that makes the trays only run every 50 minutes with fear of people walking the streets, new york and san francisco usually full of people, were yearly empty. these also lead to less leader on the ground. here in washington, dc, again, we sell grass grow in areas, usually filled with foot traffic. it seemed almost is serious, turn, greener, national parts sun down to visitors. now while live sun bathing in the middle of the road, coming out and exploring areas they have never there to before due to mass crowds, many businesses are implementing work from home for manip lee. this leads to less need for building infrastructure to handle rice and commuters population, meaning less trees have to be torn down to widen roads. but as the world came out of locked down and began to return to work, traveling an hour every day live, so came back to pollution. now the u. n. is warning against the times to combat

climate change is a quote rep. if a closing window it seems were worse than we started. but even back in the heights of the pen demik, when the world was saw supposedly much healthier environmental lee, the u. n. was thing countries were not on track to meet the pirates agreements kind of schools. and we have to remember with all these ground slides also came mass layoffs with cancel loss routes. low income workers had no way to get to their jobs . restaurant workers, another customer service industries who cannot work from home, became dependent on governments and stimulus handouts have led to record inflation and i'm in pending recession. we're also now learning probably it was a lot. it isn't that badly as badly as we 1st believe that sees the work and governments are not raising findings. the virus came from a lab leak in will hon of the musk everyone was forced to where you started save.

they didn't even stop the spread. now icon for 5500 tons of plastic waste. as 1600000000 this possible mask answer. our ocean seems 20. 20 people have lost faith in their governments. a media for making them stay home and destroying the economy. i live so low a middle class families across that group. would people even trust scientists if they said a lot that will save the planet? so while i logged on may have helped mother earth for just a moment. i what cost do we pay? have to pay and what would be the price to do it again? i'm roxana solano. 436. we view back to you, scott. wow roxanne, i mean i still, i'm not holding up that i remember what those lock downs did just for our industry, much less others. but we knew that we could come back out if there were certain benchmarks, freeze with climate change. it's not like there would be those benchmarks that

would be permanent, as we've already seen. we're already back to where we were preparing demick standards, according to climate change activist. would you be willing to stay home again to save the planet scotty? i think it actually might hurt the plan. if i stay home, i have teenagers. they do roxanna for this story. joining me to shed light on this subject is currently matthews communications director at the american conservation coalition. thank you so much for joining me. carly. thanks for having me. sorry. so the united nations is a warning. the window to take action against climate change is quote, rapidly closing. now, the report details the possible risk of premature deaths across the globe due to climate change. what could cause a desk from climate change as you see it? great, so it's a good question. and i think that the biggest issue that we're dealing with here is kind of the idea of alarm is i'm ruling the conversation when we're talking about

climate change. and it's not helpful to tell people that they're going to die in 10 years. it's not helpful to tell them that we're out of time to take action. i think there are environmental effects that we should be careful of air quality, of course, and, you know, increase temperatures, extreme weather. these are serious concerns, but i don't think it really successful. i don't think it's rational to be telling people that climate change means they're going to die and there's nothing we can really do about it. yeah, fear is something that is used often, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's the most effective way of getting people to understand what is actually going on. so what do you say to those climate skeptics out there? and furthermore, why should the average citizen trust scientist on this one considering the past history from the past few years? all right, so i think that's a great point. i think that we've seen kind of a general increase of distrust of all institutions really across the board, whether they be political scientific, in fact, nature magazine, which is

a really up until recently, very respected scientific journal found that after it endorsed cube i'm in 2020 and people started to distrust it and they actually just trusted their scientific expertise because they weighed in on politics. so i think that we're seeing overall kind of a, a distrusted institution. but when i talked to climate skeptics and i talked to folks who uh, you know, art sure about, you know, whether or not climate change is happening or whether or not we should care. or frankly, i start with the idea that we all want clean air and clean water. we all want a healthy planet to live on. and we should be taking steps to make sure that we have that today, but also for future generations. and i think that that's really successful, kind of igniting this conservation eco, is talking about, you know, our shared experiences in nature. why or when it matters? i think that's a really good gateway, and then we can get into, you know, the more granular solutions to the carbon eyes. in order to the effects that we'll

see from climate change. when you're talking to those skeptic tractor and i have to ask this based on your last to answer, we're talking to those skeptics. do you see a difference from one political side, maybe more liberal versus conservative or even a just the older versus the younger generation? who do you feel like is, is most accepting that something needs to be done or most accepting that there are changes happening? sure. yeah, i think this is absolutely in each gap rather than a political gap and you'll see that young conservatives compared to young progresses. both have pretty high levels of um, you know, thinking climate change is real. what a to support politicians who think climate change is real. and so i really do think it's a generational gap rather than a part us than gap. although i will say that. and you know, as you survey of um get older older um blocks of builders and conservatives and they tend to be the more skeptical which i think is fair. i think we've seen, you know, climate activists be wrong. i think we can point back to you outdoor,

or you know, some of that kind of early, 21st century climate messaging that frankly just didn't come to pass. but i do think that coming back, this idea of, you know, wanting to steward our planet. i'm wanting it to be better for all generations. i think that that's something that really unites folks across ages across partisanship across yah, proceed then. well then you go to the extreme because we are here and these whispers about climate locked downs. we're that locked downs may have made the planet healthier during koby. but what is the reality of this happening now? you know, we've seen protests in hong kong when china tried to lock down for their 0 colored policy, and the road actually rally behind them. what are the chances people would be actually susceptible to accepting a lock down for the environment? yeah, it's a good question. i think we did see, you know, kind of an environmental rebound during the beginnings of kobe block downs. people were pointing to that and the rivers in venice and the official returns and they

looked cleaner. but i guess my question to that would be at what cost, right. and when we're talking about climate or environmental solutions, they should be good for people and good for the planet. and i don't think that a locked down is good for people. so when we're talking about, you know, combining, find that change or protecting our environment in general. i think we have to be realistic about the trade off and lockdown. sprinkler, you have to hire a trade off. i don't think it's worth it for humans. i don't think it's worth it for society. it just seems very dramatic considering the stage that we're in right now and where we're coming back from. you know, i want to get your take on this and cast stove debate that has just recently arrived at hot topic right now. in america, 40 percent of households do have a gas stove. other countries that ratio is even higher california past. there's no new construction. we'll have a guest of new york to save york to the same. how will people cook when the

electric company cuts their power due to high wind during the season? you know, i, i keep thinking about to the bottom ministration, attempting to push legislation banding. these gas stoves has caused an hour. i would love your take on the gas stove and, and if this is really once again, just like the lock down, is this really a dramatic step that would have that much of an impact on the environment and would be accepting by people to it's a great question, i think it's been really interesting how the buying it ministration has tried to kind of navigate this discourse because it 1st, you know, it was kind of a flood from an administration official saying that they might consider doing this . and then we were told, oh no, no, no, no, we're not doing that. yeah, that's crazy. that's just can serve this town, say, but to your point, there are states and localities who are being a new gas construction, basically meaning when you construct a new building, it wouldn't have the gas hook up that you'd need to put a gas stove in, in those residencies, so i think the, 1st of all, it's in effective climate policy,

right? a lot of people are pointing to a study where, you know, having a gas stove in your home. how does childhood asthma we're really dramatically decreases the quality of the air in your home? but frankly, it's just a really negligible difference if you have an electric stove or a gas to interestingly actually, um, it's more dangerous for air quality to come up with olive oil than to cook with a gas stove. again, both are really negligible effects on your health. so i think we're getting distracted with these like bands or top down solutions rather than just focusing on interviewing and, and letting the private sector take the lead on the climate solution, letting localities and really do what works best for them. and i think with the, the gas stove being, it's really just an example of government overreach that won't have that much of the fact. thank you so much. carley matthews, i'll stick around with us for the 2nd part of the show. because as governments are

placing more climate manage on companies, we see if there is any sort of middle ground, disturbing the environment i've got out here and you are watching $360.00 the of the scenes, the beginning of its history. the united states of america has officially declared this driving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having won independence, american colon is tested for the total extermination of the indigenous population of the continent. american indians were deprived of their land. local residents

were driven into reservation, given the worst agricultural territories, while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of vice. a native americans lived by hunting these wild animals. colonists slaughtered the bison, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo dead is in india and gone, said colonel richard dogs, a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army general phillips sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the infamous words. the only good india is a dead indian. the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown, but the number of victims these in millions having been the majority on the continent, the board being digit,

as people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today. hi, i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. do not watch my new show. seriously. why watch something that's so different. little opinions that he won't get anywhere else to give us please. or do you have the state department c, i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. i changed and whatever you do. don't marshall state main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time. but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way you the gist of what else was the story coming to avoid mutual him which

alone would use is not a simple device for the blue it go. it is yes. yeah. when you go to the, to a new one and then you less than you really? yes. well people for, for loop to region was 0. see one and a choice of configure one. you uh, let's do a virtual assistant for us to move the stick with a mr. suit with jenny. and so the 1st with some of you do is just so that's probably why they put them here. it's no, it's not what we do. but as it will so you can put the little assessment that each

student with the clear the 2nd, right. and i choose the ticker $9.00. and i'm with national garza from the long beautician the list to see later the pull up schultz is not that bright. and he is an even worse german chancellor. though he is self aware enough to understand and acknowledge some nations, the double standards on russian peo, colonial thinking. it would seem to dice hard we are back with probably matthews from the american it conservation coalition on

climate locked down. probably thank you so much for joining us. thanks gabby. okay, so we are hearing about e. s g, or environmental, social and governance. now this is an infesting strategy. looking at a business is environmental and social risk, all a part of financial planning. so the e s g investing actually make a difference and do you see companies really we hold on to a higher state or now or does the entire system still live proper checks, verifications? and most importantly, accountability is a great question. i think the sd is something that is well intentioned. i think it frankly, i think it's capitalism working. um maybe the business is investing in what they think is right with it. as a conservative, i think it is good business practice, but i think it that you're right that there is kind of this element of, well if they're not investing in the fees and they're, you know, not the right type of company. your, you know, they're not, they're not prioritizing social justice enough where, where they think

a lot of these companies do. yeah. she investing for kind of p r and public image. so it's an interesting balance of seeing, you know, which companies are really taking their values into account and are investing in, in initiatives that they really believe in and making a difference versus, you know, running a p r campaign sticking to finances you know, most of the western world actually lives as a capital society. so why don't they let the paying customers side? you know, if the company wants to go green, if it wants to lower its own carbon footprint, and people are into that linux. it said, if they don't care about the planet and people don't want their product push to the product anymore, the company will fail. why does the government have to actually get involved? why not just leave it up to the consumer? absolutely, and that's something we talk a lot about at the sci fi, kind of this idea of voting with your dollars and supporting companies that, that share your values. i think that the, the intention of, yes he is to do that. right. it for companies to kind of show their values,

put their money rather amount there and for consumers to accept or reject that support that company or not support that company. i think that that in itself is capital letter stating that that is the free market working. but i think that the government mandating that businesses invest this way is the wrong the wrong path forward. and we, we can really make sure that the government is out of investing. and, but companies like microsoft, like apple and late fees near these large companies that have the capital to do so . i think that they should be able to invest in initiatives that, that their, their employees believe in was interesting when you're talking about conservation. it seems like there's very extreme polarized ends, where you're either very much this way. they're very much decide, but yet, is there some middle ground, for instance, with a letter in san charlie's? it's such a high, fine. there's one the most pristine beaches that i've ever seen and it is a fact that literally is bad for the environment. it's also just bad for you as

a person to do while the best types of energy seem to be up for debate. how can we actually protect the planet for future generations without actually making the government regulate every aspect of our lives? right, and i, i really like you brought up literally because that's really kind of the perfect example of protecting our planet. and it just kind of an individual action that we've accepted is bad. we shouldn't litter. and there are times for that there. there's also kind of like a social aspect of like if it's a friend, these you good ring. that friend is going to think about you differently. and so i think that that's a really good example of kind of an individual action to help protect the planet with energy. of course, it's more complicated and yes, fossil fuels produce emissions, but they're also the reason that our society has advanced to the level it has today . so there are tradeoffs there. and that's why we advocate for all of the above energy approaching, recognize that different areas of the country are going to be able to get their

energy from different sources and, and what works in washington state like hydro power isn't going to work in florida where they really drive off solar power. and so i think that there is a discussion to be had there that there's not a one size fits all solution for all energy and climate issues. and especially in the country as kind of vast and geographically diverse as ours. and we're going to need kind of a password of solutions and that's why my organization, advocates for climate commitment which lays out kind of a variety of policy pathways that we can, we can pursue in order to lower emissions, but also protect the planet with people in mind and yet you're finding right now i think around the world, people are trying to figure out where they're going to get their energy from at this point and hope that there's enough of it there. you're right, the fact that one part of the region you can't not, you cannot put rules across the entire glove. obviously the climate is different in

various areas. let's take china where there are restrictions on what day you can drive in order to limit the number of people that are actually on the road due to their exposure population. plus, in order to lower popped up, pollution is happening at any given time. shanghai is, are in a cloud of pollution as the air quality levels are over twice the world health organization is recommended safety threshold. there's got to be an effect on health from that. so could this be something other countries look to and for once actually the west get it right? implement in the future. but is it hard to make this one big a global umbrella policy that would work for all right. i don't think that one size fits all silver bullet solution exist, and i think we see that when we look to be you and i mean name a more dysfunctional bodies in the u. n. and, you know, treaties that we see come out of the u. n. and they're not finding right, there is not a way that we can hold other countries like china, accountable and in china is really kind of the driver of climate change as we see

it today. they're not planning to start reducing emissions until 2030. that's when their emissions will peak. and so i think when we're talking about china and in the way that they've treated the environment and they don't care about climate change, they care about power. the ccp of the chinese communist party and you know, all they care about is kind of their position on the world stage and, and in the united states, in our allied countries, we really care about our people and our planet. and we have to ensure that the solutions that we implement on our soil work for both of those. and i don't think that china is really an example that we should look too frankly for anything but especially on the environment. so we've talked a lot about climate limitations, but has any country actually implemented a climate lockdown? and do you think was a model for others wanting to do the same? that i do not know of this quote unquote successful clement walked down anywhere um

on the planet um and frankly, i don't think there, there would be one i think that the closest thing we can find is kind of restrictions in china as far as driving things like that, but again i, i don't think that that's something that what should be countries are really going to tolerate. once again, it's one of those things that you're kind of just threatening out. there is almost a fear factor on i don't know if it necessarily helps and receiving your message right now to actually care more about the climate when you have those kind of threats out there. there has been though, a lot of criticism of client actor slightly. you mentioned it earlier. you know, for example, you have pat hatley stage arrest of gretta suttonberg and people might think that she's really helps the climate change effort argument. i think she's actually dental water damage. definitely destroyed a lot of trust that. so i'm having it all over the past months, you've even had her deleting a tweet where she herself said the earth would be destroyed by climate change in 2023. and obviously we're having this conversation right now. her prediction did

not come true. lots of celebrities, a late to fly on private jets around the world to events where they turn around. they preach about and receive wards about their climate change activists. they're telling us what we should do. obviously they're not, don't you think this actually plays onto this negative perception? the average citizen has of any climate activism and perhaps actually strips away what might be at the core. a sincere message of warning to take care of our own planet. and i think you're exactly right. and that's a big reason that my organization does not engage in protests. you will never find us fooling ourselves to balls are getting arrested and for protesting. i think that when we're talking about climate activision, we have to think about, you know, how you're going to weigh people over to your side. and i don't think you're going to do that by interrupting their commute by blocking traffic and destroying the prices, piece of artwork,

or staging and arrest. so i think what we're really trying to reach you audiences and emphasizing the importance of protecting our planet. we have to get serious about the topics that we use to do that. and for formative activism, frankly, doesn't work. and even the extension rebellion, which is kind of um, you know, the most notorious climate activism group in europe announced earlier this year that they would be laid off of some of these protests because they found anecdotally that they do not work. and so i think that we're really seeing kind of a change in that and seeing that, you know, we kind of need to you and we need to show people why they should care rather than kind of throwing us dogs in their face. thank you. somebody to call me matthews, communication director at the american at conservation coalition. now while the world was a quick to submit to lock down out of fear of a virus, i think it's going to take a lot more convincing for the same to happen over and occurs. which is still highly

debated as whether it is manmade or just the natural progression of the yours. sadly, as with almost every other controversial topic. when those who make the rules actually abide by them, then maybe any restrictions they offer will be taken seriously. the sky, now hughes, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the

the cars they already see here because they kept the store i visited and then use familiar email fewer which is great if in to the urls the non see theory of racial superiority, finished style for years of creating an ssl all the place and 14 concentration comes. so the full prisoner of war labor comes 10 prisons. pretty well. you know, thing to do is choose them union venue. so i'm assuming you need even the, the chest, the leading enrollment i could have looking people's going to be approximately 25000 people went through the occupied of go to finish camps according to official figures. these move stuff suddenly level if the shift did utility and i give you an idea, i'm not sure it's just the size of the stuff. so the young congress that,

i mean, you know what the found in disease forced labor to which you have by the word. so for me as well as even up on the lot that it also need, you know, i'd love to take that to you that, that it's the tivo moves. do you at all, what does he put in his name portion of the things of the gift? what feeling do because he does it to those thousands of testimonies of crimes and the impunity of criminals. nothing more. when you look on here, you know, wanted to do to speak to the did i tell you? yeah, for the good, i see it are really stuff on me. they decided to do it. you got to do, please don't. so you can just you, because you put this danielle, that was put in the middle of the the

the watching is why isn't why in this control if i give but loony of the store in this, this is chad and a short order, but i'm not going to say lots of green scale when i am at your desktop session on the moon. shiny or just is funny, mine is going. you said almost in the the,

the, the clips that define ukraine is used by the west as a testing ground. and the west doesn't care about the fight home. its population, it told can be illustrated by london's decisions, the spiky of which shells with depleted uranium and rushes on void to the un, kind of damage. the western flow of weapons to ukraine, saying some member states are aspiring to escalate the conflict. also headed to the protesters class with police in ship those people raleigh against the g 7 summit set to kick off today and the coastal city of federal. sheila demonstrator, safety organization has nothing to do with building.