steve happens if there's the kaufman doing doesn't do something about it. on thursday, around 250 villagers, led by church leaders march through the city of jobs denouncing the killings and the spiraling violence. local residents told us the government needs to take action for the government from here, but i suppose i just see some more is the one the government most. this is a need to approach just these. it just is, it must be seem to lucky because you,

because you have the beginning cool. these power to do so. tech you to continue that. that's what was just this is dispense is that the tax will stop and government has the will power to read. but that really, how are you still at a site? we offer an import export bank, and the united nations are collaborating to develop a platform to system supplies of rain and fertilizer to africa. that's according to the un trade official. we are working with them and making a platform that will allow for more edge all due diligence with the clients to comply with the sanctions, but allow for the transactions of food and fertilizers with africa. the platform aims to aid small african nations and overcoming trade disruptions. this follows an agreement struck in july of last year, which requires the you when to help russia overtime ops that will support for 3

years. the arrangement was reached in unison with an initiative under which russia agreed to allow you praying to resume blacks the brain exports. under the deal, russia would be allowed to export agricultural equipment and spare parts a ban on interested. and the accounts of russian fertilizer companies would be unfrozen. but according to the russian foreign ministry, none of that has actually happened. and if most of those conditions continue to be ignored, it will screw up the on the 17th of july, just in general, told us that the platforms may encounter a number of obstacles which need to be resolved in a timely manner. with that, the u. n. in the beginning countries waging on the program to do so. as i just said that to the relationship, the invasion to david products is important to us and it's important that it is not

undermine. and of course that we be your politics. it is also quite possible that it could be undermined. so it would be about 4 days out, at least has to be definitely so that the, the, the food stops reach around, lead to russia. uh, is necessary. yeah, i live in the outright in he finds you guys and so he's in how i have of african countries and of yes, the other guys taken too long to be self sufficient and a lot quite right to if i do a satellite. so the slides, right, where do i need you to receive assistance? and i think i think that i should've guessed that the got the easy load people. i guess the you says it could correct carbon border terrorist in response to india, threat to complain to the world trade organization with new dally,

saying the union's green initiative is affecting around $8000000000.00 worth of europe. the you have struggled with rising restrictions with even germany, the blogs, biggest economy raising the alarm over the necessity of cuts are to contributor rachel marston has more. it looks like brussels is taking a page from last time. it changed to tell the playing field in its own favor and against its so called friends, while presidential bible's inflation reduction are locked out, green european car manufacturers from the us market to the benefit of their american competitors. the european union is now looking to gain the same time of economic advantage by slapping carbon taxes on steel and iron ore imported from india. and just as biden said to be you that hey, don't work things out between friends, even though they still haven't. b, u has turned around and use the same sort of line on india. but wally,

you tries to shake some more cas free from indoors. it just can give itself a break either when it comes to its own climate change agenda. the largest group in the european parliament, the center, right? european people's party is now threatening to pull its support for the permissions green deal because they're worried about all the farming and food security risk is being undermined within each countries all because the big brain, russel's bureaucrats have become obsessed with the nitrogen in child done. and they want the number of cattle drastically reduced the commissions green deal proposals or cutting production and making investments and secure unsustainable costs of blood production products without realistic alternatives means a significant cut of the nature is duration. on the other hand means the cut of the land area used for forming together. they will make a big hole in delray diversity and farmers budgets and will endanger availability if you were being food and will increase inflation. that's government is obsessed

with a here a to the use plan of quote reducing that greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. which sounds scam level specific, by the way, kind of like i make $5000.00. we working 22 minutes a day from home, asked me how. so the ducks governor is now harassing its own foreigners and it said point now buying out the farmers who won't reduce their live stock in line with the government directive. and now the french fear also asked the government to make the exact same demand of french farmers. at the same time, the french president emanuel mack holz government, has introduced this climate plan that pours the same language with the same figures from the use green deal. that's certainly not a coincidence, but well going full speed down the wrong side of the highway on his emission free

bicycle. macro is also trying to slam on the brakes at the very same time. we wanted to ship a see because we've already passed a lot of regulations as a member of the e. u, even more than our neighbors. we're ahead of the americans, chinese, or any other world's power. we have said goals 420502032 lower carbon emissions and so on. i'm calling for a pause and regulations in europe. yeah, maybe a st obsession isn't the best idea when you use economic engine germany has just fallen into recession because it kind of itself off from cheap russian energy. so it's losing economically obviously. but at least it's scoring big on the green front, right. and somehow be considered green since germany is heavily reliant on coal now . and it still can't re itself to fire up its own nuclear plants though. that's probably

a tough future and to make after jury spent months probably eating france for bathing b, e. u. to classify as green, the nuclear power on which the french academy and industry heavily rely. but despite all the problems that it's member states are having and sticking to their green dyads or brussels really doesn't seem too interested in giving them a break. since the middle of transition to climate, you tell it you by 2050. but the year old has become the currency of choice for sustainable finance. the you and the republic of korea shed the ambition of a climate mutual future. the launch of our green partnership will help us towards that goal. we will now what can they converge in some key areas and deep and cooperation on strategic clean energy projects because it is good for our supply chains. good fall competitiveness. i'm good for the planet. enrolled in touch on fossil fuels is simply to meet, we needs to be compromised,

our economies as quickly as possible. and this is exactly why we put forward our, your team green deal. so as usual, it's pastoring over pragmatism here in europe, paid for of course, by the endlessly put a fine european service to the chinese b. u. k. reports calling for a security law in hong kong to be scrapped, accusing london of interfering in the cities affairs. the government of the hong kong special administrative region has issued a press release for fusing u k, so called 6 monthly report on home home. nearly 26 years of the home comes return. the u. k. still has them working out from is colonial dream and continue seeking to in to say in hong kong, the fast through misleading report, which is steeps an ideological bias. and inconsistent with the facts. this gravely

violates the principles of international law and the basic norms governing international relations. we still to during a u. n. hearing the u. k, presented a report claiming that hong kong authorities are using security legislation to persecute opposition. hong kong officials say the national security law has brought stability to the city after mass anti government protest back in 2019 international independent china specialist. andrew long says the west attempts to discredit china because it fears it's growing influence. and actually security loss was elected because i'll call for years of to but it does keels of cost by why it is just throwing petro balls and surrounding the police headquarters and holding the portal in order to read some uh, over the united kingdom like the united states wanted to and wants to say they're

all they're doing a lot to prevent the rise of trying it. all they do is there's to put the dog rails on best. so pull national security. but, and you look at both they do between what they say and what they do, what they do is they'll only hutchings on it is that is, is also in the viewing enchiladas into the fast. um, but also below i ton is um, access to technology. and is not paying the goodwin supply banning changes even told in other countries as a correct to damage. they were so obviously in this context, it's very difficult for china to establish space. i have no relationship with them because it's as if someone is going to step through with the back and wanting to steal. busy hands with you, extract it'd be friends with you, is having this result. this is really a new car depot take and

a half because at the same time, and that's what the united states and is a western allies that find do around the world and to latin america. argentina's vice president christina theater center has criticized the international monetary funds, economic proposals, saying they are damaging argentina's economy. see the if we, the audience indian people do not manage to set aside the program that the international monetary fund imposes on what status. and to develop our implant for growth industrialization and technological innovation, it will be impossible to pay for no matter what they say. the solution should also be political. argentina authorities are seeking in advance of over $10000000000.00 in the coming months to read ahead of the upcoming october elections. the countries dealings with the i am, i've had been marked by instability with the nation locked in for

a 57000000000 dollar agreement with the organization. one former leader mauricio mockery signed a deal to help alleviate a crisis. however, the program failed, resulting in a refinancing deal last year to addressing upstanding $44000000000.00 debt. we spoke to julio van b, not an economist from the foundation for social and political research. who says the i am math doesn't serve the interest of developing states, say, oh yes, there is no doubt the international monetary fund generally work. so it depends and backward countries, there is no assistance from the mon 3 fund to develop dominance or hedge. a monic capitalist countries and all of the policies of the map, historically home, the peoplesoft, the governments of the signing agreements for the it's nasty that them onto funding the world bank rates in 1945 funds. are you as them a nation, have shown in their history that they only serve to defend the interests of trends,

national capital, and today, as a time of decline in us policy of deterioration of the head, german, a crawl of to tool a. all of it shows the inevitably serves the interests of the capital and contributes absolutely nothing to the peoples of the world or stand in depth as countries, as in the case of fudge unseen. uh the e. u is more important for cuba straight then other partners like russia and china, that was the both from a foreign policy chief, joseph burrell, during his visit to havana, that's just by criticism from active is claiming the eu has been supporting, longstanding us sanctions imposed on the caribbean island, the little thing i say to the medi minnesota in the european union is the lead. an investor in cuba, who invested in most include by the european restrictive measures of the embargo, which does not make things exactly easy. despite that, europe is the 1st investor on this island,

where the 1st commercial partner were represent the 3rd part of its 4 and trade. we can look at those from the employers or export side, but it is clear that we are much more important than all the actors such as russia or china. several european and deals and activists have urge burrell to clarify his stance on the american sanctions against cuba. and to call for the lifting of the 60 year blockade, which has been widely criticized by the u. n. n. global human rights marched off the blockade intensified loops, trim levels, and research, and the development significantly affecting human families. particularly the most vulnerable groups such as women, children, the elderly and sick. we trust that as a result of the joint council, the sovereignty and self determination of cuba will be supported the exclusion of cuba from the lease of state sponsors of terrorism and the leasing of the unconditional blockade. meanwhile, russia secured

a major economic deal with advantage just weeks ago. several agreements were rich covering national currency, a change, a unified pair of system, as well as russian investment projects on the island, cuba, and as well as solid, dirty committee coordinator. gloria is misleading. as russia actively helps cubans development, while the youth service washington's interest, joseph morales statement about the d. u being more important to cuba, that russia and china. i have to laugh at that because it's obvious that the you continues to being the carrying the water for the united states and nato. and it's in fact the, if you, the tough to prosecute or it gets frustrated with this turbo sections. and in addition, the u. european union has done very little to really add weight to this because it stands against the ball case a good night states against cuba. russians relationship with cuba has steadily

increased in a positive manner. and in these last years, russia has been very helpful. russia is good stores where people can buy food and other household goods in cuban currency. everyone knows the cube is the victim of us terrorism, causing more than 3460 years a. that's a wrap on the hour and coming up post. rick sanchez dives deep into the military industrial complex and discusses us congressional and cyber trading with radio host, barley next. it next on direct impacts. thanks for joining in. don't the

the,

the time everybody. i'm rick sanchez. i've been doing news now for 30 years to languages all over the world. here in the us, interviewed for president, started a $1000000000.00 business. i believe new should be honest, direct, and impactful. this is direct impact. the it is and who isn't profiting from the war in ukraine? well, as we've pointed out before, we possibly have pointed out at just about every single door in the past that our government and its allies in the media have pushed on us. we are not profiting and by we, i mean, i mean, you and me and the american people we are not profiting. as i reported before,

the 10s of billions of dollars being spent on a climbed out a map a year ago. could have been used to build thousands of schools here in america or bridges, new roads right here. it could have provided needed health care for millions and millions of americans, especially the elderly. it could have done a lot of things, but it hasn't. in fact, even though it is our money, yes, money taken out of your paycheck, my paycheck, we're not getting it. it's not going to us. so then who is really benefiting from all that money, those billions and billions of dollars that are going to sion right? the answer again, as we pointed out, is pretty clear in the counsels of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether saw in orleans on by the military industrial complex

that is president dwight d eisenhower. a world war to general no less warning congress not to let the companies that make bombs and bullets and more bombs become too powerful, or it will destroy our democracy. that's what he said. let me listen 1961 speech. in the counsels of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence. whether shocked or on saw by the military industrial complex. and what is the military industrial complex? it's a formidable union of defense contractors and the armed forces. they should need to be kept a part they need to be separated. and who should do that?

eisenhower said, was eisenhower speaking to when he said that the when he delivered that amazingly stern and surprising speech, really, nobody expected that from this guy was a general all the way out. and he, that's what he said. be careful. this crap is going to ruin our government if we let it happen. said that before he left office. who was he talking to? he was talking to congress. he was talking to congress. he want to make sure that our law makers didn't allow the money and the greed that always seems to come along with more to get out of control. so here's the question. did congress listen? did they listen? when we look even now at this situation that's going on and ukraine, is that not only did they not listen to generalize in our president eisenhower is plea. they actually seem to be doing just the opposite of what he recommended. just the opposite. the events we're finding out the many members of congress are

personally profiting from the war and ukraine by buying. and they're doing so with what looks like. well, what the hell also, i'm not going to call it inside information. see, after voting this more weapons to ukraine or knowing that they're about to vote to send more weapons to ukraine. they buy stocks in the companies that will make profits off the weapons that are being sent to your trade. cuz they're the companies that make the limits. they know those defense companies are going to be profitable, and that's exactly what happens. a number of members of congress, of actively traded defend stocks, admits the rush hour ukraine war, one such a fender, representative john rutherford. the students from florida, according to business insider the purchase, thousands of dollars worth of raytheon stock. the day russia went into ukraine in a tweet that same day. rutherford contended that the united states should leave nothing off the table in regard to russia. rutherford's twin indicates he would

vote for more arms to ukraine, while he was also buying stock in companies that may be yards. and here's what he tweeted. he said to us and our allies must impose the maximum possible sanctions and leave nothing off the table. then there's uh, congressman curt schraner. according to congress trading dot com, trader purchased stock in general dynamics and waited almost a month before he even disclosed it. you're supposed to tell people when you buy stock, any stock you didn't even tell anybody marjorie taylor green jim up stock and lockheed martin february 27. here's what's interesting about this though with green green, we should note has been very critical of wars and places like iraq and afghanistan . so why would she say one thing? but then cash in or do another with this situation and ukraine? look, you think maybe they just can't help themselves. is it possible that members of

congress simply can't help themselves? after all, i mean, they get what amounts to insight information about foreign policy, news, and decisions before the rest of us have any idea of what the hell is going to happen. the question is, should they be allowed to trade in profit from that? and especially for the wars moore's, the answer apparently is why not nobody seems to care. because there's at present no actual law, at least not without teeth. yeah. there's the stock law act. but with tea now stopping them from buying stocks, not even in companies that they know are going to increase revenues because of their vote, their vote. and not even in companies that will make money from wars. well, joining us now to talk about this a little bit more is uh, the host of the critical our video. sputnik garland mix and what a great opportunity this is for you and i to have a conversation. hey,

thanks for inviting me, rick. great talk to you again. this is important stuff. what, what do you make of these guys? i think according to the last count that i have received, looking at my notes, and this could change a team members of congress presently are buying defense stocks and companies that are arming ukraine while voting to army grants. and you know, it, unfortunately, it makes sense sense to me, if you recall, shortly after the lockdown started with the pen demik, it was, it was soon found out that a number of members of congress when they found out that they, that, that, uh the co. yeah. on a virus was here before they did anything else. they immediately sold their stocks and called the rich friends and told them to get rid of their stocks. there were investigations and no one was held to account. no one was charged with any crime. so what we have is a complete lights the while, while western congress, there's no accountability whatsoever. well, i mentioned the stock act. so there is a law that they pass that says if ever you or your family or your kids, your wife,

for certain people buy a stock, you have to report it, especially if it's something that you've been investigating for example. but here's the, here's the thing. nobody does anything about it. we find out all the time that they're doing this and there's no penalty. there's no castigation. and here's what's the worst that i found out. you're ready for this. you know what the penalty is. if they catch you $200.00, right? so you know, the 1000000 you make a $100000.00 on a trade and you have to pay a penalty of $200.00 really. exactly. and so here's the thing. it's kind of reminds me, do remember, okay, i have to go backwards. it remember the game stop controversy? yeah. where they found out that the stock market illegally stopped trading. it was illegal, but no one was held accountable. so what we have when it comes to the ruling elite particulates congress, which is an obvious manifestation of the ruling elite, is that the laws are only there to give the appearance of propriety to give the

appearance that they're trying to hold each other to accountable. but if they're not, no one's going to act. and even if you get caught $200.00, you just made $200000.00. i'll take that deal all day. but here's the thing. i happen to be an officer or have been in a privately trade in a publicly traded company. if i did that, if i bought stock with material non public information, that's what it's called. if i was to act on material non public information, my boss goes to jail right away, by the way, as a regular guy. now maybe about some big wig city or some of those other institutions. i could probably get away with it. but the fact that i would go to jail and he would go to jail to but yeah, these guys don't just seems horribly wrong again because nobody is there to hold them account who is going to police the police mean. so you have congress, they're, they're all making a fortune. it's easy money. how easy is that for you to know what, you know,

how you're going to vote? they know it, keep in mind if you've ever been around capitol hill, which i have the discussions that are going on for the next action that they're going to take is going on for maybe weeks, maybe even months ahead of time. so long before they make a decision on the next purchase or whatever it's going to happen, they kind of can see the direction that, that, that it's going. so it's just such a easy money for them. they're all doing it. they're sitting around. that's why people come in congress, they make a $170.00 to a $190000.00 a year. and then 10 years later there were $20000000.00. how do you do that? well, uh, i told you there were a team right now who apparently are doing this in when it comes to the ukraine war up as bad as this is. i think it's worse with the war situation. yeah, i mean you're, you're, you're literally a, you're, you're, you're having of an action which you may be profiting off, which could end up sending my son or my daughter to lose their lives in some, in some country that maybe i didn't want them to go to the other thing is latoya

and with a country russia, in this case that has more nuclear warheads and we do, we're playing with fire. this is, this is potentially and i say this to. busy my friends that i don't think enough of us in this country understand this. we're, we're, we're, we're, we're pushing the envelope on what could turn into something bigger. like maybe even a world war 3 situation. i mean, i don't think i'm exaggerating when i say that. i mean if, if it's true that we have and they don't have boots on the ground inside you grain, are we fighting russian soldiers and is this what these guys are making money off of? i don't want that right? exactly. yeah, i mean, to put it, frankly, this isn't extinction level event. the actual outcome that the new, the neo cons in washington dc say their outcome, the outcome they're looking for is regime change in russia. terror rush, you a part total defeat of russia as we know russia.