how to do it, but that ruth, how are you still at the exercise the african import export bank and the united nations are collaborating to develop a platform to facilitate transactions for russian supplies of grain and fertilizer to africa. that's according to the un trade official. we are working with them and making a platform that will allow for more agile due diligence with the clients to comply with the sanctions, but allow for the transactions of food and fertilizers with africa. the platform aims to a small african nations and overcoming trade disruptions. this falls in agreement struck in july of last year, which requires the u when to help russia overcome obstacles to its grain and fertilizer exports for 3 years. the arrangement was reached in unison with an initiative under which russia agreed to allow you praying to resume blacks the brain exports. under the deal,

russia would be allowed to export agricultural equipment and spare parts. a ban on insurance coverage would also be lifted and the accounts of russian fertilizer companies would be unfrozen. but according to the russian foreign ministry, none of that has actually happened. and if most goes conditions continue to be ignored. it will scrap the agreement after it expires on the 17th of july. south africa's former suspicion general told us that the platform may encounter a number of obstacles which needs to be resolved in a timely manner. with that the u. n. in the beginning countries waiting on the program to do so. as i just said that to the relationship, the invasion to david products is important to us and it's important that it is not undermine. and of course, it will be your politics. it is also quite possible that it could be undermine. so

we have a potential risk has to be definitely so that the, the, the food stamps are each of the coincident sooner rather than later. the russia is necessarily live in the outright j u by g. hello guys, him. so he's in, i have of african countries as well. yes. the other guys taking too long to be self sufficient and a quite right to find yourself need and a badge and also the slides, right? where do i need you to receive assistance? and i think, i think that i should've guessed that the got the easy loadable, i guess the, the use says it could correct carbon border terrorist in response to india. threat to complain to the world trade organization with new delhi, saying the unions green initiative is affecting around $8000000000.00 worth of

imports from india to europe. the you have struggled with rising restrictions with even germany, the blocks biggest economy. raising the alarm over the necessity of cuts are to contributor rachel mars than has more. it looks like brussels is taking a page from washington's notebook when it comes to using climate change to tell the playing field in its own favor and against its so called friends. while presidential bible's inflation reduction are locked out, green european car manufacturers from the us market to the benefit of their american competitors. the european union is now looking to gain the same time of economic advantage by slapping carbon taxes on steel and iron, or imported from india. and just as biden said to be you that hey, don't work things out between friends, even though they still haven't. b, u has turned around and use the same sort of line on india. but while you tries to

shake some more cash free from india as pockets under the pretext of saving the earth, it just can give itself a break either when it comes to its own climate change agenda. the largest group in the european parliament, the center, right? european people's party is now threatening to pull its support for the permissions green deal because they're worried about all the farming and food security risk is being undermined within each countries all. because the big brain, brussels bureaucrats have become obsessed with the nitrogen in child done. and they want the number of cattle drastically reduced the commissions greendale proposals are cutting, production, and making investments, and secure unsustainable costs of blood production products. without realistic alternatives means a significant cut of the nature of duration. on the other hand means the cut of the land area used for forming together. they will make a big hole and they'll write a very soon farmer's budgets and will endanger availability if you were being food

and will increase inflation. that's government is obsessed with a here a to the use plan of quote reducing that greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. us. which sounds scam level specific, by the way, it's kind of like i make $5000.00. we working 22 minutes a day from home asked me how so the ducks governor is now harassing its own foreigners and it said, pointing of buying out the farmers. he won't reduce their live stock in line with the government directive. and now the french bureaucracy just a few days ago as also asked the government to make the exact same demand, the french farmers. at the same time, the french president emanuel mack holz government, has introduced this climate plan that was the same language, was the same figures from the use green deal. that's certainly not a coincidence,

but well going full speed down the wrong side of the highway on his emission free bicycle. macro is also trying to slam on the brakes at the very same time. we wanted to ship a see the we've already passed a lot of regulations as a member of the e. u. even more than our neighbors. we're ahead of the americans, chinese or any other world power. we have said goals 420502032 lower carbon emissions and so on. i'm calling for a pause in regulations in europe. yeah, maybe a st obsession isn't the best idea when you use economic engine germany has just fallen into recession because it kind of itself off from cheap russian energy. so it's losing economically obviously. but at least it's scoring big on the green front, right. well, only of coal can somehow be considered green, since germany is heavily reliant on coal now. and it still can't free itself to

fire up its own nuclear plants. so that's probably a tough future and to make, after jury spent months, probably eating france for bathing b, e. u to classify as green, the nuclear power on which the french economy and industry to heavily rely. but despite all the problems that this member states are having and sticking to their green dyads, brussels really doesn't seem too interested in giving them a break. your other not only leaves the global transition to climate utility by 2050. but the year old hasn't become the currency of choice for sustainable finance. the e u and the republic of korea chevy. ambition of a climb and mutual future. the launch of all green partnership will help us towards that goal. we will now work on the convergence in key areas and deep and cooperation on strategic clean energy projects because it is good for our supply

chains. good fall competitiveness. i'm good for the planet. growth model, centered on fossil fuels is simply obsolete. we need to be compromised our economies as quickly as possible and this is exactly why we put forward on your team green deal. so as usual, it's pastoring over pragmatism here in europe, paid for of course, by the endlessly put a fine european citizen the chinese foreign ministry has hit back at a u. k. report calling for a security law in hong kong to be scrapped, accusing london of interfering in the cities affairs. the government of the hong kong special administrative region has issued a press release for fusing u k, so called 6 monthly report on home home. nearly 26 years of to home comes return,

the u. k still has some would come out from is colonial dream and continue seeking to in to say in hong kong, the fast through misleading report, which is steeps an ideological bias and inconsistent with the facts. this gravely violates the principles of international law and the basic norms governing international relations. we strongly deploy and reject this during a you and hearing the u. k presented a report claiming that hong kong authorities are using security legislation to persecute opposition. hong kong officials say the national security law has brought stability to the city after mass, anti, and government protest back in 2019 international independent china specialists. andrew long says the west attempts to discredit china because it fears it's growing influence. the national security law was enacted because whole will subject to paul was 2 years old to make this keels

a pulse by a riotous and just throwing petro balls and surrounding the police. headquarters and holding the portal in order to read some uh over the united kingdom like the united states for twos. and wants to say that all they're doing is law to prevent the rise of trying it. all they do is there's to put rails on that. so call national security but, and you look at what they do, there's a big difference between what they say and what they do. what they do is they'll only hurting china is that is, is also in the viewing in taught as internal affairs. but also below i ton is um, access to technology is not taking the goodwood supply banning chain even holding other countries as a car to damage. they were so obviously in this context it's very difficult for china to establish space. i have no relationship with them because it's as

if someone is going to step through with the back and wanting to steal. busy hands with you, extract it'd be friends with you is having this result. this is really a new car lead will take and it was at the same time. and that's what the united states and is a western allies are trying to do have parkers the and lies. that's how moscow has branded washington's assurances that it doesn't support ukrainian attacks on russian territory. assurances by american officials that the united states does nothing cards, attacks on russia, hypocritical in line, given the direct material, evidence of the use of weapons and equipment supplied by the pentagon. so the needs of the on forces if you crane. so the preparation and implementation of terrorist attacks by ukrainian militants, that's as american and polish supplied armor vehicles were used in the ukrainian

cross border attack on russia's belgrade region. on monday, as the militants were pushed back, they abandoned several home beef and at least one m. r. a p armor fighting vehicle . 13 civilians were wounded in the incident with one man deliberately shot in the head by ukrainian soldiers. according to the belgrade governor, while washington publicly rejects its role in encouraging ukraine to stripe russian territories, senior american politician, victoria newland recognizes the us as role in the planning of ukraine's counter offensive. and even as you plan for the counter offenses which we have been working on with you for some for 5 months, we are already beginning our discussions with ukrainian government and with friends in keith. both in the civilian side and on the military side about ukraine is long

term future. there are also reports on washington is involved in planning ukrainian strikes on russian territory. press cv, journalist johnny miller told us that he witnessed one of these attacks calling it a war crime. friday was there longer. i was sitting in don't. yes. in the cafe on the take, the didn't all when the green and miss all through the line to front of me to the side of the country that i was sitting in the windows machine ah, over the people in the cafe. this was a war by drain this many people on the front lines around on. yeah, that's good environment, which is difficult to drop by water arms. they shouldn't be. that is the greeting on a tile. still siblings is done yet. and if this is the case in the middle of the reason as well, there's no mainstream lesson john was on yet, or thinking about the international human rights and the design of the little crime

simply aren't being investigated. meanwhile, a us democratic congressman has said he wouldn't care if you crane used f sixteens to attack russian territory. if the west were to provide the fighter jets, took care of a very concerned that they will enter into russian territory as there have been reason reports of alvarado at the border city. i'm not concerned i wouldn't care to you wouldn't. here's the interruption. nope. really. you would still turn about fair play. american weapons are being used in belgrade, which is you know, that maybe they're not going to use major problem. we have cost grove, the american journalist who grilled that congressman says he's concerned about the western escalation of the war when it should be focusing on negotiations instead. i was definitely surprised. i think thankfully, as jerry pointed out in that interview, he's not in the executive branch. i don't know what changes over time that makes

them allowable. i think, you know, personally, i'm very worried about this. the way this war has escalated both in terms of rhetoric and both in terms of the weapons we provided. i think it's very to cavalier. it's very reckless. this is another reason why we need to be talking in terms of negotiations. it's been clear from reports that the us and ukraine appear to be willing to give up pri, media. so i think that's at least, you know, a starting point. we, we should be talking, we should not be engaging in this kind of rhetoric of talking about strikes on russian territory, dismissing the possibility, despite the fact that it could be very well happening right now. you know, who knows? i don't know if that was a militia group or if they were sanctioned by the us. do you printing government? but it is. it's scary. it's a scary time right now. a, that's a rap on the our end coming up. many middle eastern countries are taking their destiny into their own hands, restoring relations and overcoming challenges. 0, returning to the arab league is a prime example. the discussion next,

i'm going underground. thanks for joining state gloves. the . the the china, the ways you have the only interest in this new interest. we have also our, our initial interest. but we can find some kind of space coming entries and best on this coming choose, we can do it that i wrote a map full cooperation for their principal corporation. and this was that we saw to,

to lead to, to, uh, we, we, the time as soon redundancy and welcome back to going on the ground broke us to go around the world for, to buy in the u. a. within the past few weeks, the middle east is witnessed a flurry of major diplomatic moves by side. the arabia. we had to break through china media to deal restore diplomatic relations with iran. that was quickly followed with normalization of guys. it's silvia culminating and syrian president. i'm not sure our last slide attending as well as our bleak summit since 2010 in libya. joining me here in the studio to discuss savvy rape is driving the blooms it is, but it's all of us. the editor in chief of the re, i'd base our views and member of the editorial board of our a be

a news channel. thank you so much, rachel, for coming on. obviously, the most important story in nature. they should meet who is the g 7 in their ocean, but i think does that mean this region? and i'll give you the in the whole global south, it was the r leak. i really somebody in a jetta. and how important was that summit? the us appeared to condemn it for allowing syria to rejoin an attend. oh, i agree with you perfectly about the importance of the summit and what was more important wasn't the actual attendance of the shuttle. i said, but many people are not seeing the back story here. at the back story is there as an arab summit with arab leaders who have distinctly different points of view about the return of the shuttle. i said to the public, you know, if you have, for example, on one end, the united arab emirates and you have on the other end, a caught who is tricky, oppose it was strictly apples. but the in the k through here is, or what is important is the out of leak given the new dynamic leadership in the

region has found a way to create the consensus. and this is a very promising a signal for the future of the automatic itself. think of all the kind of unsolved and results, conflicts, and issues that, that we've had with regards to your comment about the u. s. not being very happy about a subs return. i fully understand america has its own interest that it needs to protect in invited problematic the no, no, no he would say with the never know business for no, i mean they, they do have interest and they have security interest that they need to protect. but we also need to take this in context, which is very important. this isn't a making up with, with a set per se, what has been communicated since the story started leaking. and, and, and prevailing is that this is being done to create better conditions for the city of people, as you know very well. i've seen insanity is trying to do the same thing and expecting a different result. now i can go on and on about, for example,

if i want to tell you what, why is, why did see to keep that seat at the u. n. i mean, you can start from there if you were the western country, but what is important to you is this has a condition and return to the at a league. and the number one condition is creating a better environment for the return of cdns, which is obviously very good for syrians themselves. but if you think about that, if you g crisis in, in europe and around the world, if people stop and think about that, this is actually very good for the hold worked. yeah, but you can imagine being in washington or london, they're given to the united states. okie buys. i've heard of syria and the oil fields and is accused of stealing royal and there is badger eliza. do once declaim bond to his country back. um, there's does seem to be some type of level of negotiation at some kind of level even between us and then the other one. i don't know what's going to happen on that result. the ad tomorrow. i mean, sort of that obviously is going to menu inside of the radio that it was going to

incur the roof of washington. what so many things did incur the rest of, of, of washington. but a lot of things that the western countries, including the united states have done have upset a cell. do any of, you know, i'm not for a moment is suggesting that, you know, there's a break in the traditional alliance between the 2 countries. but there is very, a harsh differences of opinion, for example, a few days into the binding administration of the civilian airports in saudi arabia were being deliberately targeted by, by the who these, the whole of the, by the administration remove the whole with these from the that are let's look at that or is this then, you know, people are watching the, so show need to think about it this way. how would you as an american feel if j s. k was being bombed by a terrorist group in canada or mexico. and then an arab country or muslim country, is very reluctant to call it that, that, or is that that, or has the power to keep the monitors list and remove them off, whatever it is. so is that, do you think that was the,

by the ministration blinking and so on, actually saying, saudi arabia, you play ball and do what we say in your region, or we don't care, we'll even work with the, we work with anyone to hurt you. i, i honestly don't think it was that diminishes american officials that i spoke to, or during this period of all see, i agree that it was a miscalculation, for example. they say that withdrawal of the patriot themselves, which as you know, i've seen, is a defensive technology. nothing offensive, nobody was asking the americans to take parts into what i'm say, they don't even work. well, that's a, that's a separate discussion. but the idea of raphael is you may have just to remind you that this hosting is official slogan, is not this the, so there are a be, there will fission slogan is the america. so we were waging a war and at the request of the legitimate government of the human guess, administrative group that deliberately targets a civilians and civilian areas by default that should be cold, etc, etc. and this was the beginning of the kind of the and disagreements on

automatically, the global south audience isn't going to be surprised given the levels of information that's now there about us. and british complicity with the extreme is groups in syria fake chemical attacks and all sorts of things. i mean, i want to ask you the most of our them uses the voice of a changing region. i don't know when was that there before you started it or view that that was my fingerprint on, on the front page of edit surprise even you, because you seem to be is if this is all in the pipeline, when going on the go and sort of broadcasting from here, there was no deal with the run, there was no deal with syria. how quickly it all the things changing and they, how uh, what's an excel ration to expect. so when we were in the brainstorming session to come up with that tag line and we take, you know, i take full pride with me and my team about it. we knew things were changing. for example, at that time, it was the talk about the woman driving the curbing the powers of the rid of just

police, which is phenomenon. we just had, i honestly say that we, nobody had any idea how massive the changes are going to be. when you talk about the aging brokerage, so the around the deal, i don't think anybody in their wildest imagination would have imagined both that this would happen. but also this would happen this quickly. literally president g came to saudi arabia in december. the deed was signed in, in march. now i know there were previous discussions before we cover that. here's a but that's at this to many for chinese, the efficiency and at this to me and then indicate through that when you get the right me the 8th or somebody was leverage over a it on and you play your cards, right? you can come up with a deal which again, like i was saying about the serious issue. i cannot see how this harms western interest and contrary. everybody has an interest in a stable with at least everybody has an interest in safe passage of only of shipments through the gulf, through the red sea. everybody has an interest in,

you know, curbing or a tackling a terrorist groups or 8 advocating them completely. i've, i've been to, you know, conferences and seeing enough americans off the record, explain that there are many forces in nature, nations believe the opposite to what you just said. they are interested in instability, unlimited leaves. you want to create instability, unlimited leaves because they fear about the for middle east and they fear desperately a united hour. well i, i really don't know what to tell me. i've seen because i've been at the receiving ends of as you probably guess, being the out. we're looking, we're english language newspaper of the region. and my, my answer is that, look when we're escalating, we get condemned when we're do escalating, we gets content. so it's a really a situation if you're done and if you do and you're done, see that we go to the stage that way. like who guess? no. so no, i think it's very much you do care? no, it was. i think in, you know, the leadership has in that, that seems atlantic interview. the conference has said that we,

we don't care what other people think because we believe we are doing the right thing. and uh, you know, if you look at all of these decisions, they do not only serve so the areas of interest, these are regional interest and international interests. but really i believe it's not our problem. if other people are failing to recognize the opportunity here. i mean, why would the country like so the be able to put all of these resources to help evacuate citizens from all over the world, from, from so then, you know, if we were in even a country, we're not, you know, we are typically trying it, we're trying heart to health, we're trying help to use our massive resources which god has given us so to help everybody else. but you know, if somebody fails to see the bigger picture, that is their problem. what about, of course, the united states would say, i think many people would say the usaid and the 8 industry is used by somebody as to the, to get the geopolitical leverage and has been in the past. i've watched interviews

with you when you really the international for them all over the world. do you think it's a level of racism or the geo political fear that's a play when they seem to suggest for his women's rights or they will concentrate on some issue. and i know you were one of the 1st. you immediately changed your news room to have uh more women in the news room. and so how, how do you react to this is orient list. we abuse that the arab countries don't decide you're able to get engaged with nation media. look, i think it's a short answer would be all of the above. it's a bit of ignorance. it's a bit of oriented it's, it's, it's a bit oriented isn't. it's a bit of agendas, but mostly i would like to go to winston churchill and who said, you know, the americans will do the right thing after they've tried everything else. the number of meetings, or re, things that i've been, you know, attending, or seen or heard of. and the amount of advice that has been given to washington back from the barrack obama, these, you know, we told them, you know,

you cannot appease a monster, be it run you clear a threat. is that clear and present danger, but it's not the only danger. when you know inject cache into the 3 gene, you're instigating the other uh, malign activities. and what was the response of the, of the whole the school as you know, are supported by it on the, the tech, the u. s. navy, 3 times in the last 4 months of the obama and the u. s. navy, which i'm sure was very humiliating for many of the generals. and many of the many, 3 men and women in service, they did not respond because the administration at the time did not want anything to in, in succeed with the run. okay. are we doing is on like an old drum broadcast. that's because i just want to on the drums as well and the time. what about the shadow of a rock? because of in britain, in the united states, those policy makers who supported the destruction of a rock, they, there well in with a political firmament. whether it be

a larry clinton or advises to the people involved in the george bush junior, george w bush at junior administration. what is the shadow of a rock because uh, in a donation. same kind of forgotten. uh, absolutely. um, and i just want to tell you this with the last answer that i, i've given it up was another example we'd, we'd desperately tried to advise the us not to do it in 2003, and people who cover the what, remember what the position of saudi arabia, the leadership at the time. so this coming sold, the mismanagement, there was no question that us was going to win the war. but how were you gonna manage the, the to and we were proven a right when speaking we spoke about the shuttle asset and the seed in region. when president obama said that the using chemical weapons is a red line and then the that's really the awkward youtube. we give them advice, but there were no chemical weapons used by the bunch of our last at the administration. when i have my a difference of anything in between, why the a long name is it locked me in, read about that, but the what you know, what it, what i do know is after i, i know you,

i know that you don't want this to sound like a president trump. uh interesting, but what i can use back to control, but uh, but i do know is when trump strikes against us. uh, there were no reports whether people choose to believe them or not. uh, there were no further reports about using chemical weapons face, so i have somebody that will offer me the editor in chief of arab muse, mandatory a board member of our a be a news general off of this break the well he's got to do is identify the threats that we have, it's crazy, even foundation, let it be an arms race is on all sides. very dramatic. only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very create ticket of time. time to sit down. and.