steer which requires us to help ease missing grain on the socialize exports for 3 years. it was reached alongside the black secret initiative and the rest of it would be allowed to export agricultural equipments on spec pods. a bundle on the insurance coverage will be lifted on the accounts of russian fits allies, that companies would be unfrozen, but most ago says none of that is actually happened. and if nothing changes, it will scott the agreements after that expires on the 17th of july. for south africa's for met, stuff is sufficient, general told is the platform may encounter a number of obstacles which need to be resolved as soon as possible with that the un and they have again, countries waging on the program to do so. as i just said that to the relationship, the invasion to david products is important to us and it's important that it is not undermine. and of course it will be your politics. it is also quite possible that it could be undermined. so we add up potentiality has to be deadly. so that the,

the, the, the food stuff to reach the continent. sooner rather than later, russia is necessarily able to have been the outright, it's a in fi. do you guys him? so he's in high off again. countries as well. yes. the other guys taken too long to be self sufficient and a quite right to find yourself need and their badge and also the slides, right. where do i need you to receive assistance? and i think that i should've guessed that the got the easy loadable guess. uh no. the news, the usa zip codes, correct carbon board a terrace in response to india sweats complaints. the world trade organization, new dealings and unions. green initiative is a facing around $8000000000.00 worth of imports from india to your to contribute to

visual mazda has more. it looks like brussels is taking a page from washington's notebook when it comes to using climate change to tell the playing field in its own favor and against its so called friends. while presidential bible's inflation reduction are locked out, green european car manufacturers from the us market to the benefit of their american competitors. the european union is now looking to gain the same time of economic advantage by slapping carbon taxes on steel and iron, or imported from india. and just as biden said to be you that hey, don't work things out between friends, even though they still haven't. b, u has turned around and use the same sort of line on india. but wally, you tries to shake some more cash free from india's pockets under the pretext of saving the earth. it just can't give itself a break either when it comes to its own climate change agenda. the largest group in the european parliament, the center right, european people's party is now threatening to pull. it's support for the

permissions green deal because they're worried about all the for me and food security. risk being undermined within each countries all. because the big brain brussels bureaucrats have become obsessed with the nitrogen intel done. and they want the number of cattle drastically reduced the commissions green do proposals, or cutting production and making investments and secure unsustainable costs of planned production products without realistic alternatives means a significant cut of the nature is duration. on the other hand means the cut of the land area used for forming together. they will make a big hole in delray diversity and farmers budgets and will endanger availability if you were being food and will increase inflation. that's government is obsessed with a here a to the use plan of quote reducing that greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 level us. which sounds scam

level specific, by the way, kind of like i make $5000.00. we working 22 minutes a day from home asked me how. so the dutch government is now harassing its own foreigners and it said, pointing of buying out the farmers who won't reduce their live stock in line with the government directive. and now the french bureaucracy just a few days ago, as also asked the government to make the exact same demand of french farmers at the same time, the french president, a member of the mac holes government, has introduced this climate plan to pause the same language is the same figures from the use green deal, that's certainly not a coincidence, but well going full speed down the wrong side of the highway on his emission free bicycle. macro is also trying to slam on the brakes at the very same time. we wanted to ship a seat because we've already passed a lot of regulations as

a member of the e. u, even more than our neighbors. we're ahead of the americans, chinese, or any other world power. we have said goals 420502032 lower carbon emissions and so on. i'm calling for a pause in regulations in europe. yeah, maybe a st obsession isn't the best idea when the use economic engine germany has just fallen into recession because it kind of itself off from cheap russian energy. so it's losing economically obviously. but at least it's scoring big on the green front, right. well, only of coal can somehow be considered green, since germany is heavily reliant on coal now. and it still can't bring itself to fire up its own nuclear plants. so that's probably a tough future and to make, after jury spent months, probably eating france for bathing b, e. u to classify as green, the nuclear power on which the french economy and industries to heavily rely. but

despite all the problems that this member states are having and sticking to their green dyads, brussels really doesn't seem too interested in giving them a break. your other not only leaves the global transition to climate. you tell it you buy 2050. but the year old hasn't become the currency of choice for sustainable finance. the e u and the republic of korea shed the ambition of a climate mutual future. the launch of our green partnership will help us towards that goal. we will now work on the convergence and key areas and deep and cooperation on strategic clean energy projects because it is good for our supply chains. good fall competitiveness. i'm good for the planet. the gross model centers on fossil fuels is simply obsolete. we need to be compromised our economies as

quickly as possible. and this is exactly why we put forward our 0 p green deal. so as usual, it's pastoring over pragmatism here in europe. pay for of course, by the endlessly put a fine european citizen the chinese foreign minister has hit bunk. it's a u. k. results calling for a security law and i'm calling to be scrubs accusing on that of interfering and the city is a fast and the government of the hong kong special administrative region has issued a press release for future in u. k. so called 6 monthly report on home home, nearly 26 years of the home comes return, the u. k still has some work and up from is colonial dream and continue seeking to in to fit in hong kong the fast through misleading report, which is steeps an ideological bias. and inconsistent with the fact this gravely violates the principles of international law and the basic norms governing

international relations. we strongly deploy and reject this us drawing a human hearing, c, u. k, presented their thoughts claim to hong kong, all thoughts. these are using security legislation to persecute the opposition officials. so the national security law has both the ability for the city as of the enough anti government protests and back in 2019 international china specialist under long says the west attempts to discredit china because it is growing influence. the national security law was enacted because all calls will subject to paula was 2 years old to make his keels close by a riotous and disturbing petro balls and surrounding the police headquarters and holding the portal in order to run some uh, over the united kingdom. like the united states wanted to um, and was to say they're, all they're doing is lot to prevent the rise of trying it. all they do is there's

to put rails on there. so pull national security. but and you look at both they do, there's a big, big difference be. ringback what they say and what they do, what they do is they'll only hutchings on it is that this is also in the viewing in charges internal affairs. but also below i add thomas, texas to technology. it's in japan does not ping the goodwood supply. banning changes even told in other countries as a car to damage. they were so obviously in this context, it's very difficult for china to establish space. i have no relationship with them because it's as if someone is going to step through with the back and wanting to still hold hands with you. extract it'd be friends with you is having this result. this is really a new car depot take and a half because at the same time, and that's what the lot of stays on. spanish or western allies are trying to do

you know, the news hungry is the foreign minister has called outs the liberal left for criticizing both these countries. and so it'd be as policy of push, pushing for peace and ukraine on that and willingness to contribute to the escalation of the war. hey, it's pretty close our country's face problems and both are of the relentless attacks by international liberal mainstream. but why are they attacking us? because him governance and serves us standing up for their national interests. because we have strong leaders, they are attacking us because we want peace and ukraine and did not contribute to escalation. they are attacking us because we are committed to family values and they are. and so i can ask because we refused to be dictated to from abroad or from on this. let's cross live now to step on guides, professor ops the bell. great. institute of european studies. good. have you back with those 7 guys. thank you very much. what's your reaction now to the, the foreign ministers statement about both of you on hungry,

being attacked by the west for the desire to it, to uh, not escalate the one you can. and i think this is a very good message from uh, mr. seattle. and i also think uh it says volumes about something that i just recently uh, gave of uh a paper who be published soon about the new wife called the new little m tons. those little and dont was formed in between keys. nobody to flavio romania and in florida. yeah. back in uh uh, in the 1920s uh, as, as a counterweight uh for the alters and garrett empire, not to not to be a publisher anymore. however, in this new geopolitical moment, we see that hungary, uh, has a really close relations with uh with the serbs. i'd say not believe it, serbia, because it has pulse relations with serbia and visit republic instead of just uh uh,

the service and parts of both me and cancel going. uh and i think that we can see uh this as a uh coalition. uh which uh, what do i like to call the new little and tons. mm hm. uh, do you think there's any chance that the west on your route will be able to bend? so it'd be on 100 to the well. and when it comes to the one you can. so i think that the, this, the, you know, see, i'm placed, essentially rights of serbia did not impose sanctions after 15 months of the escalation of war at the mazda of pressures and, uh, and the now services being even more pressure uh, during this rally than i think was uh, my largest unnecessary uh there was a uh, phone ring of serbian institutions uh, in the, in the northwest. uh talk you know, by albany is also there's a problem because uh serves the by lars. don't have trust the their president. the

hope is because uh for the last 10 years he's been going why the opposite for what the on to send. he's been given game to the on demands of the west by uh, by dissolving the serbian institutions in north, if possible. and the popular theory here is that maybe there's fairly was a part of that as well, because the service game, some of the service different boston were came to rally instead of being there while they were a, they're all these were attacked by the illegally attack. the by the, i'll be, you know, story these with the green lights of united states and nato a. but i do think that the pressure as a, regardless, will continue on sort of being hungry. and i thing that the, the, that serves as a games are stronger together. and uh, i only hope that our government will be more firm, i don't doubt in, in, in the wilton gary ends. and this really, this message really comes uh, as i would say, a boost for uh, the confidence of, uh,

all the survival of these countries in the future. because i think that both serves and gary ends do not want to be swollen. even though we looking towards that, it's happening in eastern europe and the, they don't want to fight for somebody else's goals against their will. and essentially that is out of the cetera. and this is a great message and we've got some good reason validate. yeah. and it don't, it just a couple of days ago that the home gary an a prime minister going to albany said that it was unlikely that ukraine could win this war. you not as much anticipated accounts are offensive. um, what, what do you make of the statements or do you think the after these accounts are offensive? both sides might have to come to the table. not only are, but even uh, mr. daryl merely said that uh, even pentagon is, is fed up with some of the weapons. uh so what can we say about auto companies? uh, of course, that, uh, this warrant can only get pro long,

but it's just certainly not the one on the battlefield by ukraine. the only way for the war to be one by the west is what they were hoping for. the one that has some kind of it within the family and some kind of, uh, you know, political and rest in russia. that is the only way that the goal, you know, the collective, whereas the natal coley, whatever can win this war, but he can certainly not when it's a battlefield. the numbers are things so the, uh, what, what are we seeing so far on, on the battlefield? russia is producing 1600. thanks a year now. it is going up to the uh, it's actually breaking directors for the soviet size. and uh, you know, if we just met the medical, we look at the, at the, the, how things are going all for so you print cannot win this war to generally lose more. license is already been tragic after what the un nato has been doing. they

were only configured things to the tragedy from they want and they want is not 2000, but to do it is 2013 when they back the crude at the which all of this actually yeah, well a professor, the bell, great institute for european studies they'll step on the guides. thanks very much for your thoughts today. how not to thank you, my boss, hypotheses and lies. that's how most goes bounded washington's as yours is that it does as opposed to you print insights on russian territory. assurances by american officials that the united states does nothing cards, attacks on russia, hypocritical in line, given the direct material, evidence of the use of weapons and equipment supplied by the pentagon. so the needs of the on forces if you crane. so the preparation and implementation of terrorist acts by ukrainian militants, american and polish of supplied the vehicles were used in the ukrainian cost border attack on versus bel good regional monday. as the minutes since web post box,

the abundant several homes, these and at least one m rob and fighting vehicle. 13 civilians were wounded with woman shots in the head by militants. according to the boat, good governor of washington has denied accusations. it's encouraging ukraine to strike russian territories. the senior american politician victoria newland does recognize the us role in the funding of ukraine's come to offensive. and even as you plan for the counter offensive, which we have been working on with you or some for 5 months, we are already beginning or discussions with ukrainian government and with friends in keith. both in the civilian side and on the military side about ukraine is long term future. there are also reports of washington. he's involved in plumbing. ukraine strikes on. don't boss. journalist johnny miller believes he witnessed one of them. i'm sorry, i wasn't there long ago. i was sitting in don't, yes, in the cafe and it says the doing all when the green and miss. all 2 of them

along the front of me to the side of the cafeteria that i was sitting in a windows machine. ah, over the people in the cafe, this was a war by drain this many people on the front lines around on. yeah, it's getting bomb it, which is difficult to classify is water arms. they shouldn't be. that is the greeting on a tile stone, a civilians is on. yes. and if this is the case in the middle of the reason as well, there's no mainstream listen. john was on yet, or thinking about certain international human rights and the design of the little crime simply aren't being investigated. meanwhile, a us democratic congressman has said he wouldn't. okay, if you can use f sixteens to attack russian territory. if the westwood provide the fonts just to p, f, very concerned that they will enter into russian territory as there have been reason reports of alvarado at the border city. i'm not concerned. i wouldn't care

if they did. you wouldn't care. they wanted to rush, you know, really, you would still turn about fairplay, but there are these, these are being used in belgrade, which is, you know, that maybe they're not going to use major liam called scope. the american genesis drill. congressman says he's concerned about the western escalation of the wall when he should be focusing on negotiations. i was definitely surprised. i think thankfully, as jerry pointed out in that interview, he's not in the executive branch. i don't know what changes over time that makes them allowable. i think, you know, personally, i'm very worried about this. the way this war has escalated both in terms of rhetoric and both in terms of the weapons we provided. i think it's very to cavalier. it's very reckless, this is another reason why we need to be talking in terms of negotiations. it's been clear from reports that the us and ukraine appear to be willing to give up pride media. so i think that's at least you know, a starting point. we, we should be talking, we should not be engaging in this kind of rhetoric of talking about strikes on

russian territory, dismissing the possibility, despite the fact that it could be very well happening right now. you know, who knows? i don't know if that was a militia group or if they were sanctioned by the us. do you printing government? but it is. it's scary. it's a scary time right now. so small on any of those stories do head over to all websites off to you don't call me in the meantime. my name's peter scott. i'll be back again with another one down the top of the hour. thanks for watching the china. the ways you have the only interest in this new interest. we have also our, our initial interest. but we can find some kind of space coming entries and based on this coming tree. so we can do a roadmap, full cooperation with our principal corporation. and this was that we saw to to

lead it to uh, we, we the power buddy. i'm rick sanchez. i've been doing news now for 30 years to languages all over the world. here in the us, interviewed for president, started a $1000000000.00 business. i believe new should be honest, direct, and impactful. this is direct impact, the it is and who isn't profiting from the war in ukraine? well, as we've pointed out before, and frankly, as we could possibly have pointed out, and just about every single door in the past that our government and its allies in

the media have pushed on us. we are not profiting. and by we, i mean, i mean, you and me and the american people we are not profiting. as i've reported before, the 10s of billions of dollars being spent on a country that most of us could barely 5 on a map a year ago. could have been used to build thousands of schools here in america or bridges, new roads right here. it could have provided needed health care for millions and millions of americans, especially the elderly. it could have been a lot of things, but it hasn't. in fact, even though it is our money, yes, money taken out of your paycheck, my paycheck, we're not getting it. it's not going to us. so then who is really benefiting from all that money, those billions and billions of dollars that are going to ukraine. that's an important question, right?

the answer again, as we pointed out, is pretty clear. from the counsels of government, we must car guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence. weatherstone orleans on by the military industrial complex that is president dwight d eisenhower. a world war to general no less warning congress not to let the companies that make bombs and bullets and more bombs become too powerful, or it will destroy our democracy. that's what he said. let me listen to those words on that january 17th. 1961 speech in the counsels of government, we most guard against the acquisition of on warranted influence whether shocked or on saw by the military industrial complex. and what is the military industrial complex?

it's a formidable union of defense contractors and the armed forces. they should need to be kept apart. they need to be separated. and who should do that? eisenhower said, never let them come together. who was eisenhower speaking to when he said that though, when he delivered that amazingly stern and surprising speech, really nobody expected that from this guy was a general on the way out. and he, that's what he said. be careful. this crap is going to ruin our government if we let it happen. said that before he left office. and what was he talking to? he was talking to congress. he was talking to congress. he want to make sure that our lawmakers didn't allow the money, and the greed that always seems to come along with more to get out of control. so here's the question. did congress listen? did they listen?

well, we're finding out now when we look even now at this situation that's going on and ukraine, is that not only did they not listen to generalize in our president eisenhower is plea. they actually seem to be doing just the opposite of what he recommended. just the opposite that we're finding out the many members of congress are personally profiting from the war and ukraine by buying stocks and defense companies and then, and they're doing so with what looks like. well, what the hell, also not going to call it inside information. see, after voting this more weapons to ukraine, or knowing that they're about to vote to send more weapons to ukraine. they buy stocks in the companies that will make profits off the weapons that are being sent to your trade. cuz they're the companies that may go. edmonds, they know those defense companies are going to be profitable, and that's exactly what happens. a number of members of congress of actively traded defend stocks, admits the rush hour ukraine war one such

a funder representative john russell for the students from florida. according to business insider, you purchased thousands of dollars worth of raytheon stock the day russia, when in the ukraine, in between that same day, rutherford contended that the united states should leave nothing off the table in regard to russia. rutherford's twins indicates he would vote for more arms to ukraine, while he was also buying stock, and the companies that make the yards. and here's what he tweeted, he said to us and our allies must impose the maximum possible sanctions and leave nothing off the table. then there's uh, congressman curt schraner. according to congress trading dot com, trader purchased stock in general dynamics and waited almost a month before he even disclosed it. you're supposed to tell people when you buy stock, any stock you didn't even tell anybody. marjorie taylor green came up stock and lockheed martin february 27. here's what's interesting about this though with green

green, we should note has been very critical of wars and places like iraq and afghanistan . so why would she say one thing? but then cash in or do another with this situation and ukraine. look, you think maybe they just can't help themselves? or is it possible that members of congress simply can't help themselves? after all, i mean, they get what amounts to insight information about foreign policy, news, and decisions before the rest of us have any idea of what the hell is going to happen. the question is, should they be allowed to trade in profit from that? and especially for the wars mores. the answer apparently is why not? nobody seems to care. because there's at present no actual law, at least not without teeth. yeah. there's the stock law or act, but with p know, stopping them from buying stocks. not even in companies that they know are going to

increase revenues because of their vote, their vote, and not even in companies that will make money from wars. well, joining us now to talk about this a little bit more is uh, the host of the critical our video. sputnik garland mix and what a great opportunity this is for you and i to have a conversation. hey, thanks for inviting me, rick. great talk to you again. this is important stuff. what, what do you make of these guys? i think according to the last count that i have received, looking at my notes, and this could change a team members of congress presently are buying defense stocks and companies that are arming ukraine while voting to arm ukraine's. and you know, it, unfortunately, it makes sense sense to me, if you recall, shortly after the lockdown started with the pen demik, it was, it was soon found out that a number of members of congress when they found out that the, that, that, uh, the co. yeah. on a virus was here before they did anything else. they immediately sold their stocks

and called their rich friends and told them to get rid of their stocks. there were investigations and no one was held to account. no one was charged with any crime. so what we have is a complete lights, the wall, while west and congress, there's no accountability whatsoever. well, i mentioned the stock act. so there is a law that they pass that says if ever you or your family or your kids, your wife, for certain people buy a stock, you have to report it, especially if it's something that you've been investigating for example. but here's the, here's the thing. nobody does anything about it, we find out all the time that they're doing this and there's no penalty. there's no castigation. and here's what's the worst that i found out. you ready for those? you know what the penalty is if they capture $200.00. right? so you know, the 1000000 you make a $100000.00 on a trade and you have to pay a penalty of $200.00 really. exactly. and so here's the thing. it's kind of reminds

me. do you remember? okay, i have to go backwards. and remember the game stop controversy? yeah. where they found out that the stock market illegally stopped trading. it was illegal, but no one was held accountable. so what we have when it comes to the ruling elite, particularly congress, which is an obvious manifestation of the ruling elite, is that the laws are only there to give the appearance of propriety to give the appearance that they're trying to hold each other to accountable. but if they're not, and no one's going to act, and even if you get caught $200.00, you just made $200000.00. i'll take that deal all day. but here's the thing. i happen to be an officer or have been in a privately trade in a publicly traded company. if i did that, if i bought stock with material non public information, that's what it's called. if i was to act on material non public information, my boss goes to jail right away by the way, as a regular guy. now maybe about some.