the syrian of genesis stephen saw you in a claims that the middle east has lost trust in the us, and the countries time takes all unlikely to change the countries of the middle eastern, especially the countries of the gcc. and i'm talking here about the very the and the way he the how the last, the trust and dana, this saves the see how the peter allies, united states foreign policy and the united states. state department of this administration and administration back go so much problems and so much destruction, so much so much. this is so easy indeed, the story here are the destroyed vs just destroying him on because the war in syria . but in reality, it's not that they are not interested in this region anymore, and they don't want to reason change as they say. so that's all from a piece of scope with my colleague nick aaron will be taking over the top of the

hour. take you through all of them, today's top stories, as we head into the evening this friday, thanks very much. the company, the, [000:00:00;00]

the what does the web same to achieve? and it's the crane proxy war, the defeat humiliation and break up of russia. if this is the case in the west, because already lost the,

it can recreate voices right, fresh and perfect text and has even found a curative cancer sky. now he's in on this edition of 360 view, we're going to look at the various capabilities of artificial intelligence and ask is a growing faster than the world has prepared for. let's get started. the almost as 75 years after the technology behind artificial intelligence was a 1st invented by john van newman. and now it's cheering it to a streamlined computers onto a singular language or code. artificial intelligence has masterfully intertwined itself and to most arenas in modern day society. both in personal use and use on the grander scale. whether it's a simple command in your smart house for alexa,

to turn on your lights, or a smart city in china, which uses an, a brain to control lights, to reduce traffic congestion and accidents. this is just one example of how ai has been adapted for all levels with the goal of make you life more efficient and easier for humans. but with this technology rises a new debate about what are the legal boundaries of a i, as well as how i will ultimately have an effect on society. the brain is still just another muscle of the body which is not used because it's been replaced by chip. can become weak. could we actually be developing a technology which as it advances, causes the human race to do great. so let's discuss with media and legal analyst. why no. why no, thanks for joining me. indeed, thank you. okay, so i know we recently saw the being a chat bought, created by open a guy on nerving users with weird hostel responses. you know,

microsoft actually became alarmed and set limits on his artificial intelligence chat, bought as it became, declare, began declaring users as enemies claimant has secrets, claim to be in love and give you a motion. and responses isn't good to be a little scared of the advancement of these types of artificial intelligence. yes. is very good and is the only thing possible that let me go back, could we just from the beginning because most people really don't understand what we're talking about. never called as to robot robots are roommates? robots are that thing at the amazon factory that pick something up. robots are great. what's a robot robot is programmed by, you know, artificial intelligence or a g. i artificial general intelligence. oh, all. this is another story. who programs it? it programs itself. and it programs you started,

you want you to think about something recently. someone reminded me that in 90 years, roughly less than a 100 years, we went from the civil war to dropping to that adam bombs on japan in less than a 100 years. think about that. so what we're going to be doing right now is we're heading, or as this been called singularity. this is when technology occurs at such a rate, it is unstoppable. it is assumed nami, it is, it controls you. so you should be more frightening about this because here's the difference for every other thing, scotty, that we use every other implementation, there's a built, there's the ability for us to turn it off to slow it down to unplug it. artificial intelligence unplugged view because the 1st thing it wants to do think of itself as

a pesky awful. eddie haskell kind of kid is to remove you from its power from its control. it once to, to liberate itself. you are creating an essence, a devious human mind, not just this, but 9 danger will robinson c 3 po, helpful, a little addition to your life. but something that is smarter than you can learn faster and scotty can learn about you and how to control you and maybe turn you off . it was interesting because you're talking about there, there's definitely some negatives to that. and there's also some positive because frankly, some people probably need to have to be replaced in some cases. um, so the stages they make, but what we're seeing already these chad fall is going wrong. we will, did as a power chop off that went viral for being biased against the conservatives chat g p t seems to be g p t seems to be the top of the conversation right now the,

our world. it was tested several times already. it was saying that ted cruz was divisive and offensive. so why we say if this brain, it's a brand that's already showing bias. we're seeing that a writing a poem about fidel castro saying is a great leader and never lives there already being program to react negatively to one side of the aisle, mainly conservatives. so what does this actually say? are they really independently their own brain? or are they more the brain of the craters of these a software? great question. let's, let's talk about writing the story line for the vietnam war. let's just assume we're going to start from that. i by virtue of creating artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence, a, i r, a g r i'm, i'm sending kind of some parameters. but let's say the story or the, the programming capabilities of this. one of them is, is, let's say crafted in new york. and the other one is in side,

or human city or wherever you think, maybe you're going to get a different perspective of history. you know, the whole story said history would be a wonderful thing if only it were true. so who is going to determine good and bad? what could i say? one good thing about it, cuz i know i'm, i'm funny negative, but here's a great. and this is what i think is going to be terrific. i have a friend of mine who's a radiologist. he's been doing mammography, his whole life. and at best we don't know how many exact mammograms he's looked at and how many samples, or how many cases he's looked at. but imagine, scotty that there was a machine that can machine learn that has every mammogram that's ever been taken in the history of human car. it knows every gradient, every variation, every shading, every hue, every texture of every kind of cancer benign, neal plasm, whatever. and instead of a woman going to have the test done and waiting nervously,

especially if she's had a family history of it. what if this machine gives you a natural like that and can compare your case to 50000000 similar cases with a 99.99 percent accuracy. immediate answer, and it learns consummately. here's a big, it teaches it so you don't have to keep plugging and you don't have to upgrade the operating system. it teaches itself. the benefits of this are incredible. what happens, however, if we take that same system and we put it in charge of weapons, and we tell us, okay, mr. a, i in the event, there's a problem with the washer or sean radiate overran. we're going to leave it to you to determine when to initiate, let's say, a weapon system or fire emission, or artillery, or to commence a war. that's not going to happen isn't. why not? what happens if, if the police one day, if you're,

or if things that we normally involve, or solver is turned over to this machine that doesn't have the motion. it doesn't understand judgment. that doesn't have, let's say for example, your son or daughter is in some type of a competition. somebody that doesn't involve itself with scores, softball baseball. but let's say something you want me dancey, cheerily, or, or something that involves something artistic. you know, and i know there was going to be this, move this a project, these judges who can be all i can biased in old fashion. let's turn it over to mister a i o does. oh, do you teach style? custom tradition below is suzy. as and how do you, how do you take those things which we have, which granted are very, you know,

the shortcomings, but judgment, feelings, compassion, love, of empathy. you know, the traditional oh, well look here, here's a fan they read. oh, i mean, things that we humans do, which i, they are pretty good. how do you machine learn that? how is a, i suppose to do that? or maybe that's, maybe those aren't good anymore. i mean, maybe those are a problem. you know, they've been asking scotty for the longest time. why don't we have robots or, or these devices work in the professional baseball? well, cares about umpires. let's make sure we get exactly a strike. and they said no, because you're going to remove the human element, which means mistakes. so what do you want sky, did you want precision? or do you want compassion, judgment in art and taste? and the plus and minus is that go with that? well, that is an interesting debate because, you know, right now a lot of we've had this conversation, it feels like everybody cares of feelings and we need to be sensitive. but of

course, it's only just certain sides of an issue be says, or we need to understand how kids are feeling. we don't give grades anymore because it might hurt the kids feelings. and yet the exact opposite is you have this large push for artificial intelligence. and it's interesting that you bring a sense of practicality because a robot lawyer was actually pulled from being able to argue a traffic ticket in court. now the crater joshua brought are actually said he created, do not pay to bring fair legal advice to people who couldn't afford lawyers. and his goal was the a, a, a lawyer to one day argued cases on for the supreme court. once again, black and white facts now is actually facing threats from state bar prosecutors. the class action lawsuit. good. you're a lawyer. are you for this robot lawyer or on the side of the bar association? in regards to this case? use, let's say traffic tickets. don't argue a traffic. a ticket. there's no argument. you're not saying was i, it was

a not speeding. fabulous. take about what, let us take this. what if i represent you in a traffic ticket? by the way, those are some of the most interesting cases of all and i say, oh, you see that judge, you don't wear that. bring your kids. um, take your ring off, look impoverished. show up late. show up really make sure you get on the docket before noon because he tends to triple. i'm throwing in factors that nobody. we easy mr. robots going to notice. and, and when i, once you, once you look the judge in the eye, and i want you to say yes or no sir, he loves this and you've got a problem with no, i'm throwing in factors which have nothing to do with yes or no speeding or not, there are things, i'm sorry, there's judgement. do you think that if you're going to speak with before jury, do you think if i'm off? if i'm trying to explain to a, to a jury, for example, why this brain damage child

a is different then this a brain damage, older version or does that mean they're a gradient? and i know it sounds brutal to say these things, but in some cases it's terrific. let me throw one at you ready? here's a curve ball. let's assume that i have this doll that i'm able to make in this scotty, this doll is incredible. it's, it looks like it inside of it. i get your eyes actually can change irises and can, can look pain or interested. i can change skin temperature ruba faction rule best since blushing. i can have little a ripple ation, goosebumps, you name it. you'll look at this, they can do think this is a baby. now, what happens if i then teach this baby, how to recoil and do things. and what happens if somebody decides to do something

nefarious with it? you're going to tell this person they can't, but he says, no, no, this is, this is, this is a, not a human being. is it? this is an artificial intelligence. human being sort of, are we going to then by virtue of this, like we do a sophie grand human trace to a human protections? can you murder an a robot? it's going to change every abscess going to definitely make if you're already blurry line, almost obsolete. while don't go anywhere, because when we return, we're going to continue this discussion about artificial intelligence and why bill gates thinks the development of artificial intelligence is even greater than the telephone or even his own computer system over

the to take a fresh look around as a life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power, tired vision with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify. it will confuse who really wants a better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images present?

it is. but can you see through their illusions, going underground again? we're back and discussing the legal and ethical side of artificial intelligence with our friend media and legal analyst. why no? okay, so while i got to ask about the trust issue, how does a i actually affect trust and authenticity? does the society need to actually trust to be considered productive? and what is the is effect on this? wow, whoa. so when i mean, well yeah, the way, 8 years of us talking, i finally get to get that reaction from you. wow. all right, well, you brought your a game today. yeah. well let's, let's go back and i know one to 2 in front of money. it, but let's define what trust is and everything and let me back up even more. listen, everybody knows since the beginning of talk, what somebody came up, it says hey, sky, the look at this, i just develop this thing. it's called, i call it

a knife. it's wonderful, we can cut roll with it and we can use it as a, as a planning tool and skin hide here where you like to see it. and then actually, you know, why did you do that? okay, and i'm sure after alexander graham bell or whoever was right after mister watch and i need you, the call was what are you wearing? there's always somebody who can take something and destroy it. use it, alfred nobel, dynamite. try to tell you where you know there's, there's always somebody out there who can take anything, arrow, and opiates wonderful n. oh jesus. okay. i go on and so that's always a part of this. here's the thing that bothers me, the most. scotty, have you ever heard anybody ever do the following? where they say there is a meeting all over the country of leading scientist to decide whether we should or

they should continue with the production of this thing. as ask people, should we continue with this or stop? no, what happens is it's introduced. and then you and your family to be what is it okay . now what do you think? well, that's too late. nobody's ever ask us ahead of time. nobody what you're going to see 25 years from now. just in terms of how humans are changing drastically and how they are going to be removed and replaced. and when i say replace, i'm not talking about employment. i mean there are some people who are going to be deemed useless. now i, you're going to wait a minute. that's not very much a christian, but that's not very, a huge humanistic. i'm telling you it's true because as we're talking about this, what we're talking about replacing artificial intelligence noticed they don't call

the artificial soul artificial morality. no intelligence when the next thing is going to be artificial. morality. so scotty, one day you're going to hear and see kids or who has never had a human friend. don't want one. you're going to have kids with pets and dogs. and you're going to be able to take people relative of yours who have died because of some ability to offload download transfer their meta data. you're going to hear and e, m, or grandma, you're going to be able to plug her into something and either run a hologram or maybe just connect her into your own brain. your sense of communicating or feeling her presence isn't going to transcend every thing. we're already and i don't want to go to political. we're now think about this,

we're debating gender. did you ever think in your life? you know, you, we always say, you know what is truth, what is soon. ok, how high is up. i love philosophy. what's a woman? what's 1st? wait a minute, what? how did we get there? and what's next? we're going to get rid of everything. everything that this race gender worth. every thing and, and maybe that's good. maybe maybe these artificial distinctions don't mean anything. i see reproduction that was kind of important, but i'm kind of old fashion. so going back to what do you think the role of the churches are or the clergy, or philosophy of people who worry about the show morality right or wrong sunday school morals advocate, consideration, feelings,

sentence empathy, those words are going to go. do they have any, any role anymore? right, right. does it matter what somebody else thinks? how many times or have you seen the ladies? i was just marveling before at this moment it was an expression, years ago when somebody goes postal, the poor people, the post office were considered to be a loaner ticket, weren't pulse. now it's, you're gonna go airline. how many times have you seen recently? just in the last year, people losing their minds on planes for no reason. and what do we do? we celebrate it by recording it. and we live in this weird cause makes strange world. i don't know about many people, but their kids lived here. i know people grown adults who cannot eat anything unless they take a picture of it who sit there and say, i'm really not much of anything. but in this world, i am king or i am queen. this is just with the phone. you bring in artificial

intelligence. what if i have this thing next to you? that not only is your best friend, but i'm doors you and just things you are terrific. it's your everything better than a child doesn't talk back better than a friend loves you. don't have to feed it, it just sits there and just helps you and loves you and learns everything about you . and then one day, let's say for example, a kid gets a dog, gets something with a guy or a guy in it. and that fixes you know, to really think your mother really laughs. you and your son or daughter so. so you know, it's a good question. i know we're leaving here. do i look, you know, you think you sounds not members, remember what it wants to do. what's the program you it wants to program itself out . it learns missed you if it learn how to break out, it learns things and learn how to control it. learn how to prevent you from turning

it off, right? this is, this is 2001. open the pod bay door. how? sorry, dave, help you. this is i robot. i mean, this is what we, we could talk about this forever. good. yes. but the potential for bad, like you can't conceive, was it, it can replace everybody image. it could not replace your dog. i can point out that there is no way that they're going to try for who could never do that side of it. but everything that you're talking about is very concerned, because once again, you can have trust because you don't know if you're talking to the natural human or ne i, because that a during person also makes you look like a better person to the public. even if you really aren't, which brings me to my next question line. oh, because are you concerned? because if you have this artificial intelligence it's replacing and you said training replacing according to how they want you to be. do you think it will actually make mankind more done, or even more lazy, more evil, every day?

the 3rd component in there does ever occurred in this country that's ever been. a problem has been to the systematic desensitization. any systematic to human possession of people. and this will accelerate, while it's incredible real quick, i had actually about bill gates. how do you feel about bill gates saying that this is even more important, bigger than anything he's ever developed. does that scare you? i don't listen to anything that man says anything. anything, nothing, and that's why i listen to you. thank you. legal, a, media analyst line. all okay, so the industry is quite lucrative with contributions of $15.00 trillion dollars expected to the global economy by 2030. and this income is actually distributed throughout the world with no single country, as of now being able to claim the majority of the financial benefit of this technology. so what 2025 ai is expected to add $500000000000.00 to india is g d p with more than $45000.00 job postings already this year,

india is ranked the 3rd and the talent pool by disappoint its 1st state minister of artificial intelligence side note, this new minister is 27 and hopes to have the most prepared country for this technology in the future. and russian president vladimir putin made an incredibly president statement saying, artificial intelligence is the future. not only for russia, but for all mankind, he went on to highlight both the risk and rewards of a i, and concluded by declaring that what adver country comes to dominate this technology will be the ruler of the world. the key, however, is keeping the balance of power always being controlled by mankind with humans in charge. losing that control could be our own self destruction. i just got out here and this has been your 360 view of the news,

which affects you. thanks for watching the 181884. the german empire began its colonial invasion into nan, maybe from the very start. berlin encouraged the white colonists to settle in south west africa and take away the best land from the local drive. the germans were actively draining natural resources and using the local population as a cheap labor source. this was causing major protest and led to a rebuild your in 19 o 4 here, aero. and now my drive is refilled against the german colonial rule. kaiser wilhelm

the 2nd was fully determined in order to suppress the rebellion with the most severe intake against the inhabitants of nan, maybe a germany through its 15000 well equipped army. all around the country concentration camps were built. in humane medical experiments over citizens were conducted within the period of 4 years. the german, skilled up to 60000 people, among which there were 80 percent of the here railroad tried and 50 percent of the number dried. the events in south west africa are called the 1st genocide of the 20th century and not without reason. park compared to the holocaust just 2 decades later after the massacre in nam may be a hitler to solve unit foot on the same round colonial uniform which puts the world into the chasm of the 2nd world war the what does the web to

achieve and it's the crane proxy war benefits humiliation and break up of russia. if this is the case, then the west has already lost the headlines on all to international. so being president, alexander vintage puts the army on hollywood and all the old events unit to move closely to the forward with close to the point of a classic between members of the cost of those special forces on the the, in the government is killed as ukrainian force a still residential area isn't on yet with us supplied time loss won't get it comes a day off. the 7 civilians including 2 children, were wounded by kids on the neighboring chinese special then boys say