of others way to sort of genre commit to cold and i say gloria the reverse states for rel statement is completely wrong. as russia it will, the use of washington's interests. joseph burrell statement about the you being more important to cuba, that rush at china. i have to laugh at that because it's obvious that the you continues to being the carrying the water for the united states and nato. and it's in fact you that tough prosecute before it gets frustrated with this terrible sections. and in addition, the you to really add weight, she does, it stands against the law case of united states against cube russians. relationship with cuba has steadily increased in a positive manner. and in these last years or russia has been very helpful. russia is going to open large stores where people can buy food and other household goods

in, in cuban currency. and russia is recognizing cuba as currency the best, so which up to now has no exchange value anywhere in the world. and most people don't know this, but these are all the effects, the fact that cuba is being knows, the cube is the victim of us service, causing more than 3400 lives of the cuban people in 60 years. we can keep on top of all the latest news and analysis by taking a website, a t dot com. as always, we are pre auntie international. the what does the west to achieve and, and see crane proxy war the defeat humiliation and break up of russia. if this is the case in the west because already lost

the at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning and natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local depot. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women, and children are shot when ever they can be met with squat or henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as fast as these rightly described as blood soaked in

races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines has not been resolved so far. it can recreate voices right fresh and perfect text and has even found a curative cancer sky. now he was in on this edition of a 360 view, we're going to look at the various capabilities of artificial intelligence and ask is a growing faster than the world has prepared for. let's get started. the

almost as 75 years after the technology behind artificial intelligence was a 1st invented by john van newman and alex cheering it to a streamlined computers onto a singular language of code. artificial intelligence has masterfully intertwined itself into most arenas in modern day society. both in personal use and use on the grander scale. whether it's a simple command in your smart house for alexa to turn on your lights. yeah. which uses an, a brain to control lights, to reduce traffic congestion and accidents. this is just one example of how ai has been adapted for all levels with the goal make you life more efficient and easier for humans. but with this technology right, as a new debate about what are the legal boundaries of a i, as well as how i will ultimately have an effect on society. the brain is still just another muscle of the body which is not used because it's been replaced by chip.

can become weak. could we actually be developing a technology which as it advances, causes the human race to do great. so let us discuss with media and legal analyst. why? no. why no, thanks for joining me. the thank you. okay, so i know we recently saw the being a chat bought, created by open a guy on nerving users with weird, hostile responses. you know, microsoft actually became alarm and set limits on his artificial intelligence chat, bought as it became, declare, began declaring users as enemies claimant has secrets, claim to be in love and give you a motion and responses. is it good to be a little scared of the advancement of these types of artificial intelligence? yes. possible. but let me go back. could we just from the beginning because most people really don't understand what we're talking about. never called is to robot. robots are roommates? robots are the thing at the amazon factory that pick something up. robots are great

. brand by, you know, artificial intelligence or a g. i artificial general intelligence. oh, all. this is another story. who programs it? it programs itself. and it programs you study want you to think about something recently someone reminded me that in 90 years, roughly less than a 100 years, we went from the civil war to dropping to that adam bombs. when japan in less than a 100 years, think about that. so what we're going to be doing right now is we're heading, or as this been called singularity. this is when technology occurs at such a rate, it is unstoppable. it is assumed nami, it is, it controls you. so it's frightening about this because here's the difference for

every other thing study that we use every other implementation, there's a built, there's the ability for us to turn it off to slow it down. to unplug it. artificial intelligence unplugged view because the 1st thing it wants to do think of itself as a pesky awful. eddie haskell kind of kid is to remove you from its power from its control. it once to, to liberate itself. a devious human mind. not just as benign danger will robinson c 3 po, helpful little addition to your life, but something that is smarter than you can learn faster and scotty can learn about you and how to control you and maybe turn you off. it was interesting because you're talking about there, there's definitely some negatives to that. and there's also some positive because frankly, some people probably need to have to be replaced in some cases. um,

so this is a make. what we're seeing already these chad fall is going wrong. we will, did as a power chop off that went viral for being biased against the conservatives chat, g p t seems to be g p t seems to be the top of the conversation right now. the, our world, it was tested several times, all wrapped divisive and offensive. so while we say it's this brain, it's a brand that's already showing bias. we're seeing that a writing a poem about fidel castro saying is a great leader and never lies. they're already being program to react negatively to one side of the aisle, mainly conservatives. so what does this actually say? are they really independently their own brain? or they more the brain of the craters of these a software? great question about writing the story line for the vietnam war. let's just assume we're going to start from that. i, by virtue of creating artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence, a, i r,

a g i, i'm, i'm sending kind of some parameters. but let's say the strong capabilities of this one of them is, is, let's say crafted in new york. and the other one is in cider, or human city, or wherever you think, maybe you're going to get a different perspective of history. you know, the whole story said history would be a wonderful thing if only it were true. so who is going to determine good and bad? what could i say one good thing about it, cuz i know i'm, i'm funny negative, but here's a great. and this is what i think is going to be terrific. i have a friend of mine who is a radiologist. he's been doing mammography, his whole life. and at best we've, i don't know how many exact samples or how many cases he's looked at. but imagine, scotty that there was a machine, a machine learned it has every mammogram that's ever been taken in the history of human car. it knows every gradient, every variation, every shading, every whew, every texture of every kind of cancer benign, neal plasm,

whatever. a woman going to have the test done and waiting nervously, especially, she's got a family history of it. what if this machine gives you an answer like that and can compare your case to 50 with a 99.99 percent accuracy. immediate answer and it learns constantly. here's the thing, it teaches it so you don't have to keep plugging and you don't have to upgrade the operating system. it teaches itself. the benefits of this are incredible. what system and we put it in charge of that. okay. mr. a, i in the event, there's a problem with the washer. of course, on the radio overran, we're going to leave it to you to determine when to initiate, let's say, a weapon system or fire emission, or artillery, or just commence a war. that's not going to happen isn't or why not?

what happens if, if the police one day, if you're, or if things that we normally a mom or solver is turned over to this machine that doesn't have the motion. it doesn't understand judgment. that doesn't have, let's say for example, your son or daughter is in some type of a competition. somebody that doesn't involve itself with scores, softball baseball. but let's say something you want me dancey, cheerily, or, or something that involves something artistic. you know, and i know there was going to be this, move this a project, these judges who can be all i can biased in to mr. a. i o does. how do you teach style custom tradition below is suzy as, and how do you, how do you take those things which we have, which granted are very, you know, the shortcomings, but judgment, feelings,

compassion, love, of empathy. you know, the traditional oh, look here, here's a fan favorite. oh, i mean things that we humans do which i, they are pretty good. how do you machine learn that? how is a, i suppose to do that? or maybe that's maybe maybe those aren't good anymore. i mean, you know, they've been asking scotty for the longest time. why don't we have robots or, or these devices work in the professional baseball cares about umpires. let's make sure we get exactly astride. and they said no because means mistakes. so, what do you want? sky, did you want precision or do you want to compassion, judgment in art and taste, and the plus and minus is the go with that? well, that is an interesting debate because, you know, right now a lot of we've had this conversation, it feels like everybody cares of feelings and we need to be sensitive. of course, it's only to certain sides of an issue. we don't give grades anymore because it

might hurt the kids feelings. and yet the exact opposite is you have this large push for artificial intelligence. and it's interesting that you bring this up to practicality because a robot lawyer was actually pull traffic ticket in court. now the crater joshua brought or actually said he created, do not pay to bring fair legal advice to people who couldn't afford lawyers. and his goal was the a, a, a lawyer to one day argue cases on for the supreme court. once again, black and white facts. now he's actually facing threats from the state bar, prosecutors, the class action lawsuit. good. you're a lawyer. are you for this robot lawyer or on the side of the bar association? in regards to this case? use, let's say travel as a ease ticket. there's no argument. you're not saying was i, it was a not speeding. fabulous. take about let, let us take this. what if i represent you in a traffic ticket? by the way, those are some of the most interesting cases of all and i say, oh,

you see that judge, you don't wear that. bring your kids. um, take your ring off, look impoverished. show up late. show up really make sure you get on the docket before noon because he tends to triple. i'm throwing in factors that nobody we, you think mr. robots can, once you have what you looked at, judge in the eye, and i want you to say yes or no sir, he loves this and you've got a problem with no, i'm throwing in factors which have nothing to do with yes or no speeding or not there are things, i'm sorry, there's judgement. do you think that if you're going to speak with before jury, do you think if i'm off? if i'm trying to explain to a, to a jury, for example, why this brain damage child a is different then this a brain damage, older version or does that mean they're a gradient? and i know it sounds brutal to say these things,

but in some cases is terrific. here's a curve ball. let's assume that i have this doll that i'm able to make in this scotty, this dog is incredible. it's, it looks like it inside it. ok, the eyes actually can change irises and can, can look pain or into.