its own business and stay out of the taiwan strait. well, i think this is the kind of the incarnation of the way a lot of foreign ministers and defense ministers around the world kind of feel about the united states meddling and its affairs. united states obviously has the most military bases in the world all over the entire world. and you know, and has repeatedly interfered not only in the affairs of china and taiwan, southeast asia cetera, but also all around the world. but again, i think that the united states, as the defense minister pointed out, i think the united states should focus on its own citizens, which clearly things in the united states are very far from ideal. as opposed to spending, you know, almost a trillion dollars to maintain this us military, those up in his arms race that they are pursuing with china. i really think that it would be better not only for the people of the world, but also for the people of the united states. if the united states government were to quote unquote,

mind its own business. i think even the people here in the united states would very much benefit from that. and i think they are very much in favor of that as well. which one is surprised when it's to, might well be urging the us to stay out of the territory of other countries. but washington already has plenty of military bases around china. well, sort of respond see that we can expect for american officials if any well, i think to the us officials will continue to, to kind of stay the course. you know, obviously the united states has a push and it's government to maintain global hegemony. they want to maintain, you know, hed gemini in military matters in, quote, unquote, diplomatic matters in economic matters, germany of the dollar, etc. any sort of questioning of us unit polarity is quickly bulk that in the quarters of power in the united states. but also in much of the last, you know, a lot of countries, in your opinion, for example, are at this point, that's the states of the united states and are completely in favor of, you know, polarity, as long as the united states is the, you know, unipolar hedge them on,

so i don't think the united states officials, you know, regardless of what people across the world and regardless of what people in the united states think. i don't think us a specials are going to kind of listen to any sort of reason. and i think if history is any sort of a indicator of that, you know, i think unfortunately, they are very far from listening to any sort of reason. washington's moves in the region that they're being seen as provocative, especially with the latest near collision of american and chinese warships and they tie one, what are they hoping to achieve? yeah, i think your guess is pretty much as good as mine. i would, i find interesting is that united states officials, you know, they, they go after and they talk about china being in the region in china. atlanta is having these interactions, you know, with between the chinese navy of us, navy, the chinese air force, us air force, etc. but what they seem to not understand us officials is that these things are

taking place in the south china sea. these events are taking place thousands of miles from any sort of us border, any sort of us shore. and really it is right there in the back yard of china right there. so i think more than anything that speaks volumes to why is the united states conducting these war games conducting these exercises so far from any sort of boundary, but they have set themselves in the question remains. yes. well how, what are they gaining? what is their long term strategy? i think personally they have, they are trying, they are trying to provoke a reaction from chains of vessels from the chinese military. and i think while the chinese officials have been very smart in responding to the appropriate ones to respond to in an appropriate manner, i think so far they haven't taken the bait. one of the key concerns for tanya,

of course, is that washington has been selling weapons to taiwan despite can be the case on the 9 states to, to forbid this action. do you think it's all about the money or something else? so washington i think it's a combination, i think, more than anything else. i think it's uh, you know, obviously war and conflict is a huge bonus with united states defense contractors for military operators, etc. but i think also is the same way that they give money to the venezuelan opposition or you know, terrace in nicaragua, all over the region, etc. that is what they're doing when they are playing these games with taiwan there for mentoring unrest, they are giving arms, logistics, aid, etc, to actors that serve their when and are in favor of continued us to germany, to the detrimental, the rest of the world, including china, so, and again, it's very similar also to what we've seen western and us interference and hong kong,

etc. you know, these movements are these, um, you know, separate test movements are never organic. there's always some form of modeling that the united states or national endowment for democracy, or is n g o's, which received my name from the state department. i think the united states, again, it's kind of a win win for them because their companies are able to make billions of dollars of selling weapons to taiwan. and they also serves the purpose of irritating and kind of provoking the chinese. the other thing that's concerning the aging right now is, of course, nato has plans to expand that site, the north atlantic and into the asia pacific region, just like nature's expansion in europe, as always sort of dickens with moscow. do you think the west is likely to give china any secure or is it guarantees or do you think it will simply ignore any dom ons, just like if it, with russia, which ultimately led to the situation with the right now with the train? yeah, i think there's a very good chance that they will give some sort of assurance to china. however,

as was the case with the soviet union, when the soviet union was still around, it will be very empty. you know, they said that they wouldn't go an inch past a certain border. and obviously, as you said, that has not been the case more and more countries have been incorporated into nato . and i think the same sort of thing would be happening in asia. and i think using history as a precursor, i think now people, policy makers, whether be in china, whether it be in russia, whether it be in bell or risk, etc, are better able to project and look back and see that the word of the united states government should not be taken as truth, which, you know, i think we could say it about a lot of different things. but particularly in terms of the expansion of nato, has been very disastrous on the international geopolitical scale. and i think would be, you know, the last thing that anyone wants, anyone say in a way, would be a nato intrusion, into se asia,

which again serves to provoke china. so, and i think again that i think china is kind of able to look at history. hindsight is 2020 as they say, look at the history with rush out with the soviet union, etc. and say, we don't want that for our region. we don't want a military build up right on our borders. so, you know, and as you said, this is kind of the pre cursor to be disaster in ukraine. i have a speaking to us today, really appreciate your insights, independent political scientist and donna, les dakota. let me thank you. a thank you. when you use one of the petroleum well now is leading a peg plus produce as have agreed on further cuts, an oil production for 2024. and saudi arabia has also a valid to you. the last one is slash its output starting from next month. the bulk is a great to extend because the non spike in a pro, despite western criticism of the move, transparency and accountability for oil production numbers will also among the top

issues at the meeting in vienna. this decision comes as the okay plus blow cause the tape oil prices. hi anastasia. the attempts to install stability. unpredictability of the global energy market. saw the energy when us to cool the pipe plastic. we met unprecedented in scope while the representative of equitorial get east west, the shed goal that's making the market the more reliable. let's go with someone out ansari's face and joins efforts by washington sound. do you raise your points to greatly contribute to global energy stability? some of the major off in front of the members have different priorities, basically something one, concrete baseline. something wants an increase in their market share and others want this type of schools to to, to remain. uh so i think this is not an issue anymore because they have full accommodations, their needs, in the headquarters premises. unfortunately,

the as the dfcs, the leader of the office, they want energy market facilities. i said review, added another customer to 1000000, but those thoughts, you know, most the time from now, which will result into having 4600000 barrels per day. so that's until will ensure the market stability, i believe so. right. yeah. and right. somebody actually the biggest oil producers in the world, or like the 2nd on the 3rd and the they are the major partners when it comes to stabilize in the oil market. and do the impulse of rush include all of his all time highs, reaching $1960000.00 barrels per day in may. an increase of 15 percent since april restaurant towns with fidelity 42 percent of india's petroleum importance last month. as the highest for an individual country, and recently he is a move and the volumes from a rock has found a way to be a combined, which has been india's largest supplies for the past decade along with the way the us. meanwhile rushes foreign minister has said increase trade between moscow on

through daily has resulted in billions of rupees, fitting an indian and bank accounts economist a cost and all explains that the excess wear pays may actually lead to even more opportunities for the 2 nations. and i think it's a win win situation because i she, i wanted to explore good and we all know fencing and all that. so india had been a big biased india has been a big one for almost a year. and we also, we got good, we live in new bees and then fund discount. it's also now coming to the point it is a she has got to do with lots of rubies. i think i'll certainly this is our censured invest in different and you know, india, you know, the other, 50 largest devante. and today we are the last there's going economy among the media

bundles, but i shouldn't invest in it didn't get to markets and get invested in g 6. and if there are certain bit relations which bought out, i shouldn't friends who invested beyond the limited, then both the domains which are great friends. they can sit together and begin have some of that extra small too. this is the best way going forward. and i expect a lot of good relations byler through the indian to she ought to be splendid when you had definitely to have the walls, biggest producers of palm which we oil malaysia and indonesia have messing brussels to voice concerns. i have a new e u deforestation. though, but couldn't be detrimental to small agricultural businesses, we have some local, as he said, the future of the industry on the livelihood is in danger of them on the front door and head. the implementation of the new law will stopped me as well as new farm was from expanding or venturing into palm or farming. with a new european,

lo implemented, i'm scared, i will lose my main income and the future of my children and family will be jeopardized. i put in a malaysian palm, ohio is the main competitor to the ears of tentative oil. so with the use trying to find a way to increase their own sales, as they are scared, their commodity will be effected without cause that they don't get the i disagree with you were being lower because it will affect the thousands of full more of farmers in malaysia, i hope that the ministry of plantation of commodities which is in charge of fund while industry can explain things to the european union. so they better understand why the reduction should not occur. malaysia and indonesia were accounted for about 85 percent of the global palm or like schools, the new or adopted in may. so been you member states from enforcing products, linked to deforestation which include palmer beef, cocoa and other commodities. and that's produced as can prove that products will not float on deforest atlanta. i think your delegation is scheduled to head to indonesia next months to continue talks. local farm has continued expressing back

concerns over the new and the negative impacts. it would have on that businesses or the farmers, frankly ask the indonesian government for help to fight for palm oil to be sold. otherwise, our life would be difficult because all living expenses are no expensive. we hope that the indonesian government will negotiate with the you, so the palm or can still be exported. but if this policy from the use and force were very worried, the other income will run out. i really asked the local and central government to be able to think about this for the european union, told them to come see us and help us because your policies can make it difficult for us. we just want to survive as farmers and but how my unique automotive, this is bad news regarding the your regulations. the indonesian government has to take his terms on this because it will have an impact. rushed through his level, especially oil, palm plantation pharmacy for only small depend on those so. so things come from the

sale of palm or as an ordinary farmer. what i want is a stable price to apply morals. i don't care about your policies as long as the indonesian government can control the price of commonwealth and have a good. meanwhile, malaysia and indonesia have formed the united funds to protect that palm oil site. so with our ministers taking that concerns directly to the chase, as long as the malaysian commodities minister threatens to circumvent restrictions or even stop exports to europe entirely. if we need to engage experts from overseas to count or whatever move by the you, we have to do it for the option could be we just stop exports to europe, just focus on other countries. if they are giving us all a difficult time to explore to them, a me thanks for joining us. head on, on the international as always, potentially more to be found on a website on tape dot com with the document that i submitted. the

the western expectation was that pressure will be disassembled, lies by extreme sanctions and the military losses. uh, there was an expectation that the pressure wouldn't be able to continue the war flight longer than a for a period of time longer than probably a couple of months. the the, the energy crisis is dealing a devastating blow to

e. u industry the, the number of for testers is rich media the day of june to the authorities, actions.