Skip to main content

tv   The 360 View  RT  May 23, 2023 8:30am-9:01am EDT

8:30 am
school, actually the rates on the 2 pieces naturally. so bus 2027, q u y, that you sent me. i still want to get this settled and it was not just make a t 20. no. the head of the african union was invited to the g 7 summit to discuss the ongoing energy crisis, while western leaders reiterated their commitment to african energy development. russian nuclear energy giant ross adam continues to develop infrastructure on the confident are to spoke to as the ceo of ross adams central and south africa office . ryan collier, who says africa has great potential for developing both nuclear and green technologies. you can watch the full interview throughout the day here in our tea. in the meantime, here's a quick teaser. i think there's a, a long standing relationship between russia and african nations. and i think we're liable to build on. that's, you know, as i said earlier, africa is really struggling when it, when it comes to power and as arose that some of the able to provide solutions that
8:31 am
are going to assess them in a sustainable, long term future in terms of strengthening our relationships, where they're responsible then the um, sustainability for us as vastly important. so everything that we do, we make sure that it includes local communities that we always in prep protect the environments and obviously human resource development and localization is vastly important for us. so i think africa is important to the wells. it so it's an important suresh and that's as an important to us the present time. we see great contain show on the consonants, not just with the nuclear energy for electricity, but also you can research and you can medicine and various other applications from you to a technology is and then outside of the mucus, the um with wind and battery storage, where we are very active as well. we see great potential. the meanwhile, beijing has taken a page out of washington sleigh book manning a us base micro chip company, which promptly caused
8:32 am
a fall on the sock of us listed firms. while other chinese counterparts are rises, sees you can corresponded leo, joshing. so it's been moved by china had an instant impact that will continue to be felt. this response is kind of symmetrical and not week and was last year. the usda is targeting on chinese mount companies in the name of the national security. this time china's move is also politically effective and powerful as the data. i showed that the, the impact is instant on the day. on a monday when it shares dropped like about 3 percent, a compare with the united states, a comprehensive announcement of sanctions and industrial confrontation. this done trying this action targeting only one company appears to be more of a strain on the surface. uh, i personally think so, but the actual a fact and impact could be impressive in time with how things october 2020 to
8:33 am
washington has imposed a sweeping next bull curves on advanced the chips and ship made can equipment to china. so it was the united states that fires the fire 1st by that violence, the principles of the market economy and international economic trade rules. so be a technology why chip complex for trade conflicts? so us is the one who fires the 1st shot and we all knows that there are no winners after the gun goes off. so yeah, of course the trade conflict has potential to escalate. i personally think so the process of technology deep hopefully between china and the us is likely to accelerate spider. but don't forget, china has a large uh, huge market advantage which also gives us a bargaining chip in the sign of us relationship. so this is kind of a ban in the hope to make that us reflect on it's unfair measures against china. and in the long run, i personally think 8 account also help safeguard china's rights and interests.
8:34 am
and the new delhi high court has issued a summons to the b, b. c. over decimation charges. after the british broadcaster, or the documentary on indian prime minister, moody questioning his role an anti muslim rides. 20 years ago, the bbc said it was aware of the proceedings, but it was inappropriate to comment further. at this stage. it is contended that the sell documentary a publication contains content which costs a slow on the reputation of the country, and also makes fools and defamatory invitations. and then senior ations against the prime minister of india, the indians registry, and the indian criminal justice system. very high court issued a notice to the b. c bulk bbc, india on bbc world. this also includes your beast and your fire, the defamation case against the bbc for the documents for you that'd be released in
8:35 am
january the see all the documents, the court india, the more the question, eventually implication, department store over the country that she want us to overdraw even though you advise that the phase 2 in the india had a band this particular document read, you know, with the question the air to e. india inside also beings of the documents that are shared on various media platforms. our calls were removed by the government. the indian government essentially see that this documents the by the bbc, was not the boss, a propaganda piece. and it was the see a lot of states between india and the bbc. remember, they bought most of the task read of that were conducted unit b. c. offices in new day and will buy all you to be seen that they've known me with the bbc documents, the youngest reads whatsoever, and that indeed was only
8:36 am
a whirling due process is the bbc had been doing a lot of ition, a consistent violation of trans replacing news, it has been engaging in the, in a, in a sense it's been indulging in what we could call in the event that this tax evasion . tatum of profits i'm, i'm done setting it. some of it is now what happened off of this particular the notice that has been issued to the bbc is the valve in the next day as bbc would have to reply. you don't have to send a recent reply up to the course of the she already in the motto boutique, p. c, a september the c r. but it will be interesting, of course, to watch one of the developments in this case. so that's are up on the hour and coming up for all their disagreements, china, the us and russia all agree that the world is that an unprecedented tipping point? how will the 3 navigate the changing world order the discussion next on worlds
8:37 am
apart? thanks for watching and say to my colleague we're at home mom, it will be taking over the phone and welcome to wells a part for all the different says one thing, russia, china in the united states, agree upon us that the world is now at a crucial perhaps even unprecedented the inflection point, the business as usual, no longer feasible or even desirable. but they fundamentally disagree about how far down in history this stage goes and what trajectory of these changes are to take in the future. to discuss that, i'm now joined by timothy board,
8:38 am
the shelf program director of the all the discussion club in russian. it's always a pleasure july to talk to you. thank you very much for finding the time. a few weeks ago when changes presence should have been, was in moscow, he told his russian counterparts, i didn't pretend that our 2 countries are now driving the kind of changes the likes of which the world hasn't seen in a 100 years. but you go further than this because in one of your articles here, your road, the recent said that a transition that at the international order is, can say, going to is the most significant in the past few 100 years. where do you place the beginning of the current and the beginning of the current and well, i think the rise of china. i think that in about 15 years ago china has accumulated unearned most economic capacitors or are political capabilities on the international scene. and 10 years ago when the china is preston,
8:39 am
she's in pain. first the 1st the rise to use and you should to you for one belt on road. it was the clear indicator that china is per pound and feeling ready to go for. and the toner chief to the west on sources of development. is that necessarily an alternative either or? or just uh, you know, one more edition to help. what is that is just to barry wisdom, the interpretation of the toner to either or a toner teeth in a chinese way. or in a way, is we in rush. see it does not mean the choice. it means that opportunity just the increasing number of very soon entries. well, nobody in russia or in china says that for example, in developing countries. so it's not quite the right way is the international institutions controlled by the western. but the point is that nowadays the
8:40 am
developing countries are ready, they can actually take one or pretending to and another opportunity, a 120 for another alternative. they don't need to make this choice either for and this is the most essential change in the international distribution of power. so what are you talking about the transition in the international order, the most significant in the past few 100 years. you mean the, the end of this uh, western dominated modo, well, the think is the to the international order is always based on the competitive power categories. so the countries and for the last of 500 years, actually on the western countries, western europe then joined the list in europe and the united states have been the strongest one rusher, was defending, it should be radiant,
8:41 am
and russia was defending vigorously. it's right to take decisions on its own bond to drink only for very limited period. the russian soviet union has being a part of the international order. i mean has been strong enough to present a new toner to for the west. but i mean, there again, are, we are coming back to either or a choice. uh, because from what i understand and maybe my knowledge of this, of history is limited, the soviet union, i still have this idea of our international lives. we're taking decisions together . i'm not meeting the only a few, the overlords where mountains, uh, everything like god knows which is ultimately the the western id and it's communicated pretty openly in this matter for over a shining city on a hill. it's not only shining, it's also enjoying resources from, from the rest of the globe for its own sake. well, so i mean to me and was representing a new toner chief, especially in the few contribution to the kids. often they have to be able to ship
8:42 am
a bond to dispute or didn't class to long for the rest of the time. starting from the beginning of the 16 century and almost to an out of the western countries kind of been having actually constructing the international wanted to sell to serve their own development purposes. now the situation has changed the rise of china, otherwise of india. so i want, i want to underline is that russia is not the most important slayer issue. the most important here. so 1st of all, china and india because they have a nervous capabilities they haven't known was human resources for us to, for about 3000000000 of the nation. they share between them. but doesn't, does these grow vacation? no force necessarily translate into influence real political geo political. you cannot make influence. that's the thing that i think it does. and we overdo,
8:43 am
see that many countries of the world actually my keen and or a cut, the rates i can took the right was china. and i put the ranking was china. conversion was russian. we've seen that the arab countries of the middle east of the, of the golf, which have being connected for it was the west for many decades since the independence. they are now cut direction was china as well. they don't break was the state, but they developed the relationships strong. and this is the most significant change is that the number of the states we have enough power to be the constituent parts of the international order is increasing. now, our western partners usually justify what they call their benevolent gemini, by the fact that somebody needs to preside over the scales of conflicting interest . and it's just the united states takes on this burden for the sake of humanity.
8:44 am
do you agree with this assumption that the multiplication of international players would necessarily lead to cares and make the world more prone to conflict as our western partners? the latch? oh, as a matter of fact, to the question, why should people would states food follow to certain rules? this is the biggest question of political philosophy about the other question is that o was the power, the state which provides power to make all those for the following the rules. he's making rules for, for itself. so it is never, it does now it just feel ground to, to and while i'm taking the mission to, to observe the international rules, the united states have been named shortly, maybe even with valid to the bad bill. taking the, the,
8:45 am
the best profits from that. so i think that the car in change we'll, we'll continue for the end a long time. and this is so early to see now what is going to be international orange because we never lived in such a want. and so i should democratic world when we have so many countries, especially not the western countries. um, i think significant will end up doing basically the same role as the worst. and adults with a, uh, i think carefully, if i'm wrong, it ultimately depends on what is the basis of the social relationship, whether it's power or whether for example, it's neutrality. and you'll argue that the country, it to the western approach where the chinese are offering is development. that is not tied to any specific ideological political outcomes. so actually it's more liberal, it's more permissive,
8:46 am
and it's nature and it's more tolerant of you know, the, the other players constituent, the peculiar at peculiarity. why do you seeing the chinese a so permissive about that, even though they have at least domestically a reputation for us to retire in tendency. 0, one thing because we, it is impossible to make another unit for our world. so everybody in china and russia or need to understand the west, we.

19 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on