the people attending the conference from over 85 different states. so it's a fantastic opportunity for decision makers on innovators to come together and work in the context of russia, reaching out and warming relations with it's a is allow, make friends and associates across the globe. the russian representative to the organization of islamic cooperation was among the guests before him. he believes rusher on this, on a country, so united on the basis of come on the valley. where is we're from the mirror. we on the mostly well to close to each other on spiritual moral and family issues. although both the most, the world and russia were on the very strict influence and control of the united states and europe, we managed to preserve some morality. now there was a de human nice ation of society and lack of it, spirituality and morality is spreading, wanted the west and will do on the basis of capitalism. a rationalized everything including evil hatred and lies from the west and the rationalized point of view. if

a light makes a profit, then it's fine, it's able bring success, been fine too. but it's not the way things are supposed to be involved. well, the main contradiction is not between the socialism and capitalism and the future. it will be between culture and ignorance, between spirituality and it's the lack of and this stage is already coming by just about wrapping up the program here on the oxy international. thank you very much for sharing a time with us here in the russian capital. you can catch up with all of us stories . be awesome, thought for more of course, the transfer of channels. but we have the pull up shelves is not that bright and he isn't even worse. german chancellor, though he is self aware enough to understand and acknowledge some nations the

double standards on russian, peo, colonial thinking. it would seem dice hard the or the, the hello, i'm the know a chan. you are tuned into modus operandi. us president joe biden is facing a crisis along the southern border with mexico as 2022 tops the record for the highest level of illegal border crossings in us history. many saying he's more

concerned with foreign borders then his own. this week will examine the international hip hop or states of america as border bias. all right, let's get into the m o. the 2022 was a record breaking year along the us border with mexico, with migrants flooding into the us, 5 of thousands daily domestic outrage as texas governor and greg abbott, a re, with abided administrations handling of the influx began busing migrants out of his state several times even dropping them off directly at the door step of vice president pamela harris, who was tasked with being the so called borders are. meanwhile, internationally, the us government is being called out for it's hypocrisy of picking and choosing when to respect the sovereignty of other countries and their borders when it comes

to bringing war to foreign lands. now to discuss the domestic issues being faced by the, by an administration, specifically the issue of title 40 to the trump era, so called remain in mexico policy. is us immigration attorney, susan? hi, susan, thanks for joining us. for susan, can you explain for our international audience what exactly title 42 is and why it's a topic of contention here in the us. so title $42.00 is actually a public health measure that prevents migrants or actually anybody from entering the united states in order to prevent cologne, a virus infection and spread and it was set forth by the department of health. and recently, the department of health has stated that total $42.00 is no longer applicable in,

in the atoms current atmosphere of testing and treatment. and so a d. c court actually declared title 42 to keep migrant out of the united states and being expelled from our southern border, illegal in november. but the supreme court of the united states has stopped that seized order of district court. so the supreme court has intervened and will later hear a case as to why title 42 should end or not. and so title 42 has been used to expel 2000000 migrants. and since its inception, and so where international law and our own law says that p, okay, present at a port of entry, which includes obviously the southern border and make a claim of asylum. and then be admitted to the united states. wilder asylum

case is pending. so title $42.00 actually removes the rights for them to claim asylum at the border. and so there's no way for those people to get admitted to the united states. and like i said, it's, they thus far expelled 2000000 migrants under title 42. now some of those maybe repeat crossers and it's estimated about 30 percent are, but nonetheless, numbers about 2000000 and without passing judgment on whether title 42 is good or bad policy, can you tell us the impact it's had on the flow of migration into the us, so title 42 definitely has worked to use circuit the asylum claim process at the southern border because as i said, they have expelled 2000000 migrants from the border without hearing their asylum plane since title $42.00 started in the united states. however, its impact on overall numbers is actually negligible. those numbers have actually

increased. so for example, in 2020 we had uh, lets see $50000.00 about $50000.00 encounters at the southern border per month in 2021 in 2022. that number has increased 220250008 per month at the southern border. so as you can see, the impact of title 42 has not been to slow down migration attempts at the southern border. actually, those numbers have increased. the undocumented population in the united states has remained largely the same between about 10.5 to a 1000000 people on authorized in the united states since 2005 before that in the year 2000. it was 8 and a half 1000000 on authorized documents. in the united states. so what people don't understand and what we offer here in the media is that these are illegal immigrants

coming into the united states. that's not the case because we have international law and also our own life, which allows people to make asylum claims at the border once the into the united states pending their assign case. they are authorized and documented aliens. so the on authorized or, and documented alien number has not increased in quite a while. but the number of authorized or documented individuals, you know, for waiting on an asylum trial to occur, like in 5 years, 6 years or 8 years after they 1st cross the border. that number is greatly increasing. so like i said, the number of such encounters in 2020 was about $50000.00 per month. and now that number is about $250000.00 per month. so that's about $4.00 to $5.00 times higher than it was in 2020. and so the,

the impact is really felt with the number of immigration cases that are backlog. so the backlog in cases is, let's see we, we have a currently, a 2000000 immigration case backlog for 600 immigration judges. and just to give you an example, about 700000 asylum cases have been decided by immigration judges. since the year 2000 in fiscal year 2023, which has just begun the asylum case backlog for just this partial year alone is already 800000. and then to give you another example in 2012, the asylum case backlog was 100000. and again, like i said, the, so the case backlog now the immigration port is 2000000 for about 600 judges. and that number is exponentially increase, increasing as each month goes on. susan high immigration attorney and immigration

law expert. thank you so much for joining and explaining i'm coming up next accusations that b. u was, and nato invented new borders to create kosovo. and why the u. s has no moral authority on sovereignty, we'll discuss it when we return, sit tight. m o will be right back. the the the,

the welcome back to the m. o i manila chant. the us often criticizes other countries for warring with its neighbors telling others to respect the neighbors southern borders. but looking back at america's modern history, the secret war allows the us led nato carving up serv, serbia, to create kosovo, or most recently, the us bombing and conflict in syria complete with american boots on the ground. is the us really then in a position to slam others who have valid border concerns? daniel mc adams is the executive director of the ron paul institute and spent a years working in the senate and the state department. he's joining us now to examine the policy of hypocrisy. daniel, thanks for being with us. so we know in the waning days of 2022, a federal judge rule to keep the title 42 that remain in mexico policy that it

should stay in place. this trump era doctor and effectively use the cobit pandemic as the basis for enactment to help stem the flow of illegal migration here. interview at the southern border, the bite administration for their part have done very little one way or the other on title 42 or immigration policy more broadly. but what bite and has done only recently adding a clause to $242.00, stating that anyone from cuba, haiti, or nicaragua, crossing illegally on the land border would be an automatic return bite. and also began erecting margaret camp facilities across southern texas, where you are, how do you read this administration stats on legal migration? it's been a difficult couple of years for them because they really haven't done very much on it. of course, everything that trump did is automatically bad. so you know, obviously the title 42 was not something they were interested until january in fact . and that's when that's when the button and mistress and started to move on title

$42.00 and started to try to strengthen it and add additional countries that's eligible to be deported upon the legal arrival to the us. the question of why they hadn't done anything. well, obviously they have some constituencies on the left wing of the party. certainly is very much in favor of open immigration. are they view it as good for voters? and that may work very well. be true that that's the case. so they have a lot of different special interests that they have to deal with, but they also have the use of the american people. now there was a, a, uh, it says pull, i think back in august of this past year that found that a large majority, well over 50 percent of americans view what's happening on the border as quote, an invasion until you're seeing a real shift in people's views i think it was in the low to mid fourties of democratic voters who agreed with it was an n p r. it's us, paul, who agreed with the idea that this was an invasion. so you have a balancing of political,

competing political views. and i think that might have had something to do with a shift that happened in january with the by the administration on the polling. but you have, well, i think we had something like 2400000 people in 2022, arrested for legally crossing the board. and that's a significant number of people, particularly when you add in those that were not arrested or not taught, which is probably many times more of that. so you do see of a massive influx and that i would just, i would just say one thing vanilla. the one sort of wrinkle in this whole thing now is that it takes on, in my view, a national security component. having people coming over and you don't know who they are, where they're coming from, or what business they have here because you have a, literally billions and billions of dollars in weapons. the united states and it's nato allies have sent to ukraine with 0 accounting. and we've already heard from finland, we've already heard for some african countries. these weapons are starting to show up in these countries. so you're going to face in increasing danger in the open you

west border of someone crossing over with god knows what a rocket launcher a. take it though. who knows what, but most seriously, it is a real issue. so there really will be a need for national security reasons to get a handle on the border. and biden has been accused of being more concerned with foreign boarders than america's own. what of that accusation that the us government in general, no matter who's in the oval office, but they always seem more concerned with protecting democracy over there. and right now, over there, in this case is ukraine is biting more concerned with ukraine's borders. then our own, you know, since the us is dumping north of a $100000000000.00 into ukraine as well, i would say, yes, i mean, it is a border issue. and then when we have referred to it that way, that, you know, we're concerned with the importance of other countries more than our own. but of course, as we know it's, it's bigger than a border issue. it's a proxy war with russia that the body administration is undertaking,

and i would just, you know, look back, if you look at the bush administration, it was a war and tear. and that was basically the premise was if we invade iraq, democracy will break out. like a plague of goodness across the middle east, everyone will be happy and death to be on the streets. and then obama came and said, we're going to re make the middle east and they invested the air of spring as a way to re make the middle east. and of course, like all neal con plans to re make the world, they both ended an abject failure. and along comes biden with a lot of, uh, obama retracts and he says, hold my beer. i'm going to have the regime change in russia. you know, forget about this middle east stuff. so i think that's exactly what we're seeing now. there hasn't been a lot of emphasis placed on the us borders for a number of reasons, but certainly the borders of ukraine, or what was ukraine speaking of crimea, and the eastern provinces that are now legally part of russia, according to russian constitution. are those are border issue, but again,

i would say it's law as part of a larger us and nato regime change operation targeting russia than anything else. a permanent washington, i like to call them that be elected bureaucrats. they seem to cherry pick when to respect or observe borders or the sovereignty of nations. take the years of illegal us bombing in syria, as one example. no war between syria and the u. s. has been declared. congress did not approve any war with syria. how does permanent washington then arrive at window respect, borders and when not to as well, there's a powerful lobby in washington called the military industrial complex, and it gets terrified when there's a prospect. a peace breaking out. of course, when we saw the end of the cold war, there was a prospect of a peace dividend, and they began to ramp up the war on terror and other things. and of course, we're right after we got out of afghanistan, and there was the possibility of us stopping a flushing all of that money down the toilet. we spent for 20 years. well,

that's when we started getting up ukraine. so the deep state, the permanent state in washington dc, the life blood, the literal blood that runs through their veins, is wor, money, and it makes everything flow in washington from the media to the think tanks to everything. so that is exactly what makes, what makes it, what makes it flow. but, you know, what with regard to the middle east, you know, the us has powerful allies and powerful forces there that have sucked the us into wars that really have nothing to do with our own security amar alliance with the saudis, which is now going south, are alliance with these rarely, that seems to be going slightly south, of course, in our lives with turkey, all 3 of those signed on to regime change in syria and were promised all sorts of goodies and things that they wanted because of it. and of course, again, as i say, as with all of these plans, it didn't work out, it works out terrible turns into a disaster. and even the turks have find the realize this at the end of last year

in the beginning of this year, as your viewers no doubt, no. there have been some high level meetings between a turkish and syrian leaders when they even see a meeting between us on an arrow on coming this year. the turks have apparently agreed to pull all of their forces out of syria and both assad and are the one focusing on what they view as the curtis threat, the kurds being america's own, the allies in syria. so at least the very interesting dynamics there, that's happening, but these are the special interest of poor it's in and then when things go south, they just move on to another. to another conflict. there's also the curious case of kosovo. the u. s. lead nato effectively decided to create a brand new country. they drew up brand new boarders around the clinton and early g . w. bush era. isn't really that easy to just create new countries and new borders?

i mean, what's that process supposed to actually look like? and what was that saying from the bush official where he said, we create realities? you know, that's, that's the mentality of the neo cons. but you know, the yugoslavia project was it was an ongoing project and certainly thought come to fruition under president clinton, who was a pretty equal president and a pretty equal guy and surrounded themselves with these evil people. but the idea was to break up people's lobby. that's what they want us to do. that's why they ramped up nationalism. they got they had to sick of corrupt, again served against bosnian muslim. and they did a pretty good job of doing that. and i think one of the reasons was 1st, they want to break off croatia, which was most eager to join a new europe. and i think that was the 1st thing. and once that happened, i think the idea was to destabilize and over throw in permanently de thing, any of the former yugoslav, territories, that would historically be pro russian. i think the,

the cold war never ended for these people. the goal has always been to overthrow moscow and i think this has something to do with it. even if we had our own puppet in power at the time in the kremlin so. so that's why you see now i served a serbia which had under which i suffered a crew in the year 2000 and the end of any kind of nationalism or pro russian sentiment. and what you have in serbia now is very, very weak and controlled leadership. and it has been for the past, you know, 25 or 30 years the same as to his montenegro, which had been historically a close to serbia and to russia. that is also con, you know, completely in the camp of the us and nato. i think we're seeing a shift and this is something that really is not appropriate for our show. but what we're seeing is shifting these alliances. but i think essentially that's what the case was. your idea was the break up yugoslavia and the idea of picking up all the pieces and bringing them into are the constellation of stars a. yeah, excellent point about how the cold war never really ended. now,

how would you compare kosovo to crimea? now in the latter, they actually held a referendum boat to secede from ukraine and rejoined the russian federation. but the us and the west did not accept that vote. can you compare and contrast for us? well, as you well, no manila, the only votes account are the ones that go washington's way. and i would add brussels to because if you remember, every major you agreement where the country is about the wrong way, they've had to redo them that in poland was victim of that a couple of times in denmark, what have you. so, you know, it's only counts if you vote our way your viewers will probably remember and i'm going to paraphrase the essence of what she said that hillary clinton said when she was secretary state. sure, we need to vote in the palestinian territories, but we need to find out how they're going to vote. first. need to find out who they're going to elect 1st. and that's the case in, in uh, in cost of them crimea, are there really isn't much of a comparison because as you said, there was

a referendum and you know, there was a claim that this was a force referendum that people were forced with, with guns to their head to vote for russia. none of the statistics know nothing that we know about crimea would, would, would bear that out. and of course, if there was violent use, we would have seen that there's no question about it. these are people that have been russian or pro russian for the longest time, and we know how long the crimea was part of russia. so it's kind of an apples and oranges in a way other than the fact that there was a vote in comfortable there wasn't a vote. there was a decision made by the us and if you allies, but of course, the majority of countries in the world don't recognize costs as low as an independent state. now last many would say the us is in the business of destroying countries to the nation build in its own image. is that a fair criticism or fair judgment? and there's a, there's a dangerous totalitarian impulse in, in liberal, liberal global is thinking right now. and you can trace it back a quite a bit,

a book that really influenced my thinking on this is rashad the good. so he's a polish intellectual who wrote a book called the demon and democracy to tell terry and temptations and free societies. and this, the idea that there is only one final way we are at the end of history. are you have to do it this global liberal way this neil, a liberal world order is the only world order. we set the rules, the international uh, the, the rules of international were, are hours to set and nothing else is acceptable. and that's a recipe for disaster. it's a recipe for war. and it's the recipe for the eventual war that happen between, of course, ukraine in russia. it's the, it's the essence of our flight with iran because you're on a choose, has to have a different kind of society than we have. so there's this to tell terry impulse, among the us and in his followers in the west and nato,

that there is only one international rules based order. we make the rules, we make the order, and if you don't follow it regardless of your history, regardless of the evolution of your society, regardless of your religion or lack of religion, if you deviate, you wouldn't either submit or you will be invaded. and there are many intellectuals that have recognize this alexander, duke and russia, for example, has been very interesting in, in flushing this out. but it's a dangerous impulse. i think it's certainly it's doomed. like all to tell terry and impulses is doomed to failure. but between point a and point z, unfortunately, there's going to be a lot of bloodshed in missouri. alright, i actually live one more, one more as a follow up, based on what you've just described for us, for as much as the us likes to fashion itself as a beacon of democracy. it's starting to sound more are like the us as an empire. so is the us of democracy. is it a republic or is it an empire? well, we're an empire. democracy in itself is not very good. it's, you know,

it's to, was to, was in the sheep funding or voting on who's for dinner as the saying goes. so in itself, it's not what we don't you mean we, we preach the taught we, we preach the gospel democracy and of course, everyone, the us a neal cons. the us washington of foreign policy establishment endorses overseas is the opposite of democracy. we were our great tomorrow, democratic ally and ukraine, shut down all media. that's not state media. close down. all political parties did not agree with. you shut down the church even. and this is our great democratic ally. our wonderful allies in the middle east include outside of and then israel with a very sketchy human rights record. let's be honest about that. so we do tend to endorse and support the worst of the worst, as long as they do our bidding in washington. and what really is needed as a change in radical change in foreign policy. that's why it's the wrong policy to be supported, non interventionist, one policy, because we simply aren't smart enough to pick or choose what,

how other people should live. we don't have the knowledge and it will be in more detail that the people how to live. in any case, daniel make, adams, i gotta leave it right there. thank you so much for that insight for that is going to do it for this weeks episode of modus operandi the show that dig deep into foreign policy. i'm your host middle a chance. thanks for tuning in. we'll see you again next week to figure out the m o the, the whole up shelves is not that bright. and he isn't even worse. and german chancellor, though he is self aware enough to understand and acknowledge some nations the double standards on russian peo, colonial thinking. it would seem to dice hard. the

english reason is munoz curtis. imagine if you speak russian, keep your voice down while house in about. so when i get up, if i chose for i suppose to don't put your human symbols on display especially on space reaching the guide. so you guys don't talk to strangers, the void noisy gatherings and was wondering what she didn't rely on. get them in the motor. she's eating your colleagues and perhaps also your friends think you're guilty because your russian let you know the boom. so what can i do? i'm that was mind stipulated. so i'd be glad to which is the team that does styles

is be a good fit, genetic of buying useful the exception to buy the specific story shortly concerning the our brains are fascinating. they control everything from our ability to function, to experience and emotion. in fact, your ability to understand what i'm saying to you right now comes down to the amazing functionality of your brain. and yet there is still so much that we don't understand about how our minds work. so what happens when things go wrong up here? well, to find out the answers we came here, is the speak with the john. here's one of the worlds for most of your surgeons utilizing state of the art technology and progressive techniques. the

little bit of goods out of the support at their action for the russian is given us . we now stand out us on the island of stability and peace. words of praise from you. god is a high level delegation is here with the russian capital that's of 6 nation group from africa is working on a possible please find the conflict in ukraine. ruptured laughter, south and west of the country use at the latest new and security council meeting for being accomplices and problem of the conflict by increasingly aman ukraine. also a head for the crossing. we're just ready for.