heights and the complexity of the situation is that a, i is much better at creating these viruses or creating malware because it's got unlimited possibilities and innovations. it can create a test code at a much a rapid pace, then a human right. a traditionally, viruses would be coded by a person, and a person would create a code and release it out there in the world. and that would be the virus. but now you have powerful technology such as artificial intelligence that's creating a virus. it's making it better every single innovation and it's finding ways to make it more penetrative, more damaging. and so cyber security is going to become much more complex in the next few years, because now we're battling anatomy, which is not a physical which is not a person, but a technology. and we have to arm ourselves really in a very strategic way to protect ourselves. so i'm interested how can consumers protect themselves and the present from this in the future. now 1st of all,

in terms of protecting ourselves in the future, we absolutely need to hold technology companies accountable and responsible for everything that they're creating. the process of creating technology as an example or chat, gd, 3 gender. dave and i video generative b, i audio content. all of these are not just about recording something, but where computers are creating code computers or creating content where there are no controls. now if we let this out of our hands and let technology determine and these companies determine what they should be doing, then nothing is in our hands. we are just at the mercy of some specific people or organizations, or corporations that dictate how we behave, how we interact with the world and what happens to people in the end. i think it's time to take control on how companies are actually creating products. there has to be regulation on how and,

and what organizations and big to can to create. and what are they allowed to create seen the last few years in the last, in the history of the internet. this being very little control on technology companies and holding them accountable on the content they create the systems they create and how they monetize them. every big tech company creates and monitor creates content and systems and the monetize our information to benefit themselves . but now things have to be a little bit different because now it's getting much more complex. uh, one of the core architectural things that can change is changing to a new architecture of the event called web 3, where people who are on the other side you n i, we can be in charge of our own information. and we can allow, in this, allow people from using our information to monetize, to be monetize and for them to benefit. so because of this, do you think it's better for policies to be made by individual countries, or should a global policy be created?

so from a country to country basis, it's very difficult for everybody to come to consensus, right? we have disagreements, even in the rules and regulations, different between the americans and between the you and both of these regions as an example. uh they, they proceed with uh, rules and regulations with respect to technology in a different way. um, there are some countries that are making a little bit more progress than we are. and let me tell you, we are really, really behind the car right now and creating this regulation. uh, surprisingly, if you look at the middle east, you look at the united arab emirates, you know, you hear about cities like to buy and have, would that be? they are progressive enough to say that, hey, we need a minister of artificial intelligence speaker wrapped in understand what to do with the i and that's progressive thinking. so if i see regulation coming to from anywhere, it's either going to be a small pocket in your maybe in a sonia or in asia and uniform, or maybe in the u, a, b,

or even saudi arabia. that is really, really taking a very serious, being, developing it a, when it comes to america, when it comes to the best and world, there are far too many powerful technology companies that exist here, that control the dialogue that controls the conversations that happen in the you know in the big houses of government and so that, that's the big challenge. i think we have to have 2 different types of dialogues. one is a global dialogue at a global level with every country involved in another. is that a local level to try and strengthen our own walls and to strengthen our own communities and country by giving you stick around. you know, this sounds like a great time to take a break but, and will be back with us to talk about the political bias of a, at the

the the, [000:00:00;00] the a culture offensive. what counter offensive was it rains? we to the topic along 5 sections of the front,

merely an expensive p r stone. it would seem so washington has no interest in saying this conflict and this votes badly for ukraine. n the only one main thing is important for gnosticism, internationally speaking to that is a nation's percept, uh, allowed to do anything, all the mazda races, and then you have the mine and agents who are the slaves. americans, rock, obama and others have had a concept of american exceptionalism. international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, it doesn't exist by turning those russians into this dangerous boy, a man that wants to take over the world. that was the culture strategy. so some, as of yet in your english v, i, v, i not finished it,

often. zip on in tablet block. nato said it's ours. we move east. the reason us, hey, jim, is dangerous. is that the, the by the sovereignty of the countries, the exceptionalism that america uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. of nature, what is founded shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in large office companies would lose millions and millions or is business businesses good. and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fascist. the let us continue our conversation about a i and the growing role is playing and society with in con, seo and founder of future see research in. do you see the chat box as posing a threat to our social fabric and the social well being of individuals?

when are people going to become diluted into thinking, they can have a relationship, for example, with a chat box. so when it comes to the future of chat boards, it's a very much possible that if we let things out of control, if we don't control what we see, how we see it, where we see it, then things will go go totally out of hand. it's not completely impossible that will end up having a relationship with the child bought and people will get emotionally involved with a, with, with a chat bought or, or an avatar of some kind that's driven by ai technologies. and because it's so easy to create content, create that engagement, create this artificial persona off of an entity that doesn't even exist, but behaves and feels like a human being on a screen. it's very much possible that certain people in the future will be in intimate relationships with these, with these entities and these avatars that are created. we'd have to be careful

about where we are headed because right now this, the future of humanity is kind of in parallel. if things go out of control, how can we trust the developers of these types of technology to be objective and unbiased? i mean, we are already seeing that chat g p t has a clear left swing by us from numerous examples. are people on the right just going to have to create their own artificial intelligence? or can we have a technology that is more neutral? in many cases, artificial intelligence right now today is biased. there's a whole whole area of conflict within a i where it has different biases. and the reason for that bias is the training data and also who has programmed that a i technology. and depending on these 2 factors, you're a, i could be totally n t, n t, a certain group of people or anti a certain, uh, ideal or philosophy. and that's, that's where we are right now. uh, the creation and the design of

e. i is not perfect to the training data it uses is not perfect. and at the end of the day, it really depends on whoever is programming, creating those algorithms. and writing that actual code is what are they thinking about and what kind of a output do they desire from this technology? i really feel that it's, it's an area of very complicated decision making off accountability and also really thinking as a community as a whole, whether you are right or left. bring that, how can we come together and create something that benefits humanity. we have to shun our, our own personal agendas and come together to solve this problem. otherwise, it might just get completely out of hand. is there any fear that artificial intelligence can become fully conscious and economists in the future? are we staring down the barrel of the terminal here, or matrix movies anytime soon? so when you think about 100 percent autonomy of ai systems or beyond autonomy,

you're looking at a i being sent and it's thinking it has a mind of its own and it can make decisions about good or bad or certain outcomes. it is possible, but not today today it's not possible ai right now is considered to be out in a very narrow field. so it's known as artificial, narrow intelligence, it can do certain things, but we're slowly headed towards the next phase of a i called artificial general intelligence, where it has much more intelligence. and it can power different things that can automate many different things that can make certain decisions as well. and the stage after that, which is what we're talking about. technology being sent in is artificial super intelligence where send p a d, i will be able to manage everything, creates things, build things. and you're looking at the terminator re scenario terminator for scenario. and these future scenarios where the possibly uh, you know, we will end up we, we won't control anything,

but technology will be able to dictate things. and that is an error of that, not even a i, scientists are looking forward to a spoken with tablets, scientists or the, or the last few years building or documentary a i the next frontier that's coming up later this year. and they're not looking forward to artificial super intelligence. and if we stayed in the ag, i era the next day or from now that would be rather happy. it is possible. and you never know what's happening behind closed doors and in labs in the i labs that are designing things. we don't know if something's doing or don't make it to the public . uh, you know, arena, but it's definitely possible. so let's say society decided a, i was going to be detrimental to society. is it too late to stop or limit integration to the world? would we even want to? so there are a few different things that are happening in the world, as we know it. there are adult, the vendors, the providers, the companies that are building technology. and we,

as consumers don't control that, we do nothing about it. we can do anything about it because it's beyond many, many walls of uh, you know, legal implications and, and frameworks. and so we are unable to dictate what these companies do as a whole, at a personal level. we interact with technologies that are out there in the world, in our everyday lives. and there were some control that we can exert on that. whether we end up using a technology or not using it, or using it in a way to harm others or to benefit ourselves and so on. there's many different ways of looking at it when it comes to being productive when it comes to, you know, creating a better world than absolutely. i mean, we cannot live without technology. think about stopping to use your cellphone or your computers. we cannot live in the, in the modern world without using certain parts of technology. and so funny enough, right now our relationship with technology is also changing. the way we interact with technology is changing right. back in the day when the internet released and

the internet was a 1st fresh thing, i remember many people were hesitant in going online and logging onto their bank and checking their balances and so on because they were afraid that some was still there. many come today 2023. we cannot live without an app or wouldn't have to transfer money or do or pay pay with our phone and even. and so that's a relationship change that's happening right now. today we move freight of a i, but maybe in the next 5 years. if it progresses in a nice way, it adds more benefit to our lives than we might end up liking it and doing things that will, that will impact the world in a positive way. so it really depends on how the public is educated, how these technology companies, uh, these creators of the technologies in algorithms. what do they create, and do they create fear in the world? or do they create good positive stuff in the world? and we can actually maybe solve some of the biggest,

biggest challenges that the world faces today in their leaders like bill gates and you know, on mosque. they seem to have different perspectives on a, i both actually have made their money off technology. do you think their debate is helping or hurting this conversation? my personal opinion. i think it's beneficial to some extent, but at, at a larger level, it's very confusing because it's 2 of these very famous, very influential people debating things that average ordinary people do not understand. you and i, and everybody else in the world. we need to understand the implications of these technologies on our daily lives, rather than on the corporations and the big factories and the big different organizations, these people run. so those conversations are 2 different things. i really feel a lot of it is very harmful. it's not productive, it doesn't help in any way. and i,

i really wish there were other leaders or these leaders who would help people understand what these technologies can really do and how they can benefit people. that humanity as a whole. so yeah, that's my opinion. i think i think the dialogue needs to change a little bit. thank you. in con, for joining us, the, you know, the developmental technology can be a good thing for that has sort of a society, as long as it is done responsibly. you know, a chat platform g b t is not perfect and can still make mistakes or generate biased responses if it is not trained properly or if it is used appropriately. these are real concerns which become serious problems is not addressed during the initial phase of its creation and integration. sadly, we are already seeing those whose only goal is profit choosing to compromise the current date. ethical standards, which those in the future will have to answer for. i just got out here and this been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching.

the, [000:00:00;00] the in the year of 1954, the united states of america engaged in warfare against the people of vietnam. the white house supported the corrupt above the governments of southern vietnam. in 1965 americans began their invasion following the aim to defeat. the forces of vietnamese patriots. defended gone, was confident that the victory would be on the american side, due to its military superiority. however, the vietnamese during this war into

a total hell for the occupants. unable to cope with the guerrillas, the american army started blanket bombing alongside using chemical weapons in naples, which burns all alive. the village of my lay, where he 1969 american soldiers killed 504 civilians, including 210 children, became a tragic symbol of this war. all involved during the whole period of this conflict, the usa dropped on vietnam more than $6000000.00 tons of bonds, which is 2 and a half times as much as on germany during the 2nd world war. in 1973, the american army under the pressure of the rebels, withdrew from vietnam, and only 2 years later did the puppet regime. and so i got involved. however, the vietnamese paid off,

i price for their freedom. more than 1000000 vietnamese people became the victims of america in the dressers rolling over to the board. you know, great union daugherty, a surname? yeah, i did. she shipped a dr. meano's report. the control room for 2 of us. so we fixed you get the system really being you have enough people not to say websites. and that's what i see mean. yeah, well we did the cloud. so essentially it's streams of dark news, but i'll let you drive both on the on the go crazy. if that's where you store lot of the my software, but just to do you still know satellite if she ever always get us, what are we shipping that just a good fit a lift or slip that came over to them. i need this says that you are in school so that i can use

a when they each of them or a couple years, you're not to buy these folks clicked the button. so i'm sitting here waiting for you to take a picture of the day. so if i, if, if the 4 civilians are wounded in rushes bordering belgrade region after you print in shelling of the area overnight, the risk of the fruits of being killed on those types destroyed in the field of pensive lives. i thought it was you also a head on the program this our donald trump say he's he's been federally indicted when he prompted folks case, religion misspelling of to place the documents informing us leader has slumped. the rest of which of the silver bowl slaves. a pressure solution is

just like rush erosion rushes, just like if they don't trust the justice of the libyan representative of the former governmental to the market down features the challenges, the display of allies, countries, those basic field nato, destroyed, hold those structures, eliminated their leadership for deeds, those people from electing new ones and appointed the new structures from a broad, within the framework of foreign agreements under the auspices when the, wherever you're catching the program from today across the world. welcome to the

global news ride up here in archie. even we begin with the latest from russia's belgrade region where we're hearing for people have been wounded by you printing and shelling on apartment building and the ton of shit back in a separate, a direct hit, setting it on fire residential areas in that border area have been under constant attack for more than a week now, and even before the local authorities have evacuated, the safety, most of the residents living there in law. the training and troops have reportedly attempted on the attack on russian positions in the zap rogia region. overnight it comes just the day after tea i've lost $300.00 soldiers and dozens of its western supplied armored vehicles. they're failing to come through at russia's defensive lines. they had all of these opera was your region saves. if you cranes suffer is that such a high rate of attrition, it will soon run out of its western supplies up to 3 and it'd be tank units were

moving in for directions. the enemy did not even reach the combat collision line in 2 places. we have been preparing for this counter offensive for a long time, and we were afraid that the enemy would prepare even more so far. we see unreasonable actions, because if they continue to lose up to 3 units in one attack, then we will reduce them to adams within one month because the equipment and people will run out. we have strength and the defensive front line enough. you would need to be crazy to make a frontal attack there. meanwhile, the russian defense ministry has posted a video showing dozens of you printing an armored vehicles including tax destroyed in the field of fence among them are german supplied leopard tex ortiz, english. a dollar for ports are from the south, but it was your which it was the most violent 24 hours a month. after a few days of testing, rushes troops resilience keep through more than

a 1000 men into the grinds of war. the old fluid began just off to midnight. few ukrainian soldiers lived to see the door, and the ukrainian army chose to hit exactly where a rush expected to even west an analyst method that just as everyone agrees, this was only the beginning. ukraine has at least 2 nato framed army cooling preserves. so russia is training itself and we were lucky to see the graduation exam over a brand new unit flying company kazi, drones here on the safe distance from the front line suppressed and forces training

rushes own drone operates as rushes own swarm. the girl for it has become a feature of this old books on tactics are useless. new ones written by those on the front line which is printed drone is designed for light armored vehicles. the flight speed is up to a 100 kilometers per hour. the operator was trained to control it to break sharply to maneuver and to turn around, as well as to locate the target. there is also a 2nd operator, and then the objective control intelligence group defines the target and says, where to move to show on the screen, what it should hit. he puts on his go, passes, picks up the remote control and operates it. it flew and struck the target. the drones themselves are probably not difficult to manufacture. there was

a lot of ammunition cheap and devastating. these devices mass produced both by russia and ukraine. and since kiera has apparently indeed made its bet on capturing the rushing it. chances are this is exactly where the two's well mommy's will have a face off. i'm a goose done of reporting from. so for roy's yet. ok, see i know, come out with say the key is on void to the united nations. how's like shoes? most school be a legend shelling off her psalm, which is currently under the control of ukrainian forces. the allegations come after you train shells on the back to a scenario for civilians in russian control territory on thursday, leaving 2 people dead, including a pregnant woman. the latest found off comes and made a huge floods following the destruction of a key on the didn't. yep. or river. we strongly condemn settings, will be recreation areas in coal,

on the russian federation to seize such effects and allow the creation teams to safely help the effect the civilian population. we also urge the russian federation to grand food safe and the common fee that access to the affected areas of the left bank of the deep river, which are currently under the me under its military control to yeah, just to point, are you frames and bust of or to the un didn't acknowledge its own faithful attacks, just the short distance away in regions under russian control. that sounds, emergency services are bustling to deal with the aftermath of the call of sky a, hydro electric, plump breach. reminder, the dumb was breached after it being seriously damaged into the talk on monday night flooding areas down stream, leaving to the fatalities up a number of people mosque was called that

a terrorist attack by ukraine. the less cross live now to us civil rights lawyer life from washington dc. robert patio. robert. good to have you on the program today. yeah. ukraine's u. n. n boy has condemn the so called russian shelling offers, sold on, you know, at similar talk by the representative of shelling under, at russian control where people were killed. does it seem one way traffic coming from the u. n. a times on this situation? i could, i could definitely see how people can have that understanding because of what we have not had as a equal conversation on what exactly are the causes of this conflict and what solutions can take place in western media. the only thing that is heard of this almost cartoon villain version of the russian federation as opposed to in thing based. in fact, the reality in a propaganda machine to the prop, to by the military industrial complex, the continuously pumping out more propaganda to keep the worst of nations funding and prayed in defense. in this case. what are the things has to happen?

those that have all sized and come to the comfortable want to court, to sit down and have a conversation on what exactly is really going on in the region. a maybe we can come to a peaceful resolution that goes to stop the can be continue loss of life and loss of treasure it is taking place. imagine what, what would happen to the world to use the resources that we're wasting. uh, and then you frame on anything else, education, healthcare, climate change, that sort of change cetera. as i think that we need to have a fair handedness by the international community, i just want to put this to as well because the, the information coming from ukraine robot alleges russia talked her psalm, that area auster presidents lensky had just visited. but if most schools military really was the, the war crazed machine, p f, as per training at, as to the world. surely they would have gone off to the trinity and leader tried to eliminate him when he was there. something doesn't appear to and i'll put the messages being expounded here to that. well, i think we have

a cross information throughout the, the course of this conflict. everything from the cause of the melbourne, me on the north string pipeline, to the instruction, to talk a bit, bridge to the movements of frame for has the counter offensive be gone, has the camera reference will not be gone. and i, the, you would think that the 21st century with the amount of information that we have, the amount of cell phones and internet and video that typically if we can get one, we're kind of what is going on our we still have information, we can filter through the corporate news media across the world, which is sony or propaganda, as opposed to something else. i actual factual information that takes place on the ground. i think that if we could have a fair conversation on, on the reality of 2 things taking place that we would probably want to solve this situation a year ago as opposed to continue this domain, which is currently taking place that message by the current in on boy, he did,

it was surrounded by western diplomats. what can we read in to that