president joe biden is facing a crisis along the southern border with mexico as 2022 tops the record for the highest level of illegal border crossings in the us history. many saying he's more concerned with foreign borders then his own. this week will examine the international hip hop receipt of america as border bias. all right, let's get into the m. o. the 2022 was a record breaking year along the us border with mexico, with migrants flooding into the us, 5 of thousands daily domestic outrage as texas governor and greg abbott, a re, with abided administrations handling of the influx began busing migrants out of his

state several times even dropping them off directly at the door step of vice president campbell harris, who was tasked with being the so called borders are. meanwhile, internationally, the us government is being called out for it's hypocrisy of picking and choosing when to respect the sovereignty of other countries and their borders when it comes to bringing war to foreign lands. now to discuss the domestic issues being faced by the, by the administration, specifically the issue of title 40 to the trump era. so all remain in mexico policy is us immigration attorney, susan? hi, susan, thanks for joining us. for susan, can you explain for our international audience what exactly title 42 is and why it's a topic of contention here in the us. so title $42.00 is actually a public health measure that prevents migrants or actually anybody from entering

the united states in order to prevent cologne, a virus infection and spread and it was set forth by the department of health. and recently, the department of health has stated that total $42.00 is no longer applicable in, in the atoms current atmosphere of testing and treatment. and so a, a, d. c court actually declared title 42 to keep migrant out of the united states and being expelled from our southern border, illegal in november. but the supreme court of the united states has stopped that seized order of district court. so the supreme court has intervened and will later hear a case as to why title 42 should end or not. and so title 42 has been used to expel 2000000 migrants. and since its inception,

and so where international law and our own law says that p ok present at a port of entry, which includes obviously the southern border and make a claim of asylum. and then be admitted to the united states while there asylum case is pending. so title $42.00 actually removes the rights for them to claim asylum at the border. and so there's no way for those people to get admitted to the united states. and like i said, it's, they thus far expelled 2000000 migrants under title 42. now some of those maybe repeat crossers and it's estimated about 30 percent are, but nonetheless, numbers about 2000000 and without passing judgment on whether title 42 is good or bad policy, can you tell us the impact it's had on the flow of migration into the us, so title 42 definitely has worked to you serve the asylum claim

process at the southern border because as i said, they have expelled 2000000 migrants from the border without hearing their asylum plane since title $42.00 started in the united states. however, its impact on overall numbers is actually negligible. those numbers have actually increased. so for example, in 2020 we had uh lets see $50000.00 about $50000.00 encounters at the southern border per month. in 20212022. that number has increased 220250000 per month at the southern border. so as you can see, the impact of title 42 has not been to slow down migration attempts at the southern border. actually, those numbers have increased. the i'm documented, population in the united states has remained largely the same between about

10.5 to a 1000000 people on authorized in the united states since 2005 before that in the year 2000. it was 8 and a half 1000000 on authorized documents in the united states. so what people don't understand, and what we often hear in the media is that these are illegal immigrants coming into the united states. that's not the case because we have international law and also our own life, which allows people to make asylum claims at the border once they let into the united states, pending their asylum case. they are authorized and documented as aliens. so the on authorized or on documented alien number has not increased in quite a while. but the number of authorized or documented individuals, you know, for waiting on an asylum trial to occur, like in 5 years, 6 years or 8 years after they 1st cross the border. that number is greatly

increasing. so like i said, the number of such encounters in 2020 was about $50000.00 per month. and now that number is about $250000.00 per month. so that's about $4.00 to $5.00 times higher than it was in 2020. and so the, the impact is really felt with the number of immigration cases that are backlog. so the backlog in cases is, let's see we, we have a currently, a 2000000 immigration case backlog for 600 immigration judges. and just to give you an example about 700000 asylum keeps this have been decided by immigration judges. since the year 2000 in fiscal year 2023, which has just begun the asylum tooth backlog for just this partial year alone is already 800000. and then to give you another example in 2012,

the asylum case backlog was 100000. and again, like i said, the, so the case backlog now with immigration port is 2000000 for about 600 judges. and that number is exponentially increase, increasing as each month goes on. susan pie immigration attorney and immigration law expert. thank you so much for joining and explaining coming up next accusations that the us and nato invented new borders to create kosovo. and why the u. s. has no moral authority on sovereignty, we'll discuss it when we return said type m o will be right back the time acceptance. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new

show seriously. why watch something that's so different. listed of opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to planes are due to have the state department c, i a weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your facts for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't marshall stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called direction. but again, you probably don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you the the,

the welcome back to the m. o i manila chant, the us often criticizes other countries for warring with its neighbors telling others to respect the neighbors sovereign borders. but looking back in america's modern history, the secret war allows the us led nato carving up serv, serbia to create cost of all. or most recently, the us bombing and conflict in syria complete with american boots on the ground. is the us really then in a position to slam others who have valid border concerns? daniel mcc. adams is the executive director of the ron paul institute and spent a years working in the senate and the state department. he's joining us now to examine the policy of hypocrisy. daniel,

thanks for being with us. so we know in the waning days of 2022, a federal judge rule to keep the title 42 that remain in mexico policy that it should stay in place. this trump era doctor and effectively use the cobit pandemic as the basis for enactment to help stem the flow of illegal migration here. interview, as of the southern border, invited administration for their part have done very little one way or the other on title 42 or immigration policy more broadly. but what biden has done only recently adding a clause to $242.00, stating that anyone from us cuba, haiti, or, and you cut off was crossing illegally on the land border would be an automatic return fighter. and also began erecting margaret camp facilities across southern texas. where you are, how do you read this administration stance on legal migration? it's been a difficult couple of years for them because they really haven't done very much on it. of course everything that trump did is automatically bad. so, you know,

obviously the title 42 was not something they were interested until january in fact . and that's when that's when the button and mistress and started to move on title $42.00 and started to try to strengthen it and add additional countries that's eligible to be the port and upon illegal arrival to the us. the question of why they hadn't done anything. well, obviously they have some constituencies or the left wing of the party certainly is very much in favor of open immigration. are they view it as good for voters? and it may work very well. be true that that's the case. so they have a lot of different special interest that they have to deal with. but they also have the use of the american people. now there was a, a, uh, it says pull, i think back in august of this past year that found that a large majority, well over 50 percent of americans view what's happening on the border as quote and invasion until you're seeing a real shift in people view and i think it was in the low to mid fourties of democrat voters who agreed with it was an n p r. it's us, paul,

who agreed with the idea that this was an invasion. so you have a balancing of political, competing political views. and i think that might have had something to do with a shift that happened in january with the by the administration on the polling. but you have, i think we had something like 2400000 people in 2022, arrested for legally crossing the board. and that's a significant number of people, particularly when you add in those that were not arrested or not caught, which is probably many times more of that. so you do see of a massive influx. and i would just, i would just say one thing though of the was sort of wrinkling this whole thing now is that it takes on, in my view, a national security component. having people coming over and you don't know who they are, where they're coming from, or what business they have here, because you have literally billions and billions of dollars and weapons that united states and it's nato allies have sent to ukraine with 0 accounting. and we've already heard from finland, we've already heard for some african countries that these weapons are starting to

show up in these countries. so you're going to face and increasing danger in the open you west border of someone crossing over with god knows what a rocket launcher a. take it though. who knows what, but a most seriously. it is a real issue. so there really will be a need for national security reasons to get a handle on the border. and biden has been accused of being more concerned with foreign boarders than america's own. what of that accusation that the us government in general, no matter who's in the oval office, but they always seem more concerned with protecting democracy over there and right now over there. in this case, as ukraine is biting more concerned with ukraine's borders, then our own, you know, since the u. s. is jumping north of a $100000000000.00 into ukraine as well. i would say, yes, i mean, it is a border issue. and then when we have referred to it that way, that, you know, we're concerned with the borders of other countries, more than our own. but of course, as we know it's, it's bigger than

a border issue. it's a proxy war with russia that the body administration is undertaking, and i would just, you know, look back, if you look at the bush administration, it was a war and tear. and that was basically the premise was if we invade iraq, democracy will break out. like a plague of goodness across the middle east. everyone will be happy and density on the streets. and then obama came and said, we're going to re make the middle east and they invested the spring as a way to re make the middle east. and of course, like all neal con plans to re make the world, they both ended an abject failure. and along comes vitamin with a lot of, uh, obama retracts and he says, hold my beer. i'm going to have the regime change in russia. you know, forget about this middle east stuff. so i think that's exactly what we're seeing now. there hasn't been a lot of emphasis placed on the us borders for a number of reasons, but certainly the borders of ukraine, or what was ukraine speaking of crimea, and the eastern provinces that are now legally part of russia,

according to russian constitution. are those are border issue, but again, i would say it's law as part of a larger us and nato regime change operation targeting russia than anything else. a permanent washington, i like to call them that be elected bureaucrats. they seem to cherry pick one to respect or observe borders or the sovereignty of nations. take the years of illegal us bombing in syria. as one example, no more between syria and the u. s. has been declared. congress did not approve any war with syria. how does permanent washington then arrive at winder respect, borders and when not to as well? there is a powerful lobby in washington called the military industrial complex and it gets terrified when there's a prospect. a piece breaking out. of course, when we saw the end of the cold war, there was a prospect of a peace dividend, and they began to ramp up the war on terror. and other things. and of course, were right after we got out of afghanistan,

and there was the possibility of us stopping a flushing all of that money down the toilet. we spent for 20 years. well that's when we started getting up ukraine. so the deep state, the permanent state in washington dc, the life blood, the literal blood that runs through their veins, is wor, money, and it makes everything flowing, washington from the media to the think tanks to everything. so that is exactly what makes, what makes it, what makes it flow. but, you know, what with regard to the middle east, you know, the us, it has powerful allies and powerful forces there that have sucked the us into wars that really have nothing to do with our own security amar alliance with the saudis, which is now going south our alliance with these rarely is it seems to be going slightly south, of course, and our lines with 30 all 3 of those signed on to regime change in syria, and were promised all sorts of goodies and things that they wanted. because of it. and of course, again, as i say, as with all of these plans, it didn't work out,

it works out terrible turns into a disaster. and even the turks have finally realized this at the end of last year and the beginning of this year, as your viewers no doubt, no. there have been some high level meetings between a turkish and syrian leaders when they even see a meeting between us on an arrow on coming this year. the turks have apparently agreed to pull all of their forces out of syria and both assad and are the one focusing on what they view as the curtis threat. the kurds being americans only allies in syria. so it leaves a very interesting dynamics there that's happening. but these are the special interest to pull us in, and then when things go south, they just move on to another to another conflict. there's also the curious case of kosovo. b, u. s. lead nato effectively decided to create a brand new country. they drew up brand new boarders around the clinton and early g

. w. bush era. isn't really that easy to just create new countries and new borders? i mean, what's that process supposed to actually look like? and what was that saying from the bush official where he said, we create realities? you know, that's, that's the mentality of the neo cons. but you know, the yugoslavia project was it was an ongoing project and certainly thought come to fruition under president clinton, who was a pretty equal president and a pretty equal guy and surrounded themselves with these evil people. but the idea was to break up. you still have you, that's what they want to do. that's why they ramped up nationalism. they got they had to sick of corrupt, again, serb against bosnian, muslim. and they did a pretty good job of doing that. and i think one of the reasons was 1st, they want to break off croatia, which was most eager to join a new europe. and i think that was the 1st thing. and once that happened, i think the idea was to destabilize and over throw in permanently de thing,

any of the former yugoslav, territories, that would historically be pro russian. i think the, the cold war never ended for these people. the goal has always been to overthrow moscow and i think this has something to do with it. even if we had our own puppet in power at the time in the kremlin so. so that's why you see now i served a serbia which had under which i suffered a crew in the year 2000 and the end of any kind of nationalism or pro russian sentiment. and what you have in serbia now is very, very weak and controlled leadership. and it has been for the past, you know, 25 or 30 years. the same is true is montenegro, which had been historically a close to serbia and to russia. that is also con, you know, completely in the camp of the us and nato. i think we're seeing a shift and this is something that really is not appropriate for our show. but what we're seeing is shifting these alliances. but i think essentially that's what the case was. your idea was the break up yugoslavia and the idea of picking up all the pieces and bringing them into are the constellation of stars a. yeah,

excellent point about how the cold war never really ended. now, how would you compare kosovo to crimea? now in the latter, they actually held a referendum boat to secede from ukraine and rejoined the russian federation. but the us and the west did not accept that vote. can you compare and contrast for us? well, as you well, no manila, the only votes account are the ones that go washington's way. and i would add brussels to because if you remember, every major you agreement where the country is about the wrong way, they've had to redo them. that in pulling was victim of that a couple of times in denmark, what have you. so, you know, it's only counts if you vote our way and you, your viewers will probably remember. and i'm going to paraphrase the essence of what she said that hillary clinton said when she was secretary state. sure, we need to vote in the palestinian territories, but we need to find out how they're going to vote. first, need to find out who they're going to elect 1st, and that's the case in, in uh,

in cost of them crimea, are there really isn't much of a comparison? because as you said, there was a referendum and you know, there's a claim that this was a force referendum that people are forced with, with guns to their head, to vote for russia. none of the statistics know nothing that we know about crimea would, would, would bear that out. and of course, if there was violent use, we would have seen that there's no question about it. these are people that have been russian or pro russian for the longest time, and we know how long the crimea was part of russia. so it's kind of an apples and oranges in a way other than the fact that there was a vote in comfortable there wasn't a vote. there was a decision made by the us and if you allies, but of course, the majority of countries in the world don't recognize costs as low as an independent state. now last many would say the us is in the business of destroying countries to the nation build in its own image. is that a fair criticism or fair judgment? so there's a, there's a dangerous totalitarian impulse in, in liberal,

liberal global is thinking right now. and you can trace it back a quite a bit, a book that really influenced my thinking on this is rashad the good. so he's a polish intellectual who wrote a book called the demon and democracy, totalitarian temptations and free societies. and this, the idea that there is only one final way we are at the end of history. are you have to do with this global as liberal way this neil, a liberal world order is the only world order. we set the rules, the international uh, the, the rules of international were, are hours to set and nothing else is acceptable. and that's a recipe for disaster. it's a recipe for war. and it's the recipe for the eventual war that happen between, of course, ukraine in russia. it's the, it's the essence of our flight with iran because iran chooses to have a different kind of society than we have. so there's this to tell terry impulse,

among the us and in his followers in the west and nato, that there is only one international rules based order. we make the rules, we make the order, and if you don't follow it regardless of your history, regardless of the evolution of your society, regardless of your religion or lack of religion, if you deviate, you wouldn't either submit or you will be invaded. and there are many intellectuals that have recognize this alexander, duke and russia, for example, has been very interesting in, in flushing this out. but it's a dangerous impulse. i think it's certainly it's doomed. like all to tell terry and impulses is doomed to failure. but between point a and point z, unfortunately, there's going to be a lot of bloodshed in missouri. alright, i actually live one more, one more as a follow up, based on what you've just described for us, for as much as the us likes to fashion itself as a beacon of democracy. it's starting to sound more or like the us as an empire. so is the us, the democracy, is it a republic or is it an empire?

well, we're an empire. democracy in itself is not very good. it's, you know, it's to, was to, was in the she funding or voting on his for dinner, as the saying goes. so in itself it's not, but we don't, you mean we, we preach the taught we, we preach the gospel democracy and of course, everyone, the us a neal cons the us washington of foreign policy establishment endorses overseas is the opposite of democracy. we were our great tomorrow, democratic ally and ukraine, shut down all media. that's not state media. close down or political parties did not agree with. you shut down the church even. and this is our great democratic ally. our wonderful allies in the middle east include outside of and then israel with a very sketchy human rights record. let's be honest about that. so we do tend to endorse and support the worst of the worst, as long as they do our bidding in washington. and what really is needed as a change in radical change in foreign policy. that's why it's the wrong policy that

we support a non interventionist one policy, because we simply aren't smart enough to pick or choose what, how other people should live. we don't have the knowledge and it will be in more detail that the people how to live. in any case, daniel make, adams, i gotta leave it right there. thank you so much for that insight for that is going to do it for this week's episode of modus operandi the show that dig deep into foreign policy. i'm your host window a chance. thanks for tuning in. we'll see you again next week to figure out the m. o, the the, the

take a fresh look around is a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real live indians. fixtures, design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just as a chosen for you. fractured images, presented as fast. can you see through their illusion going underground?

can the explosions are reported in major ukrainian cities. us error rates are installing the across the country throughout the nights us into the early morning. also this our large chinese army. we will take all necessary measures to dispatch separatism in any form and external interference and resolutely safeco trying those national sovereignty, beijing phase. it will take all measures necessary to protect the one china policy admin, washington, shipments of weapons on a 4 story house home to over 50. people says 2 of them children, they became homeless in the blink of an i went to find shelter where to sleep. the families here and i'll have many questions are to.