of course, if you can do non corporation on these 3 sectors, you and paralyzed several guys and did not have them to forgotten because we needed a gram the to actually put this all together. we need to have gotten the who can give us a simple message, which even then add us to correct, put, understand, i'm even the for us to poor could understand. so if you see how gun be communicated, i mean, one of the greatest examples of this communication was the sort much the, uh, my email back, am giga and then a local i pad. yeah. the local by a judge. i've got them. yeah. and i teach, i did the like the one that had a good 80 there, but i do literally get them get you. uh, what about that? let me know at that that the, that she said uh, i had to go to the one of my d 25 that i looked up the majority of

a gun to use it. so my husband gotten the, the, the see took a pinch of salt and broke the files back. and how did he do that? he took 78th of his formulas from out of the box and walked 241 miles to the sequels for a village called diamond. and these 241 miles with these each the coastal bond don b, he had a $100000.00 ingles with him. and one hand think somebody by the help of some of them not getting back your conscience at some point of time. but if he can, and so what am i doing? am i doing that? i think, i think that's what he did to the british, or the

take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify. it will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just because it shows you fractured images, presented as fast. can you see through their illusions, going underground? can the,

[000:00:00;00] the numbers that you need use visa deployed you sent to nancy kim's and then actually should see where it gets to that the only showcase is

use the so i'm just going to the boys at the boys. the probably the one that's noun, that'll be for them. imagery of assess florida doesn't want that. i faxed them, but the notes up under that and yeah, became independent on the 15th of august. 1947 was we were moving towards independence of india be what was so moving towards the partition of india, that was a terrible legacy of the british when they were here in india, as ruler,

is because one of the things they did was divide and rule so they did create a kind of schism between the hindus and the most slims was they were ruling this country. and that meant that the british felt that they could no longer control the situation they brought in mount baton. and he was the last viceroy of india, and he needed to do something. and he thought that petition was the only way out. so then he brought in the judge from the u. k cord, a civil servant radcliffe, who came in with never been to and deb before, she had no idea of the country at all. and he was given 5 weeks to divide the country. and within 5 weeks, he takes the decision and he just draws up the lines, mounts back to him, could not tell anybody what the boundaries, well, you know, because it was only between him and radcliffe. and of course, the british government's back home in london. so papa son was born on the 14th of

august, and india became independent on the 15th of august. but the domes of the partition of the country were only announced on the 17th of august. so it was a free in deal and focused on that loan to about what would the terms of the partition, but the people the completely on for that and people have to leave. they have to leave their homes that being forced out of their homes. because there are rights all around them, people, are you taking homes that driving people out? what happens in a situation like this when the nation is unprepared for it? and that is what had happened to the british left. a very unprepared nation. be lost so much. they lost lives, they lost homes, they lost their status, they became refugees, or what night in, in the new country that they were forced to go to. it was also

a division of everything right from the means to the cricket team, to music, to arch, to show everything was divided into, you know, on the basis of religion. the . so this is a very beautiful sculpture given to us. and by crush me, the artist did when she and it represents, as you can see, the whole story of migration how difficult it is. because this is a horse painted in the traditional style of kashmir and paper machine style. but on his back, he's gathering bones, different bones of different thoughts. so for humans, bodies, and i think that is very symbolic and something which we must remember that when people migrate,

they carry many things with them. the findings, milan show pro, i'm 11 years old and have a lot of family history. the cheese are the same. oh yes, correct. and she's the last and in line. awesome. they just so there's a straight from a line from, from the do one more rush chip from, from the ridge of more time. so that was one of the sports. and and in that main line that goes down to judge, she's in the, the last isn't a boy there's a partial india called punjab. and we had, there was mirage who had his sword there and he was flashing with a sword and he had to give the sword. and he went to prison and we want the sword back because we don't want any more bad things. we don't want the pos trauma, we just want to have

a sort of safe place. the i went about seeking the return event and i basically requested it. and that was very clearly and, and rather abruptly rejected. oh, certainly is very, very disappointed. and i think especially at a time when, when, when we've gone through quite some transformation, generally in the world where, where we've become much more accepting of, of, of different, different cultures and different people and, and the world has become more diverse place. and i think also the discussion of actually returning objects that were a taken in the colonial context has become, you know, a very relevant discussion. so this is the initial letter for me requesting the return of the sword. this was the response which after its explanation ends with the words in conclusion,

i must advise you that the regiments will not agree to the return sale of the total i sort and considers this matter trust which of course, for me it is not they basically explained that this was a war trophy and as a war trophy as a material object, it was important to them to celebrate their victories of the past. which of course, was adding insult to injury for the family that had suffered in the very brutal seas. and in addition to that, they said, well, if we give this back why, why shouldn't we give everything else back? and if we don't give everything else back, why should we give this back? and to me, that's a very false lodge. if i go into someone's house and i take something and i leave the house, and i say look, more people will benefit from this from, from your possessions. because i can put them on display. is that going to be a very satisfactory answer you?

you just want it back to came from your house. so i don't think that brittany, as it's museums, have done, can self appoint themselves as the keepers of shipments, civilization. in terms of these objects. it is not about changing history. it is not about changing the facts of history. there was a siege, there was a defeat. that's a fact that we can change our experience of that history. and i have made it very clear to the wrong itinerary that the family continues to suffer. consequence from batch. my daughter will say she doesn't want any family curse to be passed on to her. and this sword has gone through an enormously traumatic experience. i think the answer is for this or to be taken to the kind of place that mirage himself would have wanted, which is basically a hindu temple for this or to have

a degree of respect to be treated with respect and for that piece to come the um, so i have just made these 2 fellow indians who i'll, i spoke to about this cause, you know, they're just happy to be there. is that the are, the fact that they are seeing should, are best appreciated by being at the british museum. that being put on to see a lot of stuff feel that you know especially coming back video with themselves. that's how to do so i'm for sure man. these come because i learned more here to both of them both and about lower sheila the more i would build. yeah. for on this one video games and sewer. um yeah, that's an advantage of it's debbie, just giving you that out there. yeah. but i think it's just a lack of awareness. it is not just about

a to to stake viewing. of the artifact is actually about history is actually about the rightful ownership of, of each artifact. and addition, rightfully be in india, give me one minute what i would recommend is lady, you can send data heritage to india and i can get an d, they'll be more i bought those times to for addition use the, the word needs to understand that history belongs to its jungle. when people talk offer evidence of british colonialism for lead positive like, i think we have to be fair and balanced. and talked about british colonialism. you know, what a lift back is. do you go out to ask any and you should speaking person on way to school educated and they would give you 10 reasons why the picture showed was

good funny dick's time to show them to, to let's say, if i call you my neighbors my, that my neighbors, mother is more beautiful than my mother. so i caught calling her mom because she's more beautiful than my mother. the british, i'm left us still a cottage should i'm blind worship is actually putting you all forwarding and somebody else's times. and i loving dental control. you sold this misuse should stop the i'm speaking to you in english and i've been, i've learned that as my 1st language in school and my growing up years and later on it's safe as an acknowledgement of the fact that they've been colonized. and the fact that many indians cannot even, you know, probably speak probably quickly. and then what is in the language is, in the reason the language is they don't mother tongues. he's an acknowledgement of the button. he says,

effect of colonialism. reduce gene is quite unix. so it could be, come into the indian. uh, you know, dna today seemed to be honest with you, as i said, be a 5000. because if you look at our history bridge and probably use the last 200 years. but if you take 5000 the us into account, almost every part of the world has visited india. so i think not only that would be