you know, 100 button or whoever it was over here. they did this and that, so to some extent they caused control ukraine. but i will guarantee you there's people in ukraine that have enough corruption in dirt that they could take some of the people down here. let's not forget, they're telling us. we've got to give money to ukraine so they can buy tanks and things like that. and they're in investing in a crack in crypto scam. yeah. and then the money is coming right back into the democratic party. yeah. so i would imagine there were people are over there that can finger some of the crooks right here that are making money off of the end. by the way, i mean, and we can argue about this, i would venture to argue that it's not just the democratic party that it's across the board. if you're a politician in america, if you own a media company in america, even i dare say if you are supposedly a journalist in america, you're probably corrupted right now. and it bothers me to say that because, you know, we're supposed to set the example. let's take a break. i don't want you to stop. i want to get back in your head on a couple of other things or including something you mentioned earlier about how

politicians start with a certain amount of money and end up with a heck of a lot more by the way, i have a pod cast where as a journalist, as latino as an entrepreneur, i share my story, is what i've learned what i'm not learn. usually i've learned a heck of a lot more from my mistakes and i have from anything else called the rick sanchez podcast. we talked about a lot of stuff including with garland and are talking about right here right now. look for it wherever you get your podcast when we come back. so how's a guy in garland just mentioned this a little while ago or gal pelosi mcconnell start in congress or in the senate, making maybe a $100000.00 a year. and then suddenly, 1020 years later, they got $35000000.00. $85000000.00. how's that? but we're going to tell you took away the

the, i look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except we're so shorter is that conflict with the 1st law show alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously is to place a trust rather than to the area. i mean, with the artificial intelligence we have summoning the payment, the robot must protect this phone. existence is alexis

interim. those will be always believe that life as a full 2nd that will be is ups and downs. india. before the british was the richest nation with the highest gdc in the work. and why did the 100 years of british truly bring it to a dis below of some 50, attracting the latest 30 authentic and give us no deeper party. they had no right to take my property. my idols, my god, they went through all of our big spaces i was see could spaces off of san angelo winding, pointed out the spaces inside. the wood lute also in the wood, which is now closer to the english, the big city, so quite selling lead, even the heating, the words have been looted into the english lexicon. to

china. the ways you have the only interest in this new interest. we have also our, our initial interest, but we can find some kind of space coming entries and based on this coming tree. so we can do a roadmap for cooperation. there, principle corporation. and this was that we saw to, to lead to, to, uh, we, we the, hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. let me give me some examples of what we were talking about a little while ago. what happens when somebody becomes a law maker in the united states? our 1st example is majority leader. mitch mcconnell, he represents kentucky,

as you know in the united states has done those has done so since 1984. and when he came into office, he made only, oh, roughly $70000.00 a year. that was a salary right? $70000.00 a year. good salary, especially back time. right? for a young guy like he was today, somehow only serving in that same job for 20 years, making roughly a salary today. obviously he makes more than that because it's gone up. but still, he's worth $35000000.00. if you had a job making $75.00, let's say even a $150200000.00 a year. you think you'd be worth $35000000.00 after 20 years? let's go to nancy pelosi dental. correct. right. she started her career as a u. s. law maker and 87. today she said to be worth a $114000000.00. what does that come from? what does that say about them?

it may be more to the point. what does it say about our ability to get either house of congress to be less excited about funding wars? they seem to be profiting from. for example, ukraine. let's continue our conversation now with a girl at nixon. i mentioned this in particular because it seems to me that our number one export right now in this country. the number one thing that we explored is defense to military. it's got right, we don't do better, we do guns. and if i were a lawmaker and i wanted to clean up the story, so to speak, i would probably look in that direction to create alliances. and my fear is that's exactly what they're doing. that's exactly how they're getting rich. that's exactly why we're ending up. unless worse or is absolutely in that direction, wouldn't look right back at you because that's what they do. they know that they

need to get these politicians on their side and what a lot of people don't know is you mean you mean the defense and physical tractors. and one of the most opportune ways that they do it is their family. now nancy below is he's husband is a guy that does a lot of real estate. yeah, i will guarantee if you look at the real estate, you're gonna find some real nice deal. do you remember there was the ranks, for example. exactly. there was a guy from alaska, they got in trouble a few years back. it was a fatality of of yeah. and what was there were people that were redoing his house for free. so what happens is, these members of congress have a friend of a friend, and somebody gives a good deal in sales in the house cheap, and they turn that over and then their wife gets a job. remember evan, by having, by the end of sen, whatever his wife gets a job, make it a couple $1000000.00 a year with a one of these health insurance companies. so they have a way of doing this to make sure that they can skirt around the rules with nobody's been doing thing anyway. and everybody gets paid at the said state of affair and 805-0500. but yeah, but what about the donald trump?

so steps us will and, and $1000000000.00 off of a foreign country because of what and 5 buildings that he sold in new york city and made what give me a brand new what i told him that his dad wasn't in the white house. right. and pardon me is, is uh, is his father in law right in hunter biden's. uh, business partner is john kerry step. so that's what i mean on and on. it goes around is those videos, it doesn't end with how does the point is, you know, we make a lot of noise about 100 bytes. and i of course, 100 bytes of disaster. this guy is just, even beyond the corruption. i mean, just as a human being is kind of a wreck. i mean, have you read the story of the magic of something? because when they look, let's face it, they over through the government of ukraine and installed the new government. and when they went in, it was hotter by and it was name after name below. so these people on and on family members and friends went in and looted it because that's part of what they do. yes, ukraine was a blunt object. he used to hit a rush over the head with,

but at the same time the vultures went in to pick the bones of, of you create and they're doing it right now, and they're projecting what will be left of ukraine when this is all over and black rock etc, all out. they're trying to buy parts of it. and, you know, the members of congress, they got it, they gotta use that wage. rave. think lensky is a willing participant in this, or do you think he's just the guy who happens to be caught up in something he's trying to do the best to control? but i think there came a point where he had to make a decision. you know, as i said, i've done some work on my own capitol hill. and what happens with people like, was it, was it lensky if he wasn't in it from the beginning? yeah, there comes a point where you have to make a decision where you know what's going on. and so with all the corruption, let's face it. we've recently had it implied that this guy skim $400000000.00 off for his own pocket. so if you're getting 400 dollars 1000000 dollars out of the, i don't know if you're familiar with that to the right. 400000000. we have not

independently verified it, but i know that the story is out there and certainly wouldn't be any different than what we saw in, i guess, 10 or products or any of the other equity. and generally, i think he's almost been promised after i've gone a who's the present, who was the installed president of a rock. what happened at the end? he's getting into play and there's literally millions of dollars following out of satchels onto the tarmac as it's but that's, that's the gateway. and so and so, so let me take you to, when we had a possibility that he would be able to do some kind of deal. and apparently, i don't know, 2 people in the russians and reached out to them. and then they, they were talking about some kind of compromise to bring this thing finally to an end. and as we understand that the former prime minister of great britain went over there, johnson with his, uh, wonderful haircut. and uh and said, no, we don't want you drawing a deal when it's almost like you're saying, we need this thing to be pro law, right? there are a number of issues, not the least of which mean what we're talking about is money. but let's keep in

mind here. this is part of the big new brzezinski is grand chessboard strategy. ukraine is part of a strategy for the united states to maintain a world had gemini, that's already gone. so the idea is we have to use, you create the, the, the cover story is ukraine is a real country, and we're defending a country with that was invaded, the real story is they did this on purpose, so they could try to use ukraine to weaken russia that's why they don't. yeah, no, obviously, yeah, the military exercises in the black sea, which, you know, when they got a lot of money to me, we did, we did everything possible to provoke russia and anybody who doesn't see that is just not paying attention. right. but more importantly, i guess the point i'm trying to understand, okay, do they do is uh, garland because. busy as they are interested in multinational interest money, that these big corporations need to be able to or do they do it because they just feel like some of my guess have told me right here on the show and i've argued with them. no, we just feel like we're the united states, we've got

a better solution. people need to be like us cuz we're the best and that's why they do, i think that you are, which is not a reason for corruption. exactly. your 1st argument is, is it is more like it's about money, but remember, something near grand strategy to break russia up and take over russia is about money in russia, having resources, a china is threatening, that's what's the threat because they're making money and they have independence and empowers so in reality, in from a grand perspective, this is all about money and only makes sense that it from a kind of like a hologram. if you look at the smallest part of a hologram, you can see the whole thing. that's what this is. if you look at the smallest bit of corruption, you can see that this is a giant web of international corruption to make the world safe for crooked international corporate oligarchy. well, you have closed on a big go. uh, interesting choice of words, and i appreciate you having your,

your great guess. thank you. and it's interesting to look at things like this and ways that unfortunately to many americans don't because it's not to say we need to be hyper critical of our own country. but we do need to be critical and we do need to ask the right questions. thank you for helping us do that any time and thank you . we appreciate you being here and helping us with this discussion. and you know, one of the things about what we do here, and i think this is really, really important is because we want to remind you that we try and do is keep the information not in silos. so there's this side. and this side, there is no republican argument, conservative argument versus liberal argument versus democratic, no judge do not live in little boxes. truth is everywhere, and that's what we try to discuss here. thanks so much for being with us. and we'll be looking for you again. if i don't see you here, i'll see you on the rick sanchez podcast. audios the

the take a fresh look around his life kaleidoscopic isn't just

a shifted reality distortion by how of tired vision with no real live indians. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse really once a better wills and is it just because it shows you few fractured images presented as for us.