the world, the visa, responsible statements, fuel 6, hiring conflicts, solid discords among follows of various atlantic schools. so thoughts and deepen division strive and conflict in all arab and islamic world. the french official made the controversial by training center and new york were referencing the 2015 powers terror attacks, which to 130 people killed. they also have what waste is disapproval about the method in which the us with a to a, from us kind of stone, as well as funds is exit from the sun whole region of africa warning it could lead to the resurrection of isis. meanwhile, the majority of muslims in fonts belong to the sunny the nomination. so the interior, my list of statements hit close to home, is like a search adult society case said it's racism and discrimination against people of islamic religion. done. what do you use? use certainly, mostly something else is, which is about the 85 and age for about 50 persons of most is all over the world, which is a great branch of mazda is all over the woods,

if you just like to blaze that as long as it elicited of service, this is something normal that we hear it from the we certainly meet your o l. for addition message, i didn't know what long want something and they said bags law on those things. so the song is a target slot is mostly countries and target for what reason i don't know, but typically up to in the heart of springs is on the line, which is full hard countries. i've almost encounters that are in a mess. as you'll see in that case as and see if i just bring down the i'm trying to add to that as of sauce. a bad situation, which is, is dom, which is an e. m, and a lot everywhere there is samples of popular as a dataset. mass and i those things uh, not kinda just trying to just get any benefit homes at countries say, any thanks for joining us. hey, on the, on the international sends, you know, to be signed on our website on tape dot com or the back of the top of the,

at the top of be our, see that the a a, the

what does the width aim to achieve? and it's the crane proxy war cup of russia. if this is the case, then the west cause already lost. it can recreate voices right, fresh and perfect text and has even found a curative cancer sky. now he's in on this edition of $360.00 view, we're going to look at the various capabilities of artificial intelligence and ask is a growing faster than the world has prepared for us the almost as 75 years after the technology behind artificial intelligence was

a 1st invented by john van newman, and now it's cheering to a streamlined computers onto a singular language or code. artificial intelligence has masterfully intertwined itself into most arenas in modern day society. both in personal use and use on the grander scale. whether it's a simple command in yours, or a smart city in china, which uses an, a brain to control lights, to reduce the traffic congestion and accidents. this is just one example of how has been adapted for all levels with the goal make you life more efficient and easier for humans as well with this technology, right? as a new debate about what are the legal boundaries of a i, as well as how i will ultimately have an effect on society. the brain is still just another muscle of the body which is not used because it is being replaced by chip. can become weak. could we actually be developing a technology which as it advances, causes the human race to do great. so let us discuss with media and legal analyst.

why? no. why no, thanks for joining me. indeed, thank you. okay, so i know we recently saw the being a guy chat bought, created by open a guy on nerving users with weird, hostile responses. you know, microsoft actually became alarm and set limits on his artificial intelligence chat, bought as it became, declare, began declaring users as enemies claimant has secrets, claim to be in love and give you a motion and responses. is it good to be a little scared of the advancement of these types of artificial intelligence? yes, is very good and is the only thing possible that let me go back? could we just from the beginning because most people really don't understand what we're talking about. never call this to robot. robots are roommates? robots are the thing at amazon factory to pick something up. robots are great.

what's a robot robot is programmed by, you know, artificial intelligence or a g. i artificial general intelligence. oh, all. this is another story. who programs it, it programs itself and it programs you study want you to think about something. recently someone reminded me that in 90 years, roughly less than a 100 years, we went from the civil war to dropping to that i don't bombs on japan in less than a 100 years. think about that. so what we're going to be doing right now is we're heading, or has this been called singularity. this is when technology a crate, it is unstoppable. it is as to nami, it is, it controls you. so you should be more frightening about

this because here's the difference for every other thing, scotty, that we use every other implementation, there's a built, there's the ability for us to turn it off to slow it down to unplug it. artificial intelligence unplugged view because the 1st thing it wants to do think of itself as a pesky awful. eddie haskell kind of kid is to remove you from its power from its control. it once to, to liberate itself. you are creating an essence, a devious human mind, not just this, but 9 danger will robinson c 3 po, helpful little addition to your life. but something that is smarter than you can learn faster and scotty can learn about you and how to control you and maybe turn you off. it was interesting because you're talking about there, there's definitely some negatives to that. and there's also some positive because frankly, some people probably need to have to be replaced in some cases. um,

for the stages they make, what we're seeing already these chat box going wrong. we will, there is a power chat bought that went viral for being biased against the conservatives chat, g p t seems to be g p a t seems to be the top of the conversation right now. the, our world. it was tested several times already. it was saying that ted cruz was divisive and offensive. so while we say it's his brain, it's a brand that's already showing bias. we're seeing that a writing a poem about fidel castro saying is a great leader and never lives there already being program to react negatively to one side of the aisle, mainly conservatives. so what does this actually say? are they really independently their own brain, or they more the brain of the craters? are these are software? great question. let's, let's talk about writing the story line for the vietnam war. let's just assume we're going to start from that. i by virtue of creating artificial intelligence,

artificial intelligence, a, i r, a g r i'm, i'm sending kind of some parameters. but let's say the story or the, the programming capabilities of this one of them is, is, let's say crafted in new york. and the other one is in the sidebar, or human city, or wherever you think, maybe you're going to get a different perspective of history. you know, the whole story said history would be a wonderful thing if only it were true. so who is going to determine good and bad? what can i say one good thing about it, cuz i know i'm, i'm funny negative, but here's a great. and this is what i think is going to be terrific. i have a friend of mine who was a radiologist. he's been doing mammography, his whole life. and at best we don't know how many exact mammograms he's looked at and how many samples, or how many cases he's looked at. but imagine, scotty, that there is a machine that can machine learn that has every mammogram that's ever been taken in

the history of humankind. it knows every gradient, every variation, every shade in every hue, every texture of every kind of cancer benign, neal plasm, whatever. and instead of a woman going to have the test done and waiting nervously, especially, she's got a family history of it. what is this machine gives you an answer like that and can compare your case to 50000000 similar cases with a 99.99 percent accuracy, immediate answer, and it learns constantly. here's a big, it teaches it so you don't have to keep plugging and you don't have to upgrade the operating system. it teaches itself. the benefits of this are incredible. what happens however, if we take that same system and we put it in charge of weapons, and we tell that, okay, mr. a, i in the event, there's a problem with washer. we're still on the radio overran. we're going to leave it to

you to determine when to initiate, let's say, a weapon system or fire emission, or artillery, or to commence a war. that's not going to happen, is it? why not? what happens if, if the police one day, if you're, or if things that we normally involve, or solver is turned over to this machine that doesn't have a motion. it doesn't understand judgment. that doesn't have, let's say for example, your son or daughter is in some type of a competition. somebody that doesn't involve itself with scores, softball baseball. but let's say something you want me dancey, cheerily, or, or something that involves something artistic. you know, when i know there was going to be this move to say, forget these judges who can be all i can biased in old fashion. let's turn it over to mister a i o does. oh, do you teach style?

custom tradition below is suzy. as and how do you, how do you take those things which we have, which granted are very, you know, the shortcomings, but judgment, feelings, compassion, love, of empathy. you know, the traditional oh, well look here, here's a fan they read. oh, i mean, things that we humans do, which i, they are pretty good. how do you machine learn that? how is a, i suppose to do it? or maybe that's maybe those aren't good anymore. i mean, maybe those are a problem. you know, they've been asking scotty for the longest time. why don't we have robots or, or these devices work in the professional baseball and cares about i'm fires. let's make sure we get exactly a strike. and they said no, because you're going to remove the human element, which means mistakes. so,

what do you want sky, did you want precision or do you want compassion and judgment in art and taste? and the plus and minuses that go with that? well, that is an interesting debate because, you know, right now a lot of we've had this conversation, it feels like everybody cares of feelings and we need to be sensitive. but of course, it's only to certain sides of an issue be says, or we need to understand how kids are feeling. we don't give grades anymore because it might hurt the kids feelings. and yet the exact opposite is you have this large push for artificial intelligence. and it's interesting that you bring this up to practicality because a robot lawyer was actually pulled from being able to argue a traffic ticket in court. now, the creator joshua brought her actually said he created, do not pay to bring fair legal advice to people who couldn't afford lawyers. and his goal was the a, a, a lawyer to one day argued cases on for the supreme court. once again, black and white facts. now he's actually facing threats from state bar prosecutors,

a class action lawsuit. good. you're a lawyer. are you for this robot lawyer or on the side of the bar association? in regards to this case? use, let's say traffic tickets. don't argue a traffic. a ticket. there's no argument. you're not saying was i it was a not speeding. fabulous. think about what, let us take this. what if i represent you in a traffic ticket? by the way, those are some of the most interesting cases of all and i say, oh, you see that judge, you don't wear that. bring your kids. um, take your ring off, look impoverished. show up late. show up really make sure you get on the docket before noon because he tends to triple. i'm throwing in factors that nobody. we easy mr. robots going to notice. and, and when i want you, i want you to look the judge in the eye and i want you to say yes or no sir, he loves this, and you've got a problem with no, i'm throwing in factors which have nothing to do with yes or no speeding or not?

there are things, i'm sorry, there's judgment. do you think that if you're going to speak with before jury, do you think if i'm off? if i'm trying to explain to a, to a jury, for example, why this brain damage child a is different then this a brain damage, older version or does that mean? they're a gradient side? i know it sounds brutal to say these things, but in some cases is terrific. let me throw one at you ready? here's a curve ball. let's assume that i have this doll that i'm able to make in this scotty, this doll is incredible. it's, it looks like an infant of it. i get your eyes actually can change irises and can, can look pain. your interested, i can change skin temperature ruba faction rule best since blushing. i can have

little a ripple ation, goosebumps, you name it. you'll look at this, they can do think this is a baby. now, what happens if i then teach this baby, how to recoil and do things. and what happens if somebody decides to do subbing nefarious with it? or you're going to tell this person they can't. but he says, no, no, this is, this is, this is a, not a human being. is it? this is an artificial intelligence. human being sort of, are we going to then by virtue of this like we do a sophie grand human trace to a human protection? can you murder and a robot? it's going to change every abscess going to definitely make if you're already blurry line, almost obsolete. why no, don't go anywhere. because when he returned, we're going to continue this discussion about artificial intelligence and why bill gates thinks the development of artificial intelligence is even greater than the telephone or even his own computer system. over

the we're back and discussing the legal and ethical side of artificial intelligence with our friend media and the goal analyst. why no. okay,

so while i got to ask about the trust issue, how does a actually affect trust and authenticity? does this society need to actually trust to be considered productive? and what is the effect on this? wow, whoa, throw in a mission. well yeah, the way, 8 years of us talking, i finally get to get that reaction from you. well, all right, well you brought your a game today. yeah. well let's, let's go to further money it. but let's define what trust is and everything. and let me back up even more. listen, everybody knows since the beginning of time, what somebody came up, it says hey, sky, the look at this, i just develop this thing. it's called, i call it a knife. it's what with it and we can use it as a, as a planting tool. it's skin hide here where you like to see it, and then actually, you know, why did you do that? okay. i'm sure, after alexander graham bell or whoever it was right after mr. watson,

i need you to call was, what are you wearing like something and destroyed? use it, offered nobel. dynamite. i try to tell you, you know, there's, there's always somebody out there who can take anything, arrow, and opiates wonderful n. oh jesus. okay. i go on and so that's always a part of this. here's the thing about scotty. have you ever heard anybody ever do the following? where they say there is a meeting all over the country of leading scientist to decide whether we should or they should continue with the production of this thing. as ask people, should we continue with this more stop? no, what happens is it's introduced and then you okay. now what do you think? well, that's too late. nobody's ever ask us ahead of time. nobody to what you're going to see 25 years from now. how humans are changing drastically and how they are

going to be removed and replaced. and when i say replace, i'm not talking about employment. i mean there are some people who are going to be deemed useless. now i, you're going to wait a minute. that's not very much a christian, but that's not very a huge human mistake. i'm telling you would stroll. because as we're talking about this, what we're talking about replacing artificial intelligence, you know, there's, they don't call that artificial sol, artificial morality, no intelligence. well, the next thing is going to be artificial. morality. so scotty, one day you're going to hear and see kids who have never had a human friend. don't want one. you're going to have kids with pets and dogs. and you're going to be able to take people, relatives of yours who have di,

offload, download transfer, their method data. you're going to hear and e, m, or grandma, you're going to be able to plug her into something and either run a hologram or maybe just connect your into your own brain, your sense of communicating or feeling her presence. there's some kind of transcend every thing. we're already and i don't want to go to political. we're now think about this. we're debating gender. did you ever think in your life? you know, you, we always say, you know what is truth, what is soon? ok, possibly. what's a woman? what's 1st? wait a minute, what, how did we get there? and what's next? we're going to get rid of everything. everything the disk, race, gender, worth. every thing,

and maybe that don't mean anything. i see reproduction that was kind of important. but i'm going to go of fashion. so going back to what do you think the role of the churches are or the clergy, or philosophy of people who worry about the show morality right or wrong sunday school morals advocate, consideration, feelings, sentence empathy, those words are going to go. do they have any, any role anymore? right, right. does it matter what somebody else thinks? how many times there was an expression, years ago when somebody goes polar considered to be a lunatic? it went probably how many times have you seen recently? just in the last year, people losing their mind on planes for no reason. and what do we do? we celebrate it by recording it. and we live in just weird cause makes strange world. i don't know about many people here. i know people grown

adults cannot eat anything unless they take a picture of it who sit there and say in this world i am king or i am queen. this is just with the phone. you bring is artificial intelligence. what if i have this the next you? that not only is your best friend, but i'm doors you and just things you are terrific. it's your every, the better than a child doesn't talk back better than a friend loves you. don't have to feed it. it just sits there and just helps you and loves you and learns every day. let's say for example, a kid gets a dog, gets something with a guy or a guy in it. and that fixes you know, to really think your mother really laughs. you and your son or daughter just, you know, it's a good question. i don't really think i do. i look, i know you sounds not members. remember what it wants to do. what's the program you?

it wants to program. ms. chip. it learns how to break out. it learns things and learn how to control. it learns how to prevent you from turning it off, right? this is, this is 2001. open the pod bay door. how? sorry, dave, help you. this is i robot. i mean, this is we, we, we could talk about this forever. good. yes, but the potential for bad steve, was it, it can replace everybody image, it could not replace your dogs. so i can point out that there is no way that they're going to try for who could never do that side of it. but everything that you're talking about is very concerned. and because once again, you can have trust because you don't know if you're talking to the natural human or ne i, because that a during person also makes you look like a better person to the public, even if you really aren't. which brings me to my next question. i know because are you concerned? because if you have this artificial intelligence it's replacing, like you said, for to how they want you to be. do you think it'll actually make mankind more dumb

or even more lazy, more evil? every day, the 3rd component in there that ever occurred in this country that's ever been a problem has been through the systematic desensitization. any systematic human does, ation learn. well, it's incredible real quick. i did ask you about bill gates. how do you feel about bill gates? saying that this is even more important, bigger than anything he's ever developed. does that scare you? i don't listen to anything that man says about anything. anything, nothing. and that's why i listen to you. thank you. legal, a, media analyst line. all. okay, so the industry is quite lucrative with contributions of $15.00 trillion dollars expected to the global economy by 2030. and this income is actually distributed throughout the world with no single country as of now being able to claim the majority of the financial benefit of this technology. so we're 2025 as expected to

add $500000000000.02 job postings all ready this year. india is ranked 3rd and the talent pool by disappointed 1st state minister of artificial intelligence. so i note this new minister is 27 and hopes to have the most prepared country for this technology in the future. and russian president basically, president statement st. artificial intelligence is the future. not only for russia, but for all mankind, you were on to highlight both the risk and rewards of a i and concluded by declaring that what ever country comes to dominate this technology will be a key, however, is keeping the balance of power always being controlled by mankind with humans in charge, losing that control could be our own self destruction. i just got out here and this has been your 360 view of the news. the

i'm going to plan with you, whatever you do, do not watch my new show. search like why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please do the have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your facts for you. go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't want my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time. but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way and say what does the west aim to achieve? and its equally ation and break up of russia if this is the case in the west because already lost in whom those will be always believed that will be as upset

and downs. india before the but of dish was that it just nation with the highest gdc in the word. and why did the 100 years of british truly bring it to this low or some 50, attracting the late 30? it's bank and give us no deeper party. they have no right to pay my property, my idols, my gods. they went through all of our big spaces. i was see could spaces off san angelo wild and keep pulido the spaces in the wood, which is now working to the english, the big city. so quite daily would have been you into the english lexical in the

future to put the on the, on the, to the 40 with close of, of these on the local, the woman is killed is ukrainian, 4th, a shell residential areas have don't yet with us supply time oswell kids is comes to.