[000:00:00;00] the the russian states never as tight as i'm one of the most sense community best. most all sense. i'm at the, in the 65 with the keys 195 must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on russia to day and split the ortiz full neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the 76 digits. stephen twist,

which is the proud rick sanchez. i've been doing this uh, this thing we call news now for some 30 years. i've done it in 2 different languages and i've done it all over the world. and obviously here in the united states, i've interviewed for us presidents i've interviewed for and leaders, i've founded a $1000000000.00 business. and throughout all of that, what i've learned is that we, when we communicate should be honest. and we should be direct. and we should be impactful. and this, this is direct impact. the, the,

i want to start today with something that we really, really need to talk about. why is it that our political system is the way it is? and maybe, maybe it's time to change it. but let me start with this. never before in our country's history, have we been so divided? it's almost as if people in the united states right now are 2 different countries. there's one country of republicans, and there is another country of, of democrats. and the question really is this, why? how come right, why do we have to choose between one and the other? why can't we agree to disagree or agree with both types of why do we give so much power to parties that many times put their needs above our needs? chairman, we have the e mail,

there is no free time charge. you do not have the tie between the one directly control required the router mass gone with solver for mass going mr. george are asking mr. jordan, want to talk about mr. jordan, this is galen white with the devil's experts airline reservation. why don't we do it? because apparently the need to beat each other up is more important to these parties . then the need to serve us. in other words, beating the other party is worth more than the interest of the country itself. and what's worse about all of this is that now each party has its own means of communication. no, i mean i'm not kidding. think about, think about this for a minute. look around right. there are newspapers that only present republican points of view. there are other newspapers that only present democrats

points of view. there are television networks that only present news for republicans. they just want you to hear what they think you think. right. and there are also television networks that only report news for democrats. so we almost have to ask ourselves then, right. shouldn't be competition between political parties. yeah, i understand we should have a context of ideas, right? but ideas shouldn't just be limited to 2 ways of thinking. social psychologist, they're going to tell you that when there are only 2 options we become, or we're more apt to be divided and more, more locked into our ideologically, you know, rigid stances, right? in other words, we stop thinking now could it be that this is exactly what these parties

want for us to be constantly that all right, i'll show you something i want to show you this. this is, this is a fascinating study that i'm going to share with you right now. it's a study they did over at pw is pure research study. and it's kind of incredible. so look at this from 2016 to the present. a percentage of republicans who think democrats are essentially liars, increased from 45 percent to 72 percent. so whatever they hated before they hated more now. while at the same time they asked democrats the same question. who do they think? what do they think about republicans and they to said that they think republicans are liars and that number increased from 42 percent to 64 percent. so the thought process has only increased more recently from 2016 on effecting it seems by

looking at this study that they've never hated them so much. they've never hated each other so much. here's another one. when republicans are asked if they think democrats are your moral, that number goes from 47 percent into 202016 to 72 percent. now, same thing as true and democrats. they're asked the same exact question and they're the whole immoral thing. goes from 35 percent before to 63 percent now and look at how they behave when they come together or not. and protests all over the country. mm. okay

. i mean, you see that you think we almost act as if we're not americans, but rather enemies. there's no question that there is at this particular point. busy assuming that a crisis in the united states, a crisis of division in the crisis of hate, is it possible that it is designed to create division that suits various interests? which is, which is why it, it seems to be growing and growing each and every year. and nobody seems to be able to carabas. these feelings of antipathy. and by the way, the media, the media rather than telling us important stories continues to perpetuate this stuff. so why not then other parties, why not other ideas? and maybe the most important question of all, as we look at this, why so much hate? and joining us now is monique of dual, he's already a hose, he's also

a republican strategist. you're right, i want to talk about this because i think this is a fascinating subject by the way, hey, let's go through and let those. we're talking about it a lot. all right, but not really any. we talked about it typically in sound bite. so, you know, i think we have a bit longer to 3 minutes to talk about. thank god, why does america have a 2 party system that seems to be not working a, to me, i want to know what you think. and kind of creating havoc in this country. an awful lot of, hey, wouldn't you say to? yeah, it's, it's, it's a do awfully system. i think a large part of that has to do with um, you know, i'll back up a bit. so i think about what we talked about on the radio, see what we talked about geo politics, a lot of them. so yeah, and you see in places all around the world, not, not miss, not what's happening in south america right now, but in places around the world,

how they challenge their governments, how big protest industries. you see, what's it you've been following? what's been happening in europe, we see the protests that have been in paris and broad. i mean, probably getting brussels in all industries, in response to various things. whether that's the um you know, who's the support, you know, whether that is in protest of the government's involvement in the, the well be involved with in the military operations versus the military operation in ukraine. choosing sides in that sense, the impact that those decisions with this things you have had on very economy. you see the really protesting industry to about storing the energy prices towards food products as me see places around europe where they're no longer i get your point and you're saying what that because we have a 2 party system. we don't see the soap eliza. oh, making their point are yeah, so i think what happens here in america because we don't challenge our government

like that. we only challenge our government like that when he comes to think of race best typically what my problem is. okay. i'll talk to him. let me stop. yeah, a minute. i like where you're going. uh, let me then suggest this. the reason we don't challenge our government is because the government has given us 2 sides to challenge. so we'll either say something about the republicans or the conservatives, or will say something about the democrats and the lives and the liberals. but that, that works. i guess for the people running the government, because they never, they never get the attention. because the tension goes to the parties and stuff. sounds like a good plan. well, of course all of this is by design. i don't think it's by design or not, but the point that i was making is that the, we accept this as a norm. look

a lot to look at our political system where we continued election after election after election. we talked about the party, the problem with the party, and whether it's a republican or democrat, i lived or in washington dc. we just had him a euro election where the mayor was attacked for not doing enough back here and about, you know, different groups in the city. and people didn't go out of industry to protest against that. we set these things as normal and we don't push back a get started government in the same way that we see in places other places around the country as well. but the reason we don't push back against our government is because instead we think it's only one side of the government. that's right. and the other one is wrong rather than bad things fairly. but there's, there's new study. i was just sharing it with the, with our viewers, but the vast majority of republicans from 2016 to today. now think by far

more by of 2030 points are as high as 2030 points. that democrats are immoral. and democrats think republicans are a moral, same thing as dishonest, same as close minded. same is not intelligent. so more and more americans think the other guy is stupid, is a liar. and these numbers keep increasing to the point where what we have are people living in silos? no one's looking at what the government's doing. they're looking at the squirrels. yes. and, and that is an excellent point, and i think i, for i, and i often talked about this, i think a lot of it has to do with social media that you know, the, the popularity of social media. because if you think of what our politics, what may be brock obama was the 1st, i guess you could say social media president. yeah. you know, all of the twitter, well, facebook and all of those. they really kind of got there for the women. so he was

able to capitalize on that, but look at what was happening online because the things that release it on the, on both sides. so if you dare criticize the rock obama for anything, whether it was a valid criticism or not, you ever exist as any other inc. molly, the parties have too much power and i'll just give you an example. there's no way in hell that you're going to convince me that most democrats would have voted for joe by to the democratic party, decided that joe biden should be the president. it seemed to me just following the election back when that was taking place. most people were leaning toward either bernie sanders or maybe elizabeth warren or somebody else, but the party said no, you guys all have to come together. we're going to put joe up there. i mean, some people didn't think of the party back to. right. well, i think the party always picks that donald trump was an interruption of that because the party didn't take yes. right?

yeah, yeah. typically, typically what happens is the party, they have a look at what happened in 20162016. well, in fact we knew in 2009 um, we were rock. obama took offices gallery plants, it was the 6 was made secretary of state. but, you know, don swainsburg, secretary state, we knew then that she was going to be the nominee in 2016 right. but didn't care about they didn't care about jo by an in the right. oh, by that was the 2nd. if you will, most powerful person in the entire world. no one loves no job. i didn't. they didn't like to live in a 2020. he was a better option. well, outside of the establishment, he was a better option than donald trump, but this that they decided jo by the business. now this is his r and he was able to say. busy the story about how it was done, you know, charlottesville in all of this, and he wants to restore the soul of america. that was never when we come back,

i want to look at it from a different framework. let's look at the kind of systems that exist in other countries. let's ask how many other countries have a strict 2 party system like we have here in the united states. and how is that going? by the way, i want to share with you something i have a pod cast, whereas a journalist and has a lot the, you know, in the co founder of a 4000000000 dollar company. i share my stories with you and i share with you what i've learned and i talk a little bit about success and growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast, and i advise you to check it out and i'm going to be looking for you there. but when we come back, let's look at something else. who is more close minded in this system? is it the republicans? is that the democrats, new research? i'll be sharing

the turkeys already in a to enter keys already doing it. share is i nate on and that's, but it's not boring by some of the american ideas of kinda economic embargoes. i guess rush, i think directv will continue, and that's only because the relationship may be beneficial economic rates. but also because russia has to be a partner in maintaining the international orange. the need of 3 people use of, for instance, coming up with is what's

the psalm i'd love to have to choose between you of the office to get to the store, the discards there. the word made that up with anything that apple beat was awfully cool. my lot to shift new things to get suitable for something that you all a lot and that your life as a piece of off it will bring a said, i take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just

a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify. it will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just because it shows you fractured images, presented as fast? can you see through their illusion going underground? can the pass promised by that? i want to show you what other study in this particular piece of research they ask americans who has a close mind or maybe who has the most closed whites. right. but the democrats, when asked say it's the close minded republicans in 2016, that percentage of democrats was 70 percent. and now it's 83 percent. sorry. was

that was high. 73 percent. obviously even higher. right. same goes for republicans to 52 percent of republicans in 2016 and used to say that democrats have a small close binds. now that's up to 69 percent. you see the pattern here. so why does this continue to happen? right. well, it's because democrats don't know what republicans are watching. then democrats don't know what republicans are reading republicans don't know what democrats are reading or watching. they live in 2 different worlds, completely isolated from one another. that's why and we're back with the league of dual to uh, talk about why it is the united states has a 2 party system. and is it working evidence new research seems to indicate the americans have never been so silos never been so divided and more and more

americans feel like they're not really choosing their leaders. corporations are. so i did a little studying malik. and i look to seeing what other countries have a system like ours. i was surprised, not very many. the united states, the bahamas, jamaica ends above. we was the only countries in the entire world that have a strict 2 party system. everybody else has a 3 or 4. why is that? are you? are you surprised? by the way, when i tell you that? no, and i will say, i'm not surprised as a recently, as i say, you know, as you start to follow geo politics and see how, how these um, governments or parliament to run around the blow. i think it, you know, it becomes a little more apparent. but no, i'm not surprised. i thought it would probably at least be 10. i didn't know it would be less than 10. but i think the, if i don't know, you know why it, why is it that way? i don't know. many people might argue that even though the constitution itself,

i don't believe the us constitution spoke of a specific political party out the history of the united states. i don't really sweet with multi parties back in the 16 in the 1700s. when it all got started. there were about 4 that had changed and they worked in some parties have come into other parties. we've had 4, we've had 5, we've had 6 parties. suddenly, all those parties more of the window now. and now you only have either republican or democrat. interestingly enough. here's how it works around the world. in most countries around the world, there are parties that, as you mentioned earlier, when we were talking about this, um are appeal or appealing because they are for one thing, let's say unions, for example, there's a party where people are really in where that's important for them so that the union party, there's other parties that surround climate change than to them. that's important. so they're the,

the climate party. so you have issues that are important to different peoples in a country. and they form parties around those issues. and then they bring those issues forward and if enough people care about that, that party, when's the election? you know, that seems to me something that makes more sense than just be republican. cuz you hate donald. uh, you hate the joe biden or be democrat because you hate the donald trump. i mean, it seems like we don't get to decide issues in this country and that's just the way the government seems to want it. yeah, if you think of just the, of the early days of the union back when unions were fighting for basic, right. so when they were fighting for employment, wages and you know, better working conditions and things like that, or you listed job, think of what the appointment for those they were. finally, they were getting to the 1st black, i think, international union, but they were fighting for wages and couldn't, you know,

employment conditions and things like that. but then at some point it became political, where instead of just fighting for those base, those basic bees that whether you are a, you know, you're in west virginia or washington dc or maryland or mississippi, you can all agree on. i grew up in mississippi, so i'm a, i'm a junior and i'll tell from a junior family and i know that there are people they've bought for those type of things, but it became politicized why i would have to do some digging on why the unions become politicized. i'm pretty sure it has to do with their access to our the workers party in america. there's no work or no in america. it's the other. parents may claim it, but they're not. right? no, no it's, it's not at all. and that's part of like i, i would have to go and look and see what happened because something changed fundamentally, not just with the parties. when they talked about the switch, where you know that we're,

republicans then became democrats. it's not that which i'm talking about when it became the interest and labor of the fighting for the workers at some point in our history that changed. and it became a corporate thing where they were fighting for corporations as opposed to fighting for the people and politics. i somehow got in the weight of that and i think that the politics, what's the interruption that got us where we are today once they got it, because both parties, both democratic and republican, realistically, can fight for that union vote. but the same thing agree basically in principle on many of the same things, but it is, it's so heavily weighted now that unions are associated with the democratic party at the same way that the 2nd amendment is associated with the republican party. even though, as i say, i'm from the south, i from mississippi, i grew up in

a family of democrats. they are all gone owners and trustworthy. but what it seems to be, even the things that you just mentioned are so miniscule in the scheme of things. i mean, we will argue about whether the size of the gun that you're allowed to have on your, in your closet, and whether you should have 15 bullets or 18 bullets. and yet at the same time, we all are not even allowed to have a discussion as to whether or not it's okay for our government to evade some country like iraq, for no reason whatsoever. but absolutely did nothing to us. we now know and yet that's okay. we just forget it, in fact the people who got us into that war now up here on nbc and cbs and all these stations like their uh, genius, its thing is this for a lot what, what they think about what we've been finding out with the twitter files, we have members of congress, members of congress to sit on the senate for an intelligence relations finished

formulations, committee die, and 5 states, encouraging twitter, social media companies to find something to find some sort of connection to richard that these to make sure that we can get this russian connection in order to the ball going forward to push this narrative about this. russia collusion, donald trump, this what's happening in our government is the same government that was about to try to encourage pressure social media companies to ban certainly people. this is our government, so how do these things happen because we allow them to, i don't think any, these sort of files eventually this time next year. no one's going to be talking about sort of file. but republicans in congress who are going to be holding house investigations on it, but we would have moved up malik of doing great guest. thank you, sir, for taking time to take us through this. thanks for having me. all right, before we go,

i want to remind you of something. our mission really. and it's pretty simple. and particularly apropos on this newscast that we just, it wouldn't be nice if we could be silo ourselves, the silo the world. i mean, we got to stop living in these little tiny boxes because truths don't live in boxes. truth is everywhere. that's important for us to keep track of rick sanchez and i will be looking for you again, right here for i hope to provide the directory the which i thought that was the little thing is just that i'm still

a little the slug restaurants currently not electronic funds, but the look you getting this, the post is on the at the is that i, that's a get a minute come out i need, which is easy to saw on the screen. so of course to ensure material which is in line in love with someone and i didn't like the law, but the thing is because oregon. rachel, sort of, well, in the middle of something because, i mean, yeah, we didn't present it to not the beginning of the results. okay. would you 20 and then we'll just do 442. and i'm comfortable, in which way, which insidiously, kimberly process the

. at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate, extra patient. according to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local b. both any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women, and children are shot whenever they can be met with squatter. henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as fast. these rightly described as blood. so and racist eve at the beginning of colonization, and there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent. then by the beginning of

the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against the aborigines has not been resolved so far. the . this is a residential area around me. our palmer broke there was no military presence here . many of the children that use these playground would've been pulling off the 2014, so they will know nothing but war. another messiah, let's call you printing and forces on don't boss with civilian areas, including a hospital or 2 reports from the scene in the center. all the time you had said he also had on the program the